Connecting Kmt First Dark Period and the Expulsion of Akkadians from Sumer with the Hyksos

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

In 2334 BC, bandits on horses conquered Sumer. The horses were unknown in the whole region. There are no fossils to prove the existence of domesticated horses. The first mention of horses in the Sumerian antiquities appeared in the period of the Third Kingdom of Ur in 2000 BC, after the expulsion of the Akkadians in 2154 BC. The Sumerians called horses mountains donkeys. It is certain that the origin of the horse came from East Asia and appeared with the Akkadians only

Kmt First Dark Period is the period between the end of the Old Kingdom of Kmt in 2181 BC and the advent of the Middle Kingdom in 2055 BC. In that First Dark Period ruled the Seventh Dynasty, the Eighth Dynasty in Memphis (2181 BC – 2160 BC), and the Ninth Dynasty and the Tenth Dynasty Herakleopolis (2160 BC – 2050 BC). The First Dark Period ended by the victory of the Eleventh Dynasty of Thebes.

In the First Dark Period, Kmt central monarchy and institutions collapsed and until the reunification of the country at the hands of the Eleventh Dynasty. Foreign arrivals from the East, the Amorites, who are Shasu Bedouins, brought down the state and divided the country. Shasu destroyed the monarchy by fomenting unrest, violence, conspiracies and chaos against their rule. After 126 Kmt expelled the Amorites. The expelled Amorites fled from Kmt in 2055 BC, to find in their lands the Akkadian Turkic gangs who used horses and were more powerful than they were, despite their small number. The presence of the Akkadian Turkic Mongolians in Amorites lands began in the year 2154 BC, during the occupation of the Amorites for northern Kmt in the First Dark Period.

There are no books, researchers and studies relating the First Dark Period with the period of cooperation between the Amorites with the Turkic Mongolians, until the beginning of the period of the invasion and occupation of Kmt by the Hyksos in 1670 BC. 400 years of regional history is missing, despite its paramount importance, and the devastating consequences of this alliance between the infantry Amorites and the Turkic Akkadians on horses on the peoples of Kmt and Ebla, Ugarit and Sumer since that time until today. This shortcoming and omission in history is undoubtedly a major flaw and a clear complicity in falsifying history against all the peoples of the region.

The formation of Akkadians-Amorites alliance continued from 2055 BC until 1670 BC. During which they developed joint raiding bandits, to loot convoys, and cutting off trade routes between the Arab kingdoms in Dilmun, Magan and Meluhha, and the outskirts of the neighboring Ebla, coastal Ugarit, Sumer and Kmt. At the end of that period, the Turkic Akkadians with the Amorites copied and learned the technique of using arrows from Kmt, as well as the use of the horse-wheel technique that was Sumer invented for transportation. Akkadians-Amorites gangs turned what they saw in Sumer and kmt into war chariots

The Turkic Mongolian Akkadians expelled from Sumer, along with the Amorites expelled from Kmt, decided to invade Kmt again as a soft target. They relied first on the remnants of the Amorites inside Kmt who remained behind after the end of the First Dark Period. Those Amorites multiplied for 400 years and knew Kmt’s language and customs well. The second invasion plan was the introduction of more Amorites to Kmt, under the pretext of asylum, trade, and peaceful migration. The government and the people of Kmt did not notice their plan and allowed them to enter and live with them. The penetration of the Amorites into the north of Kmt was a prelude, espionage and preparations for the military invasion of the Turkic Mongolian Akkadians on horses.

It was necessary to put an agreed sign on the homes of the Amorites before the day of the attack, in order for the Turkic Mongolian Akkadian invaders to recognize them and avoid attacking their collaborators, and spies. “The blood will be a sign for you on the houses where you are, and when I see the blood, I will pass over you. No destructive plague will touch you when I strike Egypt.” (Exodus 12:13). “Then they are to take some of the blood and put it on the sides and tops of the doorframes of the houses where they eat the lambs.” (Exodus 12:7). This is a similarity to what the Amorites residing in Kmt and secretly collaborating with expecting arrival of the Turkic Akkadian invaders did to avoid the planned attacks. Thus, the targets were the people of Kmt only.

With the conquest and occupation of the Turkic Mongolian Akkadians, Kmt entered the Second Dark Period (1670-1550 BC), in which the Amorites were partners, while the rulers were Turkic Mongolian Akkadians. They took Avaris in the eastern delta as their capital and ruled under the 15th Dynasty. The people of Kmt called the Turkic Mongolian Akkadian invaders on horses Hekka Shsut, meaning the rulers of Bedouins, while the Amorites were known as Shsut only, meaning the Bedouins. Hekka Shsut became Hyksos after several centuries in the time of the Ptolemies. Kmt called the Hyksos rulers Pharaohs, while the title of indigenous king was Nesso. Therefore, the term Pharaohs points to Turkic Akkadians violent invaders only

The people and rulers of Kmt in the 17th Dynasty expelled the Hyksos in 1523 BC under the leadership of King Ahmose I, his mother and his family and founded the 18th Dynasty. The majority of the Turkic Akkadian fled to the Levant, along with some of the Amorites. A minority of stranded Turkic Mongolians and Amorites remained in Libya, unable to connect to the bulk of Akkadians-Amorites in Levant.

When Kmt expelled the Hyksos in 1523 BC, the Hyksos branched out into Hebrews, Mitannis, Kassites, and Mukarribs. After the victory of a coalition between the Hyksos and other Turkic bandits in the Battle of Carchemish over Assyria and Kmt in 605 BC, the expelled Hyksos called themselves Jews, Kurds, Babylonians and Sabaeans. This explains the relationship between the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible) written in 580 BC in Babylon and the four main off shoots of the Hyksos who were expelled from Kmt in 1523 BC

Amorites who cooperated and paved the way for the Hyksos conquest continued to live in Kmt. They caused Kmt Third Dark Period (1069-664 BC), and which led to Kmt total collapse in 343 BC to remain in 2295 years of continuous occupation that ended in 1952 AD. However, Akkadians-Amorites remnants still live in Kmt today.

Therefore, it is obvious that the first Jews only appeared in 580 BC in Babylon and were renaming for the Hebrews, and the Hebrew were one group branched from the expelled Hyksos. The Turkic Mongolian origin of the Akkadian is a very important clue to reveal the true history of Sumer and the origin of the Hyksos.

Certainly, the first Jews and the Hebrew Bible both appeared 880 years after Moses and more than 1300 years after Abraham, Jacob and the Israelites. The traditions and history of Abraham, Jacob and the Israelites link them to the western part of Punt Lands, with Arabia as the eastern part of Punt Lands.

Egyptians and the World must search, know and verify who were Thutmose III, Amenhotep II, Thutmose IV, Amenhotep III, Amenhotep IV/ Akhenaten. There are many evidences to discover the truth of their dealings with the expelled Hyksos against all the peoples of Kmt, Ebla, Sumer, Ugarit, the Arabs, Kerma, and Punt

Stranded Hyksos in Libya carried out the final attacks on Kmt together with Berber-West African Kush bandits to re-colonized Kmt. From my personal long research, I found that the Hyksos are alliance between Turkic Mongolian Akkadians expelled by Sumer in 2154 BC together with Amorites who invaded Kmt and caused the First Dark Period 2181–2055 BC, before Kmt expelled them by the 11th Dynasty.

Kerma and Kush are two totally different and opposing entities. Kerma was indigenous civilization while Kush is colony crafted by Hyksos stranded in Libya with Berber and West African slaves and mercenaries appeared in 1500 BC and caused the collapse of Kerma in 1000 BC following the collapse of the Modern Kingdom of Kmt in 1070 BC. The mixed bandits called themselves Kush in 780 BC and a kingdom replaced the destroyed kingdoms of of Kerma civilization.

I ask all those who are interested in ancient history and politics to start group work centered on three specific topics. 1. The Turkic Mongolian origin of the Akkadians 2. The Akkadian-Amorite origin of the Hyksos 3. The offshoot groups of the expelled Hyksos since 1523 BC.

I consider the four offshoots of the Hyksos are 1. The Hebrews, 2. The Mitanni, 3. The Kassites, and 4. The Mukarribs. These groups turned to Jews, Kurds, Babylonians and Sabaeans after the Battle of Carchemish in 605 BC. Another fourth topic of extreme importance is the disguised and devastating alliance between Thutmose III and the Hyksos offshoots, which characterized the rest of the second half of the 18th dynasty until general Horemheb ended that dynasty

The Kushite were West African mercenaries and slaves for the Berber and the Hyksos in Libya who Kmt cut them off from the expelled majority Hyksos who fled to Levant. The Hyksos of Libya took two alternative routes to reach Levant. The first on land by attacking Kerma with West Africans and Berber and threatening Egypt from south that led to creating Kush in 780 BC.

The Hyksos-Berber-West African bandits went further, invading and defeating the 24^th Dynasty and colonizing Kmt by the 25^th Dynasty to rescue the defeated 23^rd and 22^nd colonizing Dynasties. The second route by crossing the Mediterranean to Anatolia. Paintings depicted them in Trojan Wars as black West African mercenaries

The people of the kingdoms of Kerma Civilization along the six Cataracts were allies and kin to Kmt and Punt, and trade partners with Dilmun, Magan and Meluhha Arab regions, Ebla, Sumer and Ugarits. The Hyksos-Berber-West African bandits attacked Kerma since 1500 BC and the first half of the 18^th Dynasty supported and protected Kerma.

Suddenly, the second half of the 18^th Dynasty switched sides and supported the Hyksos-Berber-West African bandits. This led to the fall of the southern part of Kerma up the Fourth Cataract, and rest of Kerma was helpless. This situation continued until the arrival of the 19^th Dynasty that put full protection on the remaining northern Kerma.

As soon as the 20^th Dynasty fell and the New Kingdom ended in 1070 BC Kerma faced the Hyksos-Berber-West African bandits alone and was defeated in 1000 BC

Kerma and all the regions were in chaos, looting and total disorder. The Hyksos-Berber-West African bandits arranged themselves in 780 BC under a single leadership and declared the colony’s name as Kush to attack the 24^th Dynasty and colonize Kmt.

In addition, the second half of the 18^th Dynasty suddenly switched sides and supported the expelled Hyksos in the Levant against Ebla, Ugarit and Sumer. Historians wrongly describe the alliance between the second half of the 18th Dynasty and the expelled Hyksos as a formation of a great Kmt Empire by Thutmose III and his successors

Advertisement

Using Kush to Colonize and Destroy East Africa

Kerma Civilization existed from 3500 BC, and in 1500 BC it was attacked by bandits came from West Africa. The bandits were expelled Hyksos who were in Libya and collaborated with Berber to invade and enslave West Africans who were called Fulani. Together they invaded Kerma and after 500 years Kerma fell in 1000 BC.

After 215 years of looting, slavery and violence unrecorded in history the bandits came under a single warlord called Alara. He declared himself king and called his kingdom Kush in 785 BC. There are no links or continuity between Kerma Civilization which spanned from 3500 BC to 1000 BC with Kush which was created in 785 BC. Kush was very hostile to the peoples of Kerma down the Fourth Cataract. They were also hostile to all local polities and to Kmt and Punt

Kush was a colony that replaced Kerma. Kush colony invaded and colonized Kmt by the 25^th Dynasty and burned alive the last king of the 24^th Dynasty that expelled the colonizers of the 22^nd and 23^rd Dynasties.

Immediately after colonizing Kmt, Kush gave support to Amorite and Akkadian bandits in Levant to protect them from the Assyrian armies who were trying to liberate, restore order and help Kmt against ex-Hyksos bandits. These events are recorded and praised in the Hebrew Bible (the Tanahk) when it was written 200 years later.

The Hyksos, who were Turkic Akkadians with Bedouin Amorites, after their expulsion were called Hebrews. And from them in 580 BC the Akkadians invented the Jews. Because Kush was made by Hyksos so Kush was an ally to Akkadians and Amorites and invaded and colonized Egypt to support them just before the invention of Jews.

Jews and Amorite Bedouins and Berber and Fulani are related to Kush and all of them were against Kerma and Ancient Egypt Kmt. Meanwhile, the real Israelites are peoples from Punt Lands; and the Israelites have nothing with Hebrew, Jews or Kmt

Spreading fallacies about Kush is a self-defeating tool that empowers the Fulani who are colonizing the southern Nile Valley since Muhamed Ali brought them to enslave, loot and colonize and create the so-called Sudan in 1820. The Fulani were the main force that also invaded and colonized the so-called Darfur, between the Blue and White Rivers and the Beja lands in 1500 AD by the Fur and the Funj. But the first invasions and colonization of Fulani were in 1500 BC which in 785 BC created Kush colony.

Jews, African Americans, Fulani, Berber, Amorite Bedouins and Turks are working hard to aggrandize Kush to destroy the true history of Kerma, Punt, Kmt, the real Arabs and the real Israelites. The true history of Punt Lands and Kerma and Kmt is the basis for peace, justice and development.

Sudan as a name did not exist any time before 1820 AD. The name Sudan originally referred to the region from north Nigeria to the Atlantic Ocean coasts from Mauritania to Liberia. The name Sudan has no root in the Nile Valley; nor was Kush indigenous name or polity. When Emperor Ezana of Axum defeated Kush with a single blow in 350 AD Kush disappeared completely and Kush rulers fled away and they never left a trace. Kush disappeared from the annals of history too suddenly.

There are too many forgeries and fallacies in the history of Kerma, Kmt and Punt

Correcting the Jewish Version of Kush History

The real history of Kush is totally different from the Jewish version.

It was Kmt state north of the 1st Cataract; and Kerma state from 1st up to the 6th Cataract since 3500 BC until 1000 BC.

There was no Kush before 785 BC. Kush was a colony made by Hyksos bandits (Turkic Akkadians + Bedouin Amorites) with Berber and slaves collected from West Africa.

The Hyksos-Berber-Fulani bandits started invasions in 1500 BC coming from Libya via West Africa. Kmt protected Kerma down the 4th Cataract.

Following the collapse of Kmt Modern Kingdom in 1077 BC the bandits toppled Kerma civilization in 1000 BC.

The bandits brought down Kerma and it went into 200 years of violence, slavery and chaos.

The Hyksos-Berber-Fulani bandits and local slaves were first ruled by a single warlord called Alara of unknown origin in 785 BC and declared himself as king and the colony as Kush.

Kush was an enemy to Kerma and Kmt. It was made by West African slaves (Fulani), Berber and Hyksos.

The earliest Jews were not Israelite. Jews were made up from Hebrews who were expelled Hyksos. Therefore, Jews are re-packaging of Turkic Mongolian Akkadians together with Bedouin Amorites.

Kushite Queen Tabiry of the 25 Dynasty Links to Hyksos

Tabiry was the daughter of King Alara of Kush from his wife Kasaqa; and was the wife of her brother King Piye. She held some interesting titles: Her majesty Main/first King’s Wife, (hmt niswt ‘at tpit n hm.f) and “The Great One of the Foreign Country” (ta-aat-khesut), and khesut could mean nomads, similar to that in Hyksos.

She also held the more standard titles of King’s Wife (hmt niswt), King’s Daughter (s3t niswt), and King’s Sister (snt niswt).

Tabiry was buried in a pyramid at El-Kurru (K.53). A carved granite funerary stela found in her tomb mentions she is the daughter of Alara of Kush and the wife of Piye. The stela is now in Khartoum.

The stela gives Tabiry further titles. Reisner had translated one of her titles as ‘the great chieftainess of the Temehu’ (southern Libyans), and concluded that the royal house of Kush was somehow related to the Libyans. Other scientists had since shown that her title might be read as “Great One (or ‘Chieftainess’) of the Desert-dwellers”, showing her title connects her to the Kushites and not to Libyans.

الملكة الكوشية تابيري تربط الأسرة 25 إلى الهكسوس

كانت تابيري ابنة ملك كوش الارا من زوجته كاساقا وكانت زوجة شقيقها الملك بيي/بعنخي. وحملت بعض الألقاب المثيرة للاهتمام منهم: صاحبة الجلالة الرئيسية / زوجة الملك الأولى وزعيمة بلاد البدو (ta-aat-khesut) وكلمة خسوت مماثلة لتلك في كلمة هكسوس

كما أنها حملت ألقاب أخري تقليدية مثل زوجة الملك (hmt niswt) وابنة الملك  (s3t niswt)وأخت الملك(snt niswt).

دفنت تابيري في هرم في الكرو رقم (K 53). ولها لوحة جنائزية منحوتة من الجرانيت وجدت في قبرها تذكر أنها ابنة ملك كوش الارا وزوجة الملك بعنخي وموجودة الآن في الخرطوم.

تذكر اللوحة أن تابيري لها المزيد من الألقاب. وقام العالم الامريكي رايزنر بترجمة أحد ألقابها على أنها “زعيم القبيلة العظيم لتيمحو” (جنوب الليبيين) وأعتبر ريزنر أن ذلك دليل يؤكد أن الاسرة الحاكمة في كوش كانت مرتبطة بطريقة ما بالليبيين. وقد ذكر علماء آخرون منذ ذلك الحين أن الترجمة قد تقرأ على أنها عظيمة أو زعيمة القبائل الصحراوية مما يدل على أن لقب تابيري ربما يربطها بالكوشيين وليس الليبيين.

Kush Origin is in Fulani and Hyksos

The origin and history of the Hyksos and Fulani groups are essential to understand the history and the present of West Africa.

The Fulani groups were the result of wide-spread slavery raids on West Africa since 1600 BC by the Hyksos who invaded and colonized Kmt (ancient Egypt) in 1630 BC or 1800 BC, and some of the Hyksos went further to invade North Africa and first created the Lebu (Libyans) who went back and founded the 22 and 23 Dynasties in Kmt (945 – 728 BC).

It is clear the western part of the Hyksos were devastated by the loss of route connecting them with West Asian markets and the Hyksos expelled to the east of Kmt. To reconnect the Hyksos in Libya had sought assistance from Troy and also took their slavery bandits to invade the southern Nile Valley. The Hyksos wanted to connect with their bandits that were raiding Arabia and also invade and regain Kmt from the south.

The created Fulani groups were used to invade the southern Nile Valley and first colonized the region which they called Kordofan then they occupied Kerma south of the 4^th Cataract in 1500 BC. After raiding for 700 years the Hyksos with their Fulani destroyed north Kerma civilization and created in its place Kush in 785 BC, who invaded Kmt to assist the defeated Libyan dynasties and the expelled Hyksos in the Amorite east who were attacking Subar and Sumer; in the events that led to the fall of Sumer and the subsequent creation of Babylonia and the Jews.

The Hyksos were actually the same Akkadians who colonized Sumer and Subar (Fertile Crescent) in 2334-2154 BC. The Akkadians were Turkic Mongolian raiding bandits on horses and took foot soldiers from South Caucasus (Hurrians). Amorites joined the expelled Akkadians to form the Hyksos.

The same amalgam who invaded North Africa and started slavery in West Africa were the invaders and colonizers of Spain and Portugal from 711 AD and were expelled in 1492 AD. They shared and also took over power from their Fulani partner groups in West Africa who were their suppliers of wealth and slaves.

Songhai Empire c. 1464–1591 preceded by Mali Empire and Gao Empire and was succeeded by Saadi dynasty; Pashalik of Timbuktu and Dendi Kingdom.
Mali Empire c. 1230–1670 preceded by Ghana Empire and Gao Empire and was succeeded by Songhai Empire; Jolof Empire; Kaabu Empire and the Empire of Great Fulo

All these regimes were more or less dominated, created or influenced by the Fulani and their Hyksos masters of North Africa, who claim to be Amazigh; while the only true Amazigh are the Tuareg the arch-rival of Fulani and Hyksos. Indeed the history of West Africa is mainly around the history of Hyksos and Fulani slavery and looting.

In fact, “Pharaohs” was a term used by native people of Kmt during the Hyksos colonization (1630-1523 BC) to point to the foreign colonizers as “paɾuw (meaning that person in the great house)”.
Native people of Kmt refrained to call the Hyksos ruler and other foreign rulers as kings which is pronounces as “Nesso”. Nesso was reserved for genuine legitimate kings of Kmt origin. It was their smart way to resist occupation and show disregard.

In this sense, the Songhai were made up by, and related to, pharaohs who were Hyksos rulers. The Songhai were amalgam of local West African groups forced together by slavery; but were not descendants of Kmt. The Hyksos and their pharaohs were also related to the Amorite-Akkadian-Turkic-Hurrian bandits that colonized the Arabs in their homeland which is only in the Western and Southern coasts of the Arabian Peninsula, including Yemen, since 1300 BC after the Hyksos were driven out from Kmt in 1523 BC; then from Mittani and Sumer in 1300 BC.

Therefore, saying that the Songhai and the Fulani are somehow related to the pharaohs (Hyksos) and also to Yemen (Bedouin bandits who colonized Arabs) as their traditions say is reasonable since these were the only two sources for slaves, gold and horses markets and power used by the Fulani and other West African regimes to control the region.

The relationship of the Kushites and their collaboration to the Hyksos is evident in the first and second steles that Lord Carnarvon discovered in 1908 in Thebes and recounts the events of the war that Kamose waged against the Hyksos and the Kushites at the same time. It recalled a courier arrest and detention carrying a letter from the Hyksos leader named Abibi in Avares to his pact ally the leader of Kushites asking for urgent support against the threat posed by the armies of Kmt led by King Kamose against the Hyksos and the Kushites. The content of the Hyksos message to the Kushites was recorded by Kamose in the inscription recounting his victory in Karnak.

The name kes or kas (k3š) appeared in Kmt monuments for the first time in 1450 B.C., and it was meant that the Hyksos gangs that seized Sumar (the civilization of southern Iraq) and their name were the Kassites or the Kishites from Kish, Kas, Kash, or Kasu, and they were Hyksos gangs who occupied Mesopotamia from 1531 to 1155 BC .Clearly, the name Kush is close to Kassites.

It is possible that the formation of the Kush kingdom by someone called Al-Ara came as a result of the urgent need to invade Kmt from the south and to follow instructions that came to the southern Hyksos gangs and Fulani from their Libyan Hyksos partners of the 23rd family that were defeated and fell into the hands of the 24th Dynasty in 732 BC and continued to rule for 12 years only and fell to the invasion of the 25^th Dynasty, whose name became the Kingdom of Kush, by the Hyksos gangs, who are of the same origin as the Kassite gangs in Babylon from 1531 to 1155 B.C. to attack Kmt from the south

So, of course, the names Kush, Ta-siti, and Ta-nehso refer to three different lands, not one region. Ta-siti means the land of the civilization of the people of Kerma. While Kush means the colonized part by ​​the Hyksos and their Fulani slave. While Ta-nehso points to black slave areas, whether domestic or foreign.

Relationships between Amorites and Hyksos with the Invention of Jews

These are some brief conclusions I reached from analyzing the history of the Arabian Peninsula and the Fertile Crescent. Wishing to discuss them in a calm and objective manner.

The Amorites are the Bedouins and they are not Arabs, but they learned Arabic after their conquest of southern and western Arabia and the transition and connection between the north and south of the Arabian Peninsula.

The Ugarites are neither Amorites, nor Bedouins, Sumerian, or Assyrians. They had a distinct civilization, but the Amorites overthrew it and formed among them the Mitanni and the Arameans.

The Kassites appeared and disappeared suddenly and did not leave a trace in Babylon because they were of the Bedouin Amorites, but they returned to form a colony in Babylonia after they brought down the Assyrians

Turkicmongolians were gangs of male horse raiders who came from East Asia and allied with the Amorites first as displaced groups and then as infantry mercenaries to penetrate the four directions

Turkicmongolian horsemen, along with Amorite foot soldiers, went west and invaded northern Kmt; and together they formed the Hyksos

Turkicmongolian horsemen, along with Amorite foot soldiers, went south and invaded southern and western Arabia; so they formed the Sabaeans.

Turkicmongolian horsemen, along with Amorite foot soldiers, went east and invaded the Akkadians; so they formed the Babylonian Kassites

Turkicmongolian horsemen, along with Amorite foot soldiers, went north and invaded the Ugarites in, so they formed the Arameans. And then with the Hyksos after their expulsion from Kmt in 1523 BC they formed the Mittani.

Kmtian, Assyrian, and Ugaritic monuments, and before them the Sumerian, assert that the Arabs, the Hebrews, the Jews, the Israelites, the stories of al-Tanakh, the Arabic language, and the Hebrew language, all these did not exist in the north of the Arabian Peninsula and the fertile crescent before 580 BC. Archaeology does not deny that the Arabs and the Arabic language were confined to their ancient original homeland in the southern and western coasts only.

For example, the victory inscription of the king of the Neo-Assyrian Empire “Aššur-aḫa-iddina” (Esarhaddon) of 671 BC does not mention any presence of Arabs, Jews, Hebrew, or Israelites, in any of realm of his empire. Likewise, the monuments of the 24th and 26th dynasties of Kmt show no indication of Arabs, Jews or Israelites in the regions of eastern to Kmt.

Jews, Judaism, Hebrew, and Tanakh, known as the Hebrew Torah, were inventions that occurred in 580 BC in Babylon, by an alliance made up of Turkicmongolian expelled Hyksos, who overthrew the Assyrians and occupied Babylon with their Amorite Bedouin mercenary partners, and Arameans; in addition to a small group from the Ethiopian tribe of Judah.

The group of Judah is the one that provided them with the stories of Abraham, the Israelites, Solomon, the Message of Moses, and the characters before them, as a material reformulated in the Tanakh to claim historic and religious right in the lands of Canaan; and the presence of the land of Israel and Beit-ha-Maqdash (the Holy House i.e. the Temple of Solomon) in it; as well as a claim that the Jews are Israelite, and that the Israelites had been exiled for 430 years in Kmt.

There is no doubt that Syria and Lebanon are subject to dispute and conflict between the Canaanite Ugandan civilization and the nomadic Amorite Bedouin since about three thousand five hundred years ago. This is precisely what is trying to impose nomadic Amorite Bedouin culture in the name of Arabism, the Arabic language, Bedouin Islam contradictory to and different from the Message of Muhammed to Arabs; as well as imposing Roman and Aramean Christianity, which is contradictory to and different from the Messages of Jesus and Moses to Ethiopians.

The subject here is about gangs that were the first to use the horse to invade in the 1800’s and destroyed the Scythian civilizations and the Saraswati (Sind) civilization, the Iranians and the Sumerians, and they were called the Bedouin empires, but it is wrong to call them a Bedouin civilization.

Turkicmongolians is a term that I had to make because there is no equivalent term to describe these gangs, from which other gangs emerged that invaded Sumer, the Ugarites, the Kmt, the Arabs, the Hittites, North Africa, Kerma and Punt.

The Sabaeans were made as a result of invasions and colonization by the Bedouin Amorites from the Syrian deserts. They were not Arabs at all, and genuine Arabs were their victims. Bedouin Amorites were the ones who invented false Arab genealogy with concepts of Al-Arab al-Ba’ida, “The Extinct Arabs” for the ancient Arabs.

Sabaeans claim the original pure Arabs, “Al-Arab al-Ariba”, i.e. Qahtani Arabs, for themselves in Yemen; and the Arabized Adnanites Arabs, for the tribes along the Western coast of Arabia, Northern Arabia and Iraq. Arabized Arabs were actually Qedarites which was a largely nomadic Amorite tribal confederation, not much different from the Qahtani colonizers of Arabs in Yemen.

Sabaean mythology identified Qahtan with the Yoqtan (Joktan) son of Eber (Hūd) in the Hebrew Bible. According to Amorite Bedouin claims, the Qahtanites are pure Arabs, unlike the Adnanites who are “Arabized Arabs”.

In many ways the Hyksos created the Jews; and the Bedouin Amorites created the Sabaeans, and together the Jews and Sabaeans colonized and stole the identities and history of Ethiopian Israelites and their neighbors the ancient Arabs.

Just compare these two maps to discover how much deception survived 2600 years.
My Punt-Lands Hypothesis of the interpretation of the Mosaic Torah and the history of the Children of Israel

Compare Punt-Lands Hypothesis with what the academic, religious and media institutions offer. They mention the history of the Hyksos, of whom the Jews appeared after 950 years, and affixed it to the Children of Israel who had nothing to do with the Jews. And the world believed this naive lie for 2,600 years.

The True Relationship between Kmt and Assyria in 670 BC

Necho I ruled (672 – 664 BC). He was the King of Lower Kmt from his capital in the ancient city of Sais. He was the first documented king in the Twenty-Sixth Dynasty.

Necho I was an ally of the Neo Assyrian Empire (911 BC–609 BC) in its struggle against the remnants of the Hyksos, including the ancestors of the Jews and the Kushites. The Assyrian king, Esarhaddon, began commanding an army to protect Necho, but died before his arrival.

He was succeeded by his son Ashurbanipal (668 – 627 BC), the grandson of Sennacherib. Ashurbanipal sent an army against the Kushites in 667 BC and remained in his capital at Nineveh and defeated Taharqa king of the 25th family near Memphis, who fled south. Ashurbanipal supported King Nacho with Assyrian soldiers to protect the lower Kmt from the Kushites

After the death of the Kushite Taharqa in 664 BC and his defeat, his successor, Tantmani, invaded the lower Kmt again with a large army. In Memphis he defeated the Kemites and killed King Necho in battle and Psamtik I took refuge in Assyria.

Ashurbanipal sent another army south of Greek soldiers and again succeeded in defeating the Kushites north of Memphis. Tantmani fled to Kush and did not threaten Kmt again. Psamtik I and the Assyrians shattered the remnants of the Kushites severely. The Assyrians were given gifts from war spoils taken from Kushites

The Assyrian Kmtian cooperation continued and after Psamtik I liberated Kmt he maintained friendly relations with the Assyrians. After the liberation of Thebes permanently from the Kushites, Kmt was united once under a king of Sau / Sais.

Psamtik I son of Necho ruled from 664 to 610 BC, the son of Sais and the pride of Lower Kmt.
Jewish sources claim that he was against the Assyrians while the fact is that the Assyrians were his allies and helped him to establish close ties with the Greeks to counter the danger of the Kushites from the south and encouraged many Greeks to settle in Kmt and established settlements for them and encouraged them to join the quantum army.

Trade between Egypt and Greece was also active at that time, and Sais was an important trade center punched with Greece and the Mediterranean countries. So the role of the Greeks at that time was that of a friend

Most probably, the Psamtik I statue which was discovered in 2017 totally fragmented and buried was brought from Sais to be destroyed in Matariya, near Heliopolis, by Persians and Jews who are Hyksos descendants to erase his great history and achievements against the remnants of Hyksos and their offshoots.

Hyksos Descendant Ruled Kmt and Founded Judah

Mitanni of expelled Hyksos and their Kurds

the Turkic Mongolian groups

It is commonly believed that King Shoshenq I, of the Twenty-second Dynasty (943-716 BC), being of Libyan origin, but it is certain he was not of Libyan origin even though his family came from Libya. It is likely that this family are descendants of the Hyksos bandits, which continued to invade westward and occupied Libya after they occupied northern Kmt from 1630 to 1523 BC. Kmt was liberated under the leadership of the great King Ahmose I and his family in 1523 BC.

The Asiatic origin explains the connection and cooperation between the 22^nd dynasty with those who became Jews and Babylonians. As all of them were of the same Hyksos origin which is Turkic Mongolian gangs from East Asia. The Jews are totally different group from the Semite Israelite.

Part of the Levant was captured by the Hyksos who were expelled from Kmt, and they, with their slave Kurdish soldiers, established the colony of Mittani (1500-1300 BC). In 1300 BC the Turkic Mongolians were expelled also from the Levant by the Assyrians. They dispersed and went to all over north, southern and central Arabia forming the roaming Bedouins and assaulting and subjugating the Arabs viciously. Since their colonization of Arabia the Turkic Mongolian bandits kept preparing to assault the more prosperous Assyria and Kmt again.

Meanwhile, the Hyksos who invaded and colonized Libya, before their expulsion from Kmt, turned back eastward and invaded Kmt again during the Twenty-first Dynasty from 1069 BC to 945 BC. Finally, they succeeded in taking power and established the Twenty-second Dynasty.

The colonizers from Libya seized Kmt and ruled from a new city of Bubastis in the north. Soon, they formed a strong alliance with their Turkic Mongolian kin, the Bedouins of Arabia. And both were seeking to capture Kmt and attack the Syrian land (Levant) between Kmt and Assyria.

Several years before King Solomon’s death in 930 BC in his kingdom of Israel, in the Afar triangle in the Horn of Africa, the rebellious Judah tribe went to Arabia seeking to topple King Solomon.

The arrival of Judah tribe from the Horn of Africa was welcomed by Turkic Mongolian Bedouins who were looking for assistance in the Arabic language and land. A strong alliance between the Bedouins and Judah tribe was formed. Shoshenq I (reigned 943–922 BC), seized this opportunity. The history of Shoshenq I told in the Hebrew Torah contradict numerous reliable facts and archaeological evidences. There were no Judah and 10-tribes kingdoms at that time and region.

Stories taken from the tribe of Judah earlier and twisted in Babylon in 580 BC assisted to invent a history for a new colony named Judah, and then Israel. It claims that the Israelites were in Kmt and that the Torah descended on Moses on Mount Sinai, while the Torah was descended in Semien Mountains in Ethiopia and it was in the Ge’ez language not Hebrew language, which did not appear until around 580 BC after long mixing between Judah, Bedouins, Persians and Assyrians.

The alliance between the Turkic Mongolian Twenty-second Dynasty and the Bedouins with Judah tribe explains how Shoshenq I created Judah kingdom which had no Jerusalem, and which was the first step to make the shift that created present day Israel, from the original Solomonic Israel in the Afar Triangle, in Punt Lands. That is how Jews ruled and invented Egypt.

Just compare these two maps to discover how much deception survived 2600 years.
My Punt-Lands Hypothesis of the interpretation of the Mosaic Torah and the history of the Children of Israel

Compare Punt-Lands Hypothesis with what the academic, religious and media institutions offer. They mention the history of the Hyksos, of whom the Jews appeared after 950 years, and affixed it to the Children of Israel who had nothing to do with the Jews. And the world believed this naive lie for 2,600 years.

Shoshenq I Hyksos Descendant Ruled Kmt and Founded Judah

Mitanni of expelled Hyksos and their Kurds

I need to post this article urgently in Arabic until I find time to write it in English. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Shoshenq I (reigned c. 943–922 BC), a Hyksos Descendant Ruled Kmt and Founded Judah forged home
He was the first to make the shift that created present day Israel from the original Solomonic Israel in Afar Triangle, in Punt Lands

Just compare these two maps to discover how much deception survived 2600 years.
My Punt-Lands Hypothesis of the interpretation of the Mosaic Torah and the history of the Children of Israel

Compare Punt-Lands Hypothesis with what the academic, religious and media institutions offer. They mention the history of the Hyksos, of whom the Jews appeared after 950 years, and affixed it to the Children of Israel who had nothing to do with the Jews. And the world believed this naive lie for 2,600 years.

شاشانق الأول حفيد الهكسوس حكم كمت وأسس دولة اليهود

السائد عن الملك شاشانق الأول انه من الأسرة 22 (943-716 ق م) التي توصف انها من أصل ليبي ولكن من المؤكد لي انه ليس ليبي الاصل رغم ان تلك الاسرة اصلها جاء من جهة ليبيا

والارجح ان تلك الاسرة هم احفاد عصابات الهكسوس التي واصلت غزوها غربا واحتلت ليبيا بعد ان تم لهم احتلال كمت من 1630 الي 1523 ق م حين حرر كمت الملك العظيم احمس الاول واسرته. وهذا يفسر الارتباط والتعاون بين الاسرة 22 ومن اصبحوا اليهود والبابلييين وكلهم من نفس اصل الهكسوس وهم عصابات تركمنغول من شرق اسيا

يبدو لي ان “جد-بتاح-إيوف-عنخ (Djed-ptah-ef-ankh) “شغل منصب “ثاني وثالث كهنة آمون” في عهد الأسرة 22 ذلك لفترة قصيرة لان كبير كهنة امون من 944-924 كان ابن شاشانق الأول واسمه انبوت  (Iuput). والمرجح لي ان جزء اسم بتاح في اسم “جد-بتاح-إيوف-عنخ” هو ما استخدم بواسطة الاجانب الذين حكموا مصر لاشتقاق وصنع اسم جديد لكمت وهو ايكبتاح الذي تحول تدريجيا الي ايكبت وايجبت وكبت

سياسة شاشانق الأول سار علي النهج الذي أتبعه بينجم من قبل فأسند إبنه إيبوبوت منصب كبير كهنة آمون والقائد العام للقوات المسلحة وحاكم الوجه القبلي في آن واحد. وضمن بفضل الربط بين هذه المناصب الثلاثة السلطة الزمنية والسلطة الروحية.

وعين جد بتاح يواف عنخ أحد أبنائه مساعدا له في منصب كاهن آمون الثالث، كما عين نيسي وهوزعيم إحدي القبائل المتحالفة، في منصب كاهن آمون الرابع. وواصل شاشانق الأول سياسة عقد التحالفات القائمة علي المصاهرة، فعقد قران إبنته علي جد جحوتي يواف عنخ وهو من خلفاء جد بتاح يواف عنخ ووطد هذا الزواج وغيره من المصاهرات أواصر الصلة بين السلطتين.

ولكن ذلك لن يثني شاشانق الأول من إقامة سلطة مضادة في مصر الوسطي بدافع من الحذر والفطنة. فأسند قيادة هيلراكليوبوليس العسكرية إلي نمرود أحد أبنائه وأصبحت هذه المدينة نقطة إستراتيجية تتحكم في التبادل التجاري بين المملكتين

قبل وفاة الملك سليمان عام 930 ق م بعدة سنوات في مملكته اسرائيل التي كانت في مثلث العفر في القرن الافريقي ذهب افراد من قبيلة يهوذا المعارضة الي الجزيرة العربية

كانت بارض السريان منطقة استولي عليها الهكسوس المطرودين من كمت واقاموا فيها مستعمرة الميتاني (1500-1300 ق م) مع جنودهم الرقيق الاكراد اي المرتزقة الي ان طردهم وشتتهم الاشوريين فذهبوا الي شمال ووسط الجزيرة العربية يستعدوا للهجوم مرة اخري علي الاشوريين وعلي كمت. وتجمععت قوي مطاريد الهكسوس مع احفاد الهكسوس الذين قدموا من ليبيا واستولوا علي كمت وهاجموا ارض السريان بين كمت واشوريا

واستخدم تحالف احفاد الهكسوس التركمنغول قصص قبيلة يهوذا اللاجئة والحليفة لهم لاقامة مستعمرة باسم يهوذا واسرائيل وبادعاء ان بني اسرائيل كانوا في كمت وان التوراة نزلت علي موسي في جبل سيناء بينما التوراة نزلت علي موسي في جبال سيمين بالحبشة وكانت بلغة الجعز وهي لغة بني اسرائيل في زمن موسي ولم تكن اللغة العبرية قد ظهرت الا بعد عام 580 ق م

وبالفعل شيشنق المذكور في التوراة المزورة التي كتبت في بابل عام 580 ق م تعني شاشانق الأول حفيد الهكسوس حاكم شمال كمت التي تحول اسمها بالاحتيال الي مصر وايجبت. وشاشانق الأول لم يهدم هيكل سليمان لانه لم يوجد بتلك المنطقة وانما هزم السريان ودمر مملكتهم وسلم الحكم فيها لمجموعة متحالفة مع قبيلة يهوذا ليقوموا باحتلال اراضي في الشمال لاحقا

ومن إدعاءات التوراة المزيفة أن 10  قبائل من بني إسرائيل كانت لهم مملكة في شمال إسرائيل الحالية وأنه كانت توجد مدينة القدس في ارض السريان ودمرها شاشانق الأول وعادت مملكة يهوذا المدمرة في الجنوب لتفرض سيطرتها علي مملكة 10 قبائل اسرائيل الشمالية بعد ان قتلوا منهم نصف مليون رجل

كل هذه القصص هي مزج بين الملفق والحقيقي بغرض اخفاء حقيقة ان بني اسرائيل وملكة سليمان وهيكل سليمان اي بيت ها مقدش كانوا في القرن الافريقي وهم سمر البشرة وان اليهود ليسوا سوي تركمنغول من شرق اسيا صفر البشرة واحفاد الهكسوس واشقاء الفرس والاعراب والرومان والهنود الصفر. واليهود ليسوا ساميين واحتلوا كمت وخربوها بينما بني اسرائيل لم يذهب منهم اي فرد ومن قبلهم ابراهيم الي كمت ابدا

Is it “Shasu of Yhw” or “Shasu and/with Yhu” (Hyksos+Judah)?

Egyptians beating Shasu spies (detail from the Battle of Kadesh (1274 BC ) wall-carving)

ta Shasu Yhu or Hyksos Judah land

An ancient carving shows Kmtians (ancient Egyptians) beating Shasu spies (detail from the Battle of Kadesh (1274 BC) wall-carving). Two Kmtian texts, one dated to the period of Amenhotep III (14th century BCE), the other to the age of Ramesses II (13th century BCE), refer to ‘Yahu in the land of the Šosū-nomads’ (t3 š3św yhw).

It seems that the Kmtians were aware that the Aram region was invaded by two different and cooperating nomadic groups. The first and larger group the Kmtians called them “Shasu” which means the nomads. The second and smaller group the Kmtians called them “Yhw” which could mean the Yhu, referring to the Judah tribe of the Israelite, which turned into Hebrew.

This “Shasu + Yhw” is a proof that there was a coalition between the remnants of the expelled Turkic Mongolian Hyksos (Shasu) and the Judah tribe (turned Hebrew/Haberu) targeting the eastern region bordering Kmt.

And Kmt was acting to maintain stability and security in that region to fend off any invasion or migration resulting from the chaos that led to the Great Bronze Age Collapse in 1177 BC and the influxes of Sea Peoples.

The original name given by Kmtians to the invaders who colonized Kmt was certainly not Hyksos (heqa khasut, “ruler(s) of/from foreign lands”). But the term Hyksos was made by the colonizing occupation force to look respectable and of authority. Probably the original name of the Hyksos was just Shasu (nomads). The following map shows areas of reported Habiru activity during the Late Bronze IIA period (based on the Amarna letters corpus)

On page 17 in a study by Faried Adrom and Matthias Müller, titled “The Tetragrammaton in Egyptian Sources – Facts and Fiction”:
[Karl-Theodor Zauzich compiled additional (partly unpublished) attestations from Demotic sources in the expression rmT jhw(A) which he interprets as ‘man from Juda.’ However, the construction is used in Demotic word formation with toponyms (designating a place of origin, such as rmT-kmy ‘man-Egypt’ > ‘Egyptian’), divine names (designating a devotion to or a connection with a deity, such as rmT-inp ‘man-Anubis’ > ‘person dedicated to Anubis’), infinitives (designating a profession, such as rmT-Xn ‘man-row’ > ‘oarsman, rower’) as well as ‘adjectives’ (designating a characteristic or virtue, such as rmT-swg ‘man-stupid’ > ‘idiot’).

Zauzich, however, assumes the word formation with rmT to equate an otherwise unrecognized suffix =da in the word ‘Judah,’ thus rmT-jhw = Jud-ean = Ju=da. Be that as it may, the data do not help to settle the question whether jhw(A) designates a toponym or a divine name]

According to many indications it is seems very reasonable to conclude that there were two nomadic groups colonizing Aram and threatening Kmt. The two groups were the remnants of expelled Turkic Mongolian Hyksos, the proto-Jews, and the second group was the Judah tribe, the proto-Hebrew.

Areas of reported Habiru activity during the Late Bronze IIA period (based on the Amarna letters corpus)