Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy

Posts tagged ‘fulani’

The Relationship of Fulani to Hyksos and Romani Gypsies


The Fulani language is called Fulfulde, and a linguist said it was closer to the Roma language. He linked the Fulani to the Hyksos. He said exactly what I say; the appearance of Fulani is linked to the expulsion of the Hyksos from Kmt.

This also confirms that Kush are Hyksos and their slaves from West Africa and they were the Fulani. It also explains the reasons for the mystery of the origin of the Meroitic language.

Maurice Delafosse (20 December 1870 – 13 November 1926) was a French ethnographer and who worked in the field of the languages of Africa. He said: I think I may say that of all African, Asiatic, Oceanian, and European tongues which I have compared with the language of the Fulani, the language of the gypsies is that which appears to me possess the greatest point of resemblance.

JOURNAL ARTICLE: The Fulani – A Nomadic Tribe in Northern Nigeria; Mustafa B. Ibrahim; African Affairs; Vol. 65, No. 259 (Apr., 1966), pp. 170-176. Published by: Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal African Society

Also mentioned in: A Tropical Dependency: An Outline of the Ancient History of the Western Sudan with an Account of the Modern Settlement of Northern Nigeria; Authors: Flora Louisa Shaw, Lady Flora Louise Shaw Lugard; Publisher: James Nisbet, 1905; Original from: Harvard University; Digitized: 11 Dec 2007; Length: 508 pages.

Contents: INTRODUCTORY 1; CONQUEST OF North Africa AND SPAIN BY 24; ARAB Civilization IN SPAIN 31; THE EMPIRE OF The Two SHORES 50; AFRICAN RULE IN SPAIN 58; DECLINE OF MOHAMMEDAN POWER IN SPAIN 67; SPANISH ARABS IN AFRICA 73; NEGROLAND AND THE WESTERN ARABS 83; THE LATER ASKIAS 211; THE PHARAOHS IN HAUSSALAND 227; THE DOMINATION OF KANO 245; BORNU 268; THE MOORISH CONQUEST 296; THE SOUDAN UNDER THE MOORS 306; EUROPE IN WEST AFRICA 322; THE EUROPEAN SLAVE TRADE 333; BERBER AND BLACK 99; MORABITE CONQUEST OF THE SOUDAN 107; GHANA AND TIMBUCTOO 113; IBN BATUTA IN MELLE 129; ADMINISTRATION OF THE MELLESTINE 142; MEETING OF EASTERN AND WESTERN INFLUENCE UPON 153; RISE OF THE SONGHAY EMPIRE 163; Askia MOHAMMED ABOU BEKR 181; SONGHAY UNDER ASKIA THE GREAT 190; SONGHAY UNDER ASKIA THE GREAT continued 199; ENGLAND AND FRANCE ON THE LOWER NIGER 348; ORIGIN OF THE FULANI 373; RISE OF THE FULANI IN THE SOUDAN 381; SULTAN BELLO 390; CONQUEST OF SOKOTO AND KANO 438; British Policy IN NORTHERN NIGERIA 449; ECONOMIC RESOURCES OF NORTHERN NIGERIA 485; THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRADE 491; INDEX 501

علاقة الفولاني بالهكسوس والغجر

لغة الفولاني اسمها فلفولدي وقال فيها خبير لغات انها اقرب للغة الغجر. ويربط بين الفولاني والهكسوس يقول بالظبط كما اقول بان ظهور الفولاني مرتبط بطرد الهكسوس

وهذا يؤكد أيضا أن الكوشيين هم عبارة عن هكسوس ورقيق لهم من غرب أفريقيا وهم الفولاني. ويفسر كذلك أسباب غموض أصل اللغة المروية

موريس ديلافوس (20 ديسمبر 1870 – 13 نوفمبر 1926) عالمًا عرقيات فرنسي وعمل في مجال لغات إفريقيا

The Origins of Fulani, Gypsies and Meroitic Languages


The origin of the Fulani is obscure. Some scholars assigned them to Hyksos origin; while a linguist named Fezzan M. Dalfosse, whose studies in west African languages give special weight to his opinions, holds the view that Fulani may have owed their origin to the downfall of Hyksos, or shepherd kings, who were driven from Egypt about 1639 BC.
He likens the Fulani to the gypsy language he says “I think I may say that of all African, Asiatic, Oceanian and European language tongue which I have compared with the language of the Fulani, the language of the gypsies is that which appear to possess the greatest point of resemblance”.
There is strong indications the earliest Jews were not Israelites, but rather the Jews were the same Akkadians, who appeared suddenly in 2334 BC and invaded and colonized Sumer and Subar, after allying with the Amorites.
The East Asian origin possibility shared by the Akkadians; the Hyksos; the Roma (Gypsies); and the Fulani is interesting indeed; and the linkage between the Fulani with the Hyksos in creating the Kush Kingdom could lead to think of East Asian plus West African origin of the obscure Meroitic Language.

Kush Origin is in Fulani and Hyksos


The origin and history of the Hyksos and Fulani groups are essential to understand the history and the present of West Africa.

The Fulani groups were the result of wide-spread slavery raids on West Africa since 1600 BC by the Hyksos who invaded and colonized Kmt (ancient Egypt) in 1630 BC or 1800 BC, and some of the Hyksos went further to invade North Africa and first created the Lebu (Libyans) who went back and founded the 22 and 23 Dynasties in Kmt (945 – 728 BC).

It is clear the western part of the Hyksos were devastated by the loss of route connecting them with West Asian markets and the Hyksos expelled to the east of Kmt. To reconnect the Hyksos in Libya had sought assistance from Troy and also took their slavery bandits to invade the southern Nile Valley. The Hyksos wanted to connect with their bandits that were raiding Arabia and also invade and regain Kmt from the south.

The created Fulani groups were used to invade the southern Nile Valley and first colonized the region which they called Kordofan then they occupied Kerma south of the 4th Cataract in 1500 BC. After raiding for 700 years the Hyksos with their Fulani destroyed north Kerma civilization and created in its place Kush in 785 BC, who invaded Kmt to assist the defeated Libyan dynasties and the expelled Hyksos in the Amorite east who were attacking Subar and Sumer; in the events that led to the fall of Sumer and the subsequent creation of Babylonia and the Jews.

The Hyksos were actually the same Akkadians who colonized Sumer and Subar (Fertile Crescent) in 2334-2154 BC. The Akkadians were Turkic Mongolian raiding bandits on horses and took foot soldiers from South Caucasus (Hurrians). Amorites joined the expelled Akkadians to form the Hyksos.

The same amalgam who invaded North Africa and started slavery in West Africa were the invaders and colonizers of Spain and Portugal from 711 AD and were expelled in 1492 AD. They shared and also took over power from their Fulani partner groups in West Africa who were their suppliers of wealth and slaves.

Songhai Empire c. 1464–1591 preceded by Mali Empire and Gao Empire and was succeeded by Saadi dynasty; Pashalik of Timbuktu and Dendi Kingdom.
Mali Empire c. 1230–1670 preceded by Ghana Empire and Gao Empire and was succeeded by Songhai Empire; Jolof Empire; Kaabu Empire and the Empire of Great Fulo

All these regimes were more or less dominated, created or influenced by the Fulani and their Hyksos masters of North Africa, who claim to be Amazigh; while the only true Amazigh are the Tuareg the arch-rival of Fulani and Hyksos. Indeed the history of West Africa is mainly around the history of Hyksos and Fulani slavery and looting.

In fact, “Pharaohs” was a term used by native people of Kmt during the Hyksos colonization (1630-1523 BC) to point to the foreign colonizers as “paɾuw (meaning that person in the great house)”.
Native people of Kmt refrained to call the Hyksos ruler and other foreign rulers as kings which is pronounces as “Nesso”. Nesso was reserved for genuine legitimate kings of Kmt origin. It was their smart way to resist occupation and show disregard.

In this sense, the Songhai were made up by, and related to, pharaohs who were Hyksos rulers. The Songhai were amalgam of local West African groups forced together by slavery; but were not descendants of Kmt. The Hyksos and their pharaohs were also related to the Amorite-Akkadian-Turkic-Hurrian bandits that colonized the Arabs in their homeland which is only in the Western and Southern coasts of the Arabian Peninsula, including Yemen, since 1300 BC after the Hyksos were driven out from Kmt in 1523 BC; then from Mittani and Sumer in 1300 BC.

Therefore, saying that the Songhai and the Fulani are somehow related to the pharaohs (Hyksos) and also to Yemen (Bedouin bandits who colonized Arabs) as their traditions say is reasonable since these were the only two sources for slaves, gold and horses markets and power used by the Fulani and other West African regimes to control the region.

The relationship of the Kushites and their collaboration to the Hyksos is evident in the first and second steles that Lord Carnarvon discovered in 1908 in Thebes and recounts the events of the war that Kamose waged against the Hyksos and the Kushites at the same time. It recalled a courier arrest and detention carrying a letter from the Hyksos leader named Abibi in Avares to his pact ally the leader of Kushites asking for urgent support against the threat posed by the armies of Kmt led by King Kamose against the Hyksos and the Kushites. The content of the Hyksos message to the Kushites was recorded by Kamose in the inscription recounting his victory in Karnak.

The name kes or kas (k3š) appeared in Kmt monuments for the first time in 1450 B.C., and it was meant that the Hyksos gangs that seized Sumar (the civilization of southern Iraq) and their name were the Kassites or the Kishites from Kish, Kas, Kash, or Kasu, and they were Hyksos gangs who occupied Mesopotamia from 1531 to 1155 BC .Clearly, the name Kush is close to Kassites.

It is possible that the formation of the Kush kingdom by someone called Al-Ara came as a result of the urgent need to invade Kmt from the south and to follow instructions that came to the southern Hyksos gangs and Fulani from their Libyan Hyksos partners of the 23rd family that were defeated and fell into the hands of the 24th Dynasty in 732 BC and continued to rule for 12 years only and fell to the invasion of the 25th Dynasty, whose name became the Kingdom of Kush, by the Hyksos gangs, who are of the same origin as the Kassite gangs in Babylon from 1531 to 1155 B.C. to attack Kmt from the south

So, of course, the names Kush, Ta-siti, and Ta-nehso refer to three different lands, not one region. Ta-siti means the land of the civilization of the people of Kerma. While Kush means the colonized part by ​​the Hyksos and their Fulani slave. While Ta-nehso points to black slave areas, whether domestic or foreign.

Nile Southern Valley Confederation Liberation Project


Nile Rivers Confederation

Nile Rivers Confederation

Achieving liberation and rescue of the nationalities of the Nile rivers, Darfur, the East, and the South from the occupation and colonization of the Fulani-Badgara-Bederriya, and the peaceful and orderly reconstruction of the Confederacy, requires a strong aid and partnership and trust with the peoples and sisterly countries of in the immediate neighborhood who have always been in historical contact and interests, and common blood connections with the nationalities of the Nile rivers, Darfur, the East, and the South.

Therefore, it must be requested to place the regions of the rivers of the Nile rivers, Darfur, the East, and the South under the joint protection of the immediate neighbors, with international supervision and support, for a period determined according to the readiness of rebuilding the national state apparatus and institutions.

The joint protection shall be divided as follows:

First: Putting the northern region and the Island of Meroë under Egyptian protection

Second: Putting the Eastern Region under Ethiopian-Eritrean protection

Third: Putting the Kordofan and Darfur regions under the protection of Chad

Fourth: Putting a region between the Blue and White Niles under the protection of South Sudan

Fifth: The administrative boundaries between the regions shall be the Nile, Blue and White Rivers

Sixth: Establish federal capitals for each region; and participate in the confederation capital, Khartoum

Demanding that Nile Southern Valley (the Sudan) be placed under the protection of its brothers in Egypt, Ethiopia, Chad and South Sudan, with international supervision, is much honorable and safer from calling for the deployment of foreign international forces; or fighting a liberation war from which civilians and vulnerable regions are not spared.

مشروع تحرير كونفيدرالية جنوب وادي النيل

يتطلب لتحقيق تحرير وانقاذ قوميات أنهار النيل ودارفور والشرق والجنوب من إحتلال واستعمار الفلاتة البقارة البديرية وإعادة بناء الكونفيدرالية بشكل سلمي ومنظم طلب العون والشراكة القوية والثقة مع شعوب ودول الأشقاء في الجوار المباشر والذين كانوا دوما علي اتصال تاريخي ومصالح. مشتركة وصلات رحم مع قوميات أنهار النيل ودارفور والشرق والجنوب

لذلك يجب المطالبة بوضع أقاليم انهار النيل ودارفور والشرق والجنوب تحت الحماية المشتركة لدول الجوار المباشر مع إشراف ودعم دولي لمدة تحدد حسب جاهزية إعادة بناء أجهزة ومؤسسات الدولة الوطنية.

وتقسم الحماية المشتركة علي النحو التالي:

أولاً: وضع إقليم الشمالية والبطانة تحت الحماية المصرية

ثانياً: وضع إقليم الشرق تحت الحماية الإثيوبية الاريترية

ثالثاً: وضع إقليم كردفان ودارفور تحت حماية تشاد

رابعاً: وضع إقليم ما بين النيلين الازرق والابيض تحت حماية جنوب السودان

خامساً: تكون الحدود الإدارية بين الأقاليم هي أنهار ألنيل والأزرق والأبيض

سادسا: إقامة عاصمة فيدرالية خاصة لكل إقليم والمشاركة في العاصمة الكونفيدرالية الخرطوم

المطالبة بوضع جنوب وادي النيل (السودان) تحت حماية الأشقاء في مصر وأثيوبيا وتشاد وجنوب السودان بإشراف دولي اشرف واسلم كثيرا جداً من الدعوة بنشر قوات أممية اجنبية أو خوض حرب تحرير لا يسلم منها المدنيين والاقاليم الضعيفة

Punt Lands Hypothesis


Jews are Asiatic and totally different group from the Israelites who were East Africans.

My Abyssinian Hypothesis had been updated after I discovered new strong evidences, including the camel presence which was limited to the Horn of Africa.

Now, the hypothesis is called Punt Lands Hypothesis and it states that the Israelites were from Punt Lands, and not Arabs; and the Exodus was local across a river.

Jews are descendants of Turkic Mongolian Hyksos in Babylon in 580 BC and were invented in Babylon.

First Jews were Amorites bandits led by horse-riding expelled Hyksos and Kassites who used few Ethiopian Judahites to invent Jews, Judaism, Hebrew language and the Tanakh to replace the Ge’ez Torah of Mosses, and establish fake Israel and fake Jerusalem in western Amorites land.

Kush on the Nile River bears the same name of the Kassites ,Kaššu, Kassi, Kasi or Kashic who appeared in 1531 until 1155 BC in Babylon.

The light-complexion people of Arabia, the Levant, Egypt, and North and East Africa who claim to be Arabs are actually descendants of the Amorites with the Turkic Mongolian Hyksos bandits.

The light-complexion “Arabs” are the Bedouins who colonized the tanned-complexion original Arabs in the Western and Southern coasts of Arabia, who are much closer in everything to the peoples of the Horn of Africa and Kmt.

The diagram shows how Hyksos and Amorites created Kush to invade Kmt by Bedouins and Fulani (who are slaves taken from west, central and east Africa).

Just compare these two maps to discover how much deception survived 2600 years.
My Punt-Lands Hypothesis of the interpretation of the Mosaic Torah and the history of the Children of Israel

Compare Punt-Lands Hypothesis with what the academic, religious and media institutions offer. They mention the history of the Hyksos, of whom the Jews appeared after 950 years, and affixed it to the Children of Israel who had nothing to do with the Jews. And the world believed this naive lie for 2,600 years.

Most Important Groups Created by Turkic Mongolians


The Most Important Groups Created by Turkic Mongolians

The Most Important Groups Created by Turkic Mongolians

These are the Most Important Groups Created by Turkic Mongolians since 1800 BC

Important Update Notice on 24 July 2018: I have updated my Abyssinian Hypothesis  after discovering the that single-hump camel (The dromedary) was unknown in Arabia, Aram, Assyria, and Kemet before 950 BC, while in abundance in the land of Punt.

This led to make the following major changes:
1- The proposed origin of Israelite from being Arabic-speaking Arab Yemenis to Ge’ez-speaking African Puntite;
2- Rename the Abyssinian Hypothesis to the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis;
3- The Turkic Mongolian colonizers and rulers of Neo-Babylonia invited elders from the House of Israel to Babylonia in around 580 BC in what is called the Babylonian Exile to help the create Judaism and colonize Aramaic land in 530 BC;
4- The Hebrew Language and the Hebrew Israelite are products of admixture between Ge’ez Israelite, Turkic Mongolian Persians, and colonized Aramaic. They existed only after 530 C; and
5- The Lost Sheep of the House of Israel are those Israelite who  left the land of Punt and decided to collaborate with Turkic Mongolians to invent Judaism and colonize Aramaic lands; and turned into Hebrew Israelite.

Therefore, the Israelite Exodus of 1446 BC was only within Punt, from one region to another. The Jews are not Israelite at all; and the name Judah was just used deceptively to relate the Jews to the Israelite. The Israelite were scattered all over the world and they no longer exist as a nation or a tribe.

For more details on the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis read the following three articles:
1- How Persians Cooked a Cult and Called it Judaism Part 1
2- The Turkic Mongolian-African Israelite Joint-ventures
3- Jesus Pointing to “The Lost Sheep of the house of Israel” and “the Gentiles”
[End of notice]

Hebrew Israelite Links to Massive Slavery in Africa and Fulani since 1800 BC


African Slave Trade Routes

African Slave Trade Routes

Important Update Notice on 24 July 2018: I have updated my Abyssinian Hypothesis  after discovering the that single-hump camel (The dromedary) was unknown in Arabia, Aram, Assyria, and Kemet before 950 BC, while in abundance in the land of Punt.

This led to make the following major changes:
1- The proposed origin of Israelite from being Arabic-speaking Arab Yemenis to Ge’ez-speaking African Puntite;
2- Rename the Abyssinian Hypothesis to the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis;
3- The Turkic Mongolian colonizers and rulers of Neo-Babylonia invited elders from the House of Israel to Babylonia in around 580 BC in what is called the Babylonian Exile to help the create Judaism and colonize Aramaic land in 530 BC;
4- The Hebrew Language and the Hebrew Israelite are products of admixture between Ge’ez Israelite, Turkic Mongolian Persians, and colonized Aramaic. They existed only after 530 C; and
5- The Lost Sheep of the House of Israel are those Israelite who  left the land of Punt and decided to collaborate with Turkic Mongolians to invent Judaism and colonize Aramaic lands; and turned into Hebrew Israelite.

For more details on the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis read the following three articles:
1- How Persians Cooked a Cult and Called it Judaism Part 1
2- The Turkic Mongolian-African Israelite Joint-ventures
3- Jesus Pointing to “The Lost Sheep of the house of Israel” and “the Gentiles”
[End of notice]

There is no doubt that Hebrew Israelite is totally a different group from the relatively newer Jews. It is very important to draw clear distinctions between three different groups who are commonly regarded as one group.

First: The ancient Yemeni Semite Arab Hebrews Israelite “sons of Israel” those who entered Ethiopia staring with Patriarch Joseph then into the whole of Africa before the Ten Commandments in 1446 BC. This Semitic group created wide spread Hebrew Israelite slavery in all parts of Africa.

Second: The ancient Yemeni Semite Arab Hebrews Israelite “sons of Israel” who went back to Yemen in the Exodus of 1446 BC then invaded, colonized, and mixed with the Canaanites since 1400 BC. Later on, they were mostly deported to North Africa by the third group since the invention of Jews and Judaism.

And, the third group is the Turkic Mongolian “Jews” and followers of “Judaism” who were invented by Turkic Persia in 580 BC after a fraudulent Babylonian Return, replacing few hundreds of Hebrew Israelite captive rulers from the House of David by many hundreds of thousands of Turkic settlers. This created “The Jews” who invaded and colonized the Hebrew Israelite former invaders and colonizers of Canaan.

(more…)

Possible Israelite Link to the Fulani


Possible Israelite Link to the Fulani

Possible Israelite Link to the Fulani

A very important and interesting possible link to the origins of Fulani could be deducted from an article titled “The Israelite in Sudan and the Jews in the land of the Mahdi” It could suggest that earlier Fulani were Hebrew Israelite from Arab Yemeni ancestry who slowly moved from Ethiopia and the Sudan to North Africa before going south to raid and enslave West Africans.

This hypothesis allows a room to suggest that the expelled Canaanite and Hebrew Israelite by Turkic Jews after 530 BC joined forces with the groups who came from Yemen via Sudan and Ethiopia starting from 1800 BC. They were also joined by further Turkic invaders and settlers after 660 AD.

The sudden massive waves of people fleeing their collapsed countries in 1300 BC in the Mediterranean Sea, who are known as “the Sea People” also invaded the Levant, Egypt, and the rest of North Africa. These groups could had added further pressures and complexity that faced the indigenous Amazeigh and the Hebrew Israelite bandits of slavery.

عرقيا لا يوجد عرب في السودان بل فولاني


Ethnically There are No Arabs in Sudan, but Fulani

The Original Sudan ألسودان الاصيل

The Original Sudan ألسودان الاصيل

سوق الرق في الخرطوم عام 1878

سوق الرق في الخرطوم عام 1878
“In the slave-market at Khartoum”
Source J Ewing Ritchie (1876-79) The life and discoveries of David Livingstone (Pictorial ed.), London: A. Fullarton

يقع أغلب المحللين السياسيين و العامة في ثلاث أخطاء فادحة عند تناولهم تاريخ و حاضر السودان. أول هذه الأخطاء الاعتقاد بأن العديد من القوميات السودانية و قبائلها قد أصبحت عربية أو قد تصبح عربية في المستقبل. و الخطأ الثاني هو افتراض وجود أعداد كبيرة من العرب عرقيا في السودان سواء بشكل خالص أو مخلط مع القوميات السودانية القديمة كلاهما يدعي نسب ببطون في الجزيرة العربية أو الأشراف. أما الخطأ الثالث الأفدح فهو القول بأن الصراع في السودان هو بين العرب في مواجهة القوميات السودانية القديمة و قبائلها بينما الحقيقة هي أن الصراع هو بين قبائل الفولاني بمسمياتها و أشكالها المختلفة متحالفة مع مجموعات سودانية صرفة مكونة ممن تورطوا في تاريخ الرق القديم في السودان و تدعي أنها عربية في مثلث حمدي (المنطقة الواقعة بين دنقلة و القضارف و سنار والأبيض)  في مواجهة القوميات السودانية القديمة و قبائها ممن تضرروا من الرق.

 الحقيقة الهامة الأخرى و التي يجب التركيز عليها هو وجود عدد كبير من القبائل القديمة الحقيقية كما توجد بعض المجموعات الجديدة التي أطلقت علي نفسها صفة القبائل و هي قد صنعت كنتيجة لتجمعات ضمت المشتغلين بالرق و الأعمال المصاحبة لها و كذلك ضمت و اختلطت بضحاياهم.

 لا توجد أي أدلة مادية و علمية موثوق فيها تثبت عمليات ضخمة من الإفناء و الإحلال قد تمت في السودان عبر تاريخه الطويل و الذي أدي إلي إزالة قوميات عريقة من أراضيها التاريخية. فمثال وجود قبائل الجعليين في أراضي يذخر باطنها بالآثار النوبية بكثرة يثير الحيرة. و التفاسير الممكنة هي إما أن النوبيون قد تحولوا إلي جعليين أو أن الجعليون قد أفنوا النوبيين و حلوا محلهم؟ و الأقرب للمنطق هو التفسير الأول. و لكن توجد وسائل علمية أكيدة و مجربة يمكنها ترجيح أي من التفسيرين. و ذلك هي مسح اختبارات عينات من الحامض النووي ال DNA  لتلك القبائل التي تدعي أنها عربية و مقارنتها بعينات من العرب و من النوبيين.

 البحث في الأصول العرقية لقبائل السودانية هام جدا الآن لأن الصراعات الدامية و الخطيرة القائمة الآن في السودان يجب أثبات أنها ليست عرقية أو صراع هوية بقدر أنها في الأساس نتائج مترتبة عن تاريخ طويل و مؤسف للرق في السودان و الذي أدي إلي تدمير النسيج و الترابط و التعايش داخل و بين القوميات السودانية في أغلب أنحاء السودان. هذا التدمير نتج عن انحراف و انشقاق أعداد من الأفراد المنتمون للقوميات السودانية و تورطهم في جرائم الرق و تشكيلهم لمجموعات مختلطة من مجموعات أخري و من ضحايا الرق. و بذلك تشكلت زرائب و ديوم و حلل و قري اجتمعت معا لتطلق علي نفسها صفة القبيلة أسوة و منافسة لغيرهم.

 لذلك فمن الممكن تصنيف الأفراد و المجموعات في السودان إلي أربعة فئات هم:

أولا: من قاموا علي أنقاض و استفادوا من تاريخ الرق.

ثانيا: من ارتبطوا بمصالح أو يحاولوا الآن الاستفادة ممن احتكروا السلطة و الثروة من ميراث الرق.

ثالثا: من يصروا علي تصحيح الأوضاع السيئة التي نتجت عن التاريخ الطويل للرق في السودان.

رابعا: من يس لديهم معرفة أو اهتمام بتأثيرات الرق القديم علي حاضر و مستقبل السودان.

 أن أعداد و تأثير العرب المجتمعين الذين نزحوا أو وفدوا أو غزوا السودان في كل تاريخه لا يتجاوز بأي حال و أي تقدير مبالغ فيه من أعداد و تأثير أمثالهم ممن أتوا من الدول المجاورة كإريتريا و أثيوبيا و كينيا و يوغندا و إفريقيا الوسطي و تشاد و ليبيا و مصر. ( علما بأن ليبيا و مصر كلاهما ليسوا دول عربية بالمعني الصحيح بل هما دول مستعربة).

 خلاصة القول هي أن أعداد الفولاني و فروعهم و مسمياتهم المختلفة ( بما فيهم الفلاتة) ممن وفدوا الي السودان في المائة و الخمسون عام الماضية خاصة في مشاريع الجزيرة و المناقل و القضارف هم الأكثر تأثيرا علي الأوضاع الحالية في السودان من العرب الفعليين و من غيرهم. كما أن التحالف بينهم و بين من يدعوا الأصل العربي و كلاهما تورطوا في الرق في السودان هو جوهر الصراع في السودان علي الهوية و السلطة و الثروة.

1- من الواضح لدي هو ان أصل الفولاني بالرغم من الإختلاف حوله إلا انه يرجح بنسبة عالية إلي كونهم من أصول أصول سامية و بالتحديد من مكون يطلق عليه Judaeo-Syrian
2- نسبة تأثير أقلية الفولاني الأبيض (و هم من أصول سامية) و العرب من غير الفولاني علي القبائل السودانية من ناحية الأعداد بسيط للغاية
3- أكثرية الفولاني الأسمر هم من أصول إفريقية أصيلة مختلفة و ليسوا عرب و هم الغالبية في مجتمعات الفولاني في جميع الدول التي يتواجد فيها الفولاني
4- تأثير تاريخ و مؤسسات الرق في السودان هو الذي يضخم الحجم الفعلي للعرب في السودان بما نتج عنه من تحولات ثقافية جذرية و اما التاثير عرقي فهو محدود للغاية
5- المقصود من هذا المقال هو ثالوث الحقيقة و المصالحة و التنمية و هو الحل الوحيد للعيش بسلام كما حدث في جنوب إفريقيا
6- المقال لا يهدف للإساءة لا للعرب و لا للفولاني و لا للتنكر لتأثيرهم في السودان
7- المقال يؤكد دور الفولاني و العرب و بعض القبائل السودانية خاصة النوبيين في مسؤلية الإشتراك في صناعة الرق و ما ترتب عليها

الفولاني – الفلاتة في افريقيا

الفولاني – الفلاتة في افريقيا

%d bloggers like this: