Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy

Archive for February, 2017

Iran Needs to Declare the Kurdish Language as State Language


iran_tribes_and_environment_smBy analyzing the indigenous Iranian languages family, it is obvious that the Kurdish Language is the most major native language still remaining in Iran today, and it is very much relater to other ancient Iranian languages. The Persian language (Farsi) is not from Iranian roots but from Turkic roots, and it is of modern origin.

The Kurdish Language together with its relatives in Iran make a very good choice for the historic restoration of Iran from the imposed Persianization of the indigenous people of Iran that took place since the Achaemenid.

iran_languages_2014_lg-smalliran_ethnic_lg-small

Iran has two souls!

How the ancient Iranian peoples and cultures turned to become Persians? The ancient Iranian soul is peaceful, civilized, and good, but, the other soul is the Persianated Turkic soul, which is violent, primitive, and evil. Unless Iran returns to its original soul it will remain demonized in the world and will never get internal harmony. To explain that let us ask: How Ancient Iranian Peoples and Cultures turned to be Persian (which is Turkic)?

From the beginning of history there were “Iran” and “Iranians”, and there was no “Persia” or “Persians”. “Persia” or “Persians” appeared only with the Achaemenid Kings in 550 BC.

How Ancient Iranian Peoples and Cultures Were Labeled by New Turkic Persians

How Ancient Iranian Peoples and Cultures Were Labeled by New Turkic Persians

Near Lake Urmia was the first Persia tribal place in 860-600 BC. They came to this area earlier before they move again south and create their Persian chieftaincy which turned into kingdom then empire. New terms appeared like Parsua, Parsuash, Parsumash, Persis, Parsa, Pârs, Fars, and Parsava.

From 550 BC Iranian as a nation and Iran as a country disappeared and was replaced by Persians and Persia. Only in 1935, after 2485 years, Persia as a state took back the original name “Iran”, but strangely the Iranian peoples and cultures remained to be called ethnic “Persians”.

So, where the original Iranian people and cultures had gone? And why they are no longer recognized as “Iranians”? Such great ancient national identity of Iran and the ethnicities of the Iranians were clearly turned into Persia and Persians for political reasons by non-Iranians.

Even the history of the great ancient Iranian religion of Zoroastrianism which existed before 1200 BC had disappeared as a result of this forced Persianization. Also, in religion, prior to the rise of the Safavid Empire (1501–1736), Sunni Islam was the dominant religion, accounting for around 90% of the population at the time.

The Safavid dynasty had its origin in the Safaviyya Sufi order, which was established in the city of Ardabil in the Azerbaijan region (a Turkic region). Ardabil is in the same region from which the first Parsua (earlier Parsuash, Parsumash) chieftaincy originated before moving to south Iran to establish the first kingdom of Persia in (860-600 BC).

Where gone the ancient Iranians? And why the Persian restored Iran but did not restore Iranians? Simply because the Persian Turkic Azari rulers of Iran want to pretend that Iranian became Persians and want to call Iranian cultures and civilization Persian. Iranians and their achievements will never disappear or renamed Persian. The Persians are primitive and evil but the Iranians are great and good people.

The disaster that struck Iran since 550 BC is that few wicked Turkic settlers ruled Iran and the Iranians, and they invented Persia and claimed that Iranians are subjects of Persians and Iran seized to exist anymore, to confiscate Iranian lands and achievements.

iran

Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser III

An Obelisk found in Nimrud (ancient Kalhu), in northern Iraq, and commemorates the deeds of King Shalmaneser III (reigned 858-824 BC). It was erected as a public monument in 825 BC at a time of civil war, in the central square of Nimrud, close to the much earlier White Obelisk of Ashurnasirpal I.

It is the most complete Assyrian obelisk yet discovered, and is historically significant because it is thought to display the earliest ancient depiction of a biblical figure – Jehu, King of Israel. The traditional identification of “Yaw” as Jehu has been questioned by some scholars, who proposed that the inscription refers to another king, Jehoram of Israel. Its reference to ‘Parsua‘ is also the first known reference to the Persians.

Persians are totally different from Iranians, although Iranians speak Persian. The Turkic Persian is dividing the Iranians, but the Kurds are native Iranians. Israel is also working to create distrust between them. It requires some understanding from both parties and the Russians, Syrians and Egyptians may help. The Iranians are peaceful and civilized contrary to the Turkic Persians, Turkic fake Israelite, and Turkic rulers of Arabia. The Kurds and the rest of Iranians will soon realize the dangers of distrust and the gains of reconciliation and cure the damages of Persians.

For more helpful maps on the ethnic, tribal, linguistic, and geographic composition of Iran visit The Gulf/2000 Project of the Middle East Institute at the School of International and Public Affairs of Columbia University in New York City.

iranian_family_tree_v2-0

Iran and the Iranians will defeat Persians, fake Israelite, rulers of Arabia and all other Turanians Gokturks Mongols no doubt, and expose them. The Turanians Gokturks Mongols are terrorist they have no place in any civilized peaceful world.

The Great Criminals: Roosevelt, Stalin, and Churchill – Part One


The Great Criminals - Roosevelt, Stalin, and Churchill in Yalta

In the grounds of the Livadia Palace, Yalta, during the Three Power Conference the British wartime Prime Minister Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill (1874 – 1965), the 32nd President of the United States of America Franklin Delano Roosevelt (1882 – 1945) and the Soviet leader Joseph Stalin (1879 – 1953) (Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili). (Photo by Keystone/Getty Images)

Indeed the three figures who were used to shape the world after WWII, Roosevelt, Stalin, and Churchill are great criminals who must be put in trial for what they did.

Without jumping into Antisemitism, it is necessary to check out the Turkic Jewish influence and ancestry of a Dutch, a Cossack, and a Spencer.

Part One: The Crimes of Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR)

Franklin Delano Roosevelt the Great Criminal

By James Buchanan

Sixty years ago one of the most evil men in world history, Franklin Delano Roosevelt died. Without World War Two, FDR would have been seen as a dishonest bungler who couldn’t get America out of the Great Depression –but because he helped win a major war (which Americans had no need to fight), historians meekly assume the war was necessary and ignore the evidence that the war was provoked.

Roosevelt began his career as a corrupt politician out of New York. He became assistant secretary of the Navy prior to World War One and there is a strong suspicion that Roosevelt and First Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill conspired to arrange the sinking of the Lusitania…

The Lusitania incident is extremely significant in understanding FDR (and Churchill). These men were willing to allow the deaths of 1,201 civilians in an arranged attack way back in the year 1916 when such a deliberate mass murder was inconceivable for most civilized people.

 

Roosevelt surrounded himself with Jewish advisors –a sure sign of a corrupt president. FDR failed to tell Americans about the mass murder of 30 million White Christians by Jewish commissars in the Soviet Union in the 1920s and ’30s. Instead, FDR saved all his indignation and hatred for National Socialist Germany, which had removed the Jews from power and brought great prosperity to the German people.

FDR secretly ordered the US Navy to wage war against German submarines long before the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor. Roosevelt also supplied massive shipments of war materials for England and the Soviet Union prior to Dec. 7th, 1941 in violation of the Neutrality Act, passed by Congress.

Roosevelt deliberately provoked the attack on Pearl Harbor by cutting off oil to Japan and issuing an ultimatum to the Japanese Empire that they stop their war against China. (Curiously, FDR never felt an urge to issue an ultimatum to the British Empire to stop their war against Germany and Italy.) Roosevelt knew that Pearl Harbor was about to be attacked, but withheld this information since the Japanese might call off the attack if American forces were prepared, sent out more search planes and spotted their fleet halfway to Pearl Harbor. FDR blamed the commander of Pearl Harbor for the ensuing disaster.

Over 2,000 Americans died at Pearl Harbor because of FDR’s political maneuvering and treachery. An even worse disaster took place in the Philippines. Because FDR had sent most of our war production to England and the Soviet Union, our soldiers on the Philippines lacked sufficient tanks, artillery and fighter planes to withstand a Japanese assault. Over 80,000 American soldiers became POWs and half of these men died in captivity –thanks in large part to Roosevelt’s treachery.

Many Jews and empty-headed Gentiles praise Roosevelt for “winning” World War Two, but what exactly was won in that war? America could have spared itself anywhere from 250,000 to 400,000 deaths if it stayed out of World War Two. Germany never had any plans to invade the US and lacked an adequate navy to do so. The Japanese only attacked America after extreme provocations and hoped to sign an armistice rather than fight a war to the death. Because of America’s involvement in World War Two, most of eastern and central Europe became enslaved by the Communists and millions of innocent civilians were liquidated by the same Jewish commissars, who killed so many innocent people before the war.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt is one of the greatest criminals in world history. His death just weeks before the end of the war was almost certainly an act of God to show the world that a man may conquer the world, but God decides where his soul will go.

Comment: His original family name was actually Rosenfeld, Jewish. It explains a lot.

 

FDR’s Crimes

By Daniel Larison, May 13, 2005

Still, we can recognize crimes as crimes, which brings me back to Roosevelt. Why are Americans still treating this monster as a hero?

I hardly know where to start. His contempt for the U.S. Constitution he was sworn to defend, in everything from creating a national welfare state to putting U.S. citizens in concentration camps, is almost a minor item on his ledger. So are his deceits in getting the United States into World War II, while assuring the American public that he was doing everything he could to keep us at peace.

Long before that war began, he befriended Joseph Stalin by granting diplomatic recognition to the Soviet Union, shortly after it had deliberately starved millions of Ukrainians. During the war, he made an alliance with Stalin, not as a regrettable necessity, but with effusive praise for “Uncle Joe.” He even urged Hollywood to make pro-Soviet films to dispel “prejudice” against Soviet Communism and lent a hand in the production of the egregious propaganda movie Mission to Moscow. (Jack Warner later called the film the worst mistake of his long career.)

As the war progressed, Roosevelt ordered the massive bombing of Japanese and German cities for the express purpose of killing as many civilians as possible. His victims, from Tokyo to Berlin, numbered in the millions. He was uninhibited by the ancient principle of Christian civilization that warfare should spare noncombatants.

But that wasn’t enough. Meanwhile Roosevelt launched the Manhattan Project to develop the atomic bomb, which could obliterate whole cities in a flash. He thereby took the world into a dreadful new era in history, which concerned him not at all.

Long after Pearl Harbor is forgotten, the name of Franklin Roosevelt should “live in infamy.” Yet the United States still officially honors him when an official apology to the entire human race would be more fitting.

Churchill on Zionism versus Bolshevism


Churchill on Zionism versus Bolshevism

Churchill on Zionism versus Bolshevism

Illustrated Sunday Herald, February 8, 1920, page 5

Mr Churchill’s authorship of this article has been authenticated by one of the world’s leading Churchill bibliographers, Richard Heinzkill, of the University of Eugene, Oregon.

A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People

By the Rt. Hon. Winston S. Churchill.

SOME people like Jews and some do not; but no thoughtful man can doubt the fact that they are beyond all question the most formidable and the most remarkable race which has ever appeared in the world.

And it may well be that this same astounding race may at the present time be in the actual process of producing another system of morals and philosophy, as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent, which, if not arrested would shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible. It would almost seem as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel of Antichrist were destined to originate among the same people; and that this mystic and mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestations, both of the divine and the diabolical.

The National Russian Jews, in spite of the disabilities under which they have suffered, have managed to play an honourable and successful part in the national life even of Russia. As bankers and industrialists they have strenuously promoted the development of Russia’s economic resources, and they were foremost in the creation of those remarkable organisations, the Russian Co-operative Societies. In politics their support has been given, for the most part, to liberal and progressive movements, and they have been among the staunchest upholders of friendship with France and Great Britain.

International Jews.

In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus–Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.

Terrorist Jews.

There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and an the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution: by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek — all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses.

The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.

“Protector of the Jews.”

Needless to say, the most intense passions of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people. Wherever General Denikin’s authority could reach, protection was always accorded to the Jewish population, and strenuous efforts were made by his officers to prevent reprisals and to punish those guilty of them. So much was this the case that the Petlurist propaganda against General Denikin denounced him as the Protector of the Jews. The Misses Healy, nieces of Mr. Tim Healy, relating their personal experiences in Kieff, have declared that to their knowledge on more than one occasion officers who committed offences against Jews were reduced to the ranks and sent out of the city to the front. But the hordes of brigands by whom the whole vast expanse of the Russian Empire is becoming infested do not hesitate. to gratify their lust for blood and for revenge at the expense of the innocent Jewish population whenever an opportunity occurs. The brigand Makhno, the hordes of Petlura and of Gregorieff, who signalised their every success by the most brutal massacres, everywhere found among the half-stupefied, half-infuriated population an eager response to anti-Semitism in its worst and foulest forms. The fact that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish places of worship are excepted by the Bolsheviks from their universal hostility has tended more and more to associate the Jewish race in Russia with the villainies which are now being perpetrated.

A Home for the Jews.

Zionism offers the third sphere to the political conceptions of the Jewish race. In violent contrast to international communism.

Zionism has already become a factor in the political convulsions of Russia, as a powerful competing influence in Bolshevik circles with the international communistic system. Nothing could be more significant than the fury with which Trotsky has attacked the Zionists generally, and Dr. Weissmann in particular. The cruel penetration of his mind leaves him in no doubt that his schemes of a world-wide communistic State under Jewish domination are directly thwarted and hindered by this new ideal, which directs the energies and the hopes of Jews in every land towards a simpler, a truer, and a far more attainable goal. The struggle which is now beginning between the Zionist and Bolshevik Jews is little less than a struggle for the soul of the Jewish people.

The article is reproduced without editing apart from typographical


Here is a direct quote from the correspondence of Karl Marx with another Jew, Baruch Levy, quoted in the “La Revue de Paris,” June 1, 1928, page 574:

“In the new organization of mankind, the children of Israel [the Jews] will spread over the whole surface of the earth and will become everywhere, without opposition, the leading element, especially if they can impose upon workings classes the firm control of some of the them. The governments of the nations forming the Universal Republic will pass without effort into the hands of the Jews under the cover of the victory of the proletariat, private property will then be suppressed by the rulers of Jewish race, who will everywhere control public funds. Thus will be realized the Talmudic promise that, when come the times of the Messiah, Jews will possess the wealth of all peoples of the world”.


In the Congressional Record, published by the United States Government Printing Office, Proceedings of the House, 1957, page 8559 you can read the following:

“Israel Cohen, a leading Communist in England, in his A Racial Program For the Twentieth Century, wrote [in 1912]:

‘We must realize that our Party’s most powerful weapon is racial tension. By propounding into consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have have been oppressed by the whites, we can mould them to the program of the Communist Party. In America, we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites , we will instill into the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise to prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America into our hands’.”


Some sources add this paragraph to the article:

Duty of Loyal Jews.

It is particularly important in these circumstances that the national Jews in every country who are loyal to the land of their adoption should come forward on every occasion, as many of them in England have already done, and take a prominent part in every measure for combating the Bolshevik conspiracy. In this way they will be able to vindicate the honour of the Jewish name and make it clear to all the world that the Bolshevik movement is not a Jewish movement, but is repudiated vehemently by the great mass of the Jewish race.

But a negative resistance to Bolshevism in any field is not enough. Positive and practicable alternatives are needed in the moral as well as in the social sphere; and in building up with the utmost possible rapidity a Jewish national centre in Palestine which may become not only a refuge to the oppressed from the unhappy lands of Central Europe, but which will also be a symbol of Jewish unity and the temple of Jewish glory, a task is presented on which many blessings rest.


Winston Churchill the Criminal Coward Scum


Churchill engineered the genocide in Bengal

Churchill engineered the genocide in Bengal

Winston Churchill was born into the family of the Dukes of Marlborough, a branch of the noble Spencer family, Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill, like his father, used the surname “Churchill” in public life.

His ancestor George Spencer had changed his surname to Spencer-Churchill in 1817 when he became Duke of Marlborough, to highlight his descent from John Churchill, 1st Duke of Marlborough. Churchill’s father, Lord Randolph Churchill, the third son of John Spencer-Churchill, 7th Duke of Marlborough, was a politician; and his mother, Lady Randolph Churchill (née Jennie Jerome) was the daughter of American millionaire Leonard Jerome. Churchill was born on 30 November 1874, two months prematurely, in a bedroom in Blenheim Palace, Woodstock, Oxfordshire.

Here are few of Churchill’s disgusting quotes:

“I hate Indians, they are a beastly people with a beastly religion”

As Churchill put it, Palestinians were simply “barbaric hordes who ate little but camel dung.”

In 1937, he told the Palestine Royal Commission:

“I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place.”

Apart from being an unrepentant racist, Churchill was also a staunch proponent of the use of terrorism as a weapon of war.
During the Kurdish rebellion against the British dictatorship in 1920, Churchill remarked that he simply did not understand the “squeamishness” surrounding the use of gas by civilized Great Britain as a weapon of terror. “I am strongly in favour of using gas against uncivilised tribes, it would spread a lively terror,” he remarked.
He insisted that it was the solemn duty of Great Britain to invade and loot foreign lands because in Churchill’s own words Britain’s “Aryan stock is bound to triumph”
As Churchill himself boasted, he “created Jordan with a stroke of a pen one Sunday afternoon,” thereby placing many Jordanians under the brutal thumb of a throneless Hashemite prince, Abdullah. Historian Michael R. Burch recalls how the huge zigzag in Jordan’s eastern border with Saudi Arabia has been called “Winston’s Hiccup” or “Churchill’s Sneeze” because Churchill carelessly drew the expansive boundary after a generous lunch.
“I’d rather see them have a good civil war”. – Churchill wishing partition on India
For more details on this wretched person read an article by Garikai Chengu on Centre for Research on Globalization:
Winston Churchill was a genocidal maniac. He is fawned over in Britain and held up as a hero of the nation. He was voted ‘Greatest Briton’ of all time. Below is the real history of Churchill, the history of a white supremacist whose hatred for Indians led to four million starving to death, the man who loathed Irish people so much he conceived different ways to terrorize them, the racist thug who waged war on black people across Africa and in Britain. This is the trial of Winston Churchill, the enemy of all humanity.
Winston Churchill was a coward criminal racist scum. He killed Indians, African, Afrikaaner, Arabs, and Europeans.
In many battle fields he was afraid of fighting and taking risks, he only took risks at offices.
The coward scum called Winston Churchill could only serve in the British Army for 4 years, from 1895 to 1899, he preferred the safety of a career as an uneducated reporter unfit to be a journalist or a writer plus a lunatic politician. This coward scum reporter fright when the Boers blocked and ambushed the train he was taking with British soldiers. He ran and hid himself and didn’t even fire back or help the injured for more then an hour. He was captured and imprisoned. This prisoner of war used to give his guards chocolates!
After four weeks he arranged and escaped. contacted the local British consul in Lourenco Marques, who assisted this useless lad to go back home.The Boers put only 25 Pounds as a reward to capture this POW dead or alive.
Immediately upon arrival to Britain he resigned from the army out of fear.

Churchill’s Capture, Imprisonment, ans Escape, by David Buckerfield

This is a brief story of the most famous British disgusting hero. In contrast, Major General Charles George Gordon must be a million times more manly and humane than this coward privileged nobody.
Also see this article on Counter Currents.org
If only for the crimes of Winston Churchill against humanity Britain deserves to be wiped out from Earth.

The crimes of Britain blog published the following article on September 13, 2016

Terrorism is Turkic Islam


Expansions of Turkic Islam

Expansions of Turkic Islam

Islam during prophet Mohamed b. (622-632 AD) was not beyond the main Arabian Peninsula. But during the first three Caliphs, Abu Bakr (632-634), and Umar (634-644)(Assassinated), Uthman (644-656)(Assassinated) it went into invasions.

That was totally unacceptable to many believers but the Turkic elements encouraged such offensive military expansions.

The fourth Caliph Ali (656-661)(Assassinated) was the cousin of the prophet and he stopped that and carried out internal reforms and these were the main causes for the eruption of a brutal civil war throughout his rule (656-661) that ended up by assassinating him and killing most of this family.

By that killings the original Islam died and it was replaced by a fake Turkic militant cult calling itself Islam. This became the source of terrorism, colonialism, and heresy.

How Ancient Iranian Peoples and Cultures Were Labeled by New Turkic Persians


How Ancient Iranian Peoples and Cultures Were Labeled by New Turkic Persians

How Ancient Iranian Peoples and Cultures Were Labeled by New Turkic Persians

Iran has two souls!

The ancient Iranian soul, which is good. The other soul is the Persianated Turkic soul, which is evil. Unless Iran returns to its original soul it will remain demonized. To explain that let us ask: How Ancient Iranian Peoples and Cultures turned to be Persian (which is Turkic)?

How Ancient Iranian Peoples and Cultures Were Labeled by New Turkic Persians?

List of rulers of Iranian kingdoms of Iran and the Iranian people

From the beginning of history there were “Iran” and “Iranians”, and there was no “Persia” or “Persians”. “Persia” or “Persians” appeared only with the Achaemenid Kings in 550 BC. Here is a list of the Iranian kingdoms since 2700 BC, that made the original Iran:

  2.1 Elamite Empire, c. 2700 – 650 BC

  2.2 Minor Elamite Kingdoms, c. 2700 – 519 BC

  2.3 Kings of Elymais, c. 147 BC – c. 224 AD

3.1 Marhasi kingdom, c. 2550–c. 1900 BC

3.2 Namar kingdom, c. 24th century–c. 750 BC

3.3 Zakhara kingdom, c. 2350–c. 2250 BC

3.4 Ganhar kingdom, c. 21st century BC

3.5 Eshnuna kingdom, c. 21st century–c. 8th century BC

3.6 Zabshali kingdom, c. 2050–c. 2000 BC

3.7 Kassites kingdom, 21st to 9th century BC

3.8 Parsua kingdom, c. 840–c. 710 BC

3.9 Ellipi kingdom, c. 810–c. 700 BC

3.10 Bit-Istar kingdom, c. 12th century–c. 710 BC

4.1 Kuti kingdom, c. 2550–c. 2100 BC

4.2 Lullubi kingdom, c. 2400–c. 650 BC

4.3 Gilzan kingdom, c. 900–c. 820 BC

4.4 Urartu kingdom, c. 860 – 547 BC

4.5 Ida kingdom, c. 860–c. 710 BC

4.6 Allabria, c. 850–c. 710 BC

4.7 Gizilbunda kingdom, c. 850–c. 700 BC

4.8 Araziash kingdom, c. 850 – 716 BC

4.9 Manna kingdom, c. 850–c. 550 BC

4.10 Andia Kingdom, c. 850–c. 700 BC

4.11 Kishesu kingdom, c. 830–c. 710 BC

4.12 Sagbitu kingdom, c. 820–c. 710 BC

4.13 Abdadana kingdom, c. 810–c. 710 BC

4.14 Zikartu kingdom, c. 750 – 521 BC

4.15 Median dynasty, 726–521 BC

4.16 Karalla kingdom, c. 720–c. 700 BC

4.17 Uriaku kingdom, c. 720–c. 700 BC

4.18 Karzinu kingdom, c. 720–c. 700 BC

4.19 Saparda kingdom, c. 720–c. 670 BC

4.20 Scythian kingdom, c. 700–c. 530 BC

5.1 Dilmun kingdom, 27th century–7th century BC

5.2 Gunilaha kingdom, c. 2350–c. 2300 BC

5.3 Makkan kingdom, 23rd century – 550 BC

5.4 Bashimi kingdom, c. 2100–c. 1900 BC

5.5 Zabum kingdom, 21st century BC

5.6 Achaemenid Kings of Parsumash, c. 710–c. 635 BC

5.7 Achaemenid Kings of Anshan, c. 635 – 550 BC

Near Lake Urmia was the first Persia tribal place in 860-600 BC. They came to this area earlier before they move again south and create their Persian chieftaincy which turned into kingdom then empire. New terms appeared like Parsua, Parsuash, Parsumash, Persis, Parsa, Pârs, Fars, and Parsava.

Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser III
An Obelisk found in Nimrud (ancient Kalhu), in northern Iraq, and commemorates the deeds of King Shalmaneser III (reigned 858-824 BC). It was erected as a public monument in 825 BC at a time of civil war, in the central square of Nimrud, close to the much earlier White Obelisk of Ashurnasirpal I.
It is the most complete Assyrian obelisk yet discovered, and is historically significant because it is thought to display the earliest ancient depiction of a biblical figure – Jehu, King of Israel. The traditional identification of “Yaw” as Jehu has been questioned by some scholars, who proposed that the inscription refers to another king, Jehoram of Israel. Its reference to ‘Parsua‘ is also the first known reference to the Persians.

Parsua
Parsua (earlier Parsuash, Parsumash) was an ancient tribal kingdom/chiefdom (860-600 BC) located near Lake Urmia between Zamua (formerly: Lullubi) and Ellipi, in central Zagros to the southwest of Sanandaj, northwestern Iran. The name Parsua is from an old Iranian word *Parsava and it is presumed to mean border or borderland.
Parsua was distinct from Persis, another region to the southeast, now known as Fars province in Iran. Some accounts suggest that Teispes, the ancestor of the Achaemenid dynasty, led a migration from Parsua to Persis, formerly the Elamite state of Anshan.

Persis
ersis (Greek: Περσίς), better known as Persia (Old Persian: Parsa; Persian: پارس‎‎, Pars), or “Persia proper”, was originally a name of a region near the Zagros mountains at Lake Urmia. The country name Persia was derived directly from the Old Persian Parsa. Over time, the area of settlement shifted to the southwest of today Iran (now Fars).
The ancient Persians were present in the region from about the 10th century BC, and became the rulers of the largest empire the world had yet seen under the Achaemenid dynasty which was established in the late 6th century BC

Fars
The word Fârs is derived from Pârsâ, the Old Persian name for Persia and its capital, Persepolis. Fârs is the Arabized version of Pârs, as Arabic has no [p] phoneme.

Persian people
Ancient Persians were originally a nomadic branch of the ancient population (probably from Turkic origins) who entered modern-day Iran by the early 10th century BC.

 

List of Persian monarchs of Iran

From this time Iranian as a nation and Iran as a country disappeared and was replaced by Persians and Persia.

Here is a list of the new Persian kingdoms since 550 BC that made the current Persian Iran:

18.1 Sarbadars (1332–1386)

18.2 Chupanids (1335–1357)

18.3 Jalayirids (1335–1432)

18.4 Injuids (1335–1357)

18.5 Muzaffarids (1314–1393)

18.6 Kara Koyunlu (1375–1468)

18.7 Ak Koyunlu (1378–1497)

18.8 Timurid dynasty (1370–1507)

Only in 1935, after 2485 years, Persia as a state took back the original name “Iran”, but strangely the Iranian peoples and cultures remained to be called ethnic “Persians”.

So, where the original Iranian people and cultures had gone? And why they are no longer recognized as “Iranians”?

Such great ancient national identity of Iran and the ethnicities of the Iranians were clearly turned into Persia and Persians for political reasons by non-Iranians.

Even the history of the great ancient Iranian religion of Zoroastrianism which existed before 1200 BC had disappeared as a result of this forced Persianization. Also, in religion, prior to the rise of the Safavid Empire (1501–1736), Sunni Islam was the dominant religion, accounting for around 90% of the population at the time.

The Safavid dynasty had its origin in the Safaviyya Sufi order, which was established in the city of Ardabil in the Azerbaijan region (a Turkic region). Ardabil is in the same region from which the first Parsua (earlier Parsuash, Parsumash) chieftaincy originated before moving to south Iran to establish the first kingdom of Persia in (860-600 BC).

Where gone the ancient Iranians? And why the Persian restored Iran but did not restore Iranians? Simply because the Persian Turkic Azari rulers of Iran want to pretend that Iranian became Persians and want to call Iranian cultures and civilization Persian. Iranians and their achievements will never disappear or renamed Persian. The Persians are primitive and evil but the Iranians are great and good people.

The disaster that struck Iran since 550 BC is that few wicked Turkic settlers ruled Iran and the Iranians, and they invented Persia and claimed that Iranians are subjects of Persians and Iran seized to exist anymore, to confiscate Iranian lands and achievements.

Lake Urmia First Persia Tribal Place in 860-600 BC


Lake Urmia First Persia Tribal Place in 860-600 BC

Lake Urmia First Persia Tribal Place in 860-600 BC

Near Lake Urmia was the first Persia tribal place in 860-600 BC. They came to this area earlier before they move again south and create their Persian chieftaincy which turned into kingdom then empire. (It is also called Parsua, Parsuash, Parsumash, Persis, Parsa, Pârs, Fars, or Parsava)

Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser III

It comes from Nimrud (ancient Kalhu), in northern Iraq, and commemorates the deeds of King Shalmaneser III (reigned 858-824 BC).

It was erected as a public monument in 825 BC at a time of civil war, in the central square of Nimrud, close to the much earlier White Obelisk of Ashurnasirpal I.

It is the most complete Assyrian obelisk yet discovered, and is historically significant because it is thought to display the earliest ancient depiction of a biblical figure – Jehu, King of Israel. The traditional identification of “Yaw” as Jehu has been questioned by some scholars, who proposed that the inscription refers to another king, Jehoram of Israel. Its reference to ‘Parsua’ is also the first known reference to the Persians.

Parsua

Parsua (earlier Parsuash, Parsumash) was an ancient tribal kingdom/chiefdom (860-600 BC) located near Lake Urmia between Zamua (formerly: Lullubi) and Ellipi, in central Zagros to the southwest of Sanandaj, northwestern Iran. The name Parsua is from an old Iranian word *Parsava and it is presumed to mean border or borderland.

Parsua was distinct from Persis, another region to the southeast, now known as Fars province in Iran. Some accounts suggest that Teispes, the ancestor of the Achaemenid dynasty, led a migration from Parsua to Persis, formerly the Elamite state of Anshan.

Persis

ersis (Greek: Περσίς), better known as Persia (Old Persian: Parsa; Persian: پارس‎‎, Pars), or “Persia proper”, was originally a name of a region near the Zagros mountains at Lake Urmia. The country name Persia was derived directly from the Old Persian Parsa. Over time, the area of settlement shifted to the southwest of today Iran (now Fars).

The ancient Persians were present in the region from about the 10th century BC, and became the rulers of the largest empire the world had yet seen under the Achaemenid dynasty which was established in the late 6th century BC

Fars

The word Fârs is derived from Pârsâ, the Old Persian name for Persia and its capital, Persepolis. Fârs is the Arabized version of Pârs, as Arabic has no [p] phoneme.

Persian people

The ancient Persians were originally a nomadic branch of the ancient population (probably from Turkic origins) who entered modern-day Iran by the early 10th century BC.

%d bloggers like this: