Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy

Posts tagged ‘Islam’

What is Islam and How it Relates to Mohamed, Yeshua, and Moses?


What is Islam and How it Relates to Mohamed, Yeshua, and Moses

What is Islam and How it Relates to Mohamed, Yeshua, and Moses

Original Christianity is a revival of the religion of Abraham and Moses and these were sent to the Israelite only. While Islam has two different definitions; the correct one describes Islam as the single original religion existed even before creation. The common and wrong definition considers Islam as a new religion on its own and started with prophet Mohamed only.

The teachings of Mohamed was supposed to put law/code for his people and his region only; but also it is a part of the bigger single universal religion. The original teachings of prophet and messenger Mohamed were hijacked by Turkic Mongolians soon after his death, in the same way they hijacked those of Moses and Jesus (Yeshua).

So, the Turkic Islam of today is neither genuine Islam nor the teachings of Mohamed. To distinguish between the original and the present versions I personally call them “Mosesianity”, “Jesusianity”, and “Mohamedianity”.

True Islam distinguishes between prophets (revive existing law) and messengers (bring distinct law). Every messenger is a prophet, while not every prophet is a messenger. And it states clearly that God sent to each nation its own messenger and law. This leads to a conclusion that Mohamed was a prophet to the universe; and at the same time a messenger to the Arabs only.

Islam describes all genuine messengers and prophets as Muslims, including Adam, Enoch, Abraham, all Israelite prophets, and even many unnamed foreign ones (Ghafir 40:78) and (An-Nisa 4:164). Therefore, true Islam is a single universal religion with a multitude of distinct national laws for each distinct nation. The national laws are mistakenly considered as distinct and conflicting religions.

The Afar people, since they are part of the Israelite in my opinion, are supposed to follow the genuine teachings of Jesus and Moses which is a single part of genuine Islam but with two books/codes not Turkic Islam, not common Christianity; and not Judaism. Since the Hebrew Israelite in Aramaic land became a different nation in contract with the Ge’ez Israelite in Punt they needed a messenger, and not just a prophet.

Islamic holy books are the texts authored by Allah via various messengers, while prophets received no books. The books mentioned in the holy Quran are: Tawrat or Torah; Zabur (often interpreted as being the Book of Psalms); Injil or Gospel; Scrolls of Abraham (Ṣuḥuf Ibrāhīm); Book of John the Baptist (Kitāb Yaḥyā); and Scrolls of Moses (Ṣuḥuf Mūsā). The number messengers and their holy books are not specified.

Islam states clearly that many prophets existed, including many not mentioned in the Quran. The Quran itself refers to at least four other prophets but does not name them. One less-than-sound hadith states there have been 124,000 prophets approx., while another scholarly source states that “their exact numbers are not known with any kind of certainty.”

Advertisements

Return Christianity to its Owners


The Punt Federation the Land of God

The Punt Federation the Land of God

I just want to point to a gross big mistake and wrong assumption that Jerusalem, Solomon, and the Temple were originally in Aramaic land.

The truth is they were in Afar Triangle and the journey of Queen of Sheba (Makeda), her son Menelik and the Arc of the Covenant were just few hundred miles long, and never went via Egypt or Arabia.

Another gross mistake is the assumption that Christianity introduced to Ethiopia.

I believe Yeshua was ethnically Puntite. He was sent to the lost sheep of the house of Israel only, who are also ethnically from the lands of Punt.

Therefore, Christianity is a local indigenous religion of Punt and only a revival of the faith and the religion of Enoch, Abraham, and Moses. Christianity was never meant to be global or to deal with nations other than those of Punt.

So, saying that Christianity was introduced to Ethiopia is illogical.

Punt is Enoch who is more exalted than the great Abraham.

I guess Armageddon will be in Punt and Jesus and the might of God will show there.

Love you Punt; God blessed you.

What are my Sources and References?


What are my Sources and References

What are my Sources and References

I always get this question from interested readers and skeptics. When a scholar uses information from sources, it is needed to tell readers where the information came from and where they can locate credible sources. This is what citations and references are for.

But if researches challenge the credibility of existing sources then a different approach must be followed. Otherwise new researches will lead to the same old invalid findings.

My answer for this issue once and for all is:

The common element in the history of the Middle East and religions took me too far from the region. I have had to look into the history of Central Asia and the emigrations of those who I called “Turkic-Mongolians” because of the absence of a term that exists in both Arabic and English.

There may be some Chinese and Russian sources, but I have not seen them.

The method of history revisionism which I follow is not conventionally based on references and sources, but on modern evidences, analysis, investigation and reconstruction. Therefore, it is necessary to study traditional sources only to discover their weaknesses and to link conflicting, unproven, and contradictory narratives based on logic and modern information only in order to develop an alternative narrative. Then test the resulting new hypotheses in the general framework of modern and ancient history.

For example, if it is mentioned that Abraham used camel; Jacob and his sons entered a walled city; a great destructive volcano happened and was not mentioned in the history of the Israelites; the Hyksos and Mitanni had common foreign origins; or that Abraham made long journeys without specifying the type of animal. These are few simple issues to research, investigation, and test. There are an enormous amount of weak and false stories that confirm the poor historicity of our existing references, sources, and religious interpretations.

So unfortunately I have no reference books or even historians to suggest, because these many new topics and facts had not been studied before. Take for example camel and horse fossils; the Thera (or Santorini) eruption, the Scythian, Indus Valley, Iranian, and Zoroastrian histories, the great late bronze age collapse; links between Hyksos, Sabaeans, D’mt, and Kush.

Therefore, I could only recommend revision, criticism, new assumptions, and reconstruction of history using logic and available new and old information. It is a difficult and doubtful method to use, but could be the best way to discover true history.

One Universal Faith and a Multitude of Local Religions


One Universal Faith and a Multitude of Local Religions

One Universal Faith and a Multitude of Local Religions

I faithfully believe in God; but I don’t believe in any national, international, global, or universal religion.

Jesus was sent to the lost sheep of the House of Israel (i.e. to the Hebrew Israelite) only.

One Universal Faith and a multitude of local religions is the right path.

Never think we are alone in this endless universe.

And never think we should or could preach any religion to other planets, or even other nations.

Ashkenazim Origin


Important Update Notice on 24 July 2018: I have updated my Abyssinian Hypothesis  after discovering the that single-hump camel (The dromedary) was unknown in Arabia, Aram, Assyria, and Kemet before 950 BC, while in abundance in the land of Punt.

This led to make the following major changes:
1- The proposed origin of Israelite from being Arabic-speaking Arab Yemenis to Ge’ez-speaking African Puntite;
2- Rename the Abyssinian Hypothesis to the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis;
3- The Turkic Mongolian colonizers and rulers of Neo-Babylonia invited elders from the House of Israel to Babylonia in around 580 BC in what is called the Babylonian Exile to help the create Judaism and colonize Aramaic land in 530 BC;
4- The Hebrew Language and the Hebrew Israelite are products of admixture between Ge’ez Israelite, Turkic Mongolian Persians, and colonized Aramaic. They existed only after 530 C; and
5- The Lost Sheep of the House of Israel are those Israelite who  left the land of Punt and decided to collaborate with Turkic Mongolians to invent Judaism and colonize Aramaic lands; and turned into Hebrew Israelite.

Therefore, the Israelite Exodus of 1446 BC was only within Punt, from one region to another. The Jews are not Israelite at all; and the name Judah was just used deceptively to relate the Jews to the Israelite. The Israelite were scattered all over the world and they no longer exist as a nation or a tribe.

For more details on the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis read the following three articles:
1- How Persians Cooked a Cult and Called it Judaism Part 1
2- The Turkic Mongolian-African Israelite Joint-ventures
3- Jesus Pointing to “The Lost Sheep of the house of Israel” and “the Gentiles”
[End of notice]

The history of Ashkenazim is shrouded in mystery. Many theories have arisen speculating on their emergence as a distinct community of Jews.

Here is another hypothesis that makes a lot of sense. It supposes that the origin of Ashkenazim is very much older than the emergence of Khazar Khaganate in c. 650–969 AD. The term Jews (originally Yehudim, Israeli pronunciation [jehuˈdim]) must had appeared only in 535 BC.

The Jews are not Israelite but all Jews originated from Turkic Mongolians, similar to Persians, Turks, Romans, “whitened” Europeans, and Caucasoid Indians. While the Israelite were originally Arab tribe from Yemen. Therefore, the Israelite were Semite; but the Jews are not Semite at all.

The invasions of Turkic Mongolians into the Pontiac-Caspian Steppe which resulted in the formation of Slavic groups in the region, and later all Turkic Khaganates including the Khazar, could had started around 1700 BC.

Perhaps the Palestinians are not One Nation but Two Nations


Perhaps Palestinians are not One Nation but they are two Nations - Jebusites & Philistia

It is noticeable that geography, politics and culture divide the Palestinians into two distinct, separate and even contradictory and conflicting parts between the West Bank (the Jordan River) and the population of the Gaza Strip. Are these divisions the result of historical and racial differences? To answer this question it is necessary to note the following:
The Jews are a group of Turkic Mongolians who were sent by the colonists to Persia and Babylonia (and they also left Mongols) to displace the Hebrew Israelite of Israel and replace them in Canaan. This has been confirmed by the Samaritans and the Beta Israel Ethiopians, as well as by the loss of the tribes of Israel and other profound ethnic, cultural, religious and political transformations that followed the Babylonian return in 530 BC.

Turkic Mongolians, the origin of Jews, had existed in the region since 1800 BC with various names such as Chasu YHWH and Hyksos. Their raids and destruction caused the collapse of the Bronze Age in 1177 BC for the majority of Mediterranean civilizations and countries. It is a pivotal era documented in archeology and history books. This massive collapse resulted in a large number of large migrations and the emergence of so-called “sea peoples” fugitives and mercenaries. At the time, the Hebrew Israelites were occupying and were present in Canaan and were still allied with the Turkic Mongolians before the collapse of this alliance in 626 BC.

The first waves of Palestinians came with the collapse of the Bronze Age and the fall of the Hittite Empire and civilization in and around Anatolia. The second wave of settlements were to the Philistia region and it was organized by the Turkic Mongolians after they called themselves Jews. This was in 530 BC with the expulsion and dispersal of the Israelites from Canaan. They brought in new immigrant labor and slaves to be added to the first wave of of the sea peoples and they settled the second group in the region of Philistia; and both settlers became known as Palestinians in Western Bank and also in of Philistia despite their differences.

It is clear that the history of settler groups that were later known to the Palestinians occurred on two stages. The first stage is the migrations of the so-called “peoples of the sea”. It is noteworthy that the Jebusites are a group of settlers concentrated in the eastern region of River Jordan and they differed from the Canaanites despite attempts to include them as Canaanites, but they are closer to the Hittites (the peoples of ancient Anatolia). Many scholars consider the origin of the Jebusites is the Hittite. This is confirmed by the gods they worshiped before they converted to Christianity. As well as the similarity between them and Armenians.

The second phase was different Mediterranean groups to replace the expelled and displaced Canaanite and Hebrew. This second group was settled in what is now the Gaza Strip. “Philistia” was first mentioned in the works of the Greek historian Herodotus in the fifth century BC. With the emergence of Christianity the inhabitants of the West Bank, adopted the new religion that emerged in the lands they became advocates and defenders of Christianity in the face of Jews. While the inhabitants of the Gaza Strip remained in their old beliefs until the Islamic conquest came and embraced Islam as a means of coexistence and protection.

Could Bethlehem or Gerizim be the Real Jerusalem?


Could Bethlehem or Gerizim be the Real Jerusalem?

Important Update Notice on 24 July 2018: I have updated my Abyssinian Hypothesis  after discovering the that single-hump camel (The dromedary) was unknown in Arabia, Aram, Assyria, and Kemet before 950 BC, while in abundance in the land of Punt.

This led to make the following major changes:
1- The proposed origin of Israelite from being Arabic-speaking Arab Yemenis to Ge’ez-speaking African Puntite;
2- Rename the Abyssinian Hypothesis to the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis;
3- The Turkic Mongolian colonizers and rulers of Neo-Babylonia invited elders from the House of Israel to Babylonia in around 580 BC in what is called the Babylonian Exile to help the create Judaism and colonize Aramaic land in 530 BC;
4- The Hebrew Language and the Hebrew Israelite are products of admixture between Ge’ez Israelite, Turkic Mongolian Persians, and colonized Aramaic. They existed only after 530 C; and
5- The Lost Sheep of the House of Israel are those Israelite who  left the land of Punt and decided to collaborate with Turkic Mongolians to invent Judaism and colonize Aramaic lands; and turned into Hebrew Israelite.

For more details on the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis read the following three articles:
1- How Persians Cooked a Cult and Called it Judaism Part 1
2- The Turkic Mongolian-African Israelite Joint-ventures
3- Jesus Pointing to “The Lost Sheep of the house of Israel” and “the Gentiles”
[End of notice] Therefore, real Jerusalem is in the land of Punt.

Real Jerusalem is the place where King Solomon built the First Temple. All indications point to places other than to Aelia (present-day Jerusalem). The real Jerusalem could be in Bethlehem (also called the city of David as present-day Jerusalem!) or Gerizim Mount in Nablus.

The Second Temple was most probably built in a site totally different from the site of Solomon’s Temple (Beit HaMikdash, means the holy house or temple) for political reasons. Surely, both sites were not in Aelia (present-day Jerusalem). Aelia or present-day Jerusalem is a holy city mainly for Christians, and to a lesser extent for Muslims; but it is not holy at all for Israelite and certainly not for the Turkic Jews.

The world must investigate and question the name “Jerusalem” before handing over the most holy city for Christians to the Jews. Until this is done the world must reject giving the name “Jerusalem” wrongly to Aelia. The Romans were NOT too mean or too stupid to build their Jupiter Temple on top of Solomon’s Temple.

The Hebrew Bible, which says that the city of Bethlehem was built up as a fortified city by Rehoboam, identifies it as the city David was from and where he was crowned as the king of Israel. The New Testament identifies Bethlehem as the birthplace of Jesus. This brings back the essential question: Why Bethlehem and present-day Jerusalem are both called “the city of David”? There are archaeological discoveries around Bethlehem that intrigue scholars and relate them to the First Temple despite attempts to hush it up.

An article written by Matti Friedman on 19 May 2013 and posted on the Times of Israel is titled: Despite secrecy, interest builds around mysterious First Temple find outside Bethlehem. It says: [Archaeology in the Holy Land has long been caught up in modern-day politics. The Zionist movement always viewed unearthing remnants of the ancient past as a way of proving the depth of Jewish roots in the land. Palestinians, for their part, have increasingly taken to denying the existence of any ancient Jewish history and tend to condemn all archaeology conducted by Israel as an attempt to cement political control.]

The Samaritans (Samaritan Hebrew: Shamerim ), meaning “Guardians/Keepers/Watchers” (of the Torah), Hebrew: Shomronim, Arabic: al-Sāmiriyyūn) are an ethnoreligious group originating from the Hebrew Israelites of ancient time. They have their own Torah, language, history, and Jerusalem. They insist that the Jews are not Israelite or believers; and they are foreigners who displaced the Israelite after the Babylonian Return on 530 BC organized by the Persians.

According to many scholars, archaeological excavations at Mount Gerizim indicate that a temple existed in the first half of the 5th century BC. The history of schism between Samaritans and Jews is known, and by the early 4th century BC the communities have had distinctive practices and communal separation. According to Samaritans, it was on Mount Gerizim that Abraham was commanded by God to offer Isaac, his son, as a sacrifice (Genesis 22:2).

%d bloggers like this: