Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy

Archive for October, 2012

US Military; Intelligence; and Administrations are # 1 Terrorists


US Military, Intelligence, and Administrations are # 1 Terrorists

US Military, Intelligence, and Administrations are # 1 Terrorists

US Unified Combatant Commands map

US Unified Combatant Commands map

It needs NO deep thinking to know that the USA “War Against Terrorism” is actually the very “Terrorism” that they had invented and fooled the world with it.

  1. Why the USA invaded Iraq and stayed there?
  2. Why the USA bombed Libya and turned this small prosperous nation into tribal militias?
  3. Why the USA assisted in creating a fake “Arab Spring”?
  4. Why the USA is silent about non-democratic Gulf Arab sheikhdoms?
  5. Why the USA is vehemently hostile against Syria and Iran?
  6. Why the USA is keeping large and dangerous presence in south Asia?
  7. Why the USA is using the NATO for indirect military interventions in Asia?
  8. Why the USA is insistent on maintaining military presence in Africa (AFRICOM) despite strong objections?
  9. Why the USA has a staggering military and intelligence budget?
  10. Why the USA controls the UN?

The “War Against Terrorism” is a secret agenda to create terrorism. It must have included the following polices:

  1. To become the # 1 supplier of light and heavy weapons and explosives.
  2. To increase the already strong historic relationships between international secret societies and Islamic organizations.
  3. To destabilize and topple nationalist Arab governments with the help of Islamists and Gulf Arab sheikhdoms.
  4. To strengthen the alliance with Turkey and its killer secret societies.
  5. To provide indirect and direct military, intelligence, and financial support for militant religious and ethnic groups in Africa and Asia.
  6. To engineer and direct regime-change in African and Arab countries.
  7. To wage an undeclared war and carnage against Shia’t Muslims and create bloody conflicts between Shia’t and Sunni Islam.
Advertisements

Slain US Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and EU Nobel Prize


About Slain Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and EU Nobel Prize

Major-General Charles George Gordon (28 January 1833 – 26 January 1885) by Freres

It is really getting ever-increasing strong believe that the world is governed by global gangsters.

The U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens was killed or assassinated just like Major-General Charles George Gordon (28 January 1833 – 26 January 1885) in 1885 in Sudan. Both were deliberately left on their own because their English and American administrations wanted them to be eliminated without getting blood on their hands.

Awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to the EU reminds me of another absurd event, that is giving it to Obama immediately at the beginning of his bloody first term. The EU is an evil plan and it is not about any good values. No one shall be surprised if the next Laurent winner is Germany or Angela Merkel. Other future candidates must include the WB, the IMF; and a bunch of big fat fraudulent  banks.

As it was described by Czech President Vaclav Klaus on Friday who said the Nobel Peace Prize awarded to the European Union was a “tragic mistake“, AFP reported.
“I really thought it was a hoax, a joke. I couldn’t imagine even in a dream that someone could be serious about it,” added Klaus, quoted by the CTK news agency.
The Nobel Committee announced Friday it had awarded its annual peace prize to the EU which had transformed a continent ravaged by war into one of peace.
Klaus also slammed the prize being awarded to an institution, saying it made sense if awarded to “a specifically defined personality for a certain unique achievement.

“Freedom and democracy are shivering in the corner similar to the way it was in the regimes we experienced in the 20th century in Europe,” he said.
“It is an empty prize if given to an institution, moreover a bureaucratic one in this case. I don’t know if anyone will dare to actually receive it,” said the 71-year-old, whose second and last term as president expires in March 2013.
The Czech Republic, an ex-communist country of 10.5 million, joined the EU in 2004 but has not yet joined the debt-ravaged EuroZone.

Petr Hajek, deputy head of the office of Czech President Vaclav Klaus, who once supported the EU but has since turned against it, said the EU lacked “democratic legitimacy” and was contributing to “animosity among nations”.

Gene Sharp, The 83 Year Old Who Toppled Egypt


Gene Sharp, The 83 Year Old Who Toppled Egypt

Gene Sharp, The 83 Year Old Who Toppled Egypt

Samuel P. Jacobs wrote on Feb 14, 2011 at  The Daily Beast.com :

[The young lions of Tahrir Square found inspiration in the writings of an 83-year-old American. Samuel P. Jacobs talks to Gene Sharp about why his calls for nonviolent revolt are catching fire.

There are many roots of the Egyptian revolution. But one of the most unlikely goes back to an East Boston rowhouse, where an 83-year-old named Gene Sharp runs a shoestring operation called the Albert Einstein Institute—and arguably just changed the course of history.

For the last half century, Sharp has been writing about nonviolent protest, and trying to make his ideas accessible to dissidents the world over. No mean feat, given that his signature work, The Politics of Non-Violent Action, weighs in at 900 pages and was published in 1973. But it’s working. Thanks in part to a distillation of his ideas entitled From Dictatorships to Democracy, which can be downloaded from Sharp’s website in dozens of languages, his gospel of upheaval has apparently become essential reading for budding revolutionaries in Cairo and parts beyond.

Ahmed Maher, a 28-year-old construction engineer, was one of the young Web-savvy upstarts who helped set in motion the protests that last week ended Hosni Mubarak’s 30-year rule. Maher, of the April 6 Movement, looked to Serbia’s democratic movements for inspiration. There, he found Otpor, a protest group which helped take down strongman Slobodan Milosevic. From Otpor, the young Egyptians discovered the teachings of Sharp, who urges nonviolent resistance as the most efficient way to topple dictatorships.

Sharp says he hasn’t been directly in touch with anyone in Egypt since the uprising began late last month. But he says he is happy to know that his ideas may have had some influence.

“I’m very pleased,” he says. “I’ve been studying this question of dictatorships for many decades. It is a lonely struggle. To get this kind of recognition is very important.”

Among his less-conventional suggestions for protest, Sharp has advocated the “Lysistratic nonaction,” in which women use sex as political leverage. He’s also called for disrobing and skywriting as political statements.

Peter Beinart: America’s Proud Egypt Moment

Niall Ferguson: How Obama Blew Egypt

Full coverage of the Egypt revolutionThe pro-democracy advocates aren’t the only ones who’ve noticed. In 2007, Hugo Chavez accused Sharp of being part of a CIA-led conspiracy to overthrow his government. The following year, Iranian officials made a similar charge, alleging that the former Harvard researcher was working hand-in-hand with the likes of John McCain and George Soros to foment rebellion in the country. (The paranoia is perhaps understandable; thousands of copies of From Dictatorships to Democracy had been downloaded in Farsi in advance of protests that flooded Iran’s streets in 2009.) The Burmese felt similarly hoodwinked by the solitary scholar. Sharp first published his manual to resistance, which teaches 198 methods of nonviolent action, in Myanmar.

His advice is particularly granular, giving instructions from how “rude gestures” can function as “symbolic public acts” to using “guerrilla theater” as a form of “social intervention.” According to one take, Sharp’s Albert Einstein Institution is “a U.S. intelligence asset used to spark ‘nonviolent’ regime change around the world on behalf of the U.S. strategic agenda.”

In most interviews, Sharp holds up the shabby state of his institute as a sign that he’s not in the cahoots with George Soros or anyone at the CIA. Lately, he had to let go of most of his staff.

“We are very small and very poor,” he says.

Not that Sharp isn’t without his benefactors. One former student, the financier Peter Ackerman, once told The Wall Street Journal that he’s given his mentor’s institution more than $10 million over the years. In 2004, the pair had a falling out.

These days, Sharp says, resistance leaders usually find him.

“We get news from all over the world. We never know where the next phone call will come from, what part of the world,” Sharp says.

Among his less-conventional suggestions for protest, Sharp has advocated the “Lysistratic nonaction,” in which women use sex as political leverage (a ploy adopted in Kenya in 2009, in an activist-led drive to stop government infighting). He’s also called for disrobing and skywriting as political statements.

Sharp argues that dictatorships share certain traits throughout the world—making it easier to tailor a one-size-fits-all approach. But he’s not blasé about what happened in Cairo last week; he ranks the fall of Mubarak as “at the top” of democratic revolutions he’s witnessed. And he’s confident that the spirit shown in Tahrir Square won’t end there.

“People are learning that they don’t have to be afraid,” Sharp says. “The fear is gone. People can see the example. The Egyptian example will be imitated elsewhere. We don’t know where, but it will happen.”

Samuel P. Jacobs is a staff reporter at The Daily Beast. He has also written for The Boston Globe, The New York Observer, and The New Republic Online.

Like The Daily Beast on Facebook and follow us on Twitter for updates all day long.

Samuel P. Jacobs, former Associate Editor for NewsBeast, Newsweek’s front-of-the-book section, is Campaign Correspondent for Reuters. He has written about politics for Newsweek and The Daily Beast. His writing has also appeared in The Boston Globe, The New York Observer, and The New Republic Online.]

For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.

Once Again It Is All About Lebensraum and not Europe


Once Again It Is All About Lebensraum and not Europe

Once Again It Is All About Lebensraum and not Europe

 

Important Note from the writer of this post:

My opinion here was my believe at the time of writing it. But now it is totally different and the opposite. It took a lot of reading and analysis to discover that the Nazi were protecting Germany and Europe from the Turkic Jewish Khazar. But I still believed that the EU is an evil plan and Germany is now under the control of their enemy. I apologies to all true Germans.

I preferred not to delete this post but to add to it to explain how I was totally wrong and deceived by the main Jewish media. My latest posts express my present corrected convictions.

I am deeply sorry to write this rude and wrong post.

[Few German politicians are trying to make another big leap. This time not by their military or by aggression but rather by tricky globalist financiers and bankesters and some EU bureaucrats and politicians. They are trying to achieve Hitler’s dream of “Lebensraum”

France; Italy and Spain are making very grave mistakes by allowing Germany to design the EU and convert it into a superstate under German financial control. (A Federal Europe of federal member states!! they must be fooling Europeans).

The only difference this time is that Germany is not looking East but rather in all directions!
France; Italy and Spain will regret their shortsightedness sooner than later.

(Lebensraum (German for “habitat” or literally “living space”) was one of the major genocidal political goals of Adolf Hitler, and an important component of Nazi ideology. It served as the motivation for the expansionist policies of Nazi Germany, aiming to provide extra space for the growth of the German population, for a Greater Germany. In Hitler’s book Mein Kampf, he detailed his belief that the German people needed Lebensraum (“living space”, i.e. land and raw materials), and that it should be found in Eastern Europe. It was the stated policy of the Nazis to kill, deport, or enslave the Polish, Ukrainian, Russian, and other Slavic populations, whom they considered inferior, and to repopulate the land with Germanic people. The entire urban population was to be exterminated by starvation, thus creating an agricultural surplus to feed Germany and allowing their replacement by a German upper class).]

%d bloggers like this: