Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy

Posts tagged ‘Egypt’

The Origins of Fulani, Gypsies and Meroitic Languages


The origin of the Fulani is obscure. Some scholars assigned them to Hyksos origin; while a linguist named Fezzan M. Dalfosse, whose studies in west African languages give special weight to his opinions, holds the view that Fulani may have owed their origin to the downfall of Hyksos, or shepherd kings, who were driven from Egypt about 1639 BC.
He likens the Fulani to the gypsy language he says “I think I may say that of all African, Asiatic, Oceanian and European language tongue which I have compared with the language of the Fulani, the language of the gypsies is that which appear to possess the greatest point of resemblance”.
There is strong indications the earliest Jews were not Israelites, but rather the Jews were the same Akkadians, who appeared suddenly in 2334 BC and invaded and colonized Sumer and Subar, after allying with the Amorites.
The East Asian origin possibility shared by the Akkadians; the Hyksos; the Roma (Gypsies); and the Fulani is interesting indeed; and the linkage between the Fulani with the Hyksos in creating the Kush Kingdom could lead to think of East Asian plus West African origin of the obscure Meroitic Language.

Kush Origin is in Fulani and Hyksos


The origin and history of the Hyksos and Fulani groups are essential to understand the history and the present of West Africa.

The Fulani groups were the result of wide-spread slavery raids on West Africa since 1600 BC by the Hyksos who invaded and colonized Kmt (ancient Egypt) in 1630 BC or 1800 BC, and some of the Hyksos went further to invade North Africa and first created the Lebu (Libyans) who went back and founded the 22 and 23 Dynasties in Kmt (945 – 728 BC).

It is clear the western part of the Hyksos were devastated by the loss of route connecting them with West Asian markets and the Hyksos expelled to the east of Kmt. To reconnect the Hyksos in Libya had sought assistance from Troy and also took their slavery bandits to invade the southern Nile Valley. The Hyksos wanted to connect with their bandits that were raiding Arabia and also invade and regain Kmt from the south.

The created Fulani groups were used to invade the southern Nile Valley and first colonized the region which they called Kordofan then they occupied Kerma south of the 4th Cataract in 1500 BC. After raiding for 700 years the Hyksos with their Fulani destroyed north Kerma civilization and created in its place Kush in 785 BC, who invaded Kmt to assist the defeated Libyan dynasties and the expelled Hyksos in the Amorite east who were attacking Subar and Sumer; in the events that led to the fall of Sumer and the subsequent creation of Babylonia and the Jews.

The Hyksos were actually the same Akkadians who colonized Sumer and Subar (Fertile Crescent) in 2334-2154 BC. The Akkadians were Turkic Mongolian raiding bandits on horses and took foot soldiers from South Caucasus (Hurrians). Amorites joined the expelled Akkadians to form the Hyksos.

The same amalgam who invaded North Africa and started slavery in West Africa were the invaders and colonizers of Spain and Portugal from 711 AD and were expelled in 1492 AD. They shared and also took over power from their Fulani partner groups in West Africa who were their suppliers of wealth and slaves.

Songhai Empire c. 1464–1591 preceded by Mali Empire and Gao Empire and was succeeded by Saadi dynasty; Pashalik of Timbuktu and Dendi Kingdom.
Mali Empire c. 1230–1670 preceded by Ghana Empire and Gao Empire and was succeeded by Songhai Empire; Jolof Empire; Kaabu Empire and the Empire of Great Fulo

All these regimes were more or less dominated, created or influenced by the Fulani and their Hyksos masters of North Africa, who claim to be Amazigh; while the only true Amazigh are the Tuareg the arch-rival of Fulani and Hyksos. Indeed the history of West Africa is mainly around the history of Hyksos and Fulani slavery and looting.

In fact, “Pharaohs” was a term used by native people of Kmt during the Hyksos colonization (1630-1523 BC) to point to the foreign colonizers as “paɾuw (meaning that person in the great house)”.
Native people of Kmt refrained to call the Hyksos ruler and other foreign rulers as kings which is pronounces as “Nesso”. Nesso was reserved for genuine legitimate kings of Kmt origin. It was their smart way to resist occupation and show disregard.

In this sense, the Songhai were made up by, and related to, pharaohs who were Hyksos rulers. The Songhai were amalgam of local West African groups forced together by slavery; but were not descendants of Kmt. The Hyksos and their pharaohs were also related to the Amorite-Akkadian-Turkic-Hurrian bandits that colonized the Arabs in their homeland which is only in the Western and Southern coasts of the Arabian Peninsula, including Yemen, since 1300 BC after the Hyksos were driven out from Kmt in 1523 BC; then from Mittani and Sumer in 1300 BC.

Therefore, saying that the Songhai and the Fulani are somehow related to the pharaohs (Hyksos) and also to Yemen (Bedouin bandits who colonized Arabs) as their traditions say is reasonable since these were the only two sources for slaves, gold and horses markets and power used by the Fulani and other West African regimes to control the region.

The relationship of the Kushites and their collaboration to the Hyksos is evident in the first and second steles that Lord Carnarvon discovered in 1908 in Thebes and recounts the events of the war that Kamose waged against the Hyksos and the Kushites at the same time. It recalled a courier arrest and detention carrying a letter from the Hyksos leader named Abibi in Avares to his pact ally the leader of Kushites asking for urgent support against the threat posed by the armies of Kmt led by King Kamose against the Hyksos and the Kushites. The content of the Hyksos message to the Kushites was recorded by Kamose in the inscription recounting his victory in Karnak.

The name kes or kas (k3š) appeared in Kmt monuments for the first time in 1450 B.C., and it was meant that the Hyksos gangs that seized Sumar (the civilization of southern Iraq) and their name were the Kassites or the Kishites from Kish, Kas, Kash, or Kasu, and they were Hyksos gangs who occupied Mesopotamia from 1531 to 1155 BC .Clearly, the name Kush is close to Kassites.

It is possible that the formation of the Kush kingdom by someone called Al-Ara came as a result of the urgent need to invade Kmt from the south and to follow instructions that came to the southern Hyksos gangs and Fulani from their Libyan Hyksos partners of the 23rd family that were defeated and fell into the hands of the 24th Dynasty in 732 BC and continued to rule for 12 years only and fell to the invasion of the 25th Dynasty, whose name became the Kingdom of Kush, by the Hyksos gangs, who are of the same origin as the Kassite gangs in Babylon from 1531 to 1155 B.C. to attack Kmt from the south

So, of course, the names Kush, Ta-siti, and Ta-nehso refer to three different lands, not one region. Ta-siti means the land of the civilization of the people of Kerma. While Kush means the colonized part by ​​the Hyksos and their Fulani slave. While Ta-nehso points to black slave areas, whether domestic or foreign.

The Myth of the Existence of Akkadian People and a Semite Race


It can be proven beyond any doubt that the Akkadians were not a people but rather amalgam of groups and their initial nuclei from East Asia. They invaded and occupied Sumer and Subar in 2334 BC and had no previous presence in the ancient history of Sumer or Subar. Likewise, the Akkadians did not establish a civilization, but the Akkadians took over the Sumerians and the Subarians, meaning the Assyrians with the Ugarits, and they attributed them to themselves.

The Akkadians are only a foreign linguistic and political presence that appeared in 2334 BC, they have no previous existence. The Akkadians are trying to promote the myth of an ethnicity called the Semites that unites them with Bedouins and calling them Arabs and Jews. With this claim, they assert that the Akkadians are a mixture of horse-riding gangs from East Asia with Hurrian infantry mercenaries, who added Amorites from the deserts of West Mesopotamia, Syria and Jordan.

The Akkadians were the first stage in the formation of the Hyksos after their alliance with Amorites and together they invaded Kmt in 1630 BC; after the Sumerians expelled them and liberated their homeland from the Acadians in 2154 BC. The Akkadians, who are known as the Hyksos in Kmt, were expelled and Kmt was liberated by King Ahmose I in 1523 BC. Most of them fled east to the lands of the Amorites, and from there they attacked Sumer again and set up a colony of the Kassites. They simultaneously attacked Subar and set up a colony of Mittani in 1500 BC.

In 1300 BC, after the Sumerians and the Suparians liberated their lands again and expelled the Akkadian Hyksos, the Kassite and Mitanni, the gangs headed towards the Arabs and their homeland in the coasts of the southern and western peninsula only. The Akkadians continued to assault the Arabs with separate gangs, who called the leader of each gang Makrib. The Makaribs controlled the Arabs and occupied their lands completely, and they first called themselves the Bedouins, and then claimed that they were the Arabs themselves. In 685 BC they established the Sabaean Kingdom.

The Akkadians’ aggression transgressed the homeland of the Sumerians, the Subarians, and the homeland of the Arabs to cross the Red Sea and attacked the peoples of the Lands of Punt, meaning the Horn of Africa, the largest part of which is now called Abyssinia, including the states of Ethiopia and Eritrea. The Amorite Bedouins Hurrian Akkadians established a colony in the Horn of Africa called “D’mt,” in 980 B.C. and it was for pillaging and hunting slaves.

In the year 605 B.C., the Amorite Bedouins Hurrian Akkadians gangs managed to defeat the armies of the Sumerians, the Subarians, and the Kmtians combined in the disastrous Battle of Carchemish. The fall of the Assyrian empire thus ended their protection of Sumer. The Akkadians, along with the Amorites, established the Neo-Babylonia in the Sumerian lands; and with this began of the time to steal and obscure the ancient Sumerian history and civilization.

A limited part of Punt Lands had before the year 2000 BC witnessed the Flood and with it the legacy of Noah and his sons Ham, Sam and Japheth appeared. They are events and personalities belonging to a limited region in Punt lands, not all of them, and they have no relationship with the rest of the world. Therefore, the presence of what is called Semite race is confined to Abyssinia mostly and extends to the homeland of the Arabs on the western and southern coasts of the peninsula only. The true Arabs are a natural and historical extension of Abyssinia, and neither the Arabs nor the Semites have any presence on the lands of the Amorites, Sumer and Subar.

In the year 1800 BC, the Israelite tribe appeared in the land of Punt. Also, Moses came to them as a messenger in 1500 B.C. and in 1446 B.C., the Torah came to them and was in the Ethiopian language of Ge’ez, and the Torah was revealed to them in the Simien Mountains in the Tigray region. In the year 1050 BC, the Kingdom of Israel was established in the land of Punt. The Amorite Acadians colony of D’mt coincided with the rule of King David (1008-970 BC) of the Kingdom of Israel, which was neighboring it. In 970 BC, the king of Israel was Solomon, and he was very wealthy and wise, and had mines for his wealth. The Kingdom of Israel was also near the Ethiopian Kingdom of Sheba, and their Queen Makeda had visited Solomon.

The Amorite Akkadians took the stories, heritage, and news of the people of Punt lands, the message of Moses to the children of Israel, and the stories of the original Ge’ez Torah to their new colony, Babylonian. And with it the Amorite Akkadians invented the Hebrew language, which is attributed to the Hebrews. The Akkadian Amorites Bedouins are only the Aperu, pronounced Haperu, Aabero, or Khaberu, meaning that it is Hebrew. A redrafting and misrepresentation of the stories and heritage of the Israelites, Abyssinia and the Ge’ez Torah were made and the Sumerian legend and traditions were added to them to write the Hebrew Torah in Babylon in 580 BC.

The name of the well-known town of Khyber, which is about 153 km north of Medina (Old Yathrib) in the Hijaz in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, is the same name as the Khabero that is Hebrew. The Khyber Fort and the seat of Turkic Mongolian cavalry with Hurrian mercenaries and Amorites and they were all the ones who formed the first Akkadian colony in Sumer in 2334 BC, which it claims a nation, Arabs and Semites.

Finally, the Turkic Mongolian Khazars in North Caucasus were added to the Jewish association in 650 AD, after 2900 years from the beginning of the alliance of the Hurrians with the Turkic Mongolians in the South Caucasus, who first formed the Akkadian and then the Hyksos and then the Jews in their first expansion since 2334 BC.

A map shows the History of the Emergence & Expansion of the Akkadians in Sumer & Subar

The Akkadian Joint Origin of Hyksos and Jews Hypothesis


It is highly likely that the first Akkadians were Turkic Mongolian horsemen bandits, from Alti Mountains and Tarim region in East Asia, who after invading south Caucasus mixed with Armenian and Hurrian and took them as foot soldiers and slaves. The Akkadians defeated and ruled Sumer from 2334 to 2154 BC.

The defeated Akkadians in Sumer with their Armenians and Hurrians fled west and stayed for long time mixing with the Amorites. The expelled horsemen with their subjects had had learned the wheel and chariots from Sumer; and they planned new attacks on Kmt.

These bandits was called Hyksos in Kmt but were the same Akkadians in Sumer 700 years earlier. They occupied north Kmt in 1630 BC. After King Ahmose I defeated them and liberated Kmt, they went east and invaded Sumer once again forming the Kassites; and another group of them defeated the Ugarit and formed the Mitanni in 1500 BC.

But the Kassites and Mittani were defeated by the Assyrians with support from Kmt in 1300 BC. After expelling them, the Akkadian-Hyksos remnants continued to weaken the Assyrians until they defeated and overthrew them in 605 BC at the Battle of Carchemish and established Neo- Babylonian. The same mixture that created the Akkadians and the Hyksos finally invented Jews and Judaism in Babylon in 580 BC using mixed Sumerian and Ethiopian traditions and legends.

The Amorite origin of the Bedouins is nothing but the Aperu or the Hebrews. It is evident in the well-known Khaybar town some 153 km to the north of Medina (ancient Yathrib) in the Hejaz, Saudi Arabia. This oasis fortress town had been inhabited by Jewish tribes. It was the home of the Amorite Bedouins and their Jewish partners who are the Turkic Mongolian horsemen with their Armenian and Hurrian mercenaries from the lost Akkadian Empire.

فرضية الاصل المشترك الأكادي للهكسوس واليهود

من المرجح جدًا أن الأكاديين الأوائل كانوا عصابات خيالة تركمنغول من جبال ألتاي ومنطقة تاريم في شرق آسيا وغزوا جنوب القوقاز وامتزجوا بالأرمن والحروريين وأخذوهم كجنود مشاة وعبيد. وهزم الأكاديون السومريين وحكموا سومر من 2334 إلى 2154 ق م

استطاع السومريين تحرير سومر وهزيمة الاكاديين وهرب الأكاديون مع الأرمن والحوريين غربًا وبقوا لفترة طويلة يختلطوا مع العموريين. الخيالة المطرودين مع رعاياهم تعلموا العجلة والمركبات من سومر وخططوا لهجمات جديدة على كمت

كان يُطلق على تلك العصابات المختلطة اسم الهكسوس في كمت بينما كانوا هم نفس الأكاديين في سومر قبل 700 عام. احتل الاكاديين اي الهكسوس شمال كمت عام 1630 ق م. بعد أن هزمهم الملك أحمس وحرر كمت فروا شرقا وغزوا سومر مرة أخرى واقاموا مستعمرة الكاشيين. وهزمت مجموعة أخرى منهم الأوغاريت واقامت مستعمرة الميتاني في 1500 ق م

ولكن استطاع  الآشوريون بدعم من كمت من هزم الكيشيين والميتاني عام 1300 ق م. وبعد طرد الكيشيين والميتاني استمرت بقايا الأكادية – الهكسوس في إضعاف الأشوريين حتى هزموهم وأطاحوا بهم في 605 ق م في معركة كركميش وأسسوا البابلية الجديدة. المزيج نفسه الذي خلق الأكاديين والهكسوس أخترع اليهود واليهودية في بابل في عام 580 ق م باستخدام التراث والأساطير السومرية والإثيوبية المختلطة.

الأصل العموري للبدو ليس سوى الأبيرو وينطق الخبيرو أو العبرانيين. وهو واضح في بلدة خيبر المعروفة على بعد حوالي 153 كم شمال المدينة المنورة (يثرب القديمة) في الحجاز بالمملكة العربية السعودية. وكانت مدينة الحصن هذه تقطنها قبائل يهودية. كان مقر البدو العموريين وشركائهم اليهود الذين هم الخيالة التركمنغول مع المرتزقة الأرمن والحوريين من الإمبراطورية الأكادية المفقودة.

Relationships between Amorites and Hyksos with the Invention of Jews


These are some brief conclusions I reached from analyzing the history of the Arabian Peninsula and the Fertile Crescent. Wishing to discuss them in a calm and objective manner.

The Amorites are the Bedouins and they are not Arabs, but they learned Arabic after their conquest of southern and western Arabia and the transition and connection between the north and south of the Arabian Peninsula.

The Ugarites are neither Amorites, nor Bedouins, Sumerian, or Assyrians. They had a distinct civilization, but the Amorites overthrew it and formed among them the Mitanni and the Arameans.

The Kassites appeared and disappeared suddenly and did not leave a trace in Babylon because they were of the Bedouin Amorites, but they returned to form a colony in Babylonia after they brought down the Assyrians

Turkicmongolians were gangs of male horse raiders who came from East Asia and allied with the Amorites first as displaced groups and then as infantry mercenaries to penetrate the four directions

Turkicmongolian horsemen, along with Amorite foot soldiers, went west and invaded northern Kmt; and together they formed the Hyksos

Turkicmongolian horsemen, along with Amorite foot soldiers, went south and invaded southern and western Arabia; so they formed the Sabaeans.

Turkicmongolian horsemen, along with Amorite foot soldiers, went east and invaded the Akkadians; so they formed the Babylonian Kassites

Turkicmongolian horsemen, along with Amorite foot soldiers, went north and invaded the Ugarites in, so they formed the Arameans. And then with the Hyksos after their expulsion from Kmt in 1523 BC they formed the Mittani.

Kmtian, Assyrian, and Ugaritic monuments, and before them the Sumerian, assert that the Arabs, the Hebrews, the Jews, the Israelites, the stories of al-Tanakh, the Arabic language, and the Hebrew language, all these did not exist in the north of the Arabian Peninsula and the fertile crescent before 580 BC. Archaeology does not deny that the Arabs and the Arabic language were confined to their ancient original homeland in the southern and western coasts only.

For example, the victory inscription of the king of the Neo-Assyrian Empire “Aššur-aḫa-iddina” (Esarhaddon) of 671 BC does not mention any presence of Arabs, Jews, Hebrew, or Israelites, in any of realm of his empire. Likewise, the monuments of the 24th and 26th dynasties of Kmt show no indication of Arabs, Jews or Israelites in the regions of eastern to Kmt.

Jews, Judaism, Hebrew, and Tanakh, known as the Hebrew Torah, were inventions that occurred in 580 BC in Babylon, by an alliance made up of Turkicmongolian expelled Hyksos, who overthrew the Assyrians and occupied Babylon with their Amorite Bedouin mercenary partners, and Arameans; in addition to a small group from the Ethiopian tribe of Judah.

The group of Judah is the one that provided them with the stories of Abraham, the Israelites, Solomon, the Message of Moses, and the characters before them, as a material reformulated in the Tanakh to claim historic and religious right in the lands of Canaan; and the presence of the land of Israel and Beit-ha-Maqdash (the Holy House i.e. the Temple of Solomon) in it; as well as a claim that the Jews are Israelite, and that the Israelites had been exiled for 430 years in Kmt.

There is no doubt that Syria and Lebanon are subject to dispute and conflict between the Canaanite Ugandan civilization and the nomadic Amorite Bedouin since about three thousand five hundred years ago. This is precisely what is trying to impose nomadic Amorite Bedouin culture in the name of Arabism, the Arabic language, Bedouin Islam contradictory to and different from the Message of Muhammed to Arabs; as well as imposing Roman and Aramean Christianity, which is contradictory to and different from the Messages of Jesus and Moses to Ethiopians.

The subject here is about gangs that were the first to use the horse to invade in the 1800’s and destroyed the Scythian civilizations and the Saraswati (Sind) civilization, the Iranians and the Sumerians, and they were called the Bedouin empires, but it is wrong to call them a Bedouin civilization.

Turkicmongolians is a term that I had to make because there is no equivalent term to describe these gangs, from which other gangs emerged that invaded Sumer, the Ugarites, the Kmt, the Arabs, the Hittites, North Africa, Kerma and Punt.

The Sabaeans were made as a result of invasions and colonization by the Bedouin Amorites from the Syrian deserts. They were not Arabs at all, and genuine Arabs were their victims. Bedouin Amorites were the ones who invented false Arab genealogy with concepts of Al-Arab al-Ba’ida, “The Extinct Arabs” for the ancient Arabs.

Sabaeans claim the original pure Arabs, “Al-Arab al-Ariba”, i.e. Qahtani Arabs, for themselves in Yemen; and the Arabized Adnanites Arabs, for the tribes along the Western coast of Arabia, Northern Arabia and Iraq. Arabized Arabs were actually Qedarites which was a largely nomadic Amorite tribal confederation, not much different from the Qahtani colonizers of Arabs in Yemen.

Sabaean mythology identified Qahtan with the Yoqtan (Joktan) son of Eber (Hūd) in the Hebrew Bible. According to Amorite Bedouin claims, the Qahtanites are pure Arabs, unlike the Adnanites who are “Arabized Arabs”.

In many ways the Hyksos created the Jews; and the Bedouin Amorites created the Sabaeans, and together the Jews and Sabaeans colonized and stole the identities and history of Ethiopian Israelites and their neighbors the ancient Arabs.

Nile Southern Valley Confederation Liberation Project


Nile Rivers Confederation

Nile Rivers Confederation

Achieving liberation and rescue of the nationalities of the Nile rivers, Darfur, the East, and the South from the occupation and colonization of the Fulani-Badgara-Bederriya, and the peaceful and orderly reconstruction of the Confederacy, requires a strong aid and partnership and trust with the peoples and sisterly countries of in the immediate neighborhood who have always been in historical contact and interests, and common blood connections with the nationalities of the Nile rivers, Darfur, the East, and the South.

Therefore, it must be requested to place the regions of the rivers of the Nile rivers, Darfur, the East, and the South under the joint protection of the immediate neighbors, with international supervision and support, for a period determined according to the readiness of rebuilding the national state apparatus and institutions.

The joint protection shall be divided as follows:

First: Putting the northern region and the Island of Meroë under Egyptian protection

Second: Putting the Eastern Region under Ethiopian-Eritrean protection

Third: Putting the Kordofan and Darfur regions under the protection of Chad

Fourth: Putting a region between the Blue and White Niles under the protection of South Sudan

Fifth: The administrative boundaries between the regions shall be the Nile, Blue and White Rivers

Sixth: Establish federal capitals for each region; and participate in the confederation capital, Khartoum

Demanding that Nile Southern Valley (the Sudan) be placed under the protection of its brothers in Egypt, Ethiopia, Chad and South Sudan, with international supervision, is much honorable and safer from calling for the deployment of foreign international forces; or fighting a liberation war from which civilians and vulnerable regions are not spared.

مشروع تحرير كونفيدرالية جنوب وادي النيل

يتطلب لتحقيق تحرير وانقاذ قوميات أنهار النيل ودارفور والشرق والجنوب من إحتلال واستعمار الفلاتة البقارة البديرية وإعادة بناء الكونفيدرالية بشكل سلمي ومنظم طلب العون والشراكة القوية والثقة مع شعوب ودول الأشقاء في الجوار المباشر والذين كانوا دوما علي اتصال تاريخي ومصالح. مشتركة وصلات رحم مع قوميات أنهار النيل ودارفور والشرق والجنوب

لذلك يجب المطالبة بوضع أقاليم انهار النيل ودارفور والشرق والجنوب تحت الحماية المشتركة لدول الجوار المباشر مع إشراف ودعم دولي لمدة تحدد حسب جاهزية إعادة بناء أجهزة ومؤسسات الدولة الوطنية.

وتقسم الحماية المشتركة علي النحو التالي:

أولاً: وضع إقليم الشمالية والبطانة تحت الحماية المصرية

ثانياً: وضع إقليم الشرق تحت الحماية الإثيوبية الاريترية

ثالثاً: وضع إقليم كردفان ودارفور تحت حماية تشاد

رابعاً: وضع إقليم ما بين النيلين الازرق والابيض تحت حماية جنوب السودان

خامساً: تكون الحدود الإدارية بين الأقاليم هي أنهار ألنيل والأزرق والأبيض

سادسا: إقامة عاصمة فيدرالية خاصة لكل إقليم والمشاركة في العاصمة الكونفيدرالية الخرطوم

المطالبة بوضع جنوب وادي النيل (السودان) تحت حماية الأشقاء في مصر وأثيوبيا وتشاد وجنوب السودان بإشراف دولي اشرف واسلم كثيرا جداً من الدعوة بنشر قوات أممية اجنبية أو خوض حرب تحرير لا يسلم منها المدنيين والاقاليم الضعيفة

Punt Lands Hypothesis


Jews are Asiatic and totally different group from the Israelites who were East Africans.

My Abyssinian Hypothesis had been updated after I discovered new strong evidences, including the camel presence which was limited to the Horn of Africa.

Now, the hypothesis is called Punt Lands Hypothesis and it states that the Israelites were from Punt Lands, and not Arabs; and the Exodus was local across a river.

Jews are descendants of Turkic Mongolian Hyksos in Babylon in 580 BC and were invented in Babylon.

First Jews were Amorites bandits led by horse-riding expelled Hyksos and Kassites who used few Ethiopian Judahites to invent Jews, Judaism, Hebrew language and the Tanakh to replace the Ge’ez Torah of Mosses, and establish fake Israel and fake Jerusalem in western Amorites land.

Kush on the Nile River bears the same name of the Kassites ,Kaššu, Kassi, Kasi or Kashic who appeared in 1531 until 1155 BC in Babylon.

The light-complexion people of Arabia, the Levant, Egypt, and North and East Africa who claim to be Arabs are actually descendants of the Amorites with the Turkic Mongolian Hyksos bandits.

The light-complexion “Arabs” are the Bedouins who colonized the tanned-complexion original Arabs in the Western and Southern coasts of Arabia, who are much closer in everything to the peoples of the Horn of Africa and Kmt.

The diagram shows how Hyksos and Amorites created Kush to invade Kmt by Bedouins and Fulani (who are slaves taken from west, central and east Africa).

%d bloggers like this: