Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy

Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

Discover the Global Turkic Connection


Discover the Global Turkic Connection

Discover the Global Turkic Connection

This subject is so shockingly real and revealing to the extent that it is being deliberately hidden and suppressed over the internet and in the conventional mainstream academia and media.

Watch out for the Turkic Connection! To find out the true sources of slavery, NWO, counterfeited religions, and terrorism we have to go deeper than and depart the conventional mainstream academia, perceptions, and media.
In my opinion it is all about covering up and expanding the Turkic connection and Turanians.
1- Turkic Anatolia, (fake Caucasians),
2- Turkic Persia, (fake Shia Iranians),
3- Turkic Zionists (fake Jewish Israelite),
4- Turkic rulers of Arabia, (fake Muslim Arabs)
5- Turkic Indians (fake Hindu Aryans), and
6- Turkic Europeans (fake liberal Christians)

Most monarchies, bankers, and politicians in Europe and USA are of their making since the so-called English, French, American, and Russian “Revolutions”. These Turkic groups committed all sorts of crimes in Asia, Europe, Levant, Arabia, and Africa.

With just a little of common sense and investigation people can easily find the real historic Turkic connections between them beneath their deceptive mutual hostilities and malignant policies.

Watch out for the Turkic Connection!


Indo European Turkic connections

Indo European Turkic connections

Watch out for the Turkic Connection! To find out the true sources of slavery, NWO, counterfeited religions, and terrorism we have to go deeper than and depart the conventional mainstream academia, perceptions, and media.
In my opinion it is all about covering up and expanding the Turkic connection and Turanians.
1- Turkic Anatolia, (fake Caucasians),
2- Turkic Persia, (fake Shia Iranians),
3- Turkic Zionists (fake Jewish Israelite),
4- Turkic rulers of Arabia, (fake Muslim Arabs)
5- Turkic Indians (fake Hindu Aryans), and
6- Turkic Europeans (fake liberal Christians)

Most monarchies, bankers, and politicians in Europe and USA are of their making since the so-called English, French, American, and Russian “Revolutions”. These Turkic groups committed all sorts of crimes in Asia, Europe, Levant, Arabia, and Africa.

With just a little of common sense and investigation people can easily find the real historic Turkic connections between them beneath their deceptive mutual hostilities and malignant policies.

 

Aryans in India are not Aryans but Turkic


Aryans in India are not Aryans but Turkic

Aryans in India are not Aryans but Turkic

The so-called “Aryans” in India are not really Aryans, they just invaded and briefly settled in Aryan homelands before invading India.
They resemble the so-called “Arabs” in Africa, also invaded and briefly settled in Arabian homelands before invading Africa.
These fake “Aryans” and fake “Arabs” are Turkic nomads and invaders.

Global Forces of Terrorism


The Agenda of Pan-Turkism is Clear: To Distort Reality & to Effectuate the Takeover of Land. (Note: The Caspian Sea is called the "Khazar" Sea.)

The Agenda of Pan-Turkism is Clear: To Distort Reality & to Effectuate the Takeover of Land. (Note: The Caspian Sea is called the “Khazar” Sea.)

To find out the true sources of slavery, NWO, and terrorism we have to go deeper than the conventional mainstream academia and media. Belly dance, harem, FGM, homosexuality, bestiality, assassination, piracy, torture, terrorism, and usury are all Turkic practices.

The world must notice that only some countries are struck by rebels and mercenaries aka Jihadists.
These countries do not fall under any of the four Turkic forms:
1- Turkic Anatolia,
2- Turkic Persia, (fake Iranians),
3- Turkic fake Israelite (Jews),
4- Turkic rulers of Arabia, (fake Muslims)
5- Turkic Indians (fake Hindu Aryans), and
6- Turkic Europeans (fake liberal Christians)

Syria, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, and Yemen are good examples.
Once you submit to one of these 4 forms of Turkic evil you are no longer under attack.
Lebanon, Jordon, and Azerbaijan are also good examples.

The Ashkenazim and Sephardi are not Israelite, but with the Ottomans invented Zionism. Now, only pointing to them considered Antisemitism, although they are not Semites at all.
Those are the enemies of Hitler and the Nazis. And before them were the enemies of Alexander the Great.

East Europe, the Balkans, the Caucasus, Anatolia, Iran, India, and central Asia were heavily enslaved long before Islam and Arabs. This was done by Turkic groups. The term “Slaves” was derived from “Sloven” then “Slavs”. The Arabs were Turkified and ruled by Turkic nomads before Moses. So, Arab slavery of Africa never existed. The genuine Arabs never left Arabia, and those who are called “Arabs” in Africa are not Arabs but Turkic settlers and invaders who moved to Africa from Arabia. Arab colonization and islamization are Turkic policies, they have nothing to do with Arabs and with Islam.

Even the transatlantic slavery was not done by Europeans or Arabs, they were Turkic businesses as it was in Andalusia (Iberia). The terms “Islamic” and “Eastern” were used as covers for the Turkic atrocities everywhere until now. They are not Islamic nor Arabic. They are Turkic.
Hitler and the Nazis were not Anti-Semitists but were actually Anti-Pan-Turanism.

Turkic Zionists are aware that the region is too small for their ambitions. They left this region for their Turkic rulers of Arabia for “Pan-Arab” empire is up to Morocco. The Turkic Zionists are only after the deep vast lands of Russia, this is the second Turkic empire of “Greater Israel”. While the third Turkic empire is left for the Turkic Anatolians to expand from Hungary to the borders with India and China and create “Pan-Tauran” empire. There is no overlaps or competition between Turkic Zionists, Turkic rulers of Arabia, and Turkic Anatolians. On the contrary, they are assisting each other to establish their own empire.

Parisians are Turks

Parisians are Turks

Islam during prophet Mohamed b. (622-632 AD) was not beyond the main Arabian Peninsula. But during the first three Caliphs, Abu Bakr (632-634), and Umar (634-644) (Assassinated), Uthman (644-656) (Assassinated) it went into invasions.

That was totally unacceptable to many believers but the Turkic elements encouraged such offensive military expansions.

The fourth Caliph Ali (656-661) (Assassinated) was the cousin of the prophet and he stopped that and carried out internal reforms and these were the main causes for the eruption of a brutal civil war throughout his rule (656-661) that ended up by assassinating him and killing most of this family.

By these killings the original Islam died upon birth and it was replaced by a fake Turkic militant cult calling itself Islam. This became the source of terrorism, colonialism, and heresy.

Turkic groups fought Zoroastrianism before the time of Moses and they used twisted Zoroastrianism to create their Turkic versions for the teachings of Zoroaster, Moses, Yeshua, and Mohamed. By these they invented the new “universal” imperial religions: Persian Zoroastrianism, Jewish Judaism, Roman Christianity, and Turkic Islam.

Those Turkic Turanians have different networks and forms, among them: 1- Turkic in Anatolia, 2- Turkic Khazar Jews (fake Israelite), 3- Turkic Persians (since the Achaemenid 550 BC), and 4- Turkic rulers of Arabia (following the death of Islam), plus Turkic Indians (fake Hindu Aryans), and Turkic Europeans (fake liberal Christians).

Most monarchies, bankers, and politicians in Europe are their making since the so-called English, French, American, and Russian “Revolutions”. These Turkic groups committed all sorts of crimes in Asia, Europe, Levant, Arabia, and Africa.

The Sources of Terrorism


Parisians are Turks

Parisians are Turks

To find out the true sources of slavery, NWO, and terrorism we have to go deeper than the conventional mainstream academia and media. Belly dance, harem, FGM, homosexuality, bestiality, assassination, piracy, torture, terrorism, and usury are all Turkic practices.

The world must notice that only some countries are struck by rebels and mercenaries aka Jihadists.
These countries do not fall under any of the four Turkic forms:
1- Turkic Anatolia,
2- Turkic Persia, (fake Iranians),
3- Turkic fake Israelite (Jews),
4- Turkic rulers of Arabia, (fake Muslims)
5- Turkic Indians (fake Hindu Aryans), and
6- Turkic Europeans (fake liberal Christians)

Syria, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, and Yemen are good examples.
Once you submit to one of these 4 forms of Turkic evil you are no longer under attack.
Lebanon, Jordon, and Azerbaijan are also good examples.

The Ashkenazim and Sephardi are not Israelite, but with the Ottomans invented Zionism. Now, only pointing to them considered Antisemitism, although they are not Semites at all.
Those are the enemies of Hitler and the Nazis. And before them were the enemies of Alexander the Great.

East Europe, the Balkans, the Caucasus, Anatolia, Iran, India, and central Asia were heavily enslaved long before Islam and Arabs. This was done by Turkic groups. The term “Slaves” was derived from “Sloven” then “Slavs”. The Arabs were Turkified and ruled by Turkic nomads before Moses. So, Arab slavery of Africa never existed. The genuine Arabs never left Arabia, and those who are called “Arabs” in Africa are not Arabs but Turkic settlers and invaders who moved to Africa from Arabia. Arab colonization and islamization are Turkic policies, they have nothing to do with Arabs and with Islam.

Even the transatlantic slavery was not done by Europeans or Arabs, they were Turkic businesses as it was in Andalusia (Iberia). The terms “Islamic” and “Eastern” were used as covers for the Turkic atrocities everywhere until now. They are not Islamic nor Arabic. They are Turkic.
Hitler and the Nazis were not Anti-Semitists but were actually Anti-Pan-Turanism.

Turkic Zionists are aware that the region is too small for their ambitions. They left this region for their Turkic rulers of Arabia for “Pan-Arab” empire is up to Morocco. The Turkic Zionists are only after the deep vast lands of Russia, this is the second Turkic empire of “Greater Israel”. While the third Turkic empire is left for the Turkic Anatolians to expand from Hungary to the borders with India and China and create “Pan-Tauran” empire. There is no overlaps or competition between Turkic Zionists, Turkic rulers of Arabia, and Turkic Anatolians. On the contrary, they are assisting each other to establish their own empire.

The Agenda of Pan-Turkism is Clear: To Distort Reality & to Effectuate the Takeover of Land. (Note: The Caspian Sea is called the

The Agenda of Pan-Turkism is Clear: To Distort Reality & to Effectuate the Takeover of Land. (Note: The Caspian Sea is called the “Khazar” Sea.)

Islam during prophet Mohamed b. (622-632 AD) was not beyond the main Arabian Peninsula. But during the first three Caliphs, Abu Bakr (632-634), and Umar (634-644)(Assassinated), Uthman (644-656)(Assassinated) it went into invasions.

That was totally unacceptable to many believers but the Turkic elements encouraged such offensive military expansions.

The fourth Caliph Ali (656-661) (Assassinated) was the cousin of the prophet and he stopped that and carried out internal reforms and these were the main causes for the eruption of a brutal civil war throughout his rule (656-661) that ended up by assassinating him and killing most of this family.

By these killings the original Islam died upon birth and it was replaced by a fake Turkic militant cult calling itself Islam. This became the source of terrorism, colonialism, and heresy.

Turkic groups fought Zoroastrianism before the time of Moses and they used twisted Zoroastrianism to create their Turkic versions for the teachings of Zoroaster, Moses, Yeshua, and Mohamed. By these they invented the new “universal” imperial religions: Persian Zoroastrianism, Jewish Judaism, Roman Christianity, and Turkic Islam.

Those Turkic Turanians have different networks and forms, among them: 1- Turkic in Anatolia, 2- Turkic Khazar Jews (fake Israelite), 3- Turkic Persians (since the Achaemenid 550 BC), and 4- Turkic rulers of Arabia (following the death of Islam), plus Turkic Indians (fake Hindu Aryans), and Turkic Europeans (fake liberal Christians).

Most monarchies, bankers, and politicians in Europe are their making since the so-called English, French, American, and Russian “Revolutions”. These Turkic groups committed all sorts of crimes in Asia, Europe, Levant, Arabia, and Africa.

Liberation NOT Separation, Stop the Turkification of Iranians


The Agenda of Pan-Turkism is Clear: To Distort Reality & to Effectuate the Takeover of Land. (Note: The Caspian Sea is called the "Khazar" Sea.)

The Agenda of Pan-Turkism is Clear: To Distort Reality & to Effectuate the Takeover of Land. (Note: The Caspian Sea is called the “Khazar” Sea.)

Russia must stop the Turkification of Iranians, and return Iran to Iranians. Russia must stop the Turkification of the Caucasus, and return it to Caucasians.

Why did the Azeri people shift from speaking a Northwestern Iranian language to the Turkic language we all know today?
Azeri was the dominant language in Azerbaijan before it was replaced by Azerbaijani, which is a Turkic language.
This language was known as Old Azeri or Azari and had affinities to the Talysh languages that are spoken nearby. Many linguistic islets are said to persist into the 19th Century while certain Iranian dialects that is still spoken in the area is said to be descendants of the former language.
Āḏarī (Ar. al-āḏarīya) was the Iranian language of Azerbaijan before the spread of the Turkish language, commonly called Azeri, in the region.
Turkic Languages do not originally belong to west of Caspian Sea but central Asia. People of west Turkey and northwest of Iran and Azerbaijan countries (roughly Anatolian plateau) were once speakers of Iranian, European, Semitic, Caucasian, Slavic and some other Languages. Some of them first abandoned their native languages in favor of Greek due to Hellenization.

The process you seek is called Turkification and it began with Turkic Migration from central Asia to Middle-east and Europe. Circa 11th century, war with Turks began and led to deaths of many natives, while others were enslaved and removed. As areas became depopulated, Turkic nomads moved in.

Later in Ottoman era there happened Armenian Genocide, Greek Genocide and Assyrian Genocide due to Turkification. Many were compelled but later some chose Turkish willingly because it became the predominant language and lingua franca of the area.

Most academics view the linguistic Turkification of predominantly non-Turkic-speaking indigenous peoples and assimilation of small bands of Turkic tribes as the most likely origin for the Azerbaijani people.
The Turkic Azerbaijani language only began replacing the Iranian Old Azeri language with the advent of rule of the Safavid dynasty, when hundreds of thousands of Qizilbash Turkic peoples from Anatolia arrived into Azerbaijan, being forced out by the Ottoman Sultan Selim I with more to follow. Earlier, many Turkic speaking nomads had chosen the green pastures of Azerbaijan, Aran and Shrivan for their settlement as early as the advent of the Seljuq dynasty. However, they only filled in the pasturelands while the farmlands, villages and the cities remained Iranian in language and culture. The linguistic conversion of Azerbaijan went hand in hand with the conversion of the Azeris to Twelver Shia Islam. By the late 1800s, the Turkification of Azerbaijan was near completion, with Iranian speakers found solely in tiny isolated recesses of the mountains or other remote areas (such as Harzand, Galin Ghuya, Shahrud villages in Khalkhal and Anarjan).

Turkic Speakers Join Forces in Iran’s Parliament


Masoud Pezeshkian, the deputy speaker of parliament and leader of its newly formed Turkic-speaking faction, presides over a legislative session in Tehran, Iran, in this photo posted on Twitter on June 6, 2016. (photo by Twitter/@RZimmt)

Masoud Pezeshkian, the deputy speaker of parliament and leader of its newly formed Turkic-speaking faction, presides over a legislative session in Tehran, Iran, in this photo posted on Twitter on June 6, 2016. (photo by Twitter/@RZimmt)

The unprecedented formation of a cross-factional parliamentary group of Turkic speakers stirs controversy in Iran.

This move indicates the truth of many disputed facts about the Turkification of Iran and the Turkic origins of Persians:

1- Shiism, Sunnism, and Sufism ore just various rival forms of Turkic Islam and all of them are Turkic tool to rule over the Iranians, Arabs, Levant, India, Asia, and Africa.

2- The Turkification of the Iranian people passed through at least three phases:

A. The First Phase: was carried out by Turkic invaders, migrants, and settlers that led to the establishment of the Achaemenid Empire and the invention of Persian stock and Persian Zoroastrianism starting from 550 BC.

B. The Second Phase: was done by the Safavid Dynasty which violently imposed Shiism on Iran and turned the Iranians from Sunnis to Twelvers Shiat by force starting from 1501 AD.

C. The Third Phase: is an on going process that started by restoring the original name “Iran” in 1935 by Reza Shah Pahlavi to replace the imposed name “Persia” without restoring the Iranian identity of Iranians, who are still considered ethnically “Persians”, while they only speak Persian. This developing phase is aiming to erase the Iranian ancient indigenous national identity, and specially the Kurds who could lead the revival of other native Iranian groups.

The recent move by Turkic parliamentarians could push the Iranians to stand up against the processes of Turkification and Persianisation of Iran.

Iranian “Islamic” Parliament and the Supreme Leader of Iran are conspicuously silent towards the past and present Turkification of Iranians and the falsification of their identity, history and cultures.

This change in Iran’s parliament is also much related to the Turkish arms flexing in Syria and Iraq, together with the new constitutional amendments in Turkey which soon shall give the president sweeping new powers and controls over the executive, legislative and judiciary. This is a plan for a regional war in preparation that could turn into global war.

Al-Monitor published the following article on , written by Saeid Jafari.

(Al-Monitor is a media site launched in February 2012 by the Arab American entrepreneur Jamal Daniel and based in Washington, DC.)

[For the first time in the history of the Islamic Republic, Turkic-speaking lawmakers have formed a bloc in the Iranian parliament. The Faction of Turkic Regions was formed in late October. It has been reported to have 100 members in the 290-seat parliament and is led by Masoud Pezeshkian, who represents the northwestern city of Tabriz and who served as minister of health (2001-2005) under Reformist President Mohammad Khatami.

Controversy has surrounded the formation of this faction since its inception. This has mainly had to do with the stated number of its members. Iran’s election law grants each province a certain number of lawmakers based on its population. In this vein, the main Turkic-speaking provinces and their respective number of members of parliament include West Azerbaijan with 12 parliamentarians, East Azerbaijan with 19, Ardebil with seven and Zanjan with five. Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province as well as the provinces of Gilan and Fars also have Turkic-speaking populations, but the origins and history of these Turkic-speakers are very different from those who reside in the northwest of Iran. While ethnic Persians constitute a slight majority of Iranians, Turkic speakers make up a sizable minority.

Based on these figures, one would expect the newly formed Turkic-speaking faction to have no more than 43 members. So how is it that it counts 100 lawmakers among its members? Zahra Sai, a Tabriz member of parliament and spokeswoman for the faction, has said, “Lawmakers who speak Turkic but are from other cities have also joined the faction.” This is while a member of the group’s board of directors told Al-Monitor on condition of anonymity, “There are really 60 lawmakers in this faction. However, when the news [of the formation of the group] was being transmitted to media outlets, one group member put the figure at around 100 and so this number began circulating in the media.”

One key question is what precisely this faction seeks to achieve. In an interview with ISNA news agency Nov. 6, Pezeshkian, who also serves as deputy speaker, said, “This faction hasn’t done anything in particular yet. Unfortunately, however, some are [already] trying to divert public opinion [about its objectives]. The goal was to have Turkic-speaking MPs come together and pursue their demands of the government within the framework of the law.”

Critics, however, see the emergence of the faction as a threat to Iran’s national unity, saying that it highlights ethnocentrism. Responding to this, Pezeshkian told ISNA, “This should not happen. We are defending the law, and the government should give everyone the right to act within the framework of the law. No one has the right to do anything against the law. Public opinion should not be twisted in a way as to give certain individuals pretexts for making lawful opportunities seem like threats.”

Still, it appears that some experts on ethnicity, and especially Azeri-speaking ones, do not have favorable opinions about the formation of such a faction. Many in East Azerbaijan and West Azerbaijan provinces and elsewhere speak Azeri, which is a Turkic language. In an editorial published in Shargh newspaper Dec. 6, Nouraldin Gharavi, former governor of East Azerbaijan province, criticized the very idea of such a group and said, “Parliament Speaker Mr. [Ali] Larijani and other [parliament members] are aware that this is a dangerous innovation that goes against the constitution. Negligence in this area will have bitter consequences for everyone down the line.”

But is the formation of parliamentary factions along ethnic lines really something new in Iran? In his book “Iran Between Two Revolutions,” prominent historian Ervand Abrahamian writes that the only time such a development has previously occurred was in February 1944. According to Abrahamian, nomadic tribes formed a parliamentary group called The Faction of Democrats and began pursuing their own tribal demands. Of note, this faction was formed following the suppression of nomads and tribes by former rulers Reza Shah Pahlavi (1925-1941) and his successor and son, Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi (1941-1979).

Salar Seifoddini, an Azeri researcher who focuses on ethnicity, told Al-Monitor, “The Azeri-speaking [Turkic] faction, which a group of Iranian [parliament members] is insisting on solely for electoral purposes as well as political and personal gains, is a rare occurrence in other parts of the world. It is clearly not only against the constitution but also a new and dangerous innovation for creating divisions among the different ethnicities in Iran. I think those who came up with such an idea are more than anything after their own personal gain and want to pull in the public [in the mix] for [the purpose of winning] their own election races.”

Mojtaba Maghsoudi, a professor of political science at Tehran’s Azad University and a researcher on ethnicity, told Al-Monitor, “In democracies, factions are representative of parliamentary parties. In Iran, however, and in the case of the Azeri-speaking faction, it is the opposite. … The faction presents its own partisan demands. In developed societies, however, it is parties [based on political agendas] who form factions in parliament.”

Indeed, the new Turkic-speaking parliamentary faction notably features a collection of rival political forces. For instance, Pezeshkian, who is leading the group, entered parliament through the moderate-Reformist “List of Hope.” This is while Nader Qazipour, the deputy head of the faction and a member of parliament from Urmia, belongs to the hard-line end of the Principlist movement.

Maghsoudi, who is also the head of Iran’s Association for Peace Studies, told Al-Monitor, “The most important function of parliaments in all political establishments is to deal with national issues. With the Turkic-speaking faction, it is the complete opposite and we are seeing a section of the parliament being involved in ethnic matters instead of dealing with citizens’ rights. Such a trend is an indication of the poor performance of the parliamentary system in Iran and is considered a detour from the main path and duties of this important body.”

So far, there have been very few reactions by top officials regarding the formation of the Turkic-speaking parliamentary faction. On Nov. 27, Ali Younesi, the presidential adviser on ethnic and religious minority affairs, voiced his opposition to the formation of such a faction and stressed that ethnic divisions should not be allowed to intensify through the formation of such groups. Mansour Haghighatpour, a Turkic-speaking former member of parliament for Ardebil and current adviser to Larijani, has also voiced his opposition to the initiative. Yet there does not seem to be a consensus among government officials over the matter of the emergence of the group and whether or how to respond to it. ]

%d bloggers like this: