Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy

Judaism and Jew are Political Association NOT Religious nor Ethnic

Judaism and Jew are Political Association NOT Religious nor Ethnic

Judah was the fourth son of Jacob and Leah, the founder of the Israelite Tribe of Judah. A Judahite is a member of the tribe of Judah or of the kingdom of Judah. A Judean was one who was born in the ancient independent and separate kingdom of Judea, a person loyal to the king of Judea, an inhabitant of the kingdom of Judea, and/or one having citizenship rights in the kingdom of Judea.

Both terms “Judahite” and “Judean” used for ethnic or tribal connotation. The term “Jew” appeared much later after the return from captivity. It was never equivalent to “Judahite” and “Judean”. This means “Jew” does not describe ethnic or tribal affiliation.

Is Judaism a religion? The quick answer is NO. Because the terms “Judaism” and “Jew” actually appeared very late. The faith that is known as Judaism today was never called thus. The Jews are Turkic colonizers and rulers who were fraudulently brought to Israel by the Turkic Persians after 510 BC under a fake claim that they were the decedents of Israelite leaders who were captives in Babylonia.

Who is a Jew? Its modern connotation points to someone who follows and adheres to a faith similar to that of the Pharisees of Judah, but is not of the tribe and stock of Judah. In other words, Jews are people from nations other than the 12 Hebrew tribes who practice a religion known as Judaism/Pharisaism, the doctrine of the Pharisees.

In fact, the religion that is known as Judaism is actually Pharisaism. Judaism – as it pertains to Pharisaism – is a misnomer, since it is neither the doctrine of Judah nor the doctrine that Christ practiced. The Pharisee (“separatist”) party emerged largely out of the group of scribes and sages. Their name comes from the Hebrew and Aramaic parush or parushi, which means “one who is separated.” It may refer to their separation from Gentiles, sources of ritual impurity or from irreligious Jews. The Pharisees, among other Jewish sects, were active from the middle of the second century BCE until the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE.

Rabbi Adolph Moses in collaboration with Rabbi H.G. Enlow explained clearly in “Yahvism and Other Discourses,” that: “Among the innumerable misfortunes which have befallen… the most fatal in its consequences is the name Judaism… neither in biblical nor post-biblical, neither in Talmudic nor in much later times, is the term Judaism ever heard…”.

Rabbi Louis Finkelstein stated in his book “The Pharisees, The Sociological Background of Their Faith” that: “Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes in name . . . the spirit of the ancient Pharisees survives, unaltered . . . From Palestine to Babylonia; from Babylonia to North Africa, Italy, Spain, France and Germany; from these to Poland, Russia, and eastern Europe generally, ancient Pharisaism has wandered . . . demonstrates the enduring importance which attaches to Pharisaism as a religious movement . . .”.

In fact, Pharisaism is the doctrine of the Pharisees of old, an evil doctrine they brought back from their Babylonian captivity. It does not follow the truth of the Bible, neither of the Old Testament nor of the New. Its central tenets are found in a book called the Talmud (the real Satanic Verses), a book full of worldly traditions, lies, and superstitions.

“The Babylonian Talmud is based on the mystical religious practices of the Babylonians which were assimilated by the Judahite Rabbis during their Babylonian captivity around 600 B.C. The Rabbis then used these occult traditions in place of the word of God,” wrote Edward Hendrie in Solving the Mystery of Babylon the Great. And that is why Jesus was constantly rebuking the Pharisees.

The Sadducaic was a sect of Judaism drew their name from Zadok, the first High Priest of ancient Israel to serve in the First Temple, with the leaders of the sect proposed as the Kohanim (Priests, the “sons of Zadok”, descendant of Eleazar, son of Aaron). The name Zadok, being related to the root‎ ṣāḏaq (to be right, just, honest). The Sadducees rejected the Oral Law as proposed by the Pharisees. Rather, they saw the written Torah as the sole source of divine authority. The written law, in its depiction of the priesthood, corroborated the power and enforced the hegemony of the Sadducees in Judean society.

The Pharisees were at various times a political party, a social movement, and a school of thought in the Holy Land during the time of Second Temple Judaism. After the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE, Pharisaic beliefs became the foundational, liturgical and ritualistic basis for Rabbinic Judaism. “Pharisee” is derived from Aramaic Pərīšā, plural Pərīšayyā, meaning “set apart, separated”. It might well be related to “Faris which is Persia”

In 539 BCE the Persians conquered Babylon, and in 537 BCE Cyrus the Great allowed Jews to return to Judea and rebuild the Temple. He did not, however, allow the restoration of the Judean monarchy, which left the Judean priests as the dominant authority. Without the constraining power of the monarchy, the authority of the Temple in civic life was amplified.

It was around this time that the Sadducee party emerged as the party of priests and allied elites. However, the Second Temple, which was completed in 515 BCE, had been constructed under the auspices of a Persian power, and there were lingering questions about its legitimacy.

This provided the condition for the development of various sects or “schools of thought,” each of which claimed exclusive authority to represent “Judaism,” and which typically shunned social intercourse, especially marriage, with members of other sects. In the same period, the council of sages known as the Sanhedrin may have codified and canonized the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh), from which, following the return from Babylon, the Torah was read publicly on market-days.

In 167 BCE Mattathias, together with his sons Judah, Eleazar, Simon, John, and Jonathan, started a revolt against the Seleucid ruler Antiochus IV Epiphanes, who since 175 BCE had issued decrees that forbade Jewish religious practices. After defeating the Seleucid forces, Judas Maccabaeus’s nephew John Hyrcanus established a new monarchy in the form of the priestly Hasmonean dynasty in 152 BCE, thus establishing priests as political as well as religious authorities. Although the Hasmoneans were heroes for resisting the Seleucids, their reign lacked the legitimacy conferred by descent from the Davidic dynasty of the First Temple era.

The Temple was no longer the only institution for Jewish religious life. After the building of the Second Temple in the time of Ezra the Scribe, the houses of study and worship remained of secondary importance in Jewish life. So “Jew” and “Judaism” are neither religious nor ethnic terms. They are simply political terms with ethnic and religious cloaks.



Comments on: "Judaism and Jew are Political Association NOT Religious nor Ethnic" (2)

  1. So “Jew” and “Judaism” are neither religious nor ethnic terms. They are simply political terms with ethnic and religious cloaks.”

    The word “Jew” only entered the English language in the late 1700s – I read that some years back. The Ashnenazim or Eastern Jews are an ethnic group with their intermarriage and descent from the Khazars. Judaism has come to refer to Talmudism (really Pharasiaism). Despite the origins of the terms (Jew and Judaism), these now have meaning in the popular mind and as such refer to those people who adhere to the Talmud.

    But, you are quite right in pointing out the political association. Unity in dispersion. Worldwide, the Jews work in alliance with each other and that applies to those who are atheists and to those who believe the Talmud. They all work together so that this people can influence or control world events.

    • It is really strange who now Jews mean Hebrew Semite Israelite, and Judaism is considered a religion despite the Israelite until after Christianity didn’t call the faith of Moses Judaism.
      Add to this how Jews can switch to other religions and nationality easily and remain Jews. Take for example the Dönmeh Jews and the Sabbateans of Turkey and Poland.

      Also those of Iberia after the Reconquista and when Rabbi Chemor of Arles (Provence, France), wrote to the Grand Sandhedrin, which had its seat at Constantinople, for advice.

Leaving a Comment Here Is Nice

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: