Correcting Kmt History and Understanding of Terrorism and Organized Crime are Paramount

• 

• 

• 

To achieve sound state management and follow correct policies in all aspects of any country, especially in the Middle East and North Africa, history must be corrected and a sound understanding of the formation, motives and mentality of terrorism and the methods of soft and violent organized crime.

The prevalent perception and writings about Thutmose III and Amenhotep III and those who followed them from the second half of the 18^th Dynasty are not true at all. Because the second half, with the exception of Horemheb, reversed the national policies of the first half of the 18th Dynasty, which continued until the reign of Queen Hatshepsut.

The second half of the 18th Dynasty allowed corruption, promiscuity, moral decay, and foreign workers and agents in the entourage of the palace and government. They were supporters of the expelled Hyksos gangs, Hebrews, Kassites, Mitannis and Mukarribs in their attacks on Sumer, Ebla, Ugarit and the Arabs.

What is widespread is falsification of history of Kmt and the embellishment of the deeds and reputation of Thutmose III, Amenhotep III and those who followed them in the second half of the 18th Dynasty, from whom Kmt was liberated by the commander General King Horemheb. These were done and are policies of the groups branched from expelled Hyksos, their partners and beneficiaries, the enemies of Kmt and all the nations of the region.

In fact, the family of King Ahmose I, King Amenhotep I, King Thutmose I, Queen Hatshepsut and King Horemheb are the only true patriotic heroes of the 18th dynasty.

It is very clear that the Muslim Brotherhood are partners with Turks, Persians and Zionists, and therefore it is also clear that they are one of the forms of the Hyksos. The Hyksos are about ninety percent of Amorites from the Levant, and with them ten percent are Turkic Mongolians. The groups branched out from Hyksos after King Ahmose I expelled them in 1523 BC are Hebrews, Mitannis, Kassites, and Mukarribs.

After 900 years and their victory in the Battle of Carchemish in 605 BC over the alliance of Kmt and Assyria, their names and the names of their colonies became Jews, Kurds, Babylonians and Sabaeans.  Turkic Mongolians from East Asia are the common component between Persians, Turks, Romans, Huns and the so-called Indo-Europeans

It can be noted that the Muslim Brotherhood and sectarian organizations and terrorism are concentrated in the northeastern side of Egypt, and this confirms that these groups are ninety percent of Amorites from the Levant or of Amorite origins.

The region and the entire world is in dire need of a new institution that breaks with methods of copying and imitation and reliance on old lies and defunct concepts that have been planted by the formations of expelled Hyksos in the public and global consciousness since the invention of the Tanakh in 580 BC. These are to justify the occupation of southern Ugarit and the establishment of an entity that challenges in all directions and drains the human and material resources of the peoples of the region and the world

For these reasons, here is a call to the leaders of the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Egypt to adopt a project of establishing a strong international geographic media organization based on new and scientific foundations that avoid copying, imitation and allegations. Correcting history and the understanding of terrorism and organized crime are paramount necessities to achieve security, stability, development and moderation

Advertisement

My Altercation with a Turkic Mongolian Shamsaddin Megalommatis

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

This altercation with a Turkic Mongolian on Academia.edu began by him answering my objective messages supporting the 1^st half of the 18^th Dynasty of Kmt and accusing the 2^nd half of treason. He responded yesterday saying:  [Thank you for all the messages and long letters that you wrote to me in many sites!

I don’t think that, without many years of ordinary studies in specialized departments and without learning two or three or even more ancient languages, one can speak about the topics you raise. You are not an historian to eventually challenge the predominant academic standpoint. So, you don’t write based on historical sources but on your personal feelings, being eventually guided by others.

History is not a History of Races, but a History of Spiritual Force and Material Implementation. There is no spiritual force without Truth, but you dwell in the darkness of the Lie and the Evil Distortion. Your attempt to establish an ethnic group categorization/classification is totally wrong and contradicts the written evidence (which you evidently never studied), but this is still a minor problem compared to more essential

Expressing support for the filthy and paranoid Satanist Hatshepsut, who dared to ask her scribes to present her as a product of theogamy is a sacrilege. It is blasphemous, inhuman and monstrous act. Only the evil and the ignorant people support her. The credit for the Expedition to Punt goes to the admiral Nehesy – not her. Tuthmose III and Akhenaten were the greatest pharaohs of the 18th dynasty. Their God is God. The abomination of Amun that Hatshepsut worshipped is Satan himself – a lower and evil spirit.

The only people to deny this fact are the evil Jesuits, i.e. Satan’s top organization on Earth, and the disreputable, paranoid pseudo-pope Francis I whose end will be more torturous and more excruciating than any other’s.

Do not reproduce the silly propaganda of the Amhara cholera! The ancestors of the Abyssinians have nothing to do with Hadhramaut or Mahra. Those places were out of their reach. From other lands in NW Yemen these incestuous pigs were thrown out in order to keep the land clean from their pestilence. Yemen was kept clean and an arid region of Eastern Africa became cursed because of their presence. Soon that place will also be cleaned, because no place on Earth will be left the Amhara contamination.

And why are you repeating their paranoid lies? Are you on the payroll of the criminal state of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia)? In such case, you are a traitor and you have no place in Kemet / Masr.]

Tarig Anter: [You are a wretched hallucinating filthy ignorant. We will see who the brain and the soul to erase the stupid nonsense produced by the criminal Turkic Mongolians and their offshoots.]

Shamsaddin Megalommatis: [That’s what I thought; you are a venomous racist and a psychopath. Egypt is a good cage for you. By the way, I know many Fidjeki Nubians in Aswan. None is devilish and pathetic as you are. Most probably, you are not even a Nubian. Get lost!]

Tarig Anter: [Your name tell it all. Shamsaddin indicates Turkic Mongolian filth. What racism against criminal heterogeneous bandits. You are product villainous acts and you do not belong to any country or nation. I am certain you are from Hyksos offshoots and byproducts.

Very soon the Turkic Mongolian-Amorite bandits and their vassals will be well exposed in the world. The bandits of Akkadians; Hyksos; Berber; Hebrews/Jews; Kassites/Babylonians; Mitanni/Kurds (your bandit); Mukarribs/Sabaeans; Kushites; Romans; Persians; and Fulani reached their despicable end.

A shoe from Hatshepsut is much more valuable than all of you.]

Tuthmosis III Made the First Coup and Betrayal of Kmt People from Inside the Royal Palace

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

Hatshepsut was the only legitimate heir of her father Tuthmosis I married her half-brother (Tuthmosis II), and she had no way of ruling but to marry Thutmose II and bore him a son and two daughters. The son died in his childhood, and his name was not left in any monuments. As for the two daughters, their names are Neferura and Meritre Hatshepsut. Thutmose II gave birth to his son (Thutmose III) from one concubines of the royal court, possibly of foreign origin, her name is (East), and some forge and say her name is Isis

Hatshepsut began ruling at the age of twenty upon the death of her father, Thutmose I (1503-1493 BC). She was her father’s partner in government and the legitimate heir to the throne. She is supposed to be the next king on the throne, Thutmose I. However, because the rule of a woman was something that was not the norm. For this reason, it was inevitable that her half-brother (Thutmose II) would take part in the rule with her. That slender person of non-royal origin, poor health, and inexperienced in managing the affairs of the country, became her superficial partner as a king, while she became the royal wife and the real legitimate king running the state

Hatshepsut continued the policies of her father and the patriotic first half of the 18th Dynasty. Hatshepsut launched military campaigns focused on protecting the kingdoms of Kerma south of Kemt from the Hyksos gangs stranded in Libya with the Berbers and their slaves and mercenaries of West Africa who, after several centuries of looting, brought down Kerma kingdoms and established the Kush colony that invaded and occupied Kemt in the 25th dynasty.

Her campaigns also protected the peoples of Ebla and Ugarit from the branching bandits of the expelled Hyksos. Hatshepsut was following the usual friendly policy with the peoples of the region, Ebla, Ugarit and Karma, and supported them to fight the attacks of branched gangs of the expelled Hyksos, the Hebrews and Mitanni in the east, and those who became Kushites in the south.

Thutmose III and “Menhabi” in the Amarna letters, the sixth king of the 18th dynasty, actually ruled 32 years in the period 1458-1425 BC, after the 22 years rule of Queen Hatshepsut 1479-1458 BC. As soon as he received the throne after the death of Hatshepsut, he completely reversed these policies, fought the neighboring peoples, and supported their enemies, the Hyksos gangs, and carried out sixteen campaigns on Ebla and Ugarit. Moreover, the neighboring peoples became in the hands of the Hyksos gangs, an ally of Thutmose III. While history books falsify state and claim that he campaigned against the Mitanni and the Kushites, and this is a blatant lie and completely opposite to the truth.

Thutmose III brought sons of the leaders of the Hyksos gangs to Thebes, the capital of Kmt, to learn about Kmt conditions and customs so that they could help him as advisors in the rule of Kmt. He claimed that he would make allies, and if they return to their country and assume power, they would be among his loyal followers and would not think of war against Kmt. This is also a false and misleading claim to cover up the betrayal of Thutmose III and his alliance with the Hyksos against the peoples of Kmt and the region.

A person named Yuya married Toya, and her mother was a bridesmaid in the palace, the supervisor of clothes, and the singer. Yuya and Thuya had a daughter, Tiye, who became the wife of Amenhotep III and mother of Akhenaten. Tiye’s father, Tia, whose name is Yuya, is of foreign origin due to the features of his mummy and the presence of many different ways of writing his name, which means that it was originally a non-Egyptian name. It is most likely that Tia and her family are Kushites, a creation of the Hyksos.

Amenhotep III, Akhenaten’s father, married Glyuchiba, daughter of Shutarna II, King of Mitanni, and issued a special number of memorial scarabs on his marriage to Glyuchiba in the tenth year of his reign. 317 young women accompanied the princess from Ghawani of the Mitanni royal palace. Glyuchiba became known as “the king’s secondary wife” in the sense that she was a concubine while Tiye was the official wife of Amenhotep III and never held the title of queen because she was a foreigner. On the scarab, Amenhotep mentioned the name of his chief wife, Queen Tiye, and the names of her parents, Yuya and Thuya. Glyochiba’s niece, Dodochiba, became a new wife to Amenhotep III after Glyochiba’s death, but Amenhotep III died shortly after her arrival.

The second half of Dynasty 18 was an ally and partner of the bands that branched off from the expelled Hyksos. Moreover, they worked together against the people of Kemet and all the peoples of the region in Sumer, Ebla, Ugarit, the Arabs, Punt, Kerma and Libya. Nobody in Egypt knows or admits that Thutmose III, Amenhotep II, Thutmose IV, Amenhotep III and Amenhotep IV/Akhenaten were agents and should be accused of high treason. Rather, it is unfortunate that they are considered patriots and great kings, as the Hyksos want to deceive Kemet and the world. The army commander, Horemheb, is the one who saved Kmt from that treacherous family, the partner of the Hyksos.

The daughter of the King of Mitanni, who are from the Hyksos, the enemies of Kmt, who were expelled by King Ahmose I and his family and the first half of the 18th Dynasty. Thutmose III, Amenhotep II, Thutmose IV, Amenhotep III and Amenhotep IV/ Akhenaten were traitors and did not deserve to be Egyptians, but the Hyksos are still in Egypt and the region.

In order for the strategic alliance, which is so necessary for all the peoples of the region to succeed, between Egypt, Saudi Arabia, UAE and Bahrain, the Hyksos remnants must be removed from every important authority in all the countries of the coalition. It is not possible to confront the terrorism and sabotage of the Zionists, Persians, Turks, Romans, Kushites and Sabaeans, while the Hyksos still have power and wealth in any facility and sensitive area in any country in the alliance.

The Hyksos of today are diverting Africans, particularly in West Africa and Maghreb, from their own history to use them against the history of Kmt, Kerma, Punt and Arabs.

There is no true history now; and mainstream institutions defy learning history as an investigative subject

The correct method of learning is against academic, religious, media, and political institutions all together. They do not want or allow letting people question them and doubt their actions or legitimacy. The change must start at the top and all learning institutions is easy to follow