Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy

Posts tagged ‘Arab’

What is Islam and How it Relates to Mohamed, Yeshua, and Moses?


What is Islam and How it Relates to Mohamed, Yeshua, and Moses

What is Islam and How it Relates to Mohamed, Yeshua, and Moses

Original Christianity is a revival of the religion of Abraham and Moses and these were sent to the Israelite only. While Islam has two different definitions; the correct one describes Islam as the single original religion existed even before creation. The common and wrong definition considers Islam as a new religion on its own and started with prophet Mohamed only.

The teachings of Mohamed was supposed to put law/code for his people and his region only; but also it is a part of the bigger single universal religion. The original teachings of prophet and messenger Mohamed were hijacked by Turkic Mongolians soon after his death, in the same way they hijacked those of Moses and Jesus (Yeshua).

So, the Turkic Islam of today is neither genuine Islam nor the teachings of Mohamed. To distinguish between the original and the present versions I personally call them “Mosesianity”, “Jesusianity”, and “Mohamedianity”.

True Islam distinguishes between prophets (revive existing law) and messengers (bring distinct law). Every messenger is a prophet, while not every prophet is a messenger. And it states clearly that God sent to each nation its own messenger and law. This leads to a conclusion that Mohamed was a prophet to the universe; and at the same time a messenger to the Arabs only.

Islam describes all genuine messengers and prophets as Muslims, including Adam, Enoch, Abraham, all Israelite prophets, and even many unnamed foreign ones (Ghafir 40:78) and (An-Nisa 4:164). Therefore, true Islam is a single universal religion with a multitude of distinct national laws for each distinct nation. The national laws are mistakenly considered as distinct and conflicting religions.

The Afar people, since they are part of the Israelite in my opinion, are supposed to follow the genuine teachings of Jesus and Moses which is a single part of genuine Islam but with two books/codes not Turkic Islam, not common Christianity; and not Judaism. Since the Hebrew Israelite in Aramaic land became a different nation in contract with the Ge’ez Israelite in Punt they needed a messenger, and not just a prophet.

Islamic holy books are the texts authored by Allah via various messengers, while prophets received no books. The books mentioned in the holy Quran are: Tawrat or Torah; Zabur (often interpreted as being the Book of Psalms); Injil or Gospel; Scrolls of Abraham (Ṣuḥuf Ibrāhīm); Book of John the Baptist (Kitāb Yaḥyā); and Scrolls of Moses (Ṣuḥuf Mūsā). The number messengers and their holy books are not specified.

Islam states clearly that many prophets existed, including many not mentioned in the Quran. The Quran itself refers to at least four other prophets but does not name them. One less-than-sound hadith states there have been 124,000 prophets approx., while another scholarly source states that “their exact numbers are not known with any kind of certainty.”

Advertisements

One Universal Faith and a Multitude of Local Religions


One Universal Faith and a Multitude of Local Religions

One Universal Faith and a Multitude of Local Religions

I faithfully believe in God; but I don’t believe in any national, international, global, or universal religion.

Jesus was sent to the lost sheep of the House of Israel (i.e. to the Hebrew Israelite) only.

One Universal Faith and a multitude of local religions is the right path.

Never think we are alone in this endless universe.

And never think we should or could preach any religion to other planets, or even other nations.

Queen Sheba of Abyssinia is not Sabaean from Yemen


Important Update Notice on 24 July 2018: I have updated my Abyssinian Hypothesis  after discovering the that single-hump camel (The dromedary) was unknown in Arabia, Aram, Assyria, and Kemet before 950 BC, while in abundance in the land of Punt.

This led to make the following major changes:
1- The proposed origin of Israelite from being Arabic-speaking Arab Yemenis to Ge’ez-speaking African Puntite;
2- Rename the Abyssinian Hypothesis to the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis;
3- The Turkic Mongolian colonizers and rulers of Neo-Babylonia invited elders from the House of Israel to Babylonia in around 580 BC in what is called the Babylonian Exile to help the create Judaism and colonize Aramaic land in 530 BC;
4- The Hebrew Language and the Hebrew Israelite are products of admixture between Ge’ez Israelite, Turkic Mongolian Persians, and colonized Aramaic. They existed only after 530 C; and
5- The Lost Sheep of the House of Israel are those Israelite who  left the land of Punt and decided to collaborate with Turkic Mongolians to invent Judaism and colonize Aramaic lands; and turned into Hebrew Israelite.

Therefore, the Israelite Exodus of 1446 BC was only within Punt, from one region to another. The Jews are not Israelite at all; and the name Judah was just used deceptively to relate the Jews to the Israelite. The Israelite were scattered all over the world and they no longer exist as a nation or a tribe.

For more details on the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis read the following three articles:
1- How Persians Cooked a Cult and Called it Judaism Part 1
2- The Turkic Mongolian-African Israelite Joint-ventures
3- Jesus Pointing to “The Lost Sheep of the house of Israel” and “the Gentiles”
[End of notice]

The old and existing associates of Sabaeans (or Sabeans) and Ḥimyarite are descendants of a Turkic Mongolian gangster nicknamed Saba’a (means captor or slaver who claim to be Sun worshiper Saba’a ibn Yishgub bin Yarub bin Qahtan). They were and are the remnants of Turkic Mongolian looters and colonizers, together with their slaves and collaborators.

After their destruction and erasing the long ancient history of Yemen and Arabs which existed until their invasion of Yemen they invented and imposed fake history made up by Persians, Romans and Jews.

The new history gave them an Arab origin and claimed that the Arabs before them became extinct. The invented history is still hostile to genuine Arabs, Israelite, and Yemenis.

They are also malicious towards the civilizations of Abyssinia, Kemet (ancient Egypt), Kerma (ancient Nubia), and all other Africans.

One of the biggest frauds in history was made by confusing and blurring the history of the Abyssinian Queen Sheba and the Hebrew King Solomon with that criminal regimes of Sabaeans (or Sabeans) and Ḥimyarite.

Certainly, the Abyssinian Kingdom of Sheba is totally different from the regime of Turkic Mongolian Sabaeans.

The Old Testament does not mention the founding person of the Sabaeans (or Sabeans) and whether they were in Yemen or Abyssinia. It does not help in resolving the confusion between Saba’a and Sheba.

 

Abyssinian Hypothesis New Interpretation of Bible History


Abyssinian Hypothesis on Israelite, Hebrew, Jewish History – New Interpretation of Bible History

Important Update Notice on 24 July 2018: I have updated my Abyssinian Hypothesis  after discovering the that single-hump camel (The dromedary) was unknown in Arabia, Aram, Assyria, and Kemet before 950 BC, while in abundance in the land of Punt.

This led to make the following major changes:
1- The proposed origin of Israelite from being Arabic-speaking Arab Yemenis to Ge’ez-speaking African Puntite;
2- Rename the Abyssinian Hypothesis to the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis;
3- The Turkic Mongolian colonizers and rulers of Neo-Babylonia invited elders from the House of Israel to Babylonia in around 580 BC in what is called the Babylonian Exile to help the create Judaism and colonize Aramaic land in 530 BC;
4- The Hebrew Language and the Hebrew Israelite are products of admixture between Ge’ez Israelite, Turkic Mongolian Persians, and colonized Aramaic. They existed only after 530 C; and
5- The Lost Sheep of the House of Israel are those Israelite who  left the land of Punt and decided to collaborate with Turkic Mongolians to invent Judaism and colonize Aramaic lands; and turned into Hebrew Israelite.

Therefore, the Israelite Exodus of 1446 BC was only within Punt, from one region to another. The Jews are not Israelite at all; and the name Judah was just used deceptively to relate the Jews to the Israelite. The Israelite were scattered all over the world and they no longer exist as a nation or a tribe.

For more details on the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis read the following three articles:
1- How Persians Cooked a Cult and Called it Judaism Part 1
2- The Turkic Mongolian-African Israelite Joint-ventures
3- Jesus Pointing to “The Lost Sheep of the house of Israel” and “the Gentiles”
[End of notice]

Turkish Opinions on World Nations and Their Own History


See how Turks view nations of the world and their own Turkic history.

The Khazar Khaganate was created around 650 AD but the Turkic Mongolian groups which invaded, looted and enslaved all the populations of Eurasian Steppe, the Caucasus, and the Balkan started these from around 1800 BC. They are the same as Turks, Bulgars, Hungarians, and Persians.

The following are 3 Facebook messages sent to me by some Turk called “Hakan Yücel” today:

[The Khazar heritage of Queen Elizabeth and the British Royal Family

You fucken slave we are everywhere we turks entered every bloodline just like quen elizabeth is descendant of khazars
five descent-lines of Queen Elizabeth of Britain from JULIA, sister of JULIUS CAESAR

We created largest empire of human history under genghis khan and dominated the world and united the world under one flag one khan one rule with our tengri ideology one tengri one ruler! And now our khazar turkish cousins rothschilds bankers etc controls the world u fucken little barking slave u will kneel down to turkish master race like ur inferior slave ancestors. U should be ashamed to be descendant of inferior little slave u fucken slave i will rape ur mom and force u to watch u fucken little slave suck my dick]

[U Fucken little slave i will plunder ur wifes pussy]

[U fucken inferior little slave u cant escape from the power and sword of turkish mongolian altaic master race u fucken rebel slave do u know what we doing to rebels u fucken little rebel slave]

It is Aelia Capitolina NOT Beit HaMikdash, Al-Quds, or Jerusalem


Aelia Capitolina 633 AD

Aelia Capitolina 633 AD

Important Update Notice on 24 July 2018: I have updated my Abyssinian Hypothesis  after discovering the that single-hump camel (The dromedary) was unknown in Arabia, Aram, Assyria, and Kemet before 950 BC, while in abundance in the land of Punt.

This led to make the following major changes:
1- The proposed origin of Israelite from being Arabic-speaking Arab Yemenis to Ge’ez-speaking African Puntite;
2- Rename the Abyssinian Hypothesis to the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis;
3- The Turkic Mongolian colonizers and rulers of Neo-Babylonia invited elders from the House of Israel to Babylonia in around 580 BC in what is called the Babylonian Exile to help the create Judaism and colonize Aramaic land in 530 BC;
4- The Hebrew Language and the Hebrew Israelite are products of admixture between Ge’ez Israelite, Turkic Mongolian Persians, and colonized Aramaic. They existed only after 530 C; and
5- The Lost Sheep of the House of Israel are those Israelite who  left the land of Punt and decided to collaborate with Turkic Mongolians to invent Judaism and colonize Aramaic lands; and turned into Hebrew Israelite.

For more details on the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis read the following three articles:
1- How Persians Cooked a Cult and Called it Judaism Part 1
2- The Turkic Mongolian-African Israelite Joint-ventures
3- Jesus Pointing to “The Lost Sheep of the house of Israel” and “the Gentiles”
[End of notice]

Is “present day Jerusalem” a Jewish holy city? Is the location of “present day Jerusalem” is the same as that of the “earlier or first Jerusalem”? To answer these questions we must notice that Jerusalem has more than 70 names; and the “earlier or first Jerusalem” is specifically the site of Solomon’s Temple, also known as the First Temple (Hebrew: Beit HaMikdash). Beit HaMikdash was destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar II after the Siege of the “earlier or first Jerusalem” in 586 BC.

The Second Temple (Hebrew: Beit HaMikdash HaSheni) was built in 516 BC under instructions from the Persian King Cyrus the Great who could had invented the Jews and sent them from Babylon to Judah to replace the Israelite. The returnees were not actually Israelite but rather Turkic Mongolian settlers similar to those who conquered and ruled Iran and Mesopotamia and turned them to Persia and Neo-Babylonia (in 550 BC and 626 BC respectively).

Many new fundamental political, ethnic, and religious changes took place with the coming of new settlers from Babylonia. There was swift basic shift of powers and culture from the earlier Hebrew to the new Jewish. These changes and Persian support for the Jews raise doubts and suggest that the location of the Second Temple was actually not in the same place of Solomon’s Temple. This situation created two different Beit HaMikdash (or Jerusalem). An earlier but destroyed one belongs to the Hebrew Israelite; and a second new city made by the Jews.

The situation becomes even more confusing with the Jewish claim that the city founded by the Romans (Aelia) was built on top of the ruins of the Second Temple. With this claim, there are three different possible locations for Solomon’s Temple or Beit HaMikdash (Jerusalem): 1. the location proposed by the few remaining Hebrew Israelite (First Temple); 2. The location used by Turkic settlers (Jews) in 516 BC to build another temple and call it the Second Temple (Beit HaMikdash HaSheni); and 3. The Roman city built in 130 AD (Aelia) to administrate the colony.

Aelia Capitolina was a Roman colony, built under the emperor Hadrian in 130 AD to be for his legionaries. For Arabs Aelia remained the common name for present-day Jerusalem until 1300 AD, when the Turkic Mamluk Sultanate for strange reasons adopted the Jewish name “Al-Quds” and their claims. The name “Aelia” came from Hadrian’s nomen gentile, Aelius, while Capitolina meant dedication to Jupiter Capitolinus, to whom a temple was built. The city was in the style of a typical Roman town. Jews were prohibited from entering the city. The ban was maintained until the 7th century, though Christians would soon be granted an exemption.

During the 4th century, the Roman Emperor Constantine I ordered the construction of Christian holy sites in the city, including the Church of the Holy Sepulcher. Burial remains from the Byzantine period are exclusively Christian, suggesting that the population of Aelia in Byzantine times consisted only of Christians. The Jews claim that Aelia was built on the site of the Second Temple and it is the same site of the Solomon’s First Temple; and therefore Aelia is Jerusalem. But would the Romans use a ruined holy site for Jews to build their city and temple? Surely, Aelia is a holy city for Christians and Muslims; but it is very doubtful it is holy for the Israelite and for the Jews. Jerusalem, Al-Quds, or Beit HaMikdash is not Aelia.

First we have to find the real Jerusalem, because most probably the present-day Jerusalem in not. It is Aelia and it was built by the Romans for their own use; and it doesn’t hold any holy Israelite or Palestinian site. It has mainly Christian holy sites and a single Islamic site. So, it belongs to Christians and Muslims.

Could Bethlehem be the Real Jerusalem?
A mysterious First Temple-era archaeological found under a Palestinian orchard near Bethlehem is increasingly gaining attention — despite attempts to keep it quiet.
The Hebrew Bible, which says that the city of Bethlehem was built up as a fortified city by Rehoboam, identifies it as the city David was from and where he was crowned as the king of Israel. The New Testament identifies Bethlehem as the birthplace of Jesus. Bethlehem and present-day Jerusalem are both called “the city of David”!

Jerusalem means the place of Solomon’s Temple, the First Temple, wherever it is. Bethlehem or Girizim could be the real Jerusalem. There are archaeological discoveries around Bethlehem that intrigue scholars and relate them to the First Temple despite attempts to hush it up.

The article is at: Despite secrecy, interest builds around mysterious First Temple find outside Bethlehem

Abyssinian Hypothesis on Israelite, Hebrew, Jewish History


This is a brief Israelite, Hebrew, Jewish history diagram according to the new Abyssinian Hypothesis, by Tarig Anter.

Also see: Cyclopedia Of Biblical Literature Ed John Kitto Vol 1 1880, page 30.

Indians and the world must know about the relationship between Pashtuns and the both the Israelite and how the Turkic Jews brought them to Afghanistan and India which led to the creation of Pakistan and the civil war in Afghanistan.

Brief Israelite, Hebrew, Jewish history diagram

Brief Israelite, Hebrew, Jewish history diagram according to the new Abyssinian Hypothesis, by Tarig Anter.

%d bloggers like this: