Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy

Posts tagged ‘Jerusalem’

The Jews are Syrians and Turks


Syrian Amorite Jews and Turkic Mongolian Jews versus the genuine Israelites

The origins of earlier Jews made in 600 BC in Babylon and later Jews made in 740 AD in Khazar. While Israelites existed in Punt Lands since 1900 BC

This map shows that the early eastern Jews are Syrian Amorite Bedouins made in 600 BC, while the new western Jews are Turkic Khazars from East Asia made in 740 AD

Syrian Amorite Levant Bedouins and Turkic Mongolians from East Asia by 90% and 10% are together the Akkadians, as well as the Hyksos

The map also show that the Children of Israel since 1900 BC are a people from the peoples of Punt, in southwest of the Red Sea.

The Mukarribs Amorite Hyksos destroyed the genuine homeland and the Kingdom of Israel; and the Mukarribs dispersed the Israelites from their homeland, and took part of them to Yemen and the western and southern coasts of Arabia as well as sold many of them to passing ships and some fled to the hinterland of Africa.

The Jews have absolutely nothing to do with the Children of Israel and their prophets, nor with Moses, nor with the Torah of Moses, nor with Holy Temple of Solomon, Jerusalem nor with any heavenly message.

Advertisement

Hebrews are not Israelites and Amorites are not Arabs


It is essential to keep repeating again for those who evade what is obvious. Nations DO NOT migrate at all. Those who move or migrate are either bandits of invaders or utilized migrants groups. The true Israelites are not Jews at all. The Israelites and any nation did not migrate like birds, fish or locusts

There are no nations in the Americas other than the indigenous peoples. Others are just influential or marginalized foreign communities in the process of digestion. Indigenous peoples everywhere in the Americas or Europe or Africa absorb and digest any foreign community regardless of their size and power. This is a normal basic law of nature. Indigenous peoples win at the end for sure.

Religion is single, universal and very old with uncountable heavenly messages one for each nation in their own language, their local messenger and each one is limited to their homeland.

All denominations are just polities and they are not part of the Religion and spirituality. Denominations migrate with bandits and foreign communities but they too fade away with time and they are digested by indigenous nations.

Judaism. Christianity and Islam are unrelated to the single universal old Religion and its heavenly messages. Denominations are Hyksos Amorite-Turkic Mongolian widely spread polities that will eventually die. The Israelites and Arabs and the Messages of Moses and Jesus and Muhammad are unrelated to Jews, Amorites, Judaism, Christianity and Islam. The latter are Hyksos groups and their polities who invaded Asia, Europe, Africa and the Americas.

What is called State of Israel today is in occupied southern Ugarit and is totally different from the God given Homeland of the true Israelites nation which was in Punt Lands as the Kingdom of Kings David and Solomon with true destroyed and disappeared Jerusalem as its capital.

Being born in today’s State of Israel makes individuals linked to the Hyksos Amorites and Turkic Mongolians and their denominations but will not make them Israelites or faithful to the Messages of Moses, Jesus or Muhammad or any other uncountable heavenly messengers

The Israelites are not Jews or Hebrews. Jews are Hebrews and they are from a branch of the expelled Hyksos in 1523 BC. The Hyksos are yellowish 90% Amorites of the Levant plus 10% Turkic Mongolians from East Asia who invaded Sumer in 2334 BC and were called Akkadians and were expelled in 2154 BC

The Israelites are not Hebrew or Jews at all. The Israelites are Ethiopians from Punt Lands and their Solomon’s Temple and Jerusalem were in Afar Triangle in Ethiopia and Eritrea. The Hyksos Sabaeans of D’mt colony allied with Judah chiefs to rebel against King Solomon and when he died in 930 BC D’mt colony and Judah chiefs looted the Temple and expelled ten tribes of Israel

In 600 BC, the Babylonian Hyksos instructed D’mt colony and Judah chiefs to destroy the Temple completely, sell the ten tribes of Israel into slavery and come to Babylon to invent Jews, Judaism, Hebrew language and Hebrew Bible from Aperu and the Torah of Moses which was in Ge’ez language.

On another earlier line, Hyksos in Egypt went westward in 1600 BC and allied with the Meshwesh Berber (Moors) to invade, loot and enslave West Africa. These raids all over West Africa created the black Fulani who were subservient to the pale yellowish Fulani of Hyksos and Berber mix. Pale and black Fulani invaded the kingdoms of Kerma civilization in 1500 BC, toppled them in 1000 BC, and created Kush colony in 780 BC to invade Kmt from the south, support expelled Hyksos and recolonize Kmt

Levantine Amorites want to take over Egypt by Any Means and they must be stopped


For more than 5 thousand years, the Levantine Amorites wanted to seize Kemet by any means and with any claim, no matter how absurd their claims were.

The Amorites deny that they are 90% of the Hyksos and that they are partners with the Turkic Mongolians. The Amorites also claim that they are Arabs, while they are Hebrews and Bedouins. They claim that Amorite invasion and colonization of Kemet and the exploiting and hijacking of the Message of Muhammad, and turning it into a colonial weapon is Islamic expansion.

The Amorites claim that the Arabs have been present in Kmt since ancient times. The Amorites also claim that the people of the Kmt civilization are Arab, and they mean by that they were Amorites. The Amorites deceive and deny that they infiltrated and are still infiltrating Kmt in order to control and seize Kmt.

The Amorites deny that they are the Hebrews, Kurds, Babylonians and Sabaeans, and they are partners with the Persians, the Turks and the Romans. The Amorites of Levant claim that their infiltration into the ancient Kmt, which continues to this day, is peaceful with pretexts of Islamism, Arabism and asylum.

The Amorites deny that King Menes expelled them in 3100 BC because they were foreign attackers and took advantage of the formation of the new land in the Delta swamps to hide and wage crimes. The Amorites also claim that King Menes united two countries and that the northern imaginary country was theirs and they were the ones who developed the Delta of Lower Egypt.

The Amorite Hyksos claim that they have legitimate historical rights in Kmt, Arabia, Sumer, Ebla and Ugarit. The Amorites deny, ignore and challenge the existence and originality of the people and civilizations in the region, namely the Kmt, Ebla, Ugarit, Sumer, Dilmun, Magan, Meluhha, Punt, Kerma, Libu, Iran and Aegean

The Amorites claim that the Hebrew Hyksos, who they are part of, are from the Children of Israel. The Amorites claim that Aelia Capitolina, which is the site of the Al-Aqsa Mosque and the Jesus holy sites, is the lost Jerusalem, the site of Solomon’s Temple. The Amorite Hebrew Hyksos claim that the Hebrew entity of today was the Kingdom of the Children of Israel in the past; and that Palestinians are Arab

The Amorites claim that Thutmose III and Akhenaten were heroes because they betrayed Kmt and joined them to destroy and occupy Ugarit and Ebla. The Amorites Hebrew Hyksos deny that they overthrew and destroyed Ugarit, and established the colonies of Phoenicia and Canaan in the north and south of Ugarit.

The Amorite Hebrew Hyksos claim that the heavenly messages are religions to use them in invasion and occupation of peoples and countries. They ignore the role of Levant as the center for the Umayyads, Abbasids, Ottomans, Zionism, Pan-nationalism and terrorism. The Amorites, the Hebrew Hyksos, deny their role in sabotaging societies, behavior, and religious, media, academic, artistic and political institutions.

The Amorites claim that the Hebrews Hyksos participated in building the Pyramids; and that Sinai belonged to them, that the Delta were theirs, and that they had a role in the civilization in Kemet. The Hyksos Hebrew Amorites claim that Levant is the heart of Arabism and the Arab national resurrection, and they pretend that they have a conflict with the Hebrew entity. The Amorites, the Hebrew Hyksos, deny that they are currently occupying with their Persian partners the state of Lebanon, which is north of Ugarit as well as south of Ugarit.

Amorites, Hebrews, Hyksos, Sabaeans, Kurds, Babylonians, Turks, and Turkic Mongolians must be totally exposed and stopped from destroying and threatening the entire region.

Could Bethlehem or Gerizim be the Real Jerusalem?


Could Bethlehem or Gerizim be the Real Jerusalem?

Important Update Notice on 24 July 2018: I have updated my Abyssinian Hypothesis  after discovering the that single-hump camel (The dromedary) was unknown in Arabia, Aram, Assyria, and Kemet before 950 BC, while in abundance in the land of Punt.

This led to make the following major changes:
1- The proposed origin of Israelite from being Arabic-speaking Arab Yemenis to Ge’ez-speaking African Puntite;
2- Rename the Abyssinian Hypothesis to the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis;
3- The Turkic Mongolian colonizers and rulers of Neo-Babylonia invited elders from the House of Israel to Babylonia in around 580 BC in what is called the Babylonian Exile to help the create Judaism and colonize Aramaic land in 530 BC;
4- The Hebrew Language and the Hebrew Israelite are products of admixture between Ge’ez Israelite, Turkic Mongolian Persians, and colonized Aramaic. They existed only after 530 C; and
5- The Lost Sheep of the House of Israel are those Israelite who  left the land of Punt and decided to collaborate with Turkic Mongolians to invent Judaism and colonize Aramaic lands; and turned into Hebrew Israelite.

For more details on the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis read the following three articles:
1- How Persians Cooked a Cult and Called it Judaism Part 1
2- The Turkic Mongolian-African Israelite Joint-ventures
3- Jesus Pointing to “The Lost Sheep of the house of Israel” and “the Gentiles”
[End of notice] Therefore, real Jerusalem is in the land of Punt.

Real Jerusalem is the place where King Solomon built the First Temple. All indications point to places other than to Aelia (present-day Jerusalem). The real Jerusalem could be in Bethlehem (also called the city of David as present-day Jerusalem!) or Gerizim Mount in Nablus.

The Second Temple was most probably built in a site totally different from the site of Solomon’s Temple (Beit HaMikdash, means the holy house or temple) for political reasons. Surely, both sites were not in Aelia (present-day Jerusalem). Aelia or present-day Jerusalem is a holy city mainly for Christians, and to a lesser extent for Muslims; but it is not holy at all for Israelite and certainly not for the Turkic Jews.

The world must investigate and question the name “Jerusalem” before handing over the most holy city for Christians to the Jews. Until this is done the world must reject giving the name “Jerusalem” wrongly to Aelia. The Romans were NOT too mean or too stupid to build their Jupiter Temple on top of Solomon’s Temple.

The Hebrew Bible, which says that the city of Bethlehem was built up as a fortified city by Rehoboam, identifies it as the city David was from and where he was crowned as the king of Israel. The New Testament identifies Bethlehem as the birthplace of Jesus. This brings back the essential question: Why Bethlehem and present-day Jerusalem are both called “the city of David”? There are archaeological discoveries around Bethlehem that intrigue scholars and relate them to the First Temple despite attempts to hush it up.

An article written by Matti Friedman on 19 May 2013 and posted on the Times of Israel is titled: Despite secrecy, interest builds around mysterious First Temple find outside Bethlehem. It says: [Archaeology in the Holy Land has long been caught up in modern-day politics. The Zionist movement always viewed unearthing remnants of the ancient past as a way of proving the depth of Jewish roots in the land. Palestinians, for their part, have increasingly taken to denying the existence of any ancient Jewish history and tend to condemn all archaeology conducted by Israel as an attempt to cement political control.]

The Samaritans (Samaritan Hebrew: Shamerim ), meaning “Guardians/Keepers/Watchers” (of the Torah), Hebrew: Shomronim, Arabic: al-Sāmiriyyūn) are an ethnoreligious group originating from the Hebrew Israelites of ancient time. They have their own Torah, language, history, and Jerusalem. They insist that the Jews are not Israelite or believers; and they are foreigners who displaced the Israelite after the Babylonian Return on 530 BC organized by the Persians.

According to many scholars, archaeological excavations at Mount Gerizim indicate that a temple existed in the first half of the 5th century BC. The history of schism between Samaritans and Jews is known, and by the early 4th century BC the communities have had distinctive practices and communal separation. According to Samaritans, it was on Mount Gerizim that Abraham was commanded by God to offer Isaac, his son, as a sacrifice (Genesis 22:2).

It is Aelia Capitolina NOT Beit HaMikdash, Al-Quds, or Jerusalem


Aelia Capitolina 633 AD

Aelia Capitolina 633 AD

Important Update Notice on 24 July 2018: I have updated my Abyssinian Hypothesis  after discovering the that single-hump camel (The dromedary) was unknown in Arabia, Aram, Assyria, and Kemet before 950 BC, while in abundance in the land of Punt.

This led to make the following major changes:
1- The proposed origin of Israelite from being Arabic-speaking Arab Yemenis to Ge’ez-speaking African Puntite;
2- Rename the Abyssinian Hypothesis to the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis;
3- The Turkic Mongolian colonizers and rulers of Neo-Babylonia invited elders from the House of Israel to Babylonia in around 580 BC in what is called the Babylonian Exile to help the create Judaism and colonize Aramaic land in 530 BC;
4- The Hebrew Language and the Hebrew Israelite are products of admixture between Ge’ez Israelite, Turkic Mongolian Persians, and colonized Aramaic. They existed only after 530 C; and
5- The Lost Sheep of the House of Israel are those Israelite who  left the land of Punt and decided to collaborate with Turkic Mongolians to invent Judaism and colonize Aramaic lands; and turned into Hebrew Israelite.

For more details on the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis read the following three articles:
1- How Persians Cooked a Cult and Called it Judaism Part 1
2- The Turkic Mongolian-African Israelite Joint-ventures
3- Jesus Pointing to “The Lost Sheep of the house of Israel” and “the Gentiles”
[End of notice]

Is “present day Jerusalem” a Jewish holy city? Is the location of “present day Jerusalem” is the same as that of the “earlier or first Jerusalem”? To answer these questions we must notice that Jerusalem has more than 70 names; and the “earlier or first Jerusalem” is specifically the site of Solomon’s Temple, also known as the First Temple (Hebrew: Beit HaMikdash). Beit HaMikdash was destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar II after the Siege of the “earlier or first Jerusalem” in 586 BC.

The Second Temple (Hebrew: Beit HaMikdash HaSheni) was built in 516 BC under instructions from the Persian King Cyrus the Great who could had invented the Jews and sent them from Babylon to Judah to replace the Israelite. The returnees were not actually Israelite but rather Turkic Mongolian settlers similar to those who conquered and ruled Iran and Mesopotamia and turned them to Persia and Neo-Babylonia (in 550 BC and 626 BC respectively).

Many new fundamental political, ethnic, and religious changes took place with the coming of new settlers from Babylonia. There was swift basic shift of powers and culture from the earlier Hebrew to the new Jewish. These changes and Persian support for the Jews raise doubts and suggest that the location of the Second Temple was actually not in the same place of Solomon’s Temple. This situation created two different Beit HaMikdash (or Jerusalem). An earlier but destroyed one belongs to the Hebrew Israelite; and a second new city made by the Jews.

The situation becomes even more confusing with the Jewish claim that the city founded by the Romans (Aelia) was built on top of the ruins of the Second Temple. With this claim, there are three different possible locations for Solomon’s Temple or Beit HaMikdash (Jerusalem): 1. the location proposed by the few remaining Hebrew Israelite (First Temple); 2. The location used by Turkic settlers (Jews) in 516 BC to build another temple and call it the Second Temple (Beit HaMikdash HaSheni); and 3. The Roman city built in 130 AD (Aelia) to administrate the colony.

Aelia Capitolina was a Roman colony, built under the emperor Hadrian in 130 AD to be for his legionaries. For Arabs Aelia remained the common name for present-day Jerusalem until 1300 AD, when the Turkic Mamluk Sultanate for strange reasons adopted the Jewish name “Al-Quds” and their claims. The name “Aelia” came from Hadrian’s nomen gentile, Aelius, while Capitolina meant dedication to Jupiter Capitolinus, to whom a temple was built. The city was in the style of a typical Roman town. Jews were prohibited from entering the city. The ban was maintained until the 7th century, though Christians would soon be granted an exemption.

During the 4th century, the Roman Emperor Constantine I ordered the construction of Christian holy sites in the city, including the Church of the Holy Sepulcher. Burial remains from the Byzantine period are exclusively Christian, suggesting that the population of Aelia in Byzantine times consisted only of Christians. The Jews claim that Aelia was built on the site of the Second Temple and it is the same site of the Solomon’s First Temple; and therefore Aelia is Jerusalem. But would the Romans use a ruined holy site for Jews to build their city and temple? Surely, Aelia is a holy city for Christians and Muslims; but it is very doubtful it is holy for the Israelite and for the Jews. Jerusalem, Al-Quds, or Beit HaMikdash is not Aelia.

First we have to find the real Jerusalem, because most probably the present-day Jerusalem in not. It is Aelia and it was built by the Romans for their own use; and it doesn’t hold any holy Israelite or Palestinian site. It has mainly Christian holy sites and a single Islamic site. So, it belongs to Christians and Muslims.

Could Bethlehem be the Real Jerusalem?
A mysterious First Temple-era archaeological found under a Palestinian orchard near Bethlehem is increasingly gaining attention — despite attempts to keep it quiet.
The Hebrew Bible, which says that the city of Bethlehem was built up as a fortified city by Rehoboam, identifies it as the city David was from and where he was crowned as the king of Israel. The New Testament identifies Bethlehem as the birthplace of Jesus. Bethlehem and present-day Jerusalem are both called “the city of David”!

Jerusalem means the place of Solomon’s Temple, the First Temple, wherever it is. Bethlehem or Girizim could be the real Jerusalem. There are archaeological discoveries around Bethlehem that intrigue scholars and relate them to the First Temple despite attempts to hush it up.

The article is at: Despite secrecy, interest builds around mysterious First Temple find outside Bethlehem

%d bloggers like this: