Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy


Aryans in India are not Aryans but Turkic

Aryans in India are not Aryans but Turkic

The so-called “Aryans” in India are not really Aryans, they just invaded and briefly settled in Aryan homelands before invading India.
They resemble the so-called “Arabs” in Africa, also invaded and briefly settled in Arabian homelands before invading Africa.
These fake “Aryans” and fake “Arabs” are Turkic nomads and invaders.

The Routes of Turkic first invasions to India, Iran, Caucasus, Anatolia, East Europe, Levant, Arabia, and Africa around 600 BC. These invasions corrupted all region's major religions and created new tribal groups

The Routes of Turkic first invasions to India, Iran, Caucasus, Anatolia, East Europe, Levant, Arabia, and Africa around 600 BC. These invasions corrupted all region’s major religions and created new tribal groups

The six Turkic groups are:
1- Turkic Muslim in Anatolia and Balkan, (fake Caucasians since Byzantine–Seljuq wars in 1048 Ad),
2- Turkic Shia Persians (fake Iranians since the Achaemenids in 550 BC),
3- Turkic Khazar Zionist Jews (fake Israelite since the tricky Babylonian “Return” in 520 BC),
4- Turkic rulers of Arabia (fake Arabs, following the death of Islam in 655 AD),
5- Turkic “Hindu” Indians and Gypsy (fake Aryans since the Persian conquest in 530 BC), and
6- Turkic Europeans (fake liberal Christians since the “Holy” “Roman” “Empire” in 962 AD)

Six Turkic Groups

Six Turkic Groups

Advertisements

Comments on: "Aryans in India are not Aryans but Turkic" (6)

    • This a fake study trying to cover up the Turkic Mongolian invasion and enslavement of Indians.
      Different Turkic groups, including Turks, Northern Indians, Jews, Caucasians, and Persians, always claim they are Aryans (Iranians) and Europeans at the same time. Which is ridiculous.
      They invented linguistic and racial theories by corrupt academia and media. All of them are nonsense.
      Those so-called “upper caste Indians” are just of Turkic Mongolian, Iranian, Scythian, and Indian mix resulted from Turkic vast and brutal raids, just as the Slavs, medieval Romans, and other by products of Turkic slavery.

      • I thought so. Thanks for the detailed response. It is been said in official history a group of ‘white’ Aryan people moved from the Caucasus region into India around 1550 bc. These are supposedly the same people who around the period where they moved into the Indus Valley, created the Hindu religion and introduced Sanskrit language. So was it also falsified?

  1. Around or before 1550 BC, Turkic Mongolians after looting and enslaving Scythian peoples got bolder and went into three raiding and rampage directions: 1. Afghanistan, Sindhus, and north India (Harappan and Vedic); 2. Iran, Hittite, and Mesopotamia (Sumerians); and 3. Volga and Don Rivers and Caucasus (Eastern Europeans).
    There were no mass migrations or invasions other than the Turkic Mongolians and this is the only link. In my personal opinion White Europeans are totally different from Aryans (ancient Iranians) both ethnically and linguistically. The ledge links and theories were made to hide the terrible history of Turkic Mongolians.

  2. Ojas Kirtane said:

    You are great source of true information. So who were Turks ? And why are they so evil ?

    • Thanks, the short answers: they are Mongolians; and because they are raiding everywhere since 1800 BC. The long answers are detailed in many articles on this blog.

Leaving a Comment Here Is Nice

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: