Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy

Posts tagged ‘Christianity’

Roman Catholicism and the Vatican Are not Christian


The Jews are not Israelite or Semite; also they are not an ethnicity, race, or religion. Jews are Turkic Mongolian political association. They were invented in 530 BC together with Judaism, which is not the religion of Moses or his ethnicity or race or people.

The Khazars were also Turkic Mongolian and joined the Jewish association in 750 AD. And Rome and the Romans were also another group from Turkic Mongolian, same as the Persians, Caucasoid Indians, and the Hyksos.

When the Jews were invented they knew that the Romans are their kin and they worked together to defeat Christianity and establish a Mediterranean empire. Since Christianity was impossible to kill, the Jews and the Romans invented Roman Catholicism to hijack original Christianity and persecute true faithfuls.

Roman Catholicism is not Christianity at all and it is not even a religion. Actually, Roman Catholicism is another form of Judaism, and both are anti-Christian political cults.

The Vatican started as a site of Roman villas with a circus for charioteers. This area became the site of martyrdom of many Christians after the Great Fire of Rome in AD 64. Ancient tradition holds that it was in this circus that Saint Peter was crucified upside-down.

Opposite the circus was a cemetery separated by the Via Cornelia. Funeral monuments and mausoleums and small tombs as well as altars to pagan gods of all kinds of polytheistic religions were constructed lasting until before the construction of the Constantinian Basilica of St. Peter’s in the first half of the 4th century. Remains of this ancient necropolis were brought to light sporadically during renovations by various popes throughout the centuries, increasing in frequency during the Renaissance until it was systematically excavated by orders of Pope Pius XII from 1939 to 1941. The Constantinian basilica was built in 326 over what was believed to be the tomb of Saint Peter, buried in that cemetery.

See the early history of the Vatican.

And: Cult of Roman Catholicism by European-American Evangelistic Crusades, Inc., which was incorporated in the state of California as a nonprofit religious organization in 1972. EAEC is a mission organization dedicated to spreading the Gospel of Jesus Christ, with headquarters in Sacramento, California.

Advertisements

Why There Are Similarities between Yakut and Ashkenazim DNA?


Why There Are Similarities between Yakut and Ashkenazim DNA

Why There Are Similarities between Yakut and Ashkenazim DNA

The Ashkenazim are certainly of Turkic Mongolian origin, same as the Yakut, and both are horse-riding nomads. The raids of Turkic Mongolians using horses expanded their invasions to the west and south to Rome and India. Collectively, Ashkenazi are less genetically diverse than other Jewish ethnic divisions. The Khazar developed very late in 750 AD compared to Turkic Mongolian raids in 1800 BC.

It is unreasonable to claim that Jews are an ethnic group because Jewishness in fact is a political association that was initiated by Turkic Mongolian but very soon it became a very heterogeneous assembly due to Turkic Mongolian vast raids, excessive slavery of nations, and intensive miscegenation to breed and change their physical appearance to look like Caucasians and Europeans. Let us first give brief definition of the Yakut then show a genetic study on their origin.

Yakuts (Sakha: Саха, Sakha) are a Turkic people who mainly inhabit the Sakha Republic (Yakutia) in North East Asia. The Yakut language belongs to the Siberian branch of the Turkic languages. Yakuts mainly live in the Republic of Sakha in the Russian Federation, with some extending to the Amur, Magadan, Sakhalin regions, and the Taymyr and Evenk Autonomous Districts.

The Yakuts are divided into two basic groups based on geography and economics. Yakuts in the north are historically semi-nomadic hunters, fishermen, reindeer breeders, while southern Yakuts engage in animal husbandry focusing on horses and cattle. Yakuts – Wikipedia

Genetically the Yakuts are a hybrid population, but culturally they are Turkic. This is not a totally exceptional pattern. Ashkenazi Jews and many Latin Americans exhibit the same disjunction between genetic admixture, and relative dominance of particular cultural forms as opposed to synthesis. Part of the issue here is that biological and cultural evolution operate differently, with the latter being far more flexible and unconstrained by the inheritance modes imposed by DNA and sexual reproduction.

The Yakuts also may serve as an example of a particular mode of long distance gene flow which was possible only with the rise of horses. The origins of the Yakuts – Gene Expression

A Resource for Turkic and Jewish History in Russia and Ukraine called Khazaria.com (Khazaria.com, established on May 5, 1995 by Kevin Alan Brook, author of The Jews of Khazaria (1st edition, 1999; 2nd edition, 2006), is the leading Internet provider of information about the Khazar Kingdom.) posted the following article: Special Topic: East/Northeast Asian Admixture in Ashkenazic Jews saying:

Occasionally I get comments from Ashkenazic Jews from Eastern Europe that they or certain members of their families have a few physical characteristics typical of East Asian peoples belonging to the Mongoloid race, such as something Asiatic about their eyes, cheekbones, or hair thickness. There are also some photographs of Ashkenazim where such features are faintly evident, although European and Middle Eastern (West Asian and Southwest Asian) phenotypes prevail in most families.

It turns out there is a genetic basis for a small amount of East Asian and Northeast Asian (East Siberian) ancestry in Ashkenazim, just as there is in some neighbors of Ashkenazim such as non-Jewish Hungarians, Ukrainians, Romanians, and Russians, though the Mongoloid inputs into these populations didn’t always come from the same source populations. Let’s review the evidence we have so far: Here (Note:The genetic testing company 23andMe had updated their methodology or their reference samples and the formerly “Yakut” segments in Ashkenazim were usually reclassified as “Broadly East Asian”.)

Ashkenazim Origin


The history of Ashkenazim is shrouded in mystery. Many theories have arisen speculating on their emergence as a distinct community of Jews.

Here is another hypothesis that makes a lot of sense. It supposes that the origin of Ashkenazim is very much older than the emergence of Khazar Khaganate in c. 650–969 AD. The term Jews (originally Yehudim, Israeli pronunciation [jehuˈdim]) must had appeared only in 535 BC.

The Jews are not Israelite but all Jews originated from Turkic Mongolians, similar to Persians, Turks, Romans, “whitened” Europeans, and Caucasoid Indians. While the Israelite were originally Arab tribe from Yemen. Therefore, the Israelite were Semite; but the Jews are not Semite at all.

The invasions of Turkic Mongolians into the Pontiac-Caspian Steppe which resulted in the formation of Slavic groups in the region, and later all Turkic Khaganates including the Khazar, could had started around 1700 BC.

Abyssinian Hypothesis New Interpretation of Bible History


Abyssinian Hypothesis on Israelite, Hebrew, Jewish History – New Interpretation of Bible History

Jews Created and Ruled the Roman Empire and the Roman Republic


According to legend Rome was founded in 753 BC by Romulus and Remus, who were raised by a she-wolfThe Romans were unnatural growth from foreign origin. They were not European or had any history. Just suddenly they came out from nowhere.

Despite old common assumptions and false claims that Jews were persecuted in the Roman Empire the facts prove the complete opposite. In reality, Jews created and ruled the Roman Empire and it was their instrument to take over Europe, the Middle East, and Mediterranean.

The history of the Jews in the Roman Empire traces the interaction of Jews and Romans during the period of the Roman Empire (27 BC – AD 476). The transformation of Turkic Mongolian practices into what is called Roman culture began long before the Christian era. Indeed, the city of Rome itself was founded by Turkic Mongolians before they invented the Jews.

Traditional stories handed down by the ancient Romans themselves explain the earliest history of their city in terms of legend and myth. The most familiar of these myths, and perhaps the most famous of all Roman myths, is the story of Romulus and Remus, the twins who were suckled by a she-wolf. This story had to be reconciled with a dual tradition, set earlier in time, the one that had the Trojan refugee Aeneas escape to Italy and found the line of Romans through his son Iulus, the namesake of the Julio-Claudian dynasty. Romulus established cavalry regiments called the Celeres (“the Swift Squadron”). The introduction of horses to Europe is a strong evidence of Turkic Mongolian influence and origin.

The rape of the Sabine Women is part of the Roman history, in which the men of unknown origin committed a mass abduction of young women from the other cities in the region. The Rape occurred in the early history of Rome, shortly after its founding by Romulus and his mostly male followers. Seeking wives in order to establish families, the Romans negotiated unsuccessfully with the Sabines, who populated the surrounding area. After fighting the Sabines agreed to unite with the Romans. Titus Tatius jointly ruled with Romulus until Tatius’s death five years later. The new Sabine residents of Rome settled on the Capitoline Hill.

Rome’s earliest history, from the time of its founding as a small tribal village, to the downfall of its kings, is the least well preserved. The Roman Kingdom (753 BC–509 BC) has no written records and the histories about it that were written during the Republic and Empire are largely based on legends. The wars and violence of the Roman Republic (509 BC–27 BC) were extensive and totally unnatural. The rise of the Roman Empire through the Middle (274–148 BC) and Late (147–30 BC) military campaigns could be attributed to Turkic Mongolian and Jewish assistance.

Jews migrated to Rome and Roman Europe from Canaan, Asia Minor, Babylon and Alexandria. They took advantage of the partition of Alexander’s Empire and the rivalries between his generals after his death in 323 BC to advance their positions and recover their lost gains.

The Roman–Seleucid War (192–188 BC), also known as the War of Antiochos or the Syrian War, was a military conflict between two coalitions led by the Roman Republic and the Seleucid Empire. The fighting took place in Greece, the Aegean Sea and Asia Minor. In Rome, Jewish communities enjoyed privileges and thrived economically, becoming a significant part of the Empire’s population (perhaps as much as ten percent).

Many Jews lived in Rome even during the late Roman period (about 150 BC). Rome was also in military and commercial relations with Jews in the Greek-speaking Levant during the second and first centuries BC, many of whom came to Rome as merchants. Julius Caesar was known as a strong ally of the Jews and Jews mourned his assassination.

The Jews in Rome were very organized and possessed many Jewish temples and works. There were a large number of Jewish communities in southern Italy during this period. For example, Sicily, Calabria and Apulia have strong Jewish influence.

It is certain that Simon Macapius sent an embassy to Rome in 139 BC to strengthen the alliance between Jews and Romans against the Hellenistic Seleucid kingdom. The ambassadors received a warm welcome from the Romans and from the strong Jewish community of Rome. After the successive Jewish riots of 66 and 132 AD, many Jews immigrated to Rome.

“oruma, orumuş” (settlement, sitting, city). This old Turkish word is related Romus. Turks use “Ören” for old ruin city.

Could Bethlehem or Gerizim be the Real Jerusalem?


Could Bethlehem or Gerizim be the Real Jerusalem?Real Jerusalem is the place where King Solomon built the First Temple. All indications point to places other than to Aelia (present-day Jerusalem). The real Jerusalem could be in Bethlehem (also called the city of David as present-day Jerusalem!) or Gerizim Mount in Nablus.

The Second Temple was most probably built in a site totally different from the site of Solomon’s Temple (Beit HaMikdash, means the holy house or temple) for political reasons. Surely, both sites were not in Aelia (present-day Jerusalem). Aelia or present-day Jerusalem is a holy city mainly for Christians, and to a lesser extent for Muslims; but it is not holy at all for Israelite and certainly not for the Turkic Jews.

The world must investigate and question the name “Jerusalem” before handing over the most holy city for Christians to the Jews. Until this is done the world must reject giving the name “Jerusalem” wrongly to Aelia. The Romans were NOT too mean or too stupid to build their Jupiter Temple on top of Solomon’s Temple.

The Hebrew Bible, which says that the city of Bethlehem was built up as a fortified city by Rehoboam, identifies it as the city David was from and where he was crowned as the king of Israel. The New Testament identifies Bethlehem as the birthplace of Jesus. This brings back the essential question: Why Bethlehem and present-day Jerusalem are both called “the city of David”? There are archaeological discoveries around Bethlehem that intrigue scholars and relate them to the First Temple despite attempts to hush it up.

An article written by Matti Friedman on 19 May 2013 and posted on the Times of Israel is titled: Despite secrecy, interest builds around mysterious First Temple find outside Bethlehem. It says: [Archaeology in the Holy Land has long been caught up in modern-day politics. The Zionist movement always viewed unearthing remnants of the ancient past as a way of proving the depth of Jewish roots in the land. Palestinians, for their part, have increasingly taken to denying the existence of any ancient Jewish history and tend to condemn all archaeology conducted by Israel as an attempt to cement political control.]

The Samaritans (Samaritan Hebrew: Shamerim ), meaning “Guardians/Keepers/Watchers” (of the Torah), Hebrew: Shomronim, Arabic: al-Sāmiriyyūn) are an ethnoreligious group originating from the Hebrew Israelites of ancient time. They have their own Torah, language, history, and Jerusalem. They insist that the Jews are not Israelite or believers; and they are foreigners who displaced the Israelite after the Babylonian Return on 530 BC organized by the Persians.

According to many scholars, archaeological excavations at Mount Gerizim indicate that a temple existed in the first half of the 5th century BC. The history of schism between Samaritans and Jews is known, and by the early 4th century BC the communities have had distinctive practices and communal separation. According to Samaritans, it was on Mount Gerizim that Abraham was commanded by God to offer Isaac, his son, as a sacrifice (Genesis 22:2).

It is Aelia Capitolina NOT Beit HaMikdash, Al-Quds, or Jerusalem


Aelia Capitolina 633 AD

Aelia Capitolina 633 AD

Is “present day Jerusalem” a Jewish holy city? Is the location of “present day Jerusalem” is the same as that of the “earlier or first Jerusalem”? To answer these questions we must notice that Jerusalem has more than 70 names; and the “earlier or first Jerusalem” is specifically the site of Solomon’s Temple, also known as the First Temple (Hebrew: Beit HaMikdash). Beit HaMikdash was destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar II after the Siege of the “earlier or first Jerusalem” in 586 BC.

The Second Temple (Hebrew: Beit HaMikdash HaSheni) was built in 516 BC under instructions from the Persian King Cyrus the Great who could had invented the Jews and sent them from Babylon to Judah to replace the Israelite. The returnees were not actually Israelite but rather Turkic Mongolian settlers similar to those who conquered and ruled Iran and Mesopotamia and turned them to Persia and Neo-Babylonia (in 550 BC and 626 BC respectively).

Many new fundamental political, ethnic, and religious changes took place with the coming of new settlers from Babylonia. There was swift basic shift of powers and culture from the earlier Hebrew to the new Jewish. These changes and Persian support for the Jews raise doubts and suggest that the location of the Second Temple was actually not in the same place of Solomon’s Temple. This situation created two different Beit HaMikdash (or Jerusalem). An earlier but destroyed one belongs to the Hebrew Israelite; and a second new city made by the Jews.

The situation becomes even more confusing with the Jewish claim that the city founded by the Romans (Aelia) was built on top of the ruins of the Second Temple. With this claim, there are three different possible locations for Solomon’s Temple or Beit HaMikdash (Jerusalem): 1. the location proposed by the few remaining Hebrew Israelite (First Temple); 2. The location used by Turkic settlers (Jews) in 516 BC to build another temple and call it the Second Temple (Beit HaMikdash HaSheni); and 3. The Roman city built in 130 AD (Aelia) to administrate the colony.

Aelia Capitolina was a Roman colony, built under the emperor Hadrian in 130 AD to be for his legionaries. For Arabs Aelia remained the common name for present-day Jerusalem until 1300 AD, when the Turkic Mamluk Sultanate for strange reasons adopted the Jewish name “Al-Quds” and their claims. The name “Aelia” came from Hadrian’s nomen gentile, Aelius, while Capitolina meant dedication to Jupiter Capitolinus, to whom a temple was built. The city was in the style of a typical Roman town. Jews were prohibited from entering the city. The ban was maintained until the 7th century, though Christians would soon be granted an exemption.

During the 4th century, the Roman Emperor Constantine I ordered the construction of Christian holy sites in the city, including the Church of the Holy Sepulcher. Burial remains from the Byzantine period are exclusively Christian, suggesting that the population of Aelia in Byzantine times consisted only of Christians. The Jews claim that Aelia was built on the site of the Second Temple and it is the same site of the Solomon’s First Temple; and therefore Aelia is Jerusalem. But would the Romans use a ruined holy site for Jews to build their city and temple? Surely, Aelia is a holy city for Christians and Muslims; but it is very doubtful it is holy for the Israelite and for the Jews. Jerusalem, Al-Quds, or Beit HaMikdash is not Aelia.

First we have to find the real Jerusalem, because most probably the present-day Jerusalem in not. It is Aelia and it was built by the Romans for their own use; and it doesn’t hold any holy Israelite or Palestinian site. It has mainly Christian holy sites and a single Islamic site. So, it belongs to Christians and Muslims.

Could Bethlehem be the Real Jerusalem?
A mysterious First Temple-era archaeological found under a Palestinian orchard near Bethlehem is increasingly gaining attention — despite attempts to keep it quiet.
The Hebrew Bible, which says that the city of Bethlehem was built up as a fortified city by Rehoboam, identifies it as the city David was from and where he was crowned as the king of Israel. The New Testament identifies Bethlehem as the birthplace of Jesus. Bethlehem and present-day Jerusalem are both called “the city of David”!

Jerusalem means the place of Solomon’s Temple, the First Temple, wherever it is. Bethlehem or Girizim could be the real Jerusalem. There are archaeological discoveries around Bethlehem that intrigue scholars and relate them to the First Temple despite attempts to hush it up.

The article is at: Despite secrecy, interest builds around mysterious First Temple find outside Bethlehem

%d bloggers like this: