Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy


These are some brief conclusions I reached from analyzing the history of the Arabian Peninsula and the Fertile Crescent. Wishing to discuss them in a calm and objective manner.

The Amorites are the Bedouins and they are not Arabs, but they learned Arabic after their conquest of southern and western Arabia and the transition and connection between the north and south of the Arabian Peninsula.

The Ugarites are neither Amorites, nor Bedouins, Sumerian, or Assyrians. They had a distinct civilization, but the Amorites overthrew it and formed among them the Mitanni and the Arameans.

The Kassites appeared and disappeared suddenly and did not leave a trace in Babylon because they were of the Bedouin Amorites, but they returned to form a colony in Babylonia after they brought down the Assyrians

Turkicmongolians were gangs of male horse raiders who came from East Asia and allied with the Amorites first as displaced groups and then as infantry mercenaries to penetrate the four directions

Turkicmongolian horsemen, along with Amorite foot soldiers, went west and invaded northern Kmt; and together they formed the Hyksos

Turkicmongolian horsemen, along with Amorite foot soldiers, went south and invaded southern and western Arabia; so they formed the Sabaeans.

Turkicmongolian horsemen, along with Amorite foot soldiers, went east and invaded the Akkadians; so they formed the Babylonian Kassites

Turkicmongolian horsemen, along with Amorite foot soldiers, went north and invaded the Ugarites in, so they formed the Arameans. And then with the Hyksos after their expulsion from Kmt in 1523 BC they formed the Mittani.

Kmtian, Assyrian, and Ugaritic monuments, and before them the Sumerian, assert that the Arabs, the Hebrews, the Jews, the Israelites, the stories of al-Tanakh, the Arabic language, and the Hebrew language, all these did not exist in the north of the Arabian Peninsula and the fertile crescent before 580 BC. Archaeology does not deny that the Arabs and the Arabic language were confined to their ancient original homeland in the southern and western coasts only.

For example, the victory inscription of the king of the Neo-Assyrian Empire “Aššur-aḫa-iddina” (Esarhaddon) of 671 BC does not mention any presence of Arabs, Jews, Hebrew, or Israelites, in any of realm of his empire. Likewise, the monuments of the 24th and 26th dynasties of Kmt show no indication of Arabs, Jews or Israelites in the regions of eastern to Kmt.

Jews, Judaism, Hebrew, and Tanakh, known as the Hebrew Torah, were inventions that occurred in 580 BC in Babylon, by an alliance made up of Turkicmongolian expelled Hyksos, who overthrew the Assyrians and occupied Babylon with their Amorite Bedouin mercenary partners, and Arameans; in addition to a small group from the Ethiopian tribe of Judah.

The group of Judah is the one that provided them with the stories of Abraham, the Israelites, Solomon, the Message of Moses, and the characters before them, as a material reformulated in the Tanakh to claim historic and religious right in the lands of Canaan; and the presence of the land of Israel and Beit-ha-Maqdash (the Holy House i.e. the Temple of Solomon) in it; as well as a claim that the Jews are Israelite, and that the Israelites had been exiled for 430 years in Kmt.

There is no doubt that Syria and Lebanon are subject to dispute and conflict between the Canaanite Ugandan civilization and the nomadic Amorite Bedouin since about three thousand five hundred years ago. This is precisely what is trying to impose nomadic Amorite Bedouin culture in the name of Arabism, the Arabic language, Bedouin Islam contradictory to and different from the Message of Muhammed to Arabs; as well as imposing Roman and Aramean Christianity, which is contradictory to and different from the Messages of Jesus and Moses to Ethiopians.

The subject here is about gangs that were the first to use the horse to invade in the 1800’s and destroyed the Scythian civilizations and the Saraswati (Sind) civilization, the Iranians and the Sumerians, and they were called the Bedouin empires, but it is wrong to call them a Bedouin civilization.

Turkicmongolians is a term that I had to make because there is no equivalent term to describe these gangs, from which other gangs emerged that invaded Sumer, the Ugarites, the Kmt, the Arabs, the Hittites, North Africa, Kerma and Punt.

The Sabaeans were made as a result of invasions and colonization by the Bedouin Amorites from the Syrian deserts. They were not Arabs at all, and genuine Arabs were their victims. Bedouin Amorites were the ones who invented false Arab genealogy with concepts of Al-Arab al-Ba’ida, “The Extinct Arabs” for the ancient Arabs.

Sabaeans claim the original pure Arabs, “Al-Arab al-Ariba”, i.e. Qahtani Arabs, for themselves in Yemen; and the Arabized Adnanites Arabs, for the tribes along the Western coast of Arabia, Northern Arabia and Iraq. Arabized Arabs were actually Qedarites which was a largely nomadic Amorite tribal confederation, not much different from the Qahtani colonizers of Arabs in Yemen.

Sabaean mythology identified Qahtan with the Yoqtan (Joktan) son of Eber (Hūd) in the Hebrew Bible. According to Amorite Bedouin claims, the Qahtanites are pure Arabs, unlike the Adnanites who are “Arabized Arabs”.

In many ways the Hyksos created the Jews; and the Bedouin Amorites created the Sabaeans, and together the Jews and Sabaeans colonized and stole the identities and history of Ethiopian Israelites and their neighbors the ancient Arabs.

Just compare these two maps to discover how much deception survived 2600 years.
My Punt-Lands Hypothesis of the interpretation of the Mosaic Torah and the history of the Children of Israel

Compare Punt-Lands Hypothesis with what the academic, religious and media institutions offer. They mention the history of the Hyksos, of whom the Jews appeared after 950 years, and affixed it to the Children of Israel who had nothing to do with the Jews. And the world believed this naive lie for 2,600 years.

Comments on: "Relationships between Amorites and Hyksos with the Invention of Jews" (4)

  1. Your Conscience said:

    You’re a vile, disgusting piece of trash and you should sort out the genocide and systematic rape in your own country before leveling accusations and insults against Jewish people and others. Good luck on your journey.

    • The Akkadian Joint Origin of Hyksos and Jews Hypothesis
      It is highly likely that the first Akkadians were Turkic Mongolian horsemen bandits, from Alti Mountains and Tarim region in East Asia, who after invading south Caucasus mixed with Armenian and Hurrian and took them as foot soldiers and slaves. The Akkadians defeated and ruled Sumer from 2334 to 2154 BC.
      The defeated Akkadians in Sumer with their Armenians and Hurrians fled west and stayed for long time mixing with the Amorites. The expelled horsemen with their subjects had had learned the wheel and chariots from Sumer; and they planned new attacks on Kmt.
      These bandits was called Hyksos in Kmt but were the same Akkadians in Sumer 700 years earlier. They occupied north Kmt in 1630 BC. After King Ahmose I defeated them and liberated Kmt, they went east and invaded Sumer once again forming the Kassites; and another group of them defeated the Ugarit and formed the Mitanni in 1500 BC.
      But the Kassites and Mittani were defeated by the Assyrians with support from Kmt in 1300 BC. After expelling them, the Akkadian-Hyksos remnants continued to weaken the Assyrians until they defeated and overthrew them in 605 BC at the Battle of Carchemish and established Neo- Babylonian. The same mixture that created the Akkadians and the Hyksos finally invented Jews and Judaism in Babylon in 580 BC using mixed Sumerian and Ethiopian traditions and legends.
      The Amorite origin of the Bedouins is nothing but the Aperu or the Hebrews. It is evident in the well-known Khaybar town some 153 km to the north of Medina (ancient Yathrib) in the Hejaz, Saudi Arabia. This oasis fortress town had been inhabited by Jewish tribes. It was the home of the Amorite Bedouins and their Jewish partners who are the Turkic Mongolian horsemen with their Armenian and Hurrian mercenaries from the lost Akkadian Empire.

    • @ Your Conscience: It is always folks like you that wish to suppress research and findings that you do not like. Tarig is a good man, and all you can do is resort to childish name calling.

  2. What is certain is that bandits of horsemen came from east Asia and established relationships or forced the peoples from the highlands south of the Caucasus and formed invading groups that led to the creation of the Akkadian Empire. And this how the Hyksos; Bedouins and the Jews were formed during the next 1800 years.
    This region provided the second component of the Akkadians; Hyksos; Bedouins and Jews

Leaving a Comment Here Is Nice

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: