The Amorites are the Bedouins and they are not Arabs, but they learned Arabic after their conquest of southern and western Arabia and the transition and connection between the north and south of the Arabian Peninsula.
The Ugarites are neither Amorites, nor Bedouins, Sumerian, or Assyrians. They had a distinct civilization, but the Amorites overthrew it and formed among them the Mitanni and the Arameans.
The Kassites appeared and disappeared suddenly and did not leave a trace in Babylon because they were of the Bedouin Amorites, but they returned to form a colony in Babylonia after they brought down the Assyrians
Turkicmongolians were gangs of male horse raiders who came from East Asia and allied with the Amorites first as displaced groups and then as infantry mercenaries to penetrate the four directions
Turkicmongolian horsemen, along with Amorite foot soldiers, went west and invaded northern Kmt; and together they formed the Hyksos
Turkicmongolian horsemen, along with Amorite foot soldiers, went south and invaded southern and western Arabia; so they formed the Sabaeans.
Turkicmongolian horsemen, along with Amorite foot soldiers, went east and invaded the Akkadians; so they formed the Babylonian Kassites
Turkicmongolian horsemen, along with Amorite foot soldiers, went north and invaded the Ugarites in, so they formed the Arameans. And then with the Hyksos after their expulsion from Kmt in 1523 BC they formed the Mittani.
Kmtian, Assyrian, and Ugaritic monuments, and before them the Sumerian, assert that the Arabs, the Hebrews, the Jews, the Israelites, the stories of al-Tanakh, the Arabic language, and the Hebrew language, all these did not exist in the north of the Arabian Peninsula and the fertile crescent before 580 BC. Archaeology does not deny that the Arabs and the Arabic language were confined to their ancient original homeland in the southern and western coasts only.
For example, the victory inscription of the king of the Neo-Assyrian Empire “Aššur-aḫa-iddina” (Esarhaddon) of 671 BC does not mention any presence of Arabs, Jews, Hebrew, or Israelites, in any of realm of his empire. Likewise, the monuments of the 24th and 26th dynasties of Kmt show no indication of Arabs, Jews or Israelites in the regions of eastern to Kmt.
Jews, Judaism, Hebrew, and Tanakh, known as the Hebrew Torah, were inventions that occurred in 580 BC in Babylon, by an alliance made up of Turkicmongolian expelled Hyksos, who overthrew the Assyrians and occupied Babylon with their Amorite Bedouin mercenary partners, and Arameans; in addition to a small group from the Ethiopian tribe of Judah.
The group of Judah is the one that provided them with the stories of Abraham, the Israelites, Solomon, the Message of Moses, and the characters before them, as a material reformulated in the Tanakh to claim historic and religious right in the lands of Canaan; and the presence of the land of Israel and Beit-ha-Maqdash (the Holy House i.e. the Temple of Solomon) in it; as well as a claim that the Jews are Israelite, and that the Israelites had been exiled for 430 years in Kmt.
There is no doubt that Syria and Lebanon are subject to dispute and conflict between the Canaanite Ugandan civilization and the nomadic Amorite Bedouin since about three thousand five hundred years ago. This is precisely what is trying to impose nomadic Amorite Bedouin culture in the name of Arabism, the Arabic language, Bedouin Islam contradictory to and different from the Message of Muhammed to Arabs; as well as imposing Roman and Aramean Christianity, which is contradictory to and different from the Messages of Jesus and Moses to Ethiopians.
The subject here is about gangs that were the first to use the horse to invade in the 1800’s and destroyed the Scythian civilizations and the Saraswati (Sind) civilization, the Iranians and the Sumerians, and they were called the Bedouin empires, but it is wrong to call them a Bedouin civilization.
Turkicmongolians is a term that I had to make because there is no equivalent term to describe these gangs, from which other gangs emerged that invaded Sumer, the Ugarites, the Kmt, the Arabs, the Hittites, North Africa, Kerma and Punt.
The Sabaeans were made as a result of invasions and colonization by the Bedouin Amorites from the Syrian deserts. They were not Arabs at all, and genuine Arabs were their victims. Bedouin Amorites were the ones who invented false Arab genealogy with concepts of Al-Arab al-Ba’ida, “The Extinct Arabs” for the ancient Arabs.
Sabaeans claim the original pure Arabs, “Al-Arab al-Ariba”, i.e. Qahtani Arabs, for themselves in Yemen; and the Arabized Adnanites Arabs, for the tribes along the Western coast of Arabia, Northern Arabia and Iraq. Arabized Arabs were actually Qedarites which was a largely nomadic Amorite tribal confederation, not much different from the Qahtani colonizers of Arabs in Yemen.
Sabaean mythology identified Qahtan with the Yoqtan (Joktan) son of Eber (Hūd) in the Hebrew Bible. According to Amorite Bedouin claims, the Qahtanites are pure Arabs, unlike the Adnanites who are “Arabized Arabs”.
In many ways the Hyksos created the Jews; and the Bedouin Amorites created the Sabaeans, and together the Jews and Sabaeans colonized and stole the identities and history of Ethiopian Israelites and their neighbors the ancient Arabs.
Just compare these two maps to discover how much deception survived 2600 years.
My Punt-Lands Hypothesis of the interpretation of the Mosaic Torah and the history of the Children of Israel
Compare Punt-Lands Hypothesis with what the academic, religious and media institutions offer. They mention the history of the Hyksos, of whom the Jews appeared after 950 years, and affixed it to the Children of Israel who had nothing to do with the Jews. And the world believed this naive lie for 2,600 years.