Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy

Posts tagged ‘Europe’

All Major Middle Eastern Religions Were Replaced


All Major Middle Eastern Religions Were Replaced by Tengri

All Major Middle Eastern Religions Were Replaced by Tengri

All major Middle Eastern religions of Moses, Yeshua, and Mohamed plus the oldest of Zoroaster suffered heavy counterfeiting by the Turkic groups. The MSM academia, media, and politicians keep shouting: Terrorism, Islam, bla bla bla, creating misinformed public opinion.

But if they are playing stupid let us remind them: All Turkic groups are equally responsible for wide range of crimes and these groups include:

1- Turkic Anatolia, (fake Caucasians),

2- Turkic Persia, (fake Shia Iranians),

3- Turkic Zionists (fake Jewish Israelite),

4- Turkic rulers of Arabia, (fake Muslim Arabs)

5- Turkic Indians (fake Hindu Aryans, including Gypsy), and

6- Turkic Europeans (fake liberal Christians)

These groups discovered Zoroastrianism before Moses’ time. They killed it, and used their Tengri cult mixed with few concepts from Zoroasterianism to invent Persian Zoroastrianism. They repeated that with the teachings of Moses, Yeshua,and Mohamed.

Trust me the teachings of Moses, Yeshua, and Mohamed, and Zoroaster all died soon after birth. Most monarchies, bankers, and politicians in Europe and USA are of Turkic making since the so-called English, French, American, and Russian “Revolutions”. These Turkic groups committed all sorts of crimes in Asia, Europe, Levant, Arabia, and Africa.

With just a little of common sense and investigation people can easily find the real historic Turkic connections between them beneath their deceptive mutual hostilities and malignant policies.

Those are the enemies of Hitler, Nazis, and Russia. And before them were the enemies of Alexander the Great.

For more details on Turkic mythology and how it borrowed from Zoroastrianism and was changed from its pagan/polytheistic origins and its symbols see Turkic mythology

Tengri Expansion

Tengri Expansion

Turkic Opinions and Confessions

A Turk sent me a number of Facebook messages saying that Europeans & the World were Turkic Slaves, and the Turkic are a masters’ race. These messages are posted at:

A Turk Bragging That Europeans & World were Turkic Slaves

In another group of messages it said that Zionist Jews are also Turkic and the Turkic people subjugated Europe, Russia, India, Africa, and Middle East and whole of Asia. Read and know how these Turkic groups are thinking.

(I received first batch of FaceBook messages from some Cengizhan Atilla at 4:24 AM on 17 March 2017).

The second batch is posted at:

Hitler Also Project and Puppet of Khazar Elite to Create Israel

Read them and decide for yourself. They are very interesting, informative, and amazing!

Islamophobia is Political Appeasement Favoring Turkic Groups


Political Appeasement Favoring Turkic Groups

Political Appeasement Favoring Turkic Groups

Governments, media, academia in the West are appeasing Turkic groups and betraying their nations. They don’t name terrorism and extremism their right names. They prefer to accuse a dead and unknown concept calling it Islamic Terrorism, Islamic Extremism, or “Middle Eastern” practices.

Terrorism, Slavery, and Extremism were and are conducted by Turkic groups. This is clear because there is no Islam. Islam died 23 after birth in great civil wars created by Turkic groups, and governments, media, academia in the West you know that very well.

These Turkic groups include:
1- Turkic Anatolia, (fake Caucasians),
2- Turkic Persia, (fake Shia Iranians),
3- Turkic Zionists (fake Jewish Israelite),
4- Turkic rulers of Arabia, (fake Muslim Arabs)
5- Turkic Indians (fake Hindu Aryans, including Gypsy), and
6- Turkic Europeans (fake liberal Christians)

The world must notice that only those countries struck by rebels and mercenaries, aka Jihadists, are the countries which do not fall under the control of any of the six Turkic groups.

The world is now dealing with a Tengri Turkic cult that counterfeited original Islam , as well as all major religions, from Zoroastrianism to Christianity. Religion is off point. What missing is to identify the sources of such behaviors and they are: All Turkic groups that are equally responsible from wide range of crimes.

East Europe, the Balkans, the Caucasus, Anatolia, Iran, India, and central Asia were heavily enslaved long before Islam and Arabs. This was done by Turkic groups. The Arabs were Turkified and ruled by Turkic nomads before Moses. So, Arab slavery of Africa never existed. The genuine Arabs never left Arabia, and those who are called “Arabs” in Africa are not Arabs but Turkic settlers and invaders who moved to Africa from Arabia. Arab colonization and islamization are Turkic policies, they have nothing to do with Arabs and with Islam.

Islam during prophet Mohamed b. (622-632 AD) was not beyond the main Arabian Peninsula. But during the first three Caliphs, Abu Bakr (632-634), and Umar (634-644) (Assassinated), Uthman (644-656)(Assassinated) it went into invasions. That was totally unacceptable to many believers but the Turkic elements encouraged such offensive military expansions.

The fourth Caliph Ali (656-661)(Assassinated) was the cousin of the prophet and he stopped that and carried out internal reforms and these were the main causes for the eruption of a brutal civil war throughout his rule (656-661) that ended up by assassinating him and killing most of this family.

By these killings the original Islam died upon birth and it was replaced by a fake Turkic militant cult calling itself Islam. This became the source of terrorism, colonialism, and heresy.

Turkic groups fought Zoroastrianism before the time of Moses and they used twisted Zoroastrianism to create their Turkic versions for the teachings of Zoroaster, Moses, Yeshua, and Mohamed. By these they invented the new “universal” imperial religions: Persian Zoroastrianism, Jewish Judaism, Roman Christianity, and Turkic Islam.

Even the transatlantic slavery was not done by Europeans or Arabs, they were Turkic businesses as it was in Andalusia (Iberia). The terms “Islamic” and “Eastern” were used as covers for the Turkic atrocities everywhere until now. They are not Islamic nor Arabic. They are Turkic.

With just a little of common sense and investigation people can easily find the real historic Turkic connections between them beneath their deceptive mutual hostilities and animosities and malignant policies.
Those are the enemies of Hitler, Nazis, and Russia. And before them were the enemies of Alexander the Great.
Don’t let these groups deceive you by making you assume one Turkic group is better and innocent victim of any other Turkic group. Avoid such tricky trap.

The following is part of a statement showing Turkic bragging on the situation:

[U little slaves Kiss my ass fucken little slave your ancestors were just inferior slaves who served their Turkish masters as galley slave and their rulers kneel down to Turkish master race we ruled the world for centuries and conquered all other races but turkey and our homeland Mongolia never conquered by anu other nation. U re just butthurt slave who hate turks because we enslaved your inferior jealous slave asses fucken inferior dog:) poor slave we enslaved all races blackz asians whites europeans etc all haha fucken slaves pathetic poor slave haha dutch were enslaved by Turks even Turkish captain murat reis was dutch slave who raided iceland and atlantic for slaves haha en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_Abductions

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liever_Turks_dan_Paaps
We make dutch independent from spain with Turkish aid liever turks dan paaps was their slogan hahha and we vassalized the habsburhs and whole europe lol fcken slaves we supportrd protestans and divided europe during thirty years war hahaha fucken litrtle slave we enslaved u in your own country lol also remind u turkey has better evonomy and higher gdp per capita than your father russia lol and most of european countries and it continue to rise ahaha fucken slave orospu cocugu look last pic how your pope leo kneel down to khan attila lol u inferior pathetic loser u should be ashamed to be descendant of inferior conquered slave nation lol Fucken sudanese slave we ruined your inferior country you butthurt slave. Victors write history and we Altaic Turco Mongols are victors of world .

U jealous inferior slave kiss my superior turkish master dick im descendant of scourge of god (called by inferior loser europeans) attila the hun im the genghis khan who re u fucken inferior slave we raped the world you may have our superior master bloodline you inferior pig slave]

European, American, and all Western governments, media, academia are heroically fighting the shadows of Turkic groups, but they avoid to raise a finger against the Turkic groups who are controlling them.

European, American, and all Western people must question the integrity and competence of their governments, media, academia to know why they are accusing a dead ambiguous mirage while they are aware or ignorant of the actions of different Turkic groups.

Do these Western governments, media, academia know and understand what these Turkic groups say, do, and write publicly?

SHAME ON YOU.

Hitler Also Project and Puppet of Khazar Elite to Create Israel


Hitler Also Project and Puppet of Khazar Elite to Create Israel

Hitler Also Project and Puppet of Khazar Elite to Create Israel

This is the second patch of FaceBook messages from someone called “Cengizhan Atilla” bragging about Turkic atrocities they inflicted on Europeans. They are dated March 17, 2017 at 5:30am

Read and know how these Turkic groups are thinking about themselves and all other nations in the world. Amazing indeed!

Beginning: [U fucken slave. Hitler was also project and puppet of khazar elite to create israel. İsraels flag is also copy of turkic nomadic warrior karamanid state of 13th century anatolia also hitler idolized great turkish khan ataturk also when he conquered france he named operation name as operation attila jusy like attila conquered france and germany who was the khan of turkic huns who conquered whole germanic iranian slavic celtic latin and caucasian tribes and destroyed rome
Haha
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Manzikert
Look byzantine also used turkic pecheneg and cuman mercenaries but they changed their sides when they see their enemies are turkic speaking this war also marked the end of viking ages because both norman viking english french etc mercenaries of rome destroyed as well hahah look how turkic tentmen alp arslan khan humiliate emperor romanos
When Emperor Romanos IV was conducted into the presence of Alp Arslan, the Sultan refused to believe that the bloodied and tattered man covered in dirt was the mighty Emperor of the Romans. After discovering his identity, Alp Arslan placed his boot on the Emperor’s neck and forced him to kiss the ground.[13] A famous conversation is also reported to have taken place:[28][29]

Alp Arslan: “What would you do if I were brought before you as a prisoner?”
Romanos: “Perhaps I’d kill you, or exhibit you in the streets of Constantinople.”
Alp Arslan: “My punishment is far heavier. I forgive you, and set you free.”

How pope leo kneel down to attila khan how we enslaved and conquered millions of english german dutch irish spanish french etc slaves hahaah you faggot when inferior fatimid arabs lost jerusalem to inferior eu crusades then turks came and destroyed crusades completely by turkic zengids and their kurd vassal saladin and also later turkic rulers of egypt baibars as well as qutuz
Look how turkic pecheneg khan killed viking rurikid king of russia as well as many other russian kings and made his skull as goblet hahaha
Kurya (Ukrainian: Куря, Pecheneg: Kürä[1][2]) was the name of a Pecheneg prince[3] and khan who allied with Svyatoslav I of Kiev in his campaigns in the Balkans. Later, after Svyatoslav’s defeat by the Byzantine Empire, Kurya ambushed and killed the Kievan king at Khortitsa.[4] According to the Chronicle of Bygone Years, Kurya had Svyatoslav’s skull made into a goblet[5] (a known practice in Eurasian nomadic cultures for brave foes[6]), and gilded.[7][8]
Haha
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skull_Tower
Look how we built skull tower from our enemies heads and still erected in nis serbia hahahaha
Its our art ! Turco mongol conquest caused black death plague which killed more than half of human population hahaha genghis khan have 16 million descendants
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/02/0214_030214_genghis.html
Genghis Khan a Prolific Lover, DNA Data Implies
Hillary Mayell
for National Geographic News
February 14, 2003
Genghis Khan, the fearsome Mongolian warrior of the 13th century, may have done more than rule the largest empire in the world; according to a recently published genetic study, he may have helped populate it too.

An international group of geneticists studying Y-chromosome data have found that nearly 8 percent of the men living in the region of the former Mongol empire carry y-chromosomes that are nearly identical. That translates to 0.5 percent of the male population in the world, or roughly 16 million descendants living today.
Hahaha our homeland mongolia is 2 million and it killed half of total chinese population during turco mongol comquest of china also 80 million hindus killed by turkic muslim invaders hahahaah we destroyed the whole world and who are u fucken little slave u little sudanese slave of turkish master race . Death to subhuman inferior races! Heil Turkish master race !

(Photos)]

[U fucken inferior bastard slave The Mongol Empire was founded by Genghis Khan in 1206. At its height, it was the largest empire in human history, covering 13.8 million square miles or more than 35 million square kilometers. According to some sources, the empire comprehended almost 80% of the world population, including the most advanced and populous nations of that time:The Mongol Empire emerged from the unification of Mongol and Turkic tribes of historical Mongolia under the leadership of Genghis Khan Ancient sources described Genghis Khan’s conquests as wholesale destruction on an unprecedented scale in certain geographical regions, causing great demographic changes in world. Pax Ottomana (Latin for “Ottoman Peace”, modelled after Pax Romana) was the period of relative peace in world (1453–1699) during which the Turkish Ottoman Empire became the global hegemonic power and adopted the role of a global police force.[1][2] Which race unified and ruled the world? We did ! Which race created largest empire of human history? We did! Which race opens/finish ages? We did ! Which bloodline now run the world ? Altaic khazar bloodline! We !! Every race every people suffered under barbarian altaic master race ! We conquered the all races all nations ! And we never conquered by foreign nation ! Heil !! Death to subhuman inferior slave races heil altaic master race !!!! We are only race who unified the world under one flag one rule. U little slaves U fucken slave read last paragraph i sent u few min ago hahaha u inferior slave

(Photos)]

[U fucken inferior slave read haha
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karamanids
Flag
Also sumerian god name dengir was old turkic mongolian(altaic) god tengri
And sumerians were also altaic speaking tribe who migrated from mongolia and destroyed middle east and created their civiliation over mesopotamia all abrahamic religions derived from sumerian mythology hahaha you fucken slave kiss my superior turkish altaic master dick

(Photos)] End.

The Turkic Beast is Enjoying Our Ignorance!


The Turkic Beast is Enjoying Our Ignorance!

The Turkic Beast is Enjoying Our Ignorance!

The Turkic connection is obvious only for those who can see.

Discover the Global Turkic Connection


Discover the Global Turkic Connection

Discover the Global Turkic Connection

This subject is so shockingly real and revealing to the extent that it is being deliberately hidden and suppressed over the internet and in the conventional mainstream academia and media.

Watch out for the Turkic Connection! To find out the true sources of slavery, NWO, counterfeited religions, and terrorism we have to go deeper than and depart the conventional mainstream academia, perceptions, and media.
In my opinion it is all about covering up and expanding the Turkic connection and Turanians.
1- Turkic Anatolia, (fake Caucasians),
2- Turkic Persia, (fake Shia Iranians),
3- Turkic Zionists (fake Jewish Israelite),
4- Turkic rulers of Arabia, (fake Muslim Arabs)
5- Turkic Indians (fake Hindu Aryans), and
6- Turkic Europeans (fake liberal Christians)

Most monarchies, bankers, and politicians in Europe and USA are of their making since the so-called English, French, American, and Russian “Revolutions”. These Turkic groups committed all sorts of crimes in Asia, Europe, Levant, Arabia, and Africa.

With just a little of common sense and investigation people can easily find the real historic Turkic connections between them beneath their deceptive mutual hostilities and malignant policies.

Binary Economics Challenging the Right, Left, and Khazarians


Binary Economics Challenging the Right, Left, and Khazarians

Binary Economics Challenging the Right, Left, and Khazarians

“The Roman arena was technically a level playing field. But on one side were the lions with all the weapons, and on the other the Christians with all the blood. That’s not a level playing field. That’s a slaughter. And so is putting people into the economy without equipping them with capital, while equipping a tiny handful of people with hundreds and thousands of times more than they can use.”    –Louis O. Kelso in Bill Moyers: A World of Ideas II, Public Opinions from Private Citizens, (1990, both book and video) page 214, ISBN 0385416644

Binary economics, also known as Two-factor Economics, is a theory of economics that endorses both private property and a free market but proposes significant reforms to the banking system. According to theories first proposed by Louis Kelso, widespread use of central bank-issued interest-free loans to fund employee-owned firms can finance economic growth whilst widening stock ownership in a way which binary economists believe will be non-inflationary.

Binary economics rejects the claim that neoclassical economics alone promotes a ‘free market’ which is free, fair and efficient. (e.g., as an interpretation of the classical First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics). Binary economists believe freedom is only truly achieved if all individuals are able to acquire an independent economic base from capital holdings, and that the distribution of ownership rights can “deepen democracy”.

Although elements of binary economics can be found elsewhere (e.g., Pope Leo XIII’s Rerum Novarum 1891; the Distributism economic ideology of G.K. Chesterton and Hilaire Belloc; and Harold Moulton (1935) The Formation of Capital, the first clear formulation of the subject was in 1958. This was done by Louis Kelso (lawyer and economist, 1913-1991) and Mortimer Adler (the American Aristotelian philosopher, 1902-2001) in their unhappily titled, but momentous, book The Capitalist Manifesto (1958).

Let us hope Trump Administration will work to remove the myth that the conflict is between Right and Left. Even most the Republicans and Democrats themselves are in illusion that it is Right versus Left. I have great hopes in India and the rest of BRICS to promote Binary Economics all over the world as a viable ideological alternative for Right and Left and rid the world from the poisonous Khazarian politics and economics. Humanize Capitalism.

 

Louis Orth Kelso, founder of Kelso & Company and inventor of ESOPs

Louis Orth Kelso, founder of Kelso & Company and inventor of ESOPs

Louis Orth Kelso (December 4, 1913 – February 17, 1991) was a political economist, corporate and financial lawyer, author, lecturer and merchant banker who is chiefly remembered today as the inventor and pioneer of the employee stock ownership plan (ESOP), invented to enable working people without savings to buy stock in their employer company and pay for it out of its future dividend yield.

Kelso created the ESOP in 1956 to enable the employees of a closely held newspaper chain to buy out its retiring owners. Two years later Kelso and his co-author, the philosopher Mortimer J. Adler, explained the macro-economic theory on which the ESOP is based in The Capitalist Manifesto (Random House, 1958). In The New Capitalists (Random House, 1961), the two authors present Kelso’s financial tools for democratizing capital ownership in a private property, market economy. These ideas were further elaborated and refined in Two-Factor Theory: The Economics of Reality (Random House, 1967) and Democracy and Economic Power: Extending the ESOP Revolution Through Binary Economics (1986, Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, Massachusetts; reprinted 1991, University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland), both co-authored by Patricia Hetter Kelso, his collaborator since 1963.

Kelso’s next financing innovation, the Consumer Stock Ownership Plan (CSOP), in 1958 enabled a consortium of farmers to finance and start up a fertilizer plant. Despite fierce opposition from the major oil companies who dominated the industry, Valley Nitrogen Producers was a resounding success. Substantial dividends first paid for the stock and then drastically reduced fertilizer costs for the farmer-shareholders.

Kelso regarded the ESOP and CSOP as pragmatic proof that his revolutionary revision of classical economic theory, and the financial techniques he derived from this new perspective, were sound and workable in the economic and business world.

Kelso long believed that he had not originated a new economic theory but only discovered a vital fact that the classical economists had somehow overlooked. This fact was the key to understanding why the private property, free market economy was notoriously unstable, pursuing a roller coaster course of exhilarating highs and terrifying descents into economic and financial collapse.

This missing fact, which Kelso had uncovered over years of intensive reading, research and thought, drastically modifies the classical paradigm which has dominated formal economics since Adam Smith. It concerns the effect of technological change on the distributive dynamics of a private property, free market economy.

Below is a video of Louis Kelso being interviewed by Harold Hudson Channer. Made in 1987, this video is extraordinarily topical.

 

Rodney Shakespeare and his BinaryEconomics.net

Rodney Shakespeare was Visiting Professor of Binary Economics at Trisakti University, Jakarta where he taught on the international postgraduate Islamic Economics and Finance program.

He is a Cambridge MA; a qualified UK Barrister; and a well-known paper presenter and lecturer particularly at Islamic conferences dealing with money, the real economy, and social and economic justice. He is a co-founder of the Global Justice Movement  and the author of BinaryEconomics.net. In 2000 he received the (Martin Luther) King-Kelso Award. He broadcasts with Press TV, Russia Today, Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting and various other TV and radio stations.

Rodney’s first book on binary economics The Two-factor Nation was published in 1976. He is co-author (with Robert Ashford) of the standard textbook on binary economics Binary Economics – the new paradigm (1999).

Rodney Shakespeare is co-author (with Peter Challen) of the subsequent text Seven Steps to Justice (2002) which further develops binary economics, and is also author of The Modern Universal Paradigm (July, 2007) containing later developments in particular relating to paradigmatic understanding and the appeal of binary economics to people of faith and of good faith.

Binary economics is the expression of a new universal paradigm or new understanding of reality that creates a new economics, a new politics, a new justice and a new morality. It also addresses the big environmental issues. Without the new modern universal paradigm there will be no peace, nor an end to colonialism and racism.

 

Quick Technical Summary of Binary Economics

  1. Commercial banks to lend (at interest), as they wish, only their own money and, with permission, that of depositors. Commercial banks not allowed creating new money.

NB This creates a limited pool of money enabling reasonable interest rates to be paid to depositors.

  1. Central (or National or European) Bank to create interest-free loan money for productive capacity and, in particular, for the spreading of productive capacity (and thus the associated consuming capacity), over time, to every person in society. This is counter-inflationary because new, widespread productive (and consuming) capacity comes into existence while the money which created it is cancelled.
  2. The Central Bank interest-free loan money to be administered by the commercial banks only allowed making a reasonable administration charge.
  3. The Central Bank need only make periodic checks on a commercial bank to ensure that the interest-free loan supply is being used specifically for the spreading of productive capacity.

Any commercial bank abusing the privilege of administering the interest-free loan supply (for the benefit of everybody in society) will lose that privilege.

In its economics aspect, binary economics is a market economics whose markets work for everybody. Furthermore, it upholds private property but private property (and the associated income) for everybody.

An alternative summary is “the use of national bank-issued interest-free loans, administered by the banking system, for the development and spreading of various forms of productive (and the associated consuming) capacity thereby creating a balance of supply and demand with producers and consumers being the same people (as required by Say’s Theorem) and forwarding social and economic justice.”

No subsidy is involved. Existing money (e.g., a bank’s capital or, with permission, the deposits of customers) may be lent in ways including interest. However, newly created money MUST be lent interest-free for developing and spreading the real economy to every individual in the population.

 

Fifty Nine False Assumptions of Mainstream Neo-classical Economics

Below are listed fifty-nine false assumptions which underlie mainstream neo-classical economics. These false assumptions are basic things believed to be true or taken for granted as inevitable or sensible, but which, in fact, are false. This is a matter of considerable importance because if only one assumption is false (or, at the most, two or three assumptions are false) then the whole structure of neo-classical economics becomes invalid.

 

The false assumptions of neo-classical economics are that:-

  1. Scarcity is an inevitable part of the human condition.
  2. High taxation is necessary.
  3. Labour physically creates all, or a large part, of the wealth.
  4. The ‘free market’ is free.
  5. The ‘free market’ is efficient and allocates resources efficiently.
  6. The outcomes of the ‘free market’ are always just.
  7. Homo economicus is an accurate description of human psychology.
  8. Conventional economics is an all-encompassing science of objective process and universal value and further improvement to economics is impossible.
  9. It is a matter of small importance that the banking system creates money out of nothing sufficient for the repayment of the principal of a loan but not of the interest.
  10. The ‘free market’ consists of states of equilibrium; when there is disequilibrium there will always be a return to equilibrium.

11 There Is No Such Thing As a Free Lunch (any improvement for the poor inevitably involves a detriment to the rich).

  1. The ‘free market’ upholds private property for all.
  2. It does not matter who owns the capital, particularly productive capital.
  3. The ‘free market’ implements Say’s market Theorem (Law) that producers and consumers should be the same people.
  4. Somebody who voluntarily looks after a sick child does no work in the economic sense.
  5. Interest is inevitable and always necessary.
  6. Ethics/morality is not part of economics.
  7. The poor are poor because of lack of effort and lack of skill (rather than lack of productive capital, lack of access to capital credit and suffering the burden of interest).
  8. Inflation is not caused by the banking system.
  9. Financial savings are necessary before there can be investment.
  10. Physical savings are necessary before there can be investment.
  11. Labour and welfare payment will always suffice.
  12. It is not necessary for every person to have an independent income.
  13. The level of interest rates is all that is necessary to manage an economy properly.
  14. Wide ownership is not necessary.
  15. Student loans should bear interest.
  16. Public capital projects should be funded by borrowing interest-bearing money.
  17. Micro-credit lending should bear interest.
  18. Environmental capital projects should bear interest.
  19. An economy requires two lots of financing – one for production and one for consumption. (NB Only one lot of financing is necessary if it is simulfinancing as in binary economics).
  20. There is no such thing as society.
  21. Personal debt is healthy for an economy; as also national debt.
  22. There is no power imbalance between actors (participants, including individuals) in an economy.
  23. Social and economic justice on the one hand and efficiency on the other are incompatible.
  24. Economic history is irrelevant.
  25. Outdated economic theory (Adam Smith, 1776), basically conceived before the industrial revolution had got under way, suffices to guide modern economic theory and practice.
  26. The important things in economics are anything except the development and spreading of productive capacity so as to make producers and consumers the same people thereby enabling a Say’s Theorem (Law) balance of supply and demand and also enabling the forwarding of social and economic justice.
  27. Banks should be able to offer mortgages (as distinct from administering national bank mortgages).
  28. Economic inequality is desirable; the greater the ratio between top earnings and bottom earnings, the better.
  29. ‘Trickle down’ economics works.
  30. Rising house and stock market prices are necessarily a sign of genuinely increased wealth.
  31. Economic cycles are inevitable.
  32. Individual greed is good and institutionalised greed is even better.
  33. Countries should raise money at interest on the international markets.
  34. Countries should not be autonomous; they should be controlled by others.
  35. A country’s assets should be owned by outsiders.
  36. A country’s money supply should originate in the banking system rather than the national bank.
  37. Employee shareholdings and involvement do not improve efficiency.
  38. Political democracy does not require economic democracy.
  39. Even though today’s banking system money is created out of nothing there is a time value to borrowed money.
  40. Environmental matters are extraneous and impose extraneous cost.
  41. Not only ethics but belief in God should be eschewed.
  42. Economics is essentially a separate subject which does not have to take account of other subjects.
  43. The creation of money out of nothing and the addition of interest does not require even more creation and even more debt.
  44. Population growth is inevitable.
  45. An understanding of technology is irrelevant to economics.
  46. Jobs can be exported.
  47. Domestic manufacturing does not matter.
  48. Education and training suffice for economic needs.

NB Binary Economics becomes easily understood if the fifty-nine false assumptions of prevailing economics are one by one, and simply, reversed. Quite soon, it becomes apparent that a different picture is emerging and then, long before all the false assumptions have been reversed, it is brightly clear that a totally new landscape – the Binary landscape – has emerged.

Binary Economics might be summarized in “a justice which creates efficiency and an efficiency which creates justice. “ It is the only opportunity for people to create real democracy, away from fake contemporary democracies and tyranny. It a real challenge and threat for the Right, Left, and Khazarians, that is why people will not be allowed to know it, despite its existence for a very long lime.

The fourth side of this economic and political global conflict is the people, and they are the least influential.

Khazarian Terrorism, Zionism, & Migration Crisis


Khazarian Terrorism

Khazarian Terrorism

Liberal Democracy and the EU are using massive global migrations to change the demography of many regions to advance their powers and profits. They are doing these by colluding with the Khazars.  On the other hand conservative patriots and nationalists all over the world are opposing such devastating massive global migrations and degenerative cultural policies citing fierce opposition to what they describe as “Islamic” terrorism. The conflict between liberals and conservatives is putting genuine faiths and human rights under unfair attacks from both sides.

The Khazars are the king makers in this conflict between liberal democrats and conservative republicans. By shifting alliances and using their aggressive influence in Islam, Christianity, and Judaism, and their networks in many regions, the Khazars are the real winners.

The Khazars are fatal threats to national and global security, peace, and prosperity in this mad conflict between liberals and conservatives. Don’t let immorality, selfishness, greed, naivety, and illusions guide you.

Concerned people must ask: Who are those Khazars?

The conflict is not between Right and Left. It is a three sided conflict that is why it is extremely dangerous.

Who are the Khazars, and what are their relationships with fake religions, Islam, Judaism, Terrorism, extremism, Zionism, racism, wars, and migration?

The Khazars (Turkish: Hazarlar, Azerbaijani: Xəzərlər, Tatar: Xäzärlär, Hebrew: כוזרים‎‎ (Kuzarim), Arabic: خزر‎‎ (khazar), Ukrainian: Хоза́ри, Russian: Хаза́ры, Persian: خزر‎‎, Greek: Χάζαροι, Latin: Gazari/Cosri/Gasani) were a semi-nomadic Turkic people, who created what for its duration was the most powerful polity to emerge from the breakup of the Western Turkic Kaganate. Astride a major artery of commerce between northern Europe and southwestern Asia, Khazaria became one of the foremost trading emporia of the medieval world, commanding the western marches of the Silk Road and playing a key commercial role as a crossroad between China, the Middle East and Kievan Rus’. For some three centuries (c. 650–965) the Khazars dominated the vast area extending from the Volga-Don steppes to the eastern Crimea and the northern Caucasus.

“A THOUSAND YEARS before the establishment of the Modern State of Israel, there existed a Jewish kingdom in the eastern fringes of Europe, astride the Don and Volga rivers…” So begins a thesis by Jewish author Kevin Alan Brook. The kingdom of which he speaks appears at first consideration to be comprised of nearly as much disinformation, misinformation, “myth”information, and, curiously, NO-information as there is actual provable historical fact. Yet upon closer scrutiny this kingdom, known as Khazaria, or the Kingdom of the Khazars, is clearly revealed in a vast body of historical evidence, much of which has come to light only in the last three to five decades.

This mysterious kingdom, which has sculpted our modern world to an astounding (and alarming) degree, once occupied an immense land area of over a million square miles extending from western Hungary/Austria eastward to the Aural Sea, north to the Upper Volga, and its southern region extending to the Caucasus Mountains between the Black and Caspian seas. It was at that time literally the largest country on earth. It has only been in the last several decades, however, that greater documented evidence from ancient manuscripts has come to light and revealed the astonishing historical truth of this ancient kingdom and its connection to the origins of modern-day Israel.

Though little known to the West, and, for that matter, to even those currently occupying its ancestral land, the Khazar kingdom has been responsible for substantially shaping the history and political landscape of Europe and specifically Western Asia, but also to a remarkable degree the entirety of human events on this planet.

Of the ferocity and warlike tendencies of the Khazars there is little doubt and much historical evidence, all of it pointing to a race of people so violent in their dealings with their fellow men that they were feared and abhorred above all peoples in that region of the world.

This is the story of a kingdom of belligerent, warlike Caucasian nomads, having no linked ancestry with anything Israelite this side of Noah, yet adopting Talmudic Judaism and becoming the dominant — and virtually only — current force in twenty-first century international Jewry.

During the course of this work salient facts and issues will be presented without a too-extensive reliance on tedious historical documentation. However, considering the delicacy of the subject — especially in this modern age where any divergence from certain agendas for “political correctness” can result in epithets of racism or anti-Semitism — and for the obvious sake of accuracy, reasonably comprehensive documentation is necessary.

In this it will be shown that the cry of “anti-Semitism” hurled against those who do oppose the international actions of those ones calling themselves Jews, would be much like an immigrated Scotsman to America deciding to live on an Apache Indian reservation, coming to dominate its politics and economics, and then claiming that anyone disagreeing with his political and social agenda is racist and anti-Apache in their beliefs.

What under different circumstances could prove to be a dry treatise on Eastern European Jewish history is, if closely examined, actually a narrative of events that have laid a sequential pathway to, and beyond, the destruction of the New York World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. This historical time line has been fixed in its present course, which, by all appearances and in a most unexpected manner, is culminating in the fulfillment of the Biblical prophecies of Armageddon. But then, it has always been so with prophecy. The most consistent aspect in the nature of prophetic fulfillment is that it is consistently surprising. God has invariably worked to complete His desires, prophetically, in ways that have not been understood until revealed in retrospect — in the light of their actual happening.

The native religion of the Khazars is thought to have been Tengrism, like that of the North Caucasian Huns and other Turkic peoples. The polyethnic populace of the Khazar Khaganate appears to have been a multiconfessional mosaic of pagan, Tengrist, Jewish, Christian and Muslim worshippers. The ruling elite of the Khazars was said by Judah Halevi and Abraham ibn Daud to have converted to Rabbinic Judaism in the 8th century, but the scope of the conversion within the Khazar Khanate remains uncertain. Proposals of Khazar origins have been made regarding the Slavic Judaising Subbotniks, the Bukharan Jews, the Muslim Kumyks, Kazakhs, the Cossacks of the Don region, the Turkic-speaking Krymchaks and their Crimean neighbours the Karaites to the Moldavian Csángós, the Mountain Jews and others.

In the late 19th century, a theory emerged that the core of today’s Ashkenazi Jews are genetically descended from a hypothetical Khazarian Jewish diaspora who had migrated westward from modern Russia and Ukraine into modern France and Germany. This theory still finds occasional support, but most scholars view it with skepticism. The theory is sometimes associated with anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism. Connected to this thesis is the theory, expounded by Paul Wexler, that the grammar of Yiddish contains a Khazar substrate.

The rise of the Rus’ led to the collapse of the Khazarian state by the 10th century. Though the Khazar kingdom did not wholly succumb to Sviatoslav’s campaign, but lingered on until 1224, when the Mongols invaded Rus’, by most accounts, the Rus’-Oghuz campaigns left Khazaria devastated, with perhaps many Khazarian Jews in flight, and leaving behind at best a minor rump state. The Khazars disappeared among Europeans, Arabs, Levantians, Anatolians, and Africans and became extreme Christians, Jews, and Muslims. Several scholars have suggested that the Khazars did not disappear after the dissolution of their Empire, but many but not all of them migrated west to eventually form part of the core of the later Ashkenazi and Shaphardi Jewish population of Europe, and made other Muslim and Jewish new communities in Caucasus, India, Arabia, Levant, and Africa.

Leo IV the Khazar

Leo IV the Khazar (25 January 750 – 8 September 780) was Byzantine Emperor from 775 to 780 AD. Leo was the son of Emperor Constantine V by his first wife, Irene of Khazaria (Tzitzak), the daughter of a Khagan of the Khazars (thought to be Bihar). He was crowned co-emperor by his father in 751.

The Roman Emperor Heraclius, in 627, formed a military alliance with the Khazars for the purpose of a final defeat of the Persians. Upon the first meeting of the Khazar king, Ziebel, with the Roman Emperor, the Khazars displayed, in full array, their skills at diplomatic flattery — skills that would serve them well and would not disappear with their kingdom. He “with his nobles dismounted from their horses,” says Gibbon, “…and fell prostrate on the ground, to adore the purple of the Caesar.” So enamored was the Byzantine Emperor with this display of obeisance that it eventually led to the offer, along with many riches, of the Caesar’s daughter Eudocia in marriage. That union never took place due to the death of Ziebel while Eudocia was enroute to Khazaria. However, after the final defeat of Islam’s designs on the Northern Kingdom in AD 730, a marriage between a Khazar princess and the heir to the Byzantine Roman Empire resulted in an offspring who was to rule Byzantium as Leo the Khazar. Thus the “King of the North” had skilfully managed to place himself on the throne of the Roman Empire.

The new blood in the Byzantine Empire resulted in many ways to the end of the Isaurian dynasty in 802.

Arab–Khazar wars

Shortly after the death of Mohammed in AD 632, according to Columbia University Professor, D. M. Dunlop, Arab armies began a campaign northward, sweeping “through the wreckage of two empires and carrying all before them till they reached the great mountain barrier of the Caucasus. This barrier once passed,” Dunlop observes, “the road lay open to the lands of eastern Europe.” Had the Caliphate (the armies of the Muslim Caliph) surmounted that immense geological deterrent unchallenged, the history of Europe and, indeed, the rest of the Judeo-Christian world would have been vastly different than it now is.

It was at the Caucasus, however, that the Arabs encountered the Khazars, initiating a war that lasted over a century and effectively prevented Europe from becoming Islamic. So powerful, socially and militarily, were the Khazars that, as Kevin Alan Brook relates in his work The Jews of Khazaria, “a 10th-century emperor of the Byzantines [Roman Empire], Constantine Porphyrogenitus, sent correspondence to the Khazars marked with a gold seal worth 3 solidi – more than the 2 solidi that always accompanied letters to the Pope of Rome, the Prince of the Rus, and the Prince of the Hungarians.” The Arab–Khazar wars were a series of conflicts fought between the armies of the Khazar Khaganate and the Umayyad Caliphate (as well as its Abbasid successor) and their respective vassals.

Historians usually distinguish two major periods of conflict, the First (сa. 642–652) and Second (ca. 722–737) Arab–Khazar Wars, but the Arab–Khazar military confrontation involved several sporadic raids and isolated clashes as well, over a period from the middle of the 7th century to the end of the 8th century.

Almost all the fighters in the Umayyad armies were of Turkic origins and on the other hand the Khazar Khaganate was a Turkic colony. So the wars were actually between Turks claiming to Muslim Arabs versus Jewish Turks claiming to be Israelite.

This is reflected in the popular belief among Middle Eastern cultures that Alexander the Great had with divine assistance barred the Caucasus against the hordes of “Gog and Magog”, commonly regarded as an echo of the invasions by the Scythians and the Huns. Eventually, the Khazars would take their place, and early medieval writers came to identify the Khazars with Gog and Magog.

From that time came the concept of division of the world into the “House of Islam” (Dar al-Islam) and the “House of War” (Dar al-Harb), to which the pagan Turkic nomads were consigned.

The main significance of theses wars is in turning Islam into a Turkic version and dominance of completely different essence from the original Islam. Original Islam disappeared almost completely after Arab–Khazar wars. Instead of that appeared new traditions like salafi, Sunni, Shia and Sufi Islam.

Sons of the Conquerors: The Rise of the Turkic World, International Edition, by: Hugh Pope (Author) Paperback: 416 pages, Publisher: Overlook Books (October 31, 2006)

In his major new work, Wall Street Journal Istanbul correspondent Hugh Pope provides a vivid picture of the Turkic people, descendants of the nomadic armies that conquered the Byzantine Empire and reigned over the region for centuries. Today the Turks encompass a region much larger than the political boundaries of the nation of Turkey – from the Xinjiang province of western China, to Iran, Iraq, the Netherlands, Germany, all the way to the Appalachian Mountains of the United States.

One of the world’s foremost experts on modern Turkey – its languages, people, and history – and acclaimed co-author of Turkey Unveiled (a New York Times Notable Book), Hugh Pope has traveled the world to encounter and assimilate the many facets of this extraordinarily complex and fascinating ethnic group, distilling the essential qualities shared by all people of Turkish descent. Rich with stories and legends stretching back centuries, Sons of the Conquerors is a compellingly readable account of a profoundly neglected subject.

The Khazars of Conquest and Violence

Of the ferocity and warlike tendencies of the Khazars there is little doubt and much historical evidence, all of it pointing to a race of people so violent in their dealings with their fellow men that they were feared and abhorred above all peoples in that region of the world.

The ninth-century monk Druthmar of Aquitaine, in his commentary on Matthew 24:14 in Expositio in Matthaeum Evangelistam, stated that the Gazari, or Khazars, dwelt “in the lands of Gog and Magog.”

%d bloggers like this: