My Abyssinian Hypothesis had been updated after I discovered new strong evidences, including the camel presence which was limited to the Horn of Africa.
Now, the hypothesis is called Punt Lands Hypothesis and it states that the Israelites were from Punt Lands, and not Arabs; and the Exodus was local across a river.
Jews are descendants of Turkic Mongolian Hyksos in Babylon in 580 BC and were invented in Babylon.
First Jews were Amorites bandits led by horse-riding expelled Hyksos and Kassites who used few Ethiopian Judahites to invent Jews, Judaism, Hebrew language and the Tanakh to replace the Ge’ez Torah of Mosses, and establish fake Israel and fake Jerusalem in western Amorites land.
Kush on the Nile River bears the same name of the Kassites ,Kaššu, Kassi, Kasi or Kashic who appeared in 1531 until 1155 BC in Babylon.
The light-complexion people of Arabia, the Levant, Egypt, and North and East Africa who claim to be Arabs are actually descendants of the Amorites with the Turkic Mongolian Hyksos bandits.
The light-complexion “Arabs” are the Bedouins who colonized the tanned-complexion original Arabs in the Western and Southern coasts of Arabia, who are much closer in everything to the peoples of the Horn of Africa and Kmt.
The diagram shows how Hyksos and Amorites created Kush to invade Kmt by Bedouins and Fulani (who are slaves taken from west, central and east Africa).
Just compare these two maps to discover how much deception survived 2600 years.
My Punt-Lands Hypothesis of the interpretation of the Mosaic Torah and the history of the Children of Israel
Compare Punt-Lands Hypothesis with what the academic, religious and media institutions offer. They mention the history of the Hyksos, of whom the Jews appeared after 950 years, and affixed it to the Children of Israel who had nothing to do with the Jews. And the world believed this naive lie for 2,600 years.