Parisians are Turks
To find out the true sources of slavery, NWO, and terrorism we have to go deeper than the conventional mainstream politics, academia, and media.
The world must notice that only certain countries are struck by rebels and mercenaries aka Jihadists.
These countries do not fall under any of the six Turkic forms:
The six Turkic groups are:
1- Turkic Muslim in Anatolia and Balkan, (fake Caucasians since Byzantine–Seljuq wars in 1048 Ad),
2- Turkic Shia Persians (fake Iranians since the Achaemenids in 550 BC),
3- Turkic Khazar Zionist Jews (fake Israelite since the tricky Babylonian “Return” in 520 BC),
4- Turkic rulers of Arabia (fake Arabs, following the death of Islam in 655 AD),
5- Turkic “Hindu” Indians and Gypsy (fake Aryans since the Persian conquest in 530 BC), and
6- Turkic Europeans (fake liberal Christians since the fall of Western Roman Empire in 476 AD)
Six Turkic Groups
Syria, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, and Yemen are good examples.
Once you submit to one of these 4 forms of Turkic evil you are no longer under attack.
Lebanon, Jordon, and Azerbaijan are also good examples.
The Ashkenazim and Sephardim Jews are not Israelite, but with the Ottomans they invented Zionism. Now, only pointing to them considered Anti-Semitism, although they are not Semites at all. These are the enemies of Hitler and the Nazis; and before them were the enemies of Alexander the Great.
(The processes of inventing Jews, the Talmud, and Judaism is explained in the following article: The Invention of Judaism in Babylonian Iraq and in another article Replacing Semitic Judeans and Torah with Turkic Jews and Talmud ) (more…)
The Agenda of Pan-Turkism is Clear: To Distort Reality & to Effectuate the Takeover of Land. (Note: The Caspian Sea is called the “Khazar” Sea.)
Russia must stop the Turkification of Iranians, and return Iran to Iranians. Russia must stop the Turkification of the Caucasus, and return it to Caucasians.
Why did the Azeri people shift from speaking a Northwestern Iranian language to the Turkic language we all know today?
Azeri was the dominant language in Azerbaijan before it was replaced by Azerbaijani, which is a Turkic language.
This language was known as Old Azeri or Azari and had affinities to the Talysh languages that are spoken nearby. Many linguistic islets are said to persist into the 19th Century while certain Iranian dialects that is still spoken in the area is said to be descendants of the former language.
Āḏarī (Ar. al-āḏarīya) was the Iranian language of Azerbaijan before the spread of the Turkish language, commonly called Azeri, in the region.
Turkic Languages do not originally belong to west of Caspian Sea but central Asia. People of west Turkey and northwest of Iran and Azerbaijan countries (roughly Anatolian plateau) were once speakers of Iranian, European, Semitic, Caucasian, Slavic and some other Languages. Some of them first abandoned their native languages in favor of Greek due to Hellenization.
The process you seek is called Turkification and it began with Turkic Migration from central Asia to Middle-east and Europe. Circa 11th century, war with Turks began and led to deaths of many natives, while others were enslaved and removed. As areas became depopulated, Turkic nomads moved in. (more…)
Masoud Pezeshkian, the deputy speaker of parliament and leader of its newly formed Turkic-speaking faction, presides over a legislative session in Tehran, Iran, in this photo posted on Twitter on June 6, 2016. (photo by Twitter/@RZimmt)
The unprecedented formation of a cross-factional parliamentary group of Turkic speakers stirs controversy in Iran.
This move indicates the truth of many disputed facts about the Turkification of Iran and the Turkic origins of Persians:
1- Shiism, Sunnism, and Sufism ore just various rival forms of Turkic Islam and all of them are Turkic tool to rule over the Iranians, Arabs, Levant, India, Asia, and Africa.
2- The Turkification of the Iranian people passed through at least three phases: (more…)
The Turkification of Iran
The Turkification of Iran under the leadership of the former President Khatami and President Ahmadinejad has been carried under the banners of “Iranian Aryan Nationalism”. The truth is these people represent the Azeri nationalism or the Azeri version of Pan Turkism and their base of support are Azeris. In their political campaign they always use Persian girls and they paint themselves as the inheritors of the Persian civilization.
President Ahmadinejad showing Pan-Turkist grey wolves sign in Azerbaijan
Azeri Pan Turkism talks about uniting the “Iranian” or “Iranic” people, whatever that means. But their true aims is to unite with The Republic of Azerbaijan and bring more Azeri Turks into Iran in order to dominate Iran. Also it uses the “Iranian” cover and pretending to fight Anatolian Pan Turks. In reality Azeris are real Turks and their Pan-Iranism is the same as their Pan-Turkism but adjusted for the political conditions in Iran.
It also aims to export a form of “Pan-Turkish Islam” into Turkey in order to weaken its Anatolian rival. In these respects Azeri regime in Tehran is a copy of its ancestor, The Safavid Azeri Turks in 16 century. Also due to historical reasons, The Azeri Turks do not try to impose the Azeri Turk language on Iran unlike their Anatolian counterparts. Azeri Turks try instead to impose Azeri Turk culture on Iran and eliminate all other ethnic groups and replace them with Azeri Turks. These policies are promoted under the cover of Islam which is itself a cover for Azeri Turk culture. (more…)
By analyzing the indigenous Iranian languages family, it is obvious that the Kurdish Language is the most major native language still remaining in Iran today, and it is very much relater to other ancient Iranian languages. The Persian language (Farsi) is not from Iranian roots but from Turkic roots, and it is of modern origin.
The Kurdish Language together with its relatives in Iran make a very good choice for the historic restoration of Iran from the imposed Persianization of the indigenous people of Iran that took place since the Achaemenid. (more…)
In the grounds of the Livadia Palace, Yalta, during the Three Power Conference the British wartime Prime Minister Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill (1874 – 1965), the 32nd President of the United States of America Franklin Delano Roosevelt (1882 – 1945) and the Soviet leader Joseph Stalin (1879 – 1953) (Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili). (Photo by Keystone/Getty Images)
Indeed the three figures who were used to shape the world after WWII, Roosevelt, Stalin, and Churchill are great criminals who must be put in trial for what they did.
Without jumping into Antisemitism, it is necessary to check out the Turkic Jewish influence and ancestry of a Dutch, a Cossack, and a Spencer.
Part One: The Crimes of Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR)
Churchill on Zionism versus Bolshevism
Illustrated Sunday Herald, February 8, 1920, page 5
Mr Churchill’s authorship of this article has been authenticated by one of the world’s leading Churchill bibliographers, Richard Heinzkill, of the University of Eugene, Oregon.
A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People
By the Rt. Hon. Winston S. Churchill. (more…)
Churchill engineered the genocide in Bengal
Winston Churchill was born into the family of the Dukes of Marlborough, a branch of the noble Spencer family, Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill, like his father, used the surname “Churchill” in public life.
His ancestor George Spencer had changed his surname to Spencer-Churchill in 1817 when he became Duke of Marlborough, to highlight his descent from John Churchill, 1st Duke of Marlborough. Churchill’s father, Lord Randolph Churchill, the third son of John Spencer-Churchill, 7th Duke of Marlborough, was a politician; and his mother, Lady Randolph Churchill (née Jennie Jerome) was the daughter of American millionaire Leonard Jerome. Churchill was born on 30 November 1874, two months prematurely, in a bedroom in Blenheim Palace, Woodstock, Oxfordshire.
Here are few of Churchill’s disgusting quotes:
“I hate Indians, they are a beastly people with a beastly religion”
As Churchill put it, Palestinians were simply “barbaric hordes who ate little but camel dung.”
In 1937, he told the Palestine Royal Commission:
“I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place.”
Apart from being an unrepentant racist, Churchill was also a staunch proponent of the use of terrorism as a weapon of war.
During the Kurdish rebellion against the British dictatorship in 1920, Churchill remarked that he simply did not understand the “squeamishness” surrounding the use of gas by civilized Great Britain as a weapon of terror. “I am strongly in favour of using gas against uncivilised tribes, it would spread a lively terror,” he remarked.
He insisted that it was the solemn duty of Great Britain to invade and loot foreign lands because in Churchill’s own words Britain’s “Aryan stock is bound to triumph”
As Churchill himself boasted, he “created Jordan with a stroke of a pen one Sunday afternoon,” thereby placing many Jordanians under the brutal thumb of a throneless Hashemite prince, Abdullah. Historian Michael R. Burch recalls how the huge zigzag in Jordan’s eastern border with Saudi Arabia has been called “Winston’s Hiccup” or “Churchill’s Sneeze” because Churchill carelessly drew the expansive boundary after a generous lunch.
“I’d rather see them have a good civil war”. – Churchill wishing partition on India
Expansions of Turkic Islam
Islam during prophet Mohamed b. (622-632 AD) was not beyond the main Arabian Peninsula. But during the first three Caliphs, Abu Bakr (632-634), and Umar (634-644)(Assassinated), Uthman (644-656)(Assassinated) it went into invasions.
That was totally unacceptable to many believers but the Turkic elements encouraged such offensive military expansions.
The fourth Caliph Ali (656-661)(Assassinated) was the cousin of the prophet and he stopped that and carried out internal reforms and these were the main causes for the eruption of a brutal civil war throughout his rule (656-661) that ended up by assassinating him and killing most of this family.
By that killings the original Islam died and it was replaced by a fake Turkic militant cult calling itself Islam. This became the source of terrorism, colonialism, and heresy. (more…)