Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy

Archive for February, 2017

The Sources of Terrorism

Parisians are Turks

Parisians are Turks

To find out the true sources of slavery, NWO, and terrorism we have to go deeper than the conventional mainstream academia and media. Belly dance, harem, FGM, homosexuality, bestiality, assassination, piracy, torture, terrorism, and usury are all Turkic practices.

The world must notice that only some countries are struck by rebels and mercenaries aka Jihadists.
These countries do not fall under any of the four Turkic forms:
1- Turkic Anatolia,
2- Turkic Persia, (fake Iranians),
3- Turkic fake Israelite (Jews),
4- Turkic rulers of Arabia, (fake Muslims)
5- Turkic Indians (fake Hindu Aryans), and
6- Turkic Europeans (fake liberal Christians)

Syria, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, and Yemen are good examples.
Once you submit to one of these 4 forms of Turkic evil you are no longer under attack.
Lebanon, Jordon, and Azerbaijan are also good examples.

The Ashkenazim and Sephardi are not Israelite, but with the Ottomans invented Zionism. Now, only pointing to them considered Antisemitism, although they are not Semites at all.
Those are the enemies of Hitler and the Nazis. And before them were the enemies of Alexander the Great.

East Europe, the Balkans, the Caucasus, Anatolia, Iran, India, and central Asia were heavily enslaved long before Islam and Arabs. This was done by Turkic groups. The term “Slaves” was derived from “Sloven” then “Slavs”. The Arabs were Turkified and ruled by Turkic nomads before Moses. So, Arab slavery of Africa never existed. The genuine Arabs never left Arabia, and those who are called “Arabs” in Africa are not Arabs but Turkic settlers and invaders who moved to Africa from Arabia. Arab colonization and islamization are Turkic policies, they have nothing to do with Arabs and with Islam.

Even the transatlantic slavery was not done by Europeans or Arabs, they were Turkic businesses as it was in Andalusia (Iberia). The terms “Islamic” and “Eastern” were used as covers for the Turkic atrocities everywhere until now. They are not Islamic nor Arabic. They are Turkic.
Hitler and the Nazis were not Anti-Semitists but were actually Anti-Pan-Turanism.

Turkic Zionists are aware that the region is too small for their ambitions. They left this region for their Turkic rulers of Arabia for “Pan-Arab” empire is up to Morocco. The Turkic Zionists are only after the deep vast lands of Russia, this is the second Turkic empire of “Greater Israel”. While the third Turkic empire is left for the Turkic Anatolians to expand from Hungary to the borders with India and China and create “Pan-Tauran” empire. There is no overlaps or competition between Turkic Zionists, Turkic rulers of Arabia, and Turkic Anatolians. On the contrary, they are assisting each other to establish their own empire.

The Agenda of Pan-Turkism is Clear: To Distort Reality & to Effectuate the Takeover of Land. (Note: The Caspian Sea is called the

The Agenda of Pan-Turkism is Clear: To Distort Reality & to Effectuate the Takeover of Land. (Note: The Caspian Sea is called the “Khazar” Sea.)

Islam during prophet Mohamed b. (622-632 AD) was not beyond the main Arabian Peninsula. But during the first three Caliphs, Abu Bakr (632-634), and Umar (634-644)(Assassinated), Uthman (644-656)(Assassinated) it went into invasions.

That was totally unacceptable to many believers but the Turkic elements encouraged such offensive military expansions.

The fourth Caliph Ali (656-661) (Assassinated) was the cousin of the prophet and he stopped that and carried out internal reforms and these were the main causes for the eruption of a brutal civil war throughout his rule (656-661) that ended up by assassinating him and killing most of this family.

By these killings the original Islam died upon birth and it was replaced by a fake Turkic militant cult calling itself Islam. This became the source of terrorism, colonialism, and heresy.

Turkic groups fought Zoroastrianism before the time of Moses and they used twisted Zoroastrianism to create their Turkic versions for the teachings of Zoroaster, Moses, Yeshua, and Mohamed. By these they invented the new “universal” imperial religions: Persian Zoroastrianism, Jewish Judaism, Roman Christianity, and Turkic Islam.

Those Turkic Turanians have different networks and forms, among them: 1- Turkic in Anatolia, 2- Turkic Khazar Jews (fake Israelite), 3- Turkic Persians (since the Achaemenid 550 BC), and 4- Turkic rulers of Arabia (following the death of Islam), plus Turkic Indians (fake Hindu Aryans), and Turkic Europeans (fake liberal Christians).

Most monarchies, bankers, and politicians in Europe are their making since the so-called English, French, American, and Russian “Revolutions”. These Turkic groups committed all sorts of crimes in Asia, Europe, Levant, Arabia, and Africa.

Liberation NOT Separation, Stop the Turkification of Iranians

The Agenda of Pan-Turkism is Clear: To Distort Reality & to Effectuate the Takeover of Land. (Note: The Caspian Sea is called the "Khazar" Sea.)

The Agenda of Pan-Turkism is Clear: To Distort Reality & to Effectuate the Takeover of Land. (Note: The Caspian Sea is called the “Khazar” Sea.)

Russia must stop the Turkification of Iranians, and return Iran to Iranians. Russia must stop the Turkification of the Caucasus, and return it to Caucasians.

Why did the Azeri people shift from speaking a Northwestern Iranian language to the Turkic language we all know today?
Azeri was the dominant language in Azerbaijan before it was replaced by Azerbaijani, which is a Turkic language.
This language was known as Old Azeri or Azari and had affinities to the Talysh languages that are spoken nearby. Many linguistic islets are said to persist into the 19th Century while certain Iranian dialects that is still spoken in the area is said to be descendants of the former language.
Āḏarī (Ar. al-āḏarīya) was the Iranian language of Azerbaijan before the spread of the Turkish language, commonly called Azeri, in the region.
Turkic Languages do not originally belong to west of Caspian Sea but central Asia. People of west Turkey and northwest of Iran and Azerbaijan countries (roughly Anatolian plateau) were once speakers of Iranian, European, Semitic, Caucasian, Slavic and some other Languages. Some of them first abandoned their native languages in favor of Greek due to Hellenization.

The process you seek is called Turkification and it began with Turkic Migration from central Asia to Middle-east and Europe. Circa 11th century, war with Turks began and led to deaths of many natives, while others were enslaved and removed. As areas became depopulated, Turkic nomads moved in.

Later in Ottoman era there happened Armenian Genocide, Greek Genocide and Assyrian Genocide due to Turkification. Many were compelled but later some chose Turkish willingly because it became the predominant language and lingua franca of the area.

Most academics view the linguistic Turkification of predominantly non-Turkic-speaking indigenous peoples and assimilation of small bands of Turkic tribes as the most likely origin for the Azerbaijani people.
The Turkic Azerbaijani language only began replacing the Iranian Old Azeri language with the advent of rule of the Safavid dynasty, when hundreds of thousands of Qizilbash Turkic peoples from Anatolia arrived into Azerbaijan, being forced out by the Ottoman Sultan Selim I with more to follow. Earlier, many Turkic speaking nomads had chosen the green pastures of Azerbaijan, Aran and Shrivan for their settlement as early as the advent of the Seljuq dynasty. However, they only filled in the pasturelands while the farmlands, villages and the cities remained Iranian in language and culture. The linguistic conversion of Azerbaijan went hand in hand with the conversion of the Azeris to Twelver Shia Islam. By the late 1800s, the Turkification of Azerbaijan was near completion, with Iranian speakers found solely in tiny isolated recesses of the mountains or other remote areas (such as Harzand, Galin Ghuya, Shahrud villages in Khalkhal and Anarjan).

Turkic Speakers Join Forces in Iran’s Parliament

Masoud Pezeshkian, the deputy speaker of parliament and leader of its newly formed Turkic-speaking faction, presides over a legislative session in Tehran, Iran, in this photo posted on Twitter on June 6, 2016. (photo by Twitter/@RZimmt)

Masoud Pezeshkian, the deputy speaker of parliament and leader of its newly formed Turkic-speaking faction, presides over a legislative session in Tehran, Iran, in this photo posted on Twitter on June 6, 2016. (photo by Twitter/@RZimmt)

The unprecedented formation of a cross-factional parliamentary group of Turkic speakers stirs controversy in Iran.

This move indicates the truth of many disputed facts about the Turkification of Iran and the Turkic origins of Persians:

1- Shiism, Sunnism, and Sufism ore just various rival forms of Turkic Islam and all of them are Turkic tool to rule over the Iranians, Arabs, Levant, India, Asia, and Africa.

2- The Turkification of the Iranian people passed through at least three phases:

A. The First Phase: was carried out by Turkic invaders, migrants, and settlers that led to the establishment of the Achaemenid Empire and the invention of Persian stock and Persian Zoroastrianism starting from 550 BC.

B. The Second Phase: was done by the Safavid Dynasty which violently imposed Shiism on Iran and turned the Iranians from Sunnis to Twelvers Shiat by force starting from 1501 AD.

C. The Third Phase: is an on going process that started by restoring the original name “Iran” in 1935 by Reza Shah Pahlavi to replace the imposed name “Persia” without restoring the Iranian identity of Iranians, who are still considered ethnically “Persians”, while they only speak Persian. This developing phase is aiming to erase the Iranian ancient indigenous national identity, and specially the Kurds who could lead the revival of other native Iranian groups.

The recent move by Turkic parliamentarians could push the Iranians to stand up against the processes of Turkification and Persianisation of Iran.

Iranian “Islamic” Parliament and the Supreme Leader of Iran are conspicuously silent towards the past and present Turkification of Iranians and the falsification of their identity, history and cultures.

This change in Iran’s parliament is also much related to the Turkish arms flexing in Syria and Iraq, together with the new constitutional amendments in Turkey which soon shall give the president sweeping new powers and controls over the executive, legislative and judiciary. This is a plan for a regional war in preparation that could turn into global war.

Al-Monitor published the following article on , written by Saeid Jafari.

(Al-Monitor is a media site launched in February 2012 by the Arab American entrepreneur Jamal Daniel and based in Washington, DC.)

[For the first time in the history of the Islamic Republic, Turkic-speaking lawmakers have formed a bloc in the Iranian parliament. The Faction of Turkic Regions was formed in late October. It has been reported to have 100 members in the 290-seat parliament and is led by Masoud Pezeshkian, who represents the northwestern city of Tabriz and who served as minister of health (2001-2005) under Reformist President Mohammad Khatami.

Controversy has surrounded the formation of this faction since its inception. This has mainly had to do with the stated number of its members. Iran’s election law grants each province a certain number of lawmakers based on its population. In this vein, the main Turkic-speaking provinces and their respective number of members of parliament include West Azerbaijan with 12 parliamentarians, East Azerbaijan with 19, Ardebil with seven and Zanjan with five. Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province as well as the provinces of Gilan and Fars also have Turkic-speaking populations, but the origins and history of these Turkic-speakers are very different from those who reside in the northwest of Iran. While ethnic Persians constitute a slight majority of Iranians, Turkic speakers make up a sizable minority.

Based on these figures, one would expect the newly formed Turkic-speaking faction to have no more than 43 members. So how is it that it counts 100 lawmakers among its members? Zahra Sai, a Tabriz member of parliament and spokeswoman for the faction, has said, “Lawmakers who speak Turkic but are from other cities have also joined the faction.” This is while a member of the group’s board of directors told Al-Monitor on condition of anonymity, “There are really 60 lawmakers in this faction. However, when the news [of the formation of the group] was being transmitted to media outlets, one group member put the figure at around 100 and so this number began circulating in the media.”

One key question is what precisely this faction seeks to achieve. In an interview with ISNA news agency Nov. 6, Pezeshkian, who also serves as deputy speaker, said, “This faction hasn’t done anything in particular yet. Unfortunately, however, some are [already] trying to divert public opinion [about its objectives]. The goal was to have Turkic-speaking MPs come together and pursue their demands of the government within the framework of the law.”

Critics, however, see the emergence of the faction as a threat to Iran’s national unity, saying that it highlights ethnocentrism. Responding to this, Pezeshkian told ISNA, “This should not happen. We are defending the law, and the government should give everyone the right to act within the framework of the law. No one has the right to do anything against the law. Public opinion should not be twisted in a way as to give certain individuals pretexts for making lawful opportunities seem like threats.”

Still, it appears that some experts on ethnicity, and especially Azeri-speaking ones, do not have favorable opinions about the formation of such a faction. Many in East Azerbaijan and West Azerbaijan provinces and elsewhere speak Azeri, which is a Turkic language. In an editorial published in Shargh newspaper Dec. 6, Nouraldin Gharavi, former governor of East Azerbaijan province, criticized the very idea of such a group and said, “Parliament Speaker Mr. [Ali] Larijani and other [parliament members] are aware that this is a dangerous innovation that goes against the constitution. Negligence in this area will have bitter consequences for everyone down the line.”

But is the formation of parliamentary factions along ethnic lines really something new in Iran? In his book “Iran Between Two Revolutions,” prominent historian Ervand Abrahamian writes that the only time such a development has previously occurred was in February 1944. According to Abrahamian, nomadic tribes formed a parliamentary group called The Faction of Democrats and began pursuing their own tribal demands. Of note, this faction was formed following the suppression of nomads and tribes by former rulers Reza Shah Pahlavi (1925-1941) and his successor and son, Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi (1941-1979).

Salar Seifoddini, an Azeri researcher who focuses on ethnicity, told Al-Monitor, “The Azeri-speaking [Turkic] faction, which a group of Iranian [parliament members] is insisting on solely for electoral purposes as well as political and personal gains, is a rare occurrence in other parts of the world. It is clearly not only against the constitution but also a new and dangerous innovation for creating divisions among the different ethnicities in Iran. I think those who came up with such an idea are more than anything after their own personal gain and want to pull in the public [in the mix] for [the purpose of winning] their own election races.”

Mojtaba Maghsoudi, a professor of political science at Tehran’s Azad University and a researcher on ethnicity, told Al-Monitor, “In democracies, factions are representative of parliamentary parties. In Iran, however, and in the case of the Azeri-speaking faction, it is the opposite. … The faction presents its own partisan demands. In developed societies, however, it is parties [based on political agendas] who form factions in parliament.”

Indeed, the new Turkic-speaking parliamentary faction notably features a collection of rival political forces. For instance, Pezeshkian, who is leading the group, entered parliament through the moderate-Reformist “List of Hope.” This is while Nader Qazipour, the deputy head of the faction and a member of parliament from Urmia, belongs to the hard-line end of the Principlist movement.

Maghsoudi, who is also the head of Iran’s Association for Peace Studies, told Al-Monitor, “The most important function of parliaments in all political establishments is to deal with national issues. With the Turkic-speaking faction, it is the complete opposite and we are seeing a section of the parliament being involved in ethnic matters instead of dealing with citizens’ rights. Such a trend is an indication of the poor performance of the parliamentary system in Iran and is considered a detour from the main path and duties of this important body.”

So far, there have been very few reactions by top officials regarding the formation of the Turkic-speaking parliamentary faction. On Nov. 27, Ali Younesi, the presidential adviser on ethnic and religious minority affairs, voiced his opposition to the formation of such a faction and stressed that ethnic divisions should not be allowed to intensify through the formation of such groups. Mansour Haghighatpour, a Turkic-speaking former member of parliament for Ardebil and current adviser to Larijani, has also voiced his opposition to the initiative. Yet there does not seem to be a consensus among government officials over the matter of the emergence of the group and whether or how to respond to it. ]

The Policy of Turkification of Iran: Objectives and Methods

The Turkification of Iran

The Turkification of Iran

The Turkification of Iran under the leadership of the former President Khatami and President Ahmadinejad has been carried under the banners of “Iranian Aryan Nationalism”. The truth is these people represent the Azeri nationalism or the Azeri version of Pan Turkism and their base of support are Azeris. In their political campaign they always use Persian girls and they paint themselves as the inheritors of the Persian civilization.

President Ahmadinejad showing Pan-Turkist grey wolves sign in Azerbaijan

President Ahmadinejad showing Pan-Turkist grey wolves sign in Azerbaijan

Azeri Pan Turkism talks about uniting the “Iranian” or “Iranic” people, whatever that means. But their true aims is to unite with The Republic of Azerbaijan and bring more Azeri Turks into Iran in order to dominate Iran. Also it uses the “Iranian” cover and pretending to fight Anatolian Pan Turks. In reality Azeris are real Turks and their Pan-Iranism is the same as their Pan-Turkism but adjusted for the political conditions in Iran.

ar-persian-phenotypes-1It also aims to export a form of “Pan-Turkish Islam” into Turkey in order to weaken its Anatolian rival. In these respects Azeri regime in Tehran is a copy of its ancestor, The Safavid Azeri Turks in 16 century. Also due to historical reasons, The Azeri Turks do not try to impose the Azeri Turk language on Iran unlike their Anatolian counterparts. Azeri Turks try instead to impose Azeri Turk culture on Iran and eliminate all other ethnic groups and replace them with Azeri Turks. These policies are promoted under the cover of Islam which is itself a cover for Azeri Turk culture.

Such policies are implemented through polygamy, seeghah or temporary marriages (legal prostitution), Marriage Funds, setting up “Tourist Centers” in remote tribal areas, forcing people from rural areas to move into bigger cities, movement of the native population into Azeri Turk areas such as Tehran with economic and non-economic pressure and moving Azeri Turks into other provinces under the pretext of looking for “Jobs” such as Khuzestan or Caspian sea provinces and imposing Azeri Turks as civil servants on provincial states. Recent clashes in the Caspian region has exposed some of their policies to ordinary natives of Iran. See the Caspian clashes below.

Azeri Turk policies are supported by Jews who try to manufacture an “Aryan Iranian” history for Azeri Turks. In order to keep their “Iranian” cover the Azeri Turk ruling elite also suppresses ordinary Azeris who demand their language and ethnic rights. In summary Pan Turkism in Iran has a complete different form from Turkey. The main difference is Pan Turkism in Iran uses “Iranian” label and it uses religion to promote its policies. It does not use Azeri Turk language as it is not politically possible. It tries to impose its Azeri Turk culture on the natives of Iran.

As ordinary Azeris in Azerbaijan are severely suppressed by Azeri Turk elite in Tehran, it has led to demands for ethnic and cultural rights by Azeris in Azerbaijan. In May 2006, Azeris held big demonstrations in Tabriz, Azrebaijan against Azeri ruling class in Tehran. See the video on the left sidebar on Azeri demonstrations in Tabriz.

The policies of Turkification targets the Persian minority and tries to destroy the Persians as an ethnic minority and replace them with Azeri Turks. The policy is based in destroying the structure of Iranian population where Azeris live in separate and far away provinces from provinces where Persians live and tries to mix the Azeri population with Persian population. Azeri Turks are moved to Non-Turk provinces and Natives are moved to Azerbaijan.

Most of their policies are a copy of Anatolian Turks under Ottoman Empire in 16 century where they tried to become European Turks by mixing with those European countries that they dominated such as Balkans. Azeri Turks are trying to do same thing today 400 years later using Persians and Afghan refugees or anybody else they can find to look European.

This is the Azeri Turk agenda as described by an Azeri Turk:

“By Turks I mean the invading nomads who pillaged this side of the Caspian after the 11th century A.D. They “conquered” the areas from the Caucasus to Asia Minor and forced their language and Turkic identity on the conquered, indigenous peoples through rape, harassment, genocide, taxes, Janissary “recruitment”, stealing of women as sex slaves, stealing of children, etc.”

Actually this is the agenda of Azeri Turks today but it is assigned it to the past. This was actually what the Ottoman Turks did under ottoman empire.


Persian Safavid conversion of Iran to Shia Islam

sects of Islam

sects of Islam

The Safavid conversion of Iran from Sunnism to Shiism took place roughly over the 16th through 18th centuries and made Iran the spiritual bastion of Shia Islam against the onslaughts of Sunni Islam.

It also ensured the dominance of the Twelver sect within Shiism over the Zaydiyyah and Ismaili sects, marking one of the most important turning points in the history of Islam. As a direct result, the population of the territory of present-day Iran and neighboring Azerbaijan were converted to Shia Islam at the same time in history.

The Safavid dynasty (1501–1736) was Persian and not from Iranian origin.

Iran’s population was mostly (90%) Sunni of the Shafi`i and Hanafi legal rites until the triumph of the Safavids (who had initially been Shafi`i Sufis themselves). Ironically, this was to the extent that up until the end of the 15th century the Ottoman Empire (the most powerful and prominent Sunni state and future arch-enemy of the Shia Safavids) used to send many of its Ulema (Islamic scholars) to Iran to further their education in Sunni Islam, due to a lack of Madrasahs (Islamic schools) within the Empire itself.

All the sects of Islam appeared after a very long time, more than a hundred years, from the Great Islamic civil war “First Fitna” (during 656 – 661 AD) that wrecked the original Islam . And, all of them appeared under unjust cruel rulers many of them colonizer monarchies unacceptable by the original teachings of Prophet Mohamed (pbuh).

Iran Needs to Declare the Kurdish Language as State Language

iran_tribes_and_environment_smBy analyzing the indigenous Iranian languages family, it is obvious that the Kurdish Language is the most major native language still remaining in Iran today, and it is very much relater to other ancient Iranian languages. The Persian language (Farsi) is not from Iranian roots but from Turkic roots, and it is of modern origin.

The Kurdish Language together with its relatives in Iran make a very good choice for the historic restoration of Iran from the imposed Persianization of the indigenous people of Iran that took place since the Achaemenid.


Iran has two souls!

How the ancient Iranian peoples and cultures turned to become Persians? The ancient Iranian soul is peaceful, civilized, and good, but, the other soul is the Persianated Turkic soul, which is violent, primitive, and evil. Unless Iran returns to its original soul it will remain demonized in the world and will never get internal harmony. To explain that let us ask: How Ancient Iranian Peoples and Cultures turned to be Persian (which is Turkic)?

From the beginning of history there were “Iran” and “Iranians”, and there was no “Persia” or “Persians”. “Persia” or “Persians” appeared only with the Achaemenid Kings in 550 BC.

How Ancient Iranian Peoples and Cultures Were Labeled by New Turkic Persians

How Ancient Iranian Peoples and Cultures Were Labeled by New Turkic Persians

Near Lake Urmia was the first Persia tribal place in 860-600 BC. They came to this area earlier before they move again south and create their Persian chieftaincy which turned into kingdom then empire. New terms appeared like Parsua, Parsuash, Parsumash, Persis, Parsa, Pârs, Fars, and Parsava.

From 550 BC Iranian as a nation and Iran as a country disappeared and was replaced by Persians and Persia. Only in 1935, after 2485 years, Persia as a state took back the original name “Iran”, but strangely the Iranian peoples and cultures remained to be called ethnic “Persians”.

So, where the original Iranian people and cultures had gone? And why they are no longer recognized as “Iranians”? Such great ancient national identity of Iran and the ethnicities of the Iranians were clearly turned into Persia and Persians for political reasons by non-Iranians.

Even the history of the great ancient Iranian religion of Zoroastrianism which existed before 1200 BC had disappeared as a result of this forced Persianization. Also, in religion, prior to the rise of the Safavid Empire (1501–1736), Sunni Islam was the dominant religion, accounting for around 90% of the population at the time.

The Safavid dynasty had its origin in the Safaviyya Sufi order, which was established in the city of Ardabil in the Azerbaijan region (a Turkic region). Ardabil is in the same region from which the first Parsua (earlier Parsuash, Parsumash) chieftaincy originated before moving to south Iran to establish the first kingdom of Persia in (860-600 BC).

Where gone the ancient Iranians? And why the Persian restored Iran but did not restore Iranians? Simply because the Persian Turkic Azari rulers of Iran want to pretend that Iranian became Persians and want to call Iranian cultures and civilization Persian. Iranians and their achievements will never disappear or renamed Persian. The Persians are primitive and evil but the Iranians are great and good people.

The disaster that struck Iran since 550 BC is that few wicked Turkic settlers ruled Iran and the Iranians, and they invented Persia and claimed that Iranians are subjects of Persians and Iran seized to exist anymore, to confiscate Iranian lands and achievements.


Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser III

An Obelisk found in Nimrud (ancient Kalhu), in northern Iraq, and commemorates the deeds of King Shalmaneser III (reigned 858-824 BC). It was erected as a public monument in 825 BC at a time of civil war, in the central square of Nimrud, close to the much earlier White Obelisk of Ashurnasirpal I.

It is the most complete Assyrian obelisk yet discovered, and is historically significant because it is thought to display the earliest ancient depiction of a biblical figure – Jehu, King of Israel. The traditional identification of “Yaw” as Jehu has been questioned by some scholars, who proposed that the inscription refers to another king, Jehoram of Israel. Its reference to ‘Parsua‘ is also the first known reference to the Persians.

Persians are totally different from Iranians, although Iranians speak Persian. The Turkic Persian is dividing the Iranians, but the Kurds are native Iranians. Israel is also working to create distrust between them. It requires some understanding from both parties and the Russians, Syrians and Egyptians may help. The Iranians are peaceful and civilized contrary to the Turkic Persians, Turkic fake Israelite, and Turkic rulers of Arabia. The Kurds and the rest of Iranians will soon realize the dangers of distrust and the gains of reconciliation and cure the damages of Persians.

For more helpful maps on the ethnic, tribal, linguistic, and geographic composition of Iran visit The Gulf/2000 Project of the Middle East Institute at the School of International and Public Affairs of Columbia University in New York City.


Iran and the Iranians will defeat Persians, fake Israelite, rulers of Arabia and all other Turanians Gokturks Mongols no doubt, and expose them. The Turanians Gokturks Mongols are terrorist they have no place in any civilized peaceful world.

The Great Criminals: Roosevelt, Stalin, and Churchill – Part One

The Great Criminals - Roosevelt, Stalin, and Churchill in Yalta

In the grounds of the Livadia Palace, Yalta, during the Three Power Conference the British wartime Prime Minister Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill (1874 – 1965), the 32nd President of the United States of America Franklin Delano Roosevelt (1882 – 1945) and the Soviet leader Joseph Stalin (1879 – 1953) (Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili). (Photo by Keystone/Getty Images)

Indeed the three figures who were used to shape the world after WWII, Roosevelt, Stalin, and Churchill are great criminals who must be put in trial for what they did.

Without jumping into Antisemitism, it is necessary to check out the Turkic Jewish influence and ancestry of a Dutch, a Cossack, and a Spencer.

Part One: The Crimes of Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR)

Franklin Delano Roosevelt the Great Criminal

By James Buchanan

Sixty years ago one of the most evil men in world history, Franklin Delano Roosevelt died. Without World War Two, FDR would have been seen as a dishonest bungler who couldn’t get America out of the Great Depression –but because he helped win a major war (which Americans had no need to fight), historians meekly assume the war was necessary and ignore the evidence that the war was provoked.

Roosevelt began his career as a corrupt politician out of New York. He became assistant secretary of the Navy prior to World War One and there is a strong suspicion that Roosevelt and First Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill conspired to arrange the sinking of the Lusitania…

The Lusitania incident is extremely significant in understanding FDR (and Churchill). These men were willing to allow the deaths of 1,201 civilians in an arranged attack way back in the year 1916 when such a deliberate mass murder was inconceivable for most civilized people.


Roosevelt surrounded himself with Jewish advisors –a sure sign of a corrupt president. FDR failed to tell Americans about the mass murder of 30 million White Christians by Jewish commissars in the Soviet Union in the 1920s and ’30s. Instead, FDR saved all his indignation and hatred for National Socialist Germany, which had removed the Jews from power and brought great prosperity to the German people.

FDR secretly ordered the US Navy to wage war against German submarines long before the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor. Roosevelt also supplied massive shipments of war materials for England and the Soviet Union prior to Dec. 7th, 1941 in violation of the Neutrality Act, passed by Congress.

Roosevelt deliberately provoked the attack on Pearl Harbor by cutting off oil to Japan and issuing an ultimatum to the Japanese Empire that they stop their war against China. (Curiously, FDR never felt an urge to issue an ultimatum to the British Empire to stop their war against Germany and Italy.) Roosevelt knew that Pearl Harbor was about to be attacked, but withheld this information since the Japanese might call off the attack if American forces were prepared, sent out more search planes and spotted their fleet halfway to Pearl Harbor. FDR blamed the commander of Pearl Harbor for the ensuing disaster.

Over 2,000 Americans died at Pearl Harbor because of FDR’s political maneuvering and treachery. An even worse disaster took place in the Philippines. Because FDR had sent most of our war production to England and the Soviet Union, our soldiers on the Philippines lacked sufficient tanks, artillery and fighter planes to withstand a Japanese assault. Over 80,000 American soldiers became POWs and half of these men died in captivity –thanks in large part to Roosevelt’s treachery.

Many Jews and empty-headed Gentiles praise Roosevelt for “winning” World War Two, but what exactly was won in that war? America could have spared itself anywhere from 250,000 to 400,000 deaths if it stayed out of World War Two. Germany never had any plans to invade the US and lacked an adequate navy to do so. The Japanese only attacked America after extreme provocations and hoped to sign an armistice rather than fight a war to the death. Because of America’s involvement in World War Two, most of eastern and central Europe became enslaved by the Communists and millions of innocent civilians were liquidated by the same Jewish commissars, who killed so many innocent people before the war.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt is one of the greatest criminals in world history. His death just weeks before the end of the war was almost certainly an act of God to show the world that a man may conquer the world, but God decides where his soul will go.

Comment: His original family name was actually Rosenfeld, Jewish. It explains a lot.

FDR’s Crimes

By Daniel Larison, May 13, 2005

Still, we can recognize crimes as crimes, which brings me back to Roosevelt. Why are Americans still treating this monster as a hero?

I hardly know where to start. His contempt for the U.S. Constitution he was sworn to defend, in everything from creating a national welfare state to putting U.S. citizens in concentration camps, is almost a minor item on his ledger. So are his deceits in getting the United States into World War II, while assuring the American public that he was doing everything he could to keep us at peace.

Long before that war began, he befriended Joseph Stalin by granting diplomatic recognition to the Soviet Union, shortly after it had deliberately starved millions of Ukrainians. During the war, he made an alliance with Stalin, not as a regrettable necessity, but with effusive praise for “Uncle Joe.” He even urged Hollywood to make pro-Soviet films to dispel “prejudice” against Soviet Communism and lent a hand in the production of the egregious propaganda movie Mission to Moscow. (Jack Warner later called the film the worst mistake of his long career.)

As the war progressed, Roosevelt ordered the massive bombing of Japanese and German cities for the express purpose of killing as many civilians as possible. His victims, from Tokyo to Berlin, numbered in the millions. He was uninhibited by the ancient principle of Christian civilization that warfare should spare noncombatants.

But that wasn’t enough. Meanwhile Roosevelt launched the Manhattan Project to develop the atomic bomb, which could obliterate whole cities in a flash. He thereby took the world into a dreadful new era in history, which concerned him not at all.

Long after Pearl Harbor is forgotten, the name of Franklin Roosevelt should “live in infamy.” Yet the United States still officially honors him when an official apology to the entire human race would be more fitting.

%d bloggers like this: