Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy


It is becoming quite clearer that the Hebrew Bible lacks historicity. This video supports the hypothesis that all the events occurred within Arabia only.
But fortunately it unintentionally adds more weight to the Abyssinian Refuge hypothesis.

To sum it up, there are three hypotheses:
1. The conventional Egypt hypothesis
2. The Arabia only hypothesis
3. The Abyssinian Refuge hypothesis

With the believe that it really happened, the story of Joseph must also be linked to the stories of Famine, Moses, Plagues, Exodus, and other related stories. It seems more plausible to connect the stories of Joseph and the Israelite refuge and Exodus to Abyssinia (ancient Ethiopia) and to Karamah (ancient Nubia) rather than stopping in refuting their occurrence in Kemt (ancient Egypt).

Besides Southern Arabia areas of frankincense production were extensive in the Horn of Africa. The dromedary was probably first domesticated in northern Somalia, Eritrea and eastern Sudan about 4,000 years ago. The Persian invasion of Egypt under Cambyses in 525 BC introduced domesticated camels to the area. The fall of Sudan started with events in the Classical Kerma period which witnessed the Israelite raids for gold and slaves and that led to the collapse of Kerma and the whole Sudan. That collapse generated vacuum which was filled very late by Nubian Christian kingdoms.

Some uncommon Hebrew traditions, although not very reliable, but points to Moses involvement in power struggle in Karamah. Strange enough is that according to Jewish sources (Yalkut Me’am Loez on Shemot 2:15), says when Moses fled “Egypt” (it is supposed to mean Ethiopia) he went to Kush (Karamah at that time). During the first year of the siege of the capital, Moses fled Egypt. A strong young man, around twenty years old, he came to Kush and joined the force of Kinkos, and became very popular among the troops, who were impressed by his royal bearing. Moses found himself teaching the troops Egyptian battle tactics, further gaining their respect and admiration. Seeing his wisdom and popularity, the king took him as his closest advisor. Source: Chabad-Lubavitch

The 3500-years-old Egypt Hypothesis failed to provide scientific evidences but still widely and deeply established. This is due only to the religious and political backup it receives. Since the other two hypotheses are much more in line with common sense and logic, they must be supported against the established biased academia and methodologies. The usual question is “What is the theoretical framework, or what are the sources and references? As if the Egypt Hypothesis has any framework. The world must first answer basic question: “Is the Hebrew Bible with its Egypt Hypothesis valid today?”

The common three major racial Jewish groups are: Mizrahi (Eastern), Ashkenazi (White) and Sephardi (Hispanic). The Mizrahi Jews is not an accurate term, it is like saying “others”. It is better to distinguish the Israelite and Hebrew from the Turkic Jews who never settled in any part of Arabia and the Levant.

Therefore, The Mizrahi Jews is actually a composite category which includes two different ethnicities: ancient Israelite and Hebrew who are Arabs, plus more authentic Turkic people from the Far East. It is reasonable to consider that the Mizrahi Jews is two groups not one, and there is a deliberate political policy to deny the Israelite and Hebrew to have their own distinct group.

Advertisements

Comments on: "The Historicity of the Hebrew Bible is Questioned" (4)

  1. “It is becoming quite clearer that the Hebrew Bible lacks historicity.” Yes, it does not identify which Pharaohs it refers to. It was in oral tradition for centuries which makes its credibility suspect.

    One of the OT verses that Christian Zionists point to goes like this (God is speaking): “I will bless those who bless you.” – referring to the Jews. This is used as justification for unquestioning support for the current Zionist state of Israel. As well, when Jewish organizations here in the US want money from Christians, it is this verse that they print in their mailed solicitations. One could say that this verse is suspect and may not be something that God said.

    • 1. Abraham was from Ur, currently Iran, which makes him Persian not Hebrew.
      2. The genealogy of David goes down to Joseph, but Jesus was not the son of Joseph, but the son of Mary, who was not in David’s bloodline (thank God!!!).
      3. The New Testament establishes a new pact, a new agreement, a new contract, a new will, i.e. He (Jesus) came to his own and his own (the Jews) received Him not. (John 1:11) But as many as received Him (Jesus) to them gave He power to BECOME THE SONS OF GOD, TO THEM THAT BELIEVE ON HIS NAME! (John 1:12)
      4. Jesus said that they were the Synagogue of Satan for the followed the law of the Talmud and not the law of love which Jesus gave us & they say they are Jews but they are Khazarians! “I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.” (Revelations 2:9)

      • 1. Persia appeared only after 550 BC by Turkic Mongolian nomadic raiders before that it was Iran only.
        2. The term “Hebrew” appeared centuries after Jacob and Israelite, it was Arbi then became Ebri after 1406 BC
        3. Abraham and all his descendants are from Western Arabia and he never went to Ur or Egypt, the only region he visited was Abyssinia.
        4. The genes of Joseph are unknown because there is no known grave for him and all the Israelites until Moses.
        5. When tales fail to provide a single scientific evidence for 3400 years this is the strongest proof that they are fiction made out of thin air. There are a lot of logic and common sense in new hypotheses to replace the falsehood of the present narrative working against corrupt and ignorant churches, politics, and academia and surly truth will prevail. Abraham went to Egypt and didn’t notice the Pyramids!, large population of nomadic herders surviving in a desert like Egypt!, wandering in Sinai 40 years!, no records in Egypt who recorded even the number of cats!, staying for 430 years without leaving a single grave!, or borrowing both ways between languages! failing to identify a single Egyptian king they lived under their control for 4 centuries! and much more. The OT must not rely on the Hebrew Bible because it is clearly false and written with evil intentions.

  2. “Abraham went to Egypt and didn’t notice the Pyramids!, ” Haha. Good one.

Leaving a Comment Here Is Nice

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: