Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy

Posts tagged ‘Ebla Sumer Ugarit’

Syria is a Turkic name Made by Amorite-Turkic Hyksos for their colony in the Levant in the country of Ebla

I believe in the opinion that the origin of the name Syria came from East Asia, and it is a pronunciation of Surya, meaning sun, and is related to the Kurdish Mitanni. The name Syria appeared after a period from the expulsion of the Hyksos from Kemet in 1523 BC

The Turkic Mitanni of the expelled Hyksos called Syria to distinguish their colony from the Amorite Hebrews who occupied the southeastern coasts of the Mediterranean and established a colony there in 600 BC calling it Canaan although true Canaan is in Punt Lands.

The Turkic shared with the Amorites in occupying the middle of the eastern coasts of the Mediterranean Sea as a common area, and they established a colony calling it Phoenicia.

In addition, Syria is a name of a colony and not an authentic, national or ancient name for the region that belonged to the people of the Ebla civilization.

The ending of names with “ia” is common in East Asian names, as in Syria, Phoenicia, Turkey, and others

Some scholars put few suggestions for the origin of the name “Syria”

1- The name Syria comes from the word Suri, which is a “Babylonian-Assyrian” province that was located north of the Euphrates and northwest of the Euphrates. It also came to call the northeastern part of Syria, hence the whole country was later called Syria.

2- It was named after the city of “Tyre” located on the shore of the Mediterranean Sea, and the Greeks knew it by this name as a result of the thriving commercial relations between the two parties. Moreover, the word sur in Phoenician means rock or wall, and this name is seen engraved on the old coins that were found in this city.

3- Surya the sun in the language of the Heto-European or Aryan peoples, and the Aryan kingdom of Mitanni existed in northern Syria

4- Herodotus says it is derived from the word Assyria, which became Syria.

5- It is another from of the name of the Persian king, Cyrus, Syrus.

6- The kings of Kemet named all the region east of the Mediterranean that were subject to them: Kharu, then they were replaced by Sharu and Saru, then Syria.

7- As for the Syriacs, they took the name from the land and did not give it to it. They themselves are in force relative to the land they are in after the advent of Christianity.


The Turkic Invaders of the Hittites and the Expelled Hyksos

The Hyksos colonized Kmt from 1670 BC and they were 90% of infantry Bedouin Amorites who repeatedly colonized the marsh wet Delta for crimes; and King Menes expelled them in 3150 BC. Hyksos were also 10% of Bedouins Turkic Mongolians came from East Asia on horseback who were the Akkadian colonizers of Sumer from 2334 to 2154 BC.

Turkic Mongolian bandits came to Anatolia via the Caspian Sea and invaded the Hittites. They borrowed the chariots military weapon from the Hyksos to attack Ebla kingdoms at the same time when in 1523 BC the expelled Hyksos branched into four groups and one attacked Ebla.

Mursili I (also known as Mursilis) was a Turkic warlord invading Anatolia. He invaded Ebla and his aim was to finish off the support of Ebla to Hittites against Turkic bandits. Ebla was defeated and a colony named Mitanni appeared. This Mitanni is the origin of the Kurds who are of mixed Turkic, Hurrian, and Hittite origin.

Mitanni appeared after the Hyksos expulsion in 1523 BC and not before it as well as the Kassites in southern Sumer who called themselves Babylonians only after 600 BC. Babylon is a foreign Ge’ez translation Bab-El to Ka-Digir-ra (Gate of God).

The Turkic Mitanni gave support to the Hyksos attacking Sumer to create the Kassites colony. The Turkic Mitanni also went south to support the Hebrew branch of Hyksos who were attacking southern Ugarit to create Canaan and northern Ugarit to create Phoenicia

The final and decisive attacks on southern and northern Ugarit to create Canaan and Phoenicia were made by support to the Hebrews from Thutmose III during his rule (1458-1425 BC) who reversed the policies of Kmt and made alliance with expelled Hyksos against the nations of Ugarit, Ebla, Sumer and Arab kingdoms.

The term “Minoan” refers to the mythical King Minos of Knossos, a figure in Greek mythology associated with Theseus, the labyrinth and the Minotaur. It is purely a modern term with a 19th-century origin. It is commonly attributed to the British archaeologist Arthur Evans

Santorini eruption happened between 1642 and 1540 BC, just before the expulsion of the Hyksos from Kmt, and it may had contributed to their expulsion.

Levantine Amorites want to take over Egypt by Any Means and they must be stopped

For more than 5 thousand years, the Levantine Amorites wanted to seize Kemet by any means and with any claim, no matter how absurd their claims were.

The Amorites deny that they are 90% of the Hyksos and that they are partners with the Turkic Mongolians. The Amorites also claim that they are Arabs, while they are Hebrews and Bedouins. They claim that Amorite invasion and colonization of Kemet and the exploiting and hijacking of the Message of Muhammad, and turning it into a colonial weapon is Islamic expansion.

The Amorites claim that the Arabs have been present in Kmt since ancient times. The Amorites also claim that the people of the Kmt civilization are Arab, and they mean by that they were Amorites. The Amorites deceive and deny that they infiltrated and are still infiltrating Kmt in order to control and seize Kmt.

The Amorites deny that they are the Hebrews, Kurds, Babylonians and Sabaeans, and they are partners with the Persians, the Turks and the Romans. The Amorites of Levant claim that their infiltration into the ancient Kmt, which continues to this day, is peaceful with pretexts of Islamism, Arabism and asylum.

The Amorites deny that King Menes expelled them in 3100 BC because they were foreign attackers and took advantage of the formation of the new land in the Delta swamps to hide and wage crimes. The Amorites also claim that King Menes united two countries and that the northern imaginary country was theirs and they were the ones who developed the Delta of Lower Egypt.

The Amorite Hyksos claim that they have legitimate historical rights in Kmt, Arabia, Sumer, Ebla and Ugarit. The Amorites deny, ignore and challenge the existence and originality of the people and civilizations in the region, namely the Kmt, Ebla, Ugarit, Sumer, Dilmun, Magan, Meluhha, Punt, Kerma, Libu, Iran and Aegean

The Amorites claim that the Hebrew Hyksos, who they are part of, are from the Children of Israel. The Amorites claim that Aelia Capitolina, which is the site of the Al-Aqsa Mosque and the Jesus holy sites, is the lost Jerusalem, the site of Solomon’s Temple. The Amorite Hebrew Hyksos claim that the Hebrew entity of today was the Kingdom of the Children of Israel in the past; and that Palestinians are Arab

The Amorites claim that Thutmose III and Akhenaten were heroes because they betrayed Kmt and joined them to destroy and occupy Ugarit and Ebla. The Amorites Hebrew Hyksos deny that they overthrew and destroyed Ugarit, and established the colonies of Phoenicia and Canaan in the north and south of Ugarit.

The Amorite Hebrew Hyksos claim that the heavenly messages are religions to use them in invasion and occupation of peoples and countries. They ignore the role of Levant as the center for the Umayyads, Abbasids, Ottomans, Zionism, Pan-nationalism and terrorism. The Amorites, the Hebrew Hyksos, deny their role in sabotaging societies, behavior, and religious, media, academic, artistic and political institutions.

The Amorites claim that the Hebrews Hyksos participated in building the Pyramids; and that Sinai belonged to them, that the Delta were theirs, and that they had a role in the civilization in Kemet. The Hyksos Hebrew Amorites claim that Levant is the heart of Arabism and the Arab national resurrection, and they pretend that they have a conflict with the Hebrew entity. The Amorites, the Hebrew Hyksos, deny that they are currently occupying with their Persian partners the state of Lebanon, which is north of Ugarit as well as south of Ugarit.

Amorites, Hebrews, Hyksos, Sabaeans, Kurds, Babylonians, Turks, and Turkic Mongolians must be totally exposed and stopped from destroying and threatening the entire region.

Tuthmosis III Made the First Coup and Betrayal of Kmt People from Inside the Royal Palace

Hatshepsut was the only legitimate heir of her father Tuthmosis I married her half-brother (Tuthmosis II), and she had no way of ruling but to marry Thutmose II and bore him a son and two daughters. The son died in his childhood, and his name was not left in any monuments. As for the two daughters, their names are Neferura and Meritre Hatshepsut. Thutmose II gave birth to his son (Thutmose III) from one concubines of the royal court, possibly of foreign origin, her name is (East), and some forge and say her name is Isis

Hatshepsut began ruling at the age of twenty upon the death of her father, Thutmose I (1503-1493 BC). She was her father’s partner in government and the legitimate heir to the throne. She is supposed to be the next king on the throne, Thutmose I. However, because the rule of a woman was something that was not the norm. For this reason, it was inevitable that her half-brother (Thutmose II) would take part in the rule with her. That slender person of non-royal origin, poor health, and inexperienced in managing the affairs of the country, became her superficial partner as a king, while she became the royal wife and the real legitimate king running the state

Hatshepsut continued the policies of her father and the patriotic first half of the 18th Dynasty. Hatshepsut launched military campaigns focused on protecting the kingdoms of Kerma south of Kemt from the Hyksos gangs stranded in Libya with the Berbers and their slaves and mercenaries of West Africa who, after several centuries of looting, brought down Kerma kingdoms and established the Kush colony that invaded and occupied Kemt in the 25th dynasty.

Her campaigns also protected the peoples of Ebla and Ugarit from the branching bandits of the expelled Hyksos. Hatshepsut was following the usual friendly policy with the peoples of the region, Ebla, Ugarit and Karma, and supported them to fight the attacks of branched gangs of the expelled Hyksos, the Hebrews and Mitanni in the east, and those who became Kushites in the south.

Thutmose III and “Menhabi” in the Amarna letters, the sixth king of the 18th dynasty, actually ruled 32 years in the period 1458-1425 BC, after the 22 years rule of Queen Hatshepsut 1479-1458 BC. As soon as he received the throne after the death of Hatshepsut, he completely reversed these policies, fought the neighboring peoples, and supported their enemies, the Hyksos gangs, and carried out sixteen campaigns on Ebla and Ugarit. Moreover, the neighboring peoples became in the hands of the Hyksos gangs, an ally of Thutmose III. While history books falsify state and claim that he campaigned against the Mitanni and the Kushites, and this is a blatant lie and completely opposite to the truth.

Thutmose III brought sons of the leaders of the Hyksos gangs to Thebes, the capital of Kmt, to learn about Kmt conditions and customs so that they could help him as advisors in the rule of Kmt. He claimed that he would make allies, and if they return to their country and assume power, they would be among his loyal followers and would not think of war against Kmt. This is also a false and misleading claim to cover up the betrayal of Thutmose III and his alliance with the Hyksos against the peoples of Kmt and the region.

A person named Yuya married Toya, and her mother was a bridesmaid in the palace, the supervisor of clothes, and the singer. Yuya and Thuya had a daughter, Tiye, who became the wife of Amenhotep III and mother of Akhenaten. Tiye’s father, Tia, whose name is Yuya, is of foreign origin due to the features of his mummy and the presence of many different ways of writing his name, which means that it was originally a non-Egyptian name. It is most likely that Tia and her family are Kushites, a creation of the Hyksos.

Amenhotep III, Akhenaten’s father, married Glyuchiba, daughter of Shutarna II, King of Mitanni, and issued a special number of memorial scarabs on his marriage to Glyuchiba in the tenth year of his reign. 317 young women accompanied the princess from Ghawani of the Mitanni royal palace. Glyuchiba became known as “the king’s secondary wife” in the sense that she was a concubine while Tiye was the official wife of Amenhotep III and never held the title of queen because she was a foreigner. On the scarab, Amenhotep mentioned the name of his chief wife, Queen Tiye, and the names of her parents, Yuya and Thuya. Glyochiba’s niece, Dodochiba, became a new wife to Amenhotep III after Glyochiba’s death, but Amenhotep III died shortly after her arrival.

The second half of Dynasty 18 was an ally and partner of the bands that branched off from the expelled Hyksos. Moreover, they worked together against the people of Kemet and all the peoples of the region in Sumer, Ebla, Ugarit, the Arabs, Punt, Kerma and Libya. Nobody in Egypt knows or admits that Thutmose III, Amenhotep II, Thutmose IV, Amenhotep III and Amenhotep IV/Akhenaten were agents and should be accused of high treason. Rather, it is unfortunate that they are considered patriots and great kings, as the Hyksos want to deceive Kemet and the world. The army commander, Horemheb, is the one who saved Kmt from that treacherous family, the partner of the Hyksos.

The daughter of the King of Mitanni, who are from the Hyksos, the enemies of Kmt, who were expelled by King Ahmose I and his family and the first half of the 18th Dynasty. Thutmose III, Amenhotep II, Thutmose IV, Amenhotep III and Amenhotep IV/ Akhenaten were traitors and did not deserve to be Egyptians, but the Hyksos are still in Egypt and the region.

In order for the strategic alliance, which is so necessary for all the peoples of the region to succeed, between Egypt, Saudi Arabia, UAE and Bahrain, the Hyksos remnants must be removed from every important authority in all the countries of the coalition. It is not possible to confront the terrorism and sabotage of the Zionists, Persians, Turks, Romans, Kushites and Sabaeans, while the Hyksos still have power and wealth in any facility and sensitive area in any country in the alliance.

The Hyksos of today are diverting Africans, particularly in West Africa and Maghreb, from their own history to use them against the history of Kmt, Kerma, Punt and Arabs.

There is no true history now; and mainstream institutions defy learning history as an investigative subject

The correct method of learning is against academic, religious, media, and political institutions all together. They do not want or allow letting people question them and doubt their actions or legitimacy. The change must start at the top and all learning institutions is easy to follow

%d bloggers like this: