Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy

Posts tagged ‘Judah’

Hebrews are not Israelites and Amorites are not Arabs


It is essential to keep repeating again for those who evade what is obvious. Nations DO NOT migrate at all. Those who move or migrate are either bandits of invaders or utilized migrants groups. The true Israelites are not Jews at all. The Israelites and any nation did not migrate like birds, fish or locusts

There are no nations in the Americas other than the indigenous peoples. Others are just influential or marginalized foreign communities in the process of digestion. Indigenous peoples everywhere in the Americas or Europe or Africa absorb and digest any foreign community regardless of their size and power. This is a normal basic law of nature. Indigenous peoples win at the end for sure.

Religion is single, universal and very old with uncountable heavenly messages one for each nation in their own language, their local messenger and each one is limited to their homeland.

All denominations are just polities and they are not part of the Religion and spirituality. Denominations migrate with bandits and foreign communities but they too fade away with time and they are digested by indigenous nations.

Judaism. Christianity and Islam are unrelated to the single universal old Religion and its heavenly messages. Denominations are Hyksos Amorite-Turkic Mongolian widely spread polities that will eventually die. The Israelites and Arabs and the Messages of Moses and Jesus and Muhammad are unrelated to Jews, Amorites, Judaism, Christianity and Islam. The latter are Hyksos groups and their polities who invaded Asia, Europe, Africa and the Americas.

What is called State of Israel today is in occupied southern Ugarit and is totally different from the God given Homeland of the true Israelites nation which was in Punt Lands as the Kingdom of Kings David and Solomon with true destroyed and disappeared Jerusalem as its capital.

Being born in today’s State of Israel makes individuals linked to the Hyksos Amorites and Turkic Mongolians and their denominations but will not make them Israelites or faithful to the Messages of Moses, Jesus or Muhammad or any other uncountable heavenly messengers

The Israelites are not Jews or Hebrews. Jews are Hebrews and they are from a branch of the expelled Hyksos in 1523 BC. The Hyksos are yellowish 90% Amorites of the Levant plus 10% Turkic Mongolians from East Asia who invaded Sumer in 2334 BC and were called Akkadians and were expelled in 2154 BC

The Israelites are not Hebrew or Jews at all. The Israelites are Ethiopians from Punt Lands and their Solomon’s Temple and Jerusalem were in Afar Triangle in Ethiopia and Eritrea. The Hyksos Sabaeans of D’mt colony allied with Judah chiefs to rebel against King Solomon and when he died in 930 BC D’mt colony and Judah chiefs looted the Temple and expelled ten tribes of Israel

In 600 BC, the Babylonian Hyksos instructed D’mt colony and Judah chiefs to destroy the Temple completely, sell the ten tribes of Israel into slavery and come to Babylon to invent Jews, Judaism, Hebrew language and Hebrew Bible from Aperu and the Torah of Moses which was in Ge’ez language.

On another earlier line, Hyksos in Egypt went westward in 1600 BC and allied with the Meshwesh Berber (Moors) to invade, loot and enslave West Africa. These raids all over West Africa created the black Fulani who were subservient to the pale yellowish Fulani of Hyksos and Berber mix. Pale and black Fulani invaded the kingdoms of Kerma civilization in 1500 BC, toppled them in 1000 BC, and created Kush colony in 780 BC to invade Kmt from the south, support expelled Hyksos and recolonize Kmt

Advertisement

Is it “Shasu of Yhw” or “Shasu and/with Yhu” (Hyksos+Judah)?


Egyptians beating Shasu spies (detail from the Battle of Kadesh (1274 BC ) wall-carving)

ta Shasu Yhu or Hyksos Judah land

An ancient carving shows Kmtians (ancient Egyptians) beating Shasu spies (detail from the Battle of Kadesh (1274 BC) wall-carving). Two Kmtian texts, one dated to the period of Amenhotep III (14th century BCE), the other to the age of Ramesses II (13th century BCE), refer to ‘Yahu in the land of the Šosū-nomads’ (t3 š3św yhw).

It seems that the Kmtians were aware that the Aram region was invaded by two different and cooperating nomadic groups. The first and larger group the Kmtians called them “Shasu” which means the nomads. The second and smaller group the Kmtians called them “Yhw” which could mean the Yhu, referring to the Judah tribe of the Israelite, which turned into Hebrew.

This “Shasu + Yhw” is a proof that there was a coalition between the remnants of the expelled Turkic Mongolian Hyksos (Shasu) and the Judah tribe (turned Hebrew/Haberu) targeting the eastern region bordering Kmt.

And Kmt was acting to maintain stability and security in that region to fend off any invasion or migration resulting from the chaos that led to the Great Bronze Age Collapse in 1177 BC and the influxes of Sea Peoples.

The original name given by Kmtians to the invaders who colonized Kmt was certainly not Hyksos (heqa khasut, “ruler(s) of/from foreign lands”). But the term Hyksos was made by the colonizing occupation force to look respectable and of authority. Probably the original name of the Hyksos was just Shasu (nomads). The following map shows areas of reported Habiru activity during the Late Bronze IIA period (based on the Amarna letters corpus)

On page 17 in a study by Faried Adrom and Matthias Müller, titled “The Tetragrammaton in Egyptian Sources – Facts and Fiction”:
[Karl-Theodor Zauzich compiled additional (partly unpublished) attestations from Demotic sources in the expression rmT jhw(A) which he interprets as ‘man from Juda.’ However, the construction is used in Demotic word formation with toponyms (designating a place of origin, such as rmT-kmy ‘man-Egypt’ > ‘Egyptian’), divine names (designating a devotion to or a connection with a deity, such as rmT-inp ‘man-Anubis’ > ‘person dedicated to Anubis’), infinitives (designating a profession, such as rmT-Xn ‘man-row’ > ‘oarsman, rower’) as well as ‘adjectives’ (designating a characteristic or virtue, such as rmT-swg ‘man-stupid’ > ‘idiot’).

Zauzich, however, assumes the word formation with rmT to equate an otherwise unrecognized suffix =da in the word ‘Judah,’ thus rmT-jhw = Jud-ean = Ju=da. Be that as it may, the data do not help to settle the question whether jhw(A) designates a toponym or a divine name]

According to many indications it is seems very reasonable to conclude that there were two nomadic groups colonizing Aram and threatening Kmt. The two groups were the remnants of expelled Turkic Mongolian Hyksos, the proto-Jews, and the second group was the Judah tribe, the proto-Hebrew.

Areas of reported Habiru activity during the Late Bronze IIA period (based on the Amarna letters corpus)

%d bloggers like this: