Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy

Posts tagged ‘Abyssinia’

The Great Role of Abyssinia in Liberating the Region


The great Role of Abyssinia in Liberating the Region

The great Role of Abyssinia in Liberating the Region

Important Update Notice on 24 July 2018: I have updated my Abyssinian Hypothesis  after discovering the that single-hump camel (The dromedary) was unknown in Arabia, Aram, Assyria, and Kemet before 950 BC, while in abundance in the land of Punt.

This led to make the following major changes:
1- The proposed origin of Israelite from being Arabic-speaking Arab Yemenis to Ge’ez-speaking African Puntite;
2- Rename the Abyssinian Hypothesis to the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis;
3- The Turkic Mongolian colonizers and rulers of Neo-Babylonia invited elders from the House of Israel to Babylonia in around 580 BC in what is called the Babylonian Exile to help the create Judaism and colonize Aramaic land in 530 BC;
4- The Hebrew Language and the Hebrew Israelite are products of admixture between Ge’ez Israelite, Turkic Mongolian Persians, and colonized Aramaic. They existed only after 530 C; and
5- The Lost Sheep of the House of Israel are those Israelite who  left the land of Punt and decided to collaborate with Turkic Mongolians to invent Judaism and colonize Aramaic lands; and turned into Hebrew Israelite.

Therefore, the Israelite Exodus of 1446 BC was only within Punt, from one region to another. The Jews are not Israelite at all; and the name Judah was just used deceptively to relate the Jews to the Israelite. The Israelite were scattered all over the world and they no longer exist as a nation or a tribe.

For more details on the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis read the following three articles:
1- How Persians Cooked a Cult and Called it Judaism Part 1
2- The Turkic Mongolian-African Israelite Joint-ventures
3- Jesus Pointing to “The Lost Sheep of the house of Israel” and “the Gentiles”
[End of notice]

The Abyssinians (Habesha), the descendants of Punt, put an end to the Turkic Mongolian colony of D’mt (c. 980 BC–c. 400 BC) and liberated their lands in 400 BC.

Then also stopped the Turkic Mongolian colony of Kush in 350 AD and saved the people of present day Sudan.

The Abyssinian struggles against foreign colonization in the region ended with the overthrow of the murderous kingdom of Ḥimyar (110 BC–525 AD) in 525 AD, the heir to the Sabaean Kingdom (between 1200 and 800 BC to 275 AD) which was a Turkic Mongolian pretender of biblical Sheba.

It is truly regrettable and damaging to find unjustified aggrandizement for the kingdom of Kush, which is meant to obliterate the original history and civilization in Sudan that is the civilization of Kerma, which built the first foundation and lasted for more than 2,000 years.

This is seen in false allegations of mentioning Kush in sites dates back to Kemt’s Middle Kingdom era, but that is impossible to be because Kush (c 785 BC–c AD 350) was not yet made at that time.

The honorable and great roles played by Abyssinia in maintaining peace, justice, and prosperity in the region are indeed great examples of humility and fairness. Thanks Habesha!

[Note: The Turkic Mongolian groups who devastated all the Middle East, India, Europe, and Africa are originally from Western Mongolia, East Kazakhstan Region and the Uyghurs of Xinjiang in China. They are of Mongolian and Turkic speaking groups from the Altaic Family. They are the creators of Persians, Jews, Turks, Romans, yellow Indians, Gypsies, Bedouins, and Arabized Turkic rulers and wealthy in Arabia and Africa]

Eritrea is Just the Turkified Part of Abyssinia


History tells that Eritrea is not an old nation or a state; but it is only a new formation.

Eritrea is just the Turkified population and part of Abyssinia. Discovering and exposing the real collapse that happened shall bring back the coastal regions and its population to its Abyssinian origin and shall reunite Abyssinia.

I will try to research and write on this subject soon. I hope you could translate and post the following article written in Arabic “Explaining the contradiction between Ethiopia’s neutral position and Eritrea’s pro-coalition stance against Yemen” before I get the time to do it: تفسير التناقض بين موقف اثيوبيا المحايد و موقف اريتريا الموالي للتحالف ضد اليمن

It seems that this contradiction and difference is due to ethnic and historical political reasons implicated in the past.

Ethiopia represents Abyssinia and ancient Abyssinian relations with the original Arabs. While Eritrea is part of the history and the presence of the Turkic Mongolian groups, including the Jews, the Arabized Turkic Bedouins, and Sabaeans and they are in contrast to the original Arabs and the true history of Yemen

For sure the motives were trading posts, slaves, and gold. That is why Eritrea has very low population density, mineral deposits, and military bases.  Eritrea was depopulated by Turkic Mongolian slavery very long ago.

And it was used to tamper with the sensitive history and security of both Yemen and Abyssinia so as to conceal the true history of Israelite and their refuge in Africa in 1876 BC until their Exodus in 1446 BC.

This history if proved and revealed shall destroy the legitimacy of the Old Testament, the Jews, and the present state of Israel, plus the Judaeo-Christianity and Roman Catholicism.

%d bloggers like this: