Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy


Khafra King of Kmt (Nesso en Kmt) Reigned almost 26 years, ca. 2570 BC

Khafra King of Kmt (Nesso en Kmt) Reigned almost 26 years, ca. 2570 BC

The name of Kmt on the Luxor obelisk of Ramses II Reigned 1279-1213 BC (19th Dynasty)

The name of Kmt on the Luxor obelisk of Ramses II Reigned 1279-1213 BC (19th Dynasty)

Kmt was never Arab because Arabs never occupied or lived in it. But Kmt was occupied and colonized by Bedouins…. And Bedouins are not Arabs at all. Bedouins are Turkic Mongolians just as Jews, Persians, Romans, Copts, Aryan Indians, Sabaeans and Kushites

Kmt began to fall with the conquest and occupation of the Hyksos (1630-1523 BC) and resisted for 200 years and came Akhenaten and the last half of the 18th Dynasty to continue the destruction of Kmt, and it collapsed completely by the fall of the Modern Kmtic Kingdom in 1077 BC and with that started series of 3,000 years of destruction, colonialism, theft and falsification of history and identity, which ended with the death of Gamal Abdel Nasser.

Now Kmt feels the path of her revival, civilization and identity, which were desecrated terribly.

The Arabs are an old civilized nation that fell under the invasion and occupation of the Bedouins since the time of the Hyksos in Kmt and they became called the extinct Arabs while the Bedouins claim that they are the northern and southern Arabs.

They established the colony of the Sabaean bandits, the brothers of the Jews, the Persians and the Romans, all over the south of the Peninsula which was Arab.

And they falsified the Canon of Muhammad as they did with the Canon of Moses and the Canon of Yeshua; and used these falsified canons to colonize Kmt and many nations and peoples.

The people of Kmt are the brothers of the Kerma (the Nubians), the Amazighs, the Puntites (the Abyssinians) and the ancient Arabs.

And the people of Kmt are the Kmtians … not the Copts, nor the Misris, nor the Pharaohs, nor the Egyptians

هي كمت … لا قبط و لا مصر و لا فراعنة و لا ايجبت

وكمت ليست عربية لان العرب لم يحتلوها او يعيشوا فيها ابدا. بل احتل و استعمر كمت الاعراب … و الاعراب ليسوا عرب ابدا. بل الاعراب هم تركمنغول كاليهود و الفرس و الرومان و الاقباط و الهنود الاريين و السبئيين و الكوشيين.

و كمت بدء سقوطها مع غزو واحتلال الهكسوس (1630-1523 ق م) و قاومت ل200 عام و جاء اخناتون و النصف الاخير من الاسرة 18 لمواصلة تدمير كمت و انهارت تماما كمت بسقوط المملكة الكمتية الحديثة عام 1077 ق م و معها بدء مسلسل 3 الف عام من التخريب و الاستعمار و سرقة وتزوير التاريخ و الهوية الذي انتهي بموت جمال عبد الناصر. الان كمت تتلمس طريق نهضتها و حضارتها و هويتها التي طمست بشكل فظيع.

و العرب امة عريقة قديمة متحضرة سقطت تحت الغزو و الاحتلال الاعرابي منذ زمن الهكسوس في كمت و اصبح العرب الاصلاء يطلق عليهم العرب البائدة و ادعي الاعراب انهم عرب عاربة و مستعربة. و اقاموا مستعمرة عصابات السبئيين اشقاء اليهود و الفرس و الرومان في كل جنوب الجزيرة التي كانت عربية.

و هم من زوروا الشريعة المحمدية كما زوروا من قبل الشريعة الموسوية و الشريعة اليسوعية و بهذه الشرائع التي زوروها احتلوا كمت وشعوب اخري كثيرة.

و شعب كمت هم اشقاء الكرميين (النوبيين) و الامازيغ و البونتيين (الحبش) و القدماء العرب.

و شعب كمت هم الكمتيون … ليس الاقباط و لا المصريين و لا الفراعنة ولا الاجيبتجان

Comments on: "It is Kmt ….Not Copt, not Misr, not Pharaohs, not Egypt" (23)

  1. Erik Piculell said:

    I have tried to investigate KMT, in the case of black you are right, but I can’t find anything of
    https://www.academia.edu/7061137/A_Lesson_in_Egyptian_Determinatives_The_Case_of_KMT

    //Bedouins are not Arabs at all. Bedouins are Turkic Mongolians just as Jews, Persians, Romans, Copts, Aryan Indians, Sabaeans and Kushites//

    The problem with many historic informations are this:
    Philon of Alexandrian (20 BC to c AD 50) wrote i.a.: The Jewish origin is in Mesopotamia.
    Which probably is due to the error in Genesis 11:31, estimated written after 800 BC, that Abram and family came from Ur of the Chaldeans.

    About Bedouins, the most “people” has been nomads once upon a time, before they started to settled down ca 15,000 years ago.
    Therefore, my guess would have been, that bedouins of to day, isn’t one special “race” or “people”, but a more or less mixed race of different ancient people.

    But the Cambridge Univer´city wrote this:
    //They descend from the cradle of the Arab race, the Arabian Peninsula, and speak pure Arabic. In short, this view maintained that if there existed an Arab race, then, inherently, it must be Bedouin-nomadic.//
    https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-middle-east-studies/article/original-arabs-the-invention-of-the-bedouin-race-in-ottoman-palestine/A00666E6BAC4F30F25D6F726BB45077D

    • Ancient Arabs have archaeological remains dated older than 1500 BC in Oman and Asir region to prove they were settled and civilized nation before the coming of Turkic Mongolian who formed the Bedouins and the Sabaeans.

      • Erik Piculell said:

        You write well and trustworthy, for me it’s just not enough, because I miss to the extent some scientific data that support your article

      • I am throwing stones on world’s fake history, sciences, academia and religions to call for deep revisionism.
        I will never rely of corrupt sources and pseudosciences against logical and material evidences
        The so-called history never provided scientific data to support their ridiculous claims
        Let the wold stand up and demand scientific data for their tales first
        Then many organized decent works could be done to stand against the global and powerful corrupt organizations.

      • Erik Piculell said:

        You wrote:
        //I am throwing stones on world’s fake history//

        The same do I, but by the help of recognized Scientific results, from as many sources as possible, and not at least by using my logic.
        = = =
        You wrote:
        //I will never rely of corrupt sources//

        The found sources are exactly as corrupt, as one own attitude to life is.
        Because the facts are:
        The atheist does not believe in one of the many kinds of believer’s statements.
        The Hindu does not believe in the statements of the Jew, the Christian or the Muslim.
        Etc. etc. etc.
        As I see it, it’s only a question of being selective in one’s own selections and never believe in everything from one source.
        = = =
        You wrote:
        //Let the wold stand up and demand scientific data for their tales first//

        How should that help:
        None atheists, will ever accept the data which is conveyed by any of the dedicated believers no matter which religions they believe in.
        None of the believers of a religion, will ever believe in data conveyed by an atheist or of a believer from another religion, if it affected one’s own religion.

        You have trust in your faith, but we are still nearly 8 billions people on the earth, spread over an awful lot of believers to an awful lot religions, with its different gods, furthermore agnostics and a growing amount of non-believers.

      • Thank you very much for your insights
        I deal with sources as piles of data only then I question and investigate then with reliable new evidences.
        I support my opinion articles with logical proofs as such as a short article could hold with the objective of calling for full wide researches.
        Despite relying on doubt to reach to facts, I believe in one Creator and a single Universal Religion. Canons are just national canons not intentional religions at all. This is reasonable for believers and non-believers not only on our tiny Earth but rather in the endless Universe and limitless time.
        The Swadeshi principles are of much truth for me than the the so-called religions.

  2. Erik Piculell said:

    If Google has translated your text correctly (I’m a Dane), it looks as we see, on our world and universe, in about the same way.
    I see myself as an agnostic.
    Already for about 30 years ago (I’m 74), I discovered, that religion is not only about faith, but is also about controlling the believers, prbably because religion is several seriously big and very powerful and welthy business organisation.
    I know from experience, that things changes rapidly now a days, the informations we have today, could be changed with new discoveries tomorrow
    I started my investigations of the Abrahamic religions in 2004, and just since 2004, has the scholars found and published so many informations, that it has changed what I thought I knew, about the origin of the three religions.
    Verified examples are:
    https://www.surrey.ac.uk/ati/ibc/files/AdamEve+Devil.pdf
    And the oldest proof of the Judean Elohim, the eternal and almighty YHWH, ever found is only from the 7th BC
    http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2010/01/06/The-Blessing-of-the-Silver-Scrolls.aspx
    While found pottery with hebrew inscription is from the 11-10th cent. BC

    • I believe in the existence of God but the nature of God is beyond my knowledge now. May be in the Golden Age of the Great Year, or Santya Yuga, humans could know better.
      There is the Religions, and there are the canons. We must be aware of the difference. Corrupted canons claim they are religions and they were invented to control and deceive believers. The Abrahamic religions are not religions at all.
      Studying the Hebrew Bible will reveal its very poor historicity and logic and will lead only to confusion because of its massive forgery.
      I am certain that the Hebrew and Jews were invented in 585 BC in Babylon and not a single Hebrew or Jew existed before that, but the proto-Hebrew language started around the death of Solomon in 930 BC

      • Erik Piculell said:

        “You wrote:”
        //I believe in the existence of God but the nature of God is beyond my knowledge now//

        Why, “now”?

        At first I have to tell you, I know of experience, that there is much more between heaven and earth than anyone can explain (yet).
        But I do not believe in, it’s something we have to worship, we just have to respect, it’s there.

        I started in my early years as 10 or 12, to study the Nordic mythology, as far back as I could come.
        Then I proceeded to the Greek, the Roman and the Egyptic mythology and in my 20’s I began seriously, to read about Judaism and Christianity, because a lot of the things I learned in the school, of mythologies and religions, didn’t make sence to me.
        The only difference I could (and can) see, between mythology and religion is, that the mythological gods are not worshiped by the masses anymore.
        Did you know, , that it is believed, that organized religion was probably invented in the 11th cent BC for controlling the growing population that settled down.
        = = =
        “You wrote:”
        //There is the Religions, and their are the canons.
        Corrupted canons claim they are religions and they were invented to control and deceive believers. //

        The word Religion is derived from:
        Latin: religare, which means “to bind”,
        And Latin: religio, obligation, reverence.

        The word “canon”, means in reality just “rule!”
        Ie there exist several different kinds of “canons”, in all the different religions

        Both the religion and the canons is therefore to considered to be corrupted, for any of the persons who disagrees with the religion and/or its canon!
        = = =
        “You wrote:”
        //The Abrahamic religions are not religions at all.
        Studying the Hebrew Bible will reveal its very poor historicity and logic and will lead only to confusion because of its massive forgery.//

        That’s what is called a subjective perception.
        Following is proven facts:
        The Abrahamic religions are:
        http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Abrahamic_religions
        https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-are-the-abrahamic-religions.html
        http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697762.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199697762

        Several parts of the Pentateuch, which will say too, that several parts of the Bible and the Qur’an, are proven indisputable copied from pagan religions:
        https://www.logos.com/ugaritic
        https://www.surrey.ac.uk/ati/ibc/files/AdamEve+Devil.pdf
        https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/evidence-for-a-flood-102813115/
        The above is known and recognized of both at least one of the Jewish society and several of the Christian organisations.
        Many of them has also accepted the fact, that teh Bible is written by writers who never saw or heard Jesus, but yet they literally quoted him anyway

        The Qur’an has an obvious advantage over the Tanakh, as written far over 1000 years later.
        One know, and it is admitted by the Jews, that especially the Pentateuch, can’t be historic correct, as the content is written down, after centuries of oral traditions through generations after generations.
        It’s believed, that the first time the Pentateuch was written down, was in 1100 BC, unknown why, was the Pentateuch re-written between the 9-400 BC, which caused the errors.
        It’s known and admitted case today, that the Tanakh has existed in several versions, versions which containing some differences.
        But no one believes that the differences make one version more correct than the others, as no one can do anything but estimate what happened then.
        = = =
        “You wrote:”
        //I am certain that the Hebrew and Jews were invented in 585 BC in Babylon and not a single Hebrew or Jew existed before that//

        Regarding the term “Hebrew”, have I seen at least 4 different explanations.
        While the term “Jew” is derived from:
        “A inhabitant in the Land of Judah”
        http://www.kchanson.com/CHRON/isrkings.html
        Which is a part of:
        http://jewishhistory.huji.ac.il/Internetresources/historyresources/timelines_for_ancient_jewish_his.htm
        Again it is possible to find the wording:
        Note:
        Dates regarding biblical figures and events cannot be confirmed:

        //Regarding 585 BC//
        Well, in that case, I will please ask you explain to me, how the Hebrews was able to copied from the religion of the city-state of Ugarit, which provable was destroyed around the 1200 century BC
        https://www.logos.com/ugaritic
        https://www.surrey.ac.uk/ati/ibc/files/AdamEve+Devil.pdf
        = = =
        “You wrote:”
        //but the proto-Hebrew language started around the death of Solomon in 930 BC//

        The proto-Hebrew or the Paleo-Hebrew is the name of the first known Hebrew alphabet, used for writing.
        The oldest known Hebrew writing is found on pottery, and is estimated to around the 10th cent. BC.
        We can still see Bibles, which has included the Paleo Hebrew writing:
        https://www.hebrewoldtestament.com/index2.htm

      • If you read my words you will know that “now” refers to our current Yoga
        Please save my time

      • Erik Piculell said:

        – Sorry if I/Google misunderstood you, but
        as said before, I’m a Dane, using Google Translate,
        unforunately are all free translations of Danish far from perfect.
        = = =
        Over the last 16 years, I have corresponded with more priests, rabbis and scholars than I can remember.
        Especially the scholars have several times pointed out the following quite strongly:
        → A credible chronology is important. Without chronology it’s not possible to understand history, for chronology is the backbone of history.
        If chronology has no evidence to back up, the chronology cannot be considered credible.←

        //I mean by proto-Hebrew the culture//
        I really do not understand.
        The Proto-Hebrew Culture is according to my knowledge “the ancient Hebrews”.
        The Hebrews that existed at 1000 BC and onwards
        While the Turkic Mongolians didn’t exists before after 1200 AD.
        I.e. approx 2000 years later.

        //The Torah was received in 1446 BC//

        Sorry, but that’s imposible.
        The first five books of the Torah, is the Pentateuch, the so-called “books of Moses”.
        It is believed, that the Pentateuch was written down in the 11th century from oral traditions, unknown why, was Pentateuch re-written between the 900 to 400 BC (which has caused a lot of errors).
        The next Books in the Tora is the Book of Joshua, Book of Judges, 1.+2. Samuel, 1.+ 2. Kings, together called the Deuteronomic books.
        Estimated to be written between 900 and 400 BC
        After the above comes the Book of Isaiah.
        Which is believed, to be the oldest book, but only Chap. 1 to 39, which is believed written in the 8th cent BC, while chap 40-66, is estimated to be written after 539 BC

        //It is a very objective and logical perception to believe that there is one only God//

        For me is the logic:
        The existens of one almighty God, would simply cause, that this deity would be so powerfull, that there would exist only one religion in the world.
        Every worshiped god in the world today, is proven a big help for the worshiper, for one reason, that the worshiper are covinced, that the god really has helped to cope the day.
        And it is so regardless, the name of the god or the religion, which the deity belongs
        That’s why I do not believe in the existance of any kind of deity, humans has to worship.

        //The Judahite Hebrews and the Turkic Mongolian Jews sat down together in Babylon in 585 BC//’

        That’s impossible, unless you have some credible evidences, of the Mongolians existence in that area before AD 1200

      • The Proto-Hebrew Culture is indeed “the ancient Hebrews”. They appeared during the reign of King Solomon. The “Turkic Mongolians” is a new term I made it, no Google Translate will give you my meaning. They started raiding and invading westward since 1800 BC. Their first subgroups are Aryan Indians, Hyksos, and Bedouins (again Google translate will tell you Bedouins means Arabs). Seek assistance from someone to translate.
        “Turkic Mongolians” doesn’t mean Turks and Mongols. The first Hebrews were from Judah Tribe and sought support from “Turkic Mongolians” to defeat the other 11 tribes of Israel and passed to Yemen, Arabia, Levant and Assyria
        The Torah is the Book of Moses only and they was given and written in 1446 BC by Moses only. Moses died before 1406 BC
        Sorry, I will not answer any further questions from you that were already answered in my blog

      • Dear Erik Piculell, I really admire your sincere search for facts and opinions. Thank you very much for helping me to clarify many of my opinions put in brief.
        It would be much helpful also to reads the maps of my articles although they are impossible to use GT to turn them to Danish. But I will be happy to explain for you. Cheers bless you

      • I mean by proto-Hebrew the culture of the group of Judhite nomads who started contacting the Turkic Mongolians to fight the other 11 tribes of Israel during the life and after the death of Solomon.
        Those invented Paleo-Hebrew alphabet, Hebrew Bible, and Jews and became known as Hebrews.
        Paleo-Hebrew came 500 years after the Ge’ez original Torah and surely it wasn’t the scripts in which the Torah was written, nor the Proto-Sinaitic script or Kmtic hieroglyphs

      • The Torah was received in 1446 BC

      • It is a very objective and logical perception to believe that there is one only God and created one only Religion before even creating time and universe. This leads to a very objective opinion that there are no what are called religions.

      • The Judahite Hebrews and the Turkic Mongolian Jews sat down together in Babylon in 585 BC and concocted corrupted tales taken from different old cultures and civilizations including Zoroastrianism, Assyria, Dharma, Ge’ez, and Tengrism to invent the Hebrew Bible first orally then in writing.

    • Thanks for “Adam, Eve, and the Devil”.
      This too long tedious work could had reached the same conclusions and much more just by contemplating on our universe.
      Simply, Earth is too worthless to be considered the only living planet in the endless universe. So, making an assumption that all living beings descended from Adam is just too silly. It is like saying fossils are wrong and humans migrate like birds, and the Creator could only create a single human. and bees and whales have common ancestor.
      Do I need to dig into too much rubbish to be labeled scientific? No. thanks.

      • Erik Piculell said:

        I’m sorry to say, but I seriously doubt, that you can prove your claims of i.a. the Jews.

        The first Hebrews, was a migration of several Semitic tribes who among many others, also counts the conquerors of the lands of Canaan and Samaria, which is later settle down in the land of Israel (named after the Patriarch Jacob (son of Abraham), Jacob, who was given, the name Israel, by God (Gen 32:28)).
        And the land of Judah, the fourth son of the 12 sons of Jacob.
        The Kingdoms of Israel and Judah was under King Saul from approx 1020 BC.
        = = =
        //The Torah is the Book of Moses only and they was given and written in 1446 BC by Moses only. Moses died before 1406 BC//

        That the story the religions wants us to believe.
        The provable facts shows that’s impossible.
        Ahttp://www.kchanson.com/CHRON/isrkings.html
        The very first of them who today is called the Jews.
        The term “Jew” or “Judah” is English and from Old French juiu, via Latin from Greek Ioudaios, via Hebraic יְהוּדָ֖ה transliterated to yĕhūḏāh.
        = = =
        //11 tribes of Israel//

        Has nothing to do with the land of Israel.
        The 12 Tribes of Israel, is the sons of Israel, which is an alias for the Patriarch Jacob, which is the grandchild of Abraham.
        Jacob was named Israel by God in Gen 32:28.
        = = =
        //The Torah is the Book of Moses only and they was given and written in 1446 BC by Moses only. Moses died before 1406 BC//

        That’s exactly the story the religions wants us to believe.
        The provable facts shows that’s impossible.

      • How could I send you maps to explain my opinions?

Leaving a Comment Here Is Nice

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: