Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy

Posts tagged ‘Kush’

How Fulani Groups Colonized the Nile Valley?


It is irrefutable that the Fulani is not a cluster of tribes or a wandering nation. They are amalgamation of different groups of different origins, colors and traits made in collection camps, but not a nation at all.

The Fulani are groups made by and colluded with foreign small slavery and looting bandits from East and West Africa since the invasions of the Hyksos through Libya in 1500 BC, that is why there is no one particular specific homeland or region for the Fulani.

The Fulani were used by the Hyksos in 1500 BC; then by the Moors of the expelled colonizers of Spain and Portugal in 1500 AD both for Transatlantic slavery and for waging what claimed to be Jihadist invasions and colonization all over West and Central Africa and extended to Red Sea coasts to hunt and trade in humans and resources.

This second Fulani wave created the fictitious “Arabs” in the Nile Valley and Abyssinia to trade slavery to Arabia via what was made and named Fur, Funj and Ja’alyin groups

In 1820 AD Mohamed Ali recruited a lot of Fulani with assistance from the Fulani colonizers of North Nigeria (Sokoto) led by Usman Dan Fodio and from around Lake Chad.

This wave of Fulani led to the bloody regimes of Al Turkiyya and Al Mahdiyya for looting and slavery. From this wave came the regimes that led to today’s Janjaweed militias and the Umma and other forms that pretend to be political parties.

Alturabi, Omer Albashir, Sadiq Almahdi, Abdallah Khalil, Azhari, Daglo all who inherited the Condominium colony in 1956 and until today controlling politics and businesses are from earlier or recent Fulani groups.

Sudan has groups who claim without any support to be tribes and “Arabs”. Those who claim to be the “Arabs” of Sudan are, in fact, mixed indigenous local groups that have been dominated by small invading factions, and their native original affiliations and history were obliterated by slavery.

It is impossible to prove any existence of their “Arab” titles and groups’ names before the emergence of the colony of Funj in 1500 AD. The Funj was in persistent conflicts with the Black Kingdom of Berta, Gumuz and Shilluk, who are the original inhabitants of Aljazeera between the Blue and White Niles.

The first wave of those who claim to be Arabs in Sudan, their rulers were from the gangs of East and West Asia, who are the Bedouins of the Levant and Jordan with the Hyksos. They invaded North Africa and allied and mixed with the Berbers. These colonizing rulers are the oldest and less brown “Arabs”. They also mixed with the people of the kingdoms of the Karma civilization on the Nile at the time of Kush colony made in 785 BC. These are the older pale Fulani and they are the origin of Ja’alyeen groups

The second wave of Sudan’s “Arabs” is a mixture of East and West Asian gangs with West African slaves and mercenaries and their breeding from them produced Juhayna groups in West and Central Sudan. They are tanner than the Ja’alyeen group, except for Berbers who less mixed with West Africans

1- The Ja`alyeen groups (Ja`alyeen, Shaikiyah, Bdairiyah, Rubatab, Merifab) and Al-Batahin claim Abbasid and Qahtan origin. The Al-Batahin, east of the Nile, played the same role that the Jumu’iyya played in West Nile. The very wide spread of Ja’alyeen is from their work in human hunting and in West African Jallaba

2- Other “Arab” groups are Juhayna in the West, Al-Jazeera; plus Al-Shukria, Al-Ja’alyeen Daglal ​​Al-Bunni Amer in the East; plus Al-Rashaydah from Eastern Arabian Peninsula

Correcting the Jewish Version of Kush History


The real history of Kush is totally different from the Jewish version.

It was Kmt state north of the 1st Cataract; and Kerma state from 1st up to the 6th Cataract since 3500 BC until 1000 BC.

There was no Kush before 785 BC. Kush was a colony made by Hyksos bandits (Turkic Akkadians + Bedouin Amorites) with Berber and slaves collected from West Africa.

The Hyksos-Berber-Fulani bandits started invasions in 1500 BC coming from Libya via West Africa. Kmt protected Kerma down the 4th Cataract.

Following the collapse of Kmt Modern Kingdom in 1077 BC the bandits toppled Kerma civilization in 1000 BC.

The bandits brought down Kerma and it went into 200 years of violence, slavery and chaos.

The Hyksos-Berber-Fulani bandits and local slaves were first ruled by a single warlord called Alara of unknown origin in 785 BC and declared himself as king and the colony as Kush.

Kush was an enemy to Kerma and Kmt. It was made by West African slaves (Fulani), Berber and Hyksos.

The earliest Jews were not Israelite. Jews were made up from Hebrews who were expelled Hyksos. Therefore, Jews are re-packaging of Turkic Mongolian Akkadians together with Bedouin Amorites.

Kushite Queen Tabiry of the 25 Dynasty Links to Hyksos


Tabiry was the daughter of King Alara of Kush from his wife Kasaqa; and was the wife of her brother King Piye. She held some interesting titles: Her majesty Main/first King’s Wife, (hmt niswt ‘at tpit n hm.f) and “The Great One of the Foreign Country” (ta-aat-khesut), and khesut could mean nomads, similar to that in Hyksos.

She also held the more standard titles of King’s Wife (hmt niswt), King’s Daughter (s3t niswt), and King’s Sister (snt niswt).

Tabiry was buried in a pyramid at El-Kurru (K.53). A carved granite funerary stela found in her tomb mentions she is the daughter of Alara of Kush and the wife of Piye. The stela is now in Khartoum.

The stela gives Tabiry further titles. Reisner had translated one of her titles as ‘the great chieftainess of the Temehu’ (southern Libyans), and concluded that the royal house of Kush was somehow related to the Libyans. Other scientists had since shown that her title might be read as “Great One (or ‘Chieftainess’) of the Desert-dwellers”, showing her title connects her to the Kushites and not to Libyans.

الملكة الكوشية تابيري تربط الأسرة 25 إلى الهكسوس

كانت تابيري ابنة ملك كوش الارا من زوجته كاساقا وكانت زوجة شقيقها الملك بيي/بعنخي. وحملت بعض الألقاب المثيرة للاهتمام منهم: صاحبة الجلالة الرئيسية / زوجة الملك الأولى وزعيمة بلاد البدو (ta-aat-khesut) وكلمة خسوت مماثلة لتلك في كلمة هكسوس

كما أنها حملت ألقاب أخري تقليدية مثل زوجة الملك (hmt niswt) وابنة الملك  (s3t niswt)وأخت الملك(snt niswt).

دفنت تابيري في هرم في الكرو رقم (K 53). ولها لوحة جنائزية منحوتة من الجرانيت وجدت في قبرها تذكر أنها ابنة ملك كوش الارا وزوجة الملك بعنخي وموجودة الآن في الخرطوم.

تذكر اللوحة أن تابيري لها المزيد من الألقاب. وقام العالم الامريكي رايزنر بترجمة أحد ألقابها على أنها “زعيم القبيلة العظيم لتيمحو” (جنوب الليبيين) وأعتبر ريزنر أن ذلك دليل يؤكد أن الاسرة الحاكمة في كوش كانت مرتبطة بطريقة ما بالليبيين. وقد ذكر علماء آخرون منذ ذلك الحين أن الترجمة قد تقرأ على أنها عظيمة أو زعيمة القبائل الصحراوية مما يدل على أن لقب تابيري ربما يربطها بالكوشيين وليس الليبيين.

The Relationship of Fulani to Hyksos and Romani Gypsies


The Fulani language is called Fulfulde, and a linguist said it was closer to the Roma language. He linked the Fulani to the Hyksos. He said exactly what I say; the appearance of Fulani is linked to the expulsion of the Hyksos from Kmt.

This also confirms that Kush are Hyksos and their slaves from West Africa and they were the Fulani. It also explains the reasons for the mystery of the origin of the Meroitic language.

Maurice Delafosse (20 December 1870 – 13 November 1926) was a French ethnographer and who worked in the field of the languages of Africa. He said: I think I may say that of all African, Asiatic, Oceanian, and European tongues which I have compared with the language of the Fulani, the language of the gypsies is that which appears to me possess the greatest point of resemblance.

JOURNAL ARTICLE: The Fulani – A Nomadic Tribe in Northern Nigeria; Mustafa B. Ibrahim; African Affairs; Vol. 65, No. 259 (Apr., 1966), pp. 170-176. Published by: Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal African Society

Also mentioned in: A Tropical Dependency: An Outline of the Ancient History of the Western Sudan with an Account of the Modern Settlement of Northern Nigeria; Authors: Flora Louisa Shaw, Lady Flora Louise Shaw Lugard; Publisher: James Nisbet, 1905; Original from: Harvard University; Digitized: 11 Dec 2007; Length: 508 pages.

Contents: INTRODUCTORY 1; CONQUEST OF North Africa AND SPAIN BY 24; ARAB Civilization IN SPAIN 31; THE EMPIRE OF The Two SHORES 50; AFRICAN RULE IN SPAIN 58; DECLINE OF MOHAMMEDAN POWER IN SPAIN 67; SPANISH ARABS IN AFRICA 73; NEGROLAND AND THE WESTERN ARABS 83; THE LATER ASKIAS 211; THE PHARAOHS IN HAUSSALAND 227; THE DOMINATION OF KANO 245; BORNU 268; THE MOORISH CONQUEST 296; THE SOUDAN UNDER THE MOORS 306; EUROPE IN WEST AFRICA 322; THE EUROPEAN SLAVE TRADE 333; BERBER AND BLACK 99; MORABITE CONQUEST OF THE SOUDAN 107; GHANA AND TIMBUCTOO 113; IBN BATUTA IN MELLE 129; ADMINISTRATION OF THE MELLESTINE 142; MEETING OF EASTERN AND WESTERN INFLUENCE UPON 153; RISE OF THE SONGHAY EMPIRE 163; Askia MOHAMMED ABOU BEKR 181; SONGHAY UNDER ASKIA THE GREAT 190; SONGHAY UNDER ASKIA THE GREAT continued 199; ENGLAND AND FRANCE ON THE LOWER NIGER 348; ORIGIN OF THE FULANI 373; RISE OF THE FULANI IN THE SOUDAN 381; SULTAN BELLO 390; CONQUEST OF SOKOTO AND KANO 438; British Policy IN NORTHERN NIGERIA 449; ECONOMIC RESOURCES OF NORTHERN NIGERIA 485; THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRADE 491; INDEX 501

علاقة الفولاني بالهكسوس والغجر

لغة الفولاني اسمها فلفولدي وقال فيها خبير لغات انها اقرب للغة الغجر. ويربط بين الفولاني والهكسوس يقول بالظبط كما اقول بان ظهور الفولاني مرتبط بطرد الهكسوس

وهذا يؤكد أيضا أن الكوشيين هم عبارة عن هكسوس ورقيق لهم من غرب أفريقيا وهم الفولاني. ويفسر كذلك أسباب غموض أصل اللغة المروية

موريس ديلافوس (20 ديسمبر 1870 – 13 نوفمبر 1926) عالمًا عرقيات فرنسي وعمل في مجال لغات إفريقيا

The Origins of Fulani, Gypsies and Meroitic Languages


The origin of the Fulani is obscure. Some scholars assigned them to Hyksos origin; while a linguist named Fezzan M. Dalfosse, whose studies in west African languages give special weight to his opinions, holds the view that Fulani may have owed their origin to the downfall of Hyksos, or shepherd kings, who were driven from Egypt about 1639 BC.
He likens the Fulani to the gypsy language he says “I think I may say that of all African, Asiatic, Oceanian and European language tongue which I have compared with the language of the Fulani, the language of the gypsies is that which appear to possess the greatest point of resemblance”.
There is strong indications the earliest Jews were not Israelites, but rather the Jews were the same Akkadians, who appeared suddenly in 2334 BC and invaded and colonized Sumer and Subar, after allying with the Amorites.
The East Asian origin possibility shared by the Akkadians; the Hyksos; the Roma (Gypsies); and the Fulani is interesting indeed; and the linkage between the Fulani with the Hyksos in creating the Kush Kingdom could lead to think of East Asian plus West African origin of the obscure Meroitic Language.

Kush Origin is in Fulani and Hyksos


The origin and history of the Hyksos and Fulani groups are essential to understand the history and the present of West Africa.

The Fulani groups were the result of wide-spread slavery raids on West Africa since 1600 BC by the Hyksos who invaded and colonized Kmt (ancient Egypt) in 1630 BC or 1800 BC, and some of the Hyksos went further to invade North Africa and first created the Lebu (Libyans) who went back and founded the 22 and 23 Dynasties in Kmt (945 – 728 BC).

It is clear the western part of the Hyksos were devastated by the loss of route connecting them with West Asian markets and the Hyksos expelled to the east of Kmt. To reconnect the Hyksos in Libya had sought assistance from Troy and also took their slavery bandits to invade the southern Nile Valley. The Hyksos wanted to connect with their bandits that were raiding Arabia and also invade and regain Kmt from the south.

The created Fulani groups were used to invade the southern Nile Valley and first colonized the region which they called Kordofan then they occupied Kerma south of the 4th Cataract in 1500 BC. After raiding for 700 years the Hyksos with their Fulani destroyed north Kerma civilization and created in its place Kush in 785 BC, who invaded Kmt to assist the defeated Libyan dynasties and the expelled Hyksos in the Amorite east who were attacking Subar and Sumer; in the events that led to the fall of Sumer and the subsequent creation of Babylonia and the Jews.

The Hyksos were actually the same Akkadians who colonized Sumer and Subar (Fertile Crescent) in 2334-2154 BC. The Akkadians were Turkic Mongolian raiding bandits on horses and took foot soldiers from South Caucasus (Hurrians). Amorites joined the expelled Akkadians to form the Hyksos.

The same amalgam who invaded North Africa and started slavery in West Africa were the invaders and colonizers of Spain and Portugal from 711 AD and were expelled in 1492 AD. They shared and also took over power from their Fulani partner groups in West Africa who were their suppliers of wealth and slaves.

Songhai Empire c. 1464–1591 preceded by Mali Empire and Gao Empire and was succeeded by Saadi dynasty; Pashalik of Timbuktu and Dendi Kingdom.
Mali Empire c. 1230–1670 preceded by Ghana Empire and Gao Empire and was succeeded by Songhai Empire; Jolof Empire; Kaabu Empire and the Empire of Great Fulo

All these regimes were more or less dominated, created or influenced by the Fulani and their Hyksos masters of North Africa, who claim to be Amazigh; while the only true Amazigh are the Tuareg the arch-rival of Fulani and Hyksos. Indeed the history of West Africa is mainly around the history of Hyksos and Fulani slavery and looting.

In fact, “Pharaohs” was a term used by native people of Kmt during the Hyksos colonization (1630-1523 BC) to point to the foreign colonizers as “paɾuw (meaning that person in the great house)”.
Native people of Kmt refrained to call the Hyksos ruler and other foreign rulers as kings which is pronounces as “Nesso”. Nesso was reserved for genuine legitimate kings of Kmt origin. It was their smart way to resist occupation and show disregard.

In this sense, the Songhai were made up by, and related to, pharaohs who were Hyksos rulers. The Songhai were amalgam of local West African groups forced together by slavery; but were not descendants of Kmt. The Hyksos and their pharaohs were also related to the Amorite-Akkadian-Turkic-Hurrian bandits that colonized the Arabs in their homeland which is only in the Western and Southern coasts of the Arabian Peninsula, including Yemen, since 1300 BC after the Hyksos were driven out from Kmt in 1523 BC; then from Mittani and Sumer in 1300 BC.

Therefore, saying that the Songhai and the Fulani are somehow related to the pharaohs (Hyksos) and also to Yemen (Bedouin bandits who colonized Arabs) as their traditions say is reasonable since these were the only two sources for slaves, gold and horses markets and power used by the Fulani and other West African regimes to control the region.

The relationship of the Kushites and their collaboration to the Hyksos is evident in the first and second steles that Lord Carnarvon discovered in 1908 in Thebes and recounts the events of the war that Kamose waged against the Hyksos and the Kushites at the same time. It recalled a courier arrest and detention carrying a letter from the Hyksos leader named Abibi in Avares to his pact ally the leader of Kushites asking for urgent support against the threat posed by the armies of Kmt led by King Kamose against the Hyksos and the Kushites. The content of the Hyksos message to the Kushites was recorded by Kamose in the inscription recounting his victory in Karnak.

The name kes or kas (k3š) appeared in Kmt monuments for the first time in 1450 B.C., and it was meant that the Hyksos gangs that seized Sumar (the civilization of southern Iraq) and their name were the Kassites or the Kishites from Kish, Kas, Kash, or Kasu, and they were Hyksos gangs who occupied Mesopotamia from 1531 to 1155 BC .Clearly, the name Kush is close to Kassites.

It is possible that the formation of the Kush kingdom by someone called Al-Ara came as a result of the urgent need to invade Kmt from the south and to follow instructions that came to the southern Hyksos gangs and Fulani from their Libyan Hyksos partners of the 23rd family that were defeated and fell into the hands of the 24th Dynasty in 732 BC and continued to rule for 12 years only and fell to the invasion of the 25th Dynasty, whose name became the Kingdom of Kush, by the Hyksos gangs, who are of the same origin as the Kassite gangs in Babylon from 1531 to 1155 B.C. to attack Kmt from the south

So, of course, the names Kush, Ta-siti, and Ta-nehso refer to three different lands, not one region. Ta-siti means the land of the civilization of the people of Kerma. While Kush means the colonized part by ​​the Hyksos and their Fulani slave. While Ta-nehso points to black slave areas, whether domestic or foreign.

Punt Lands Hypothesis


Jews are Asiatic and totally different group from the Israelites who were East Africans.

My Abyssinian Hypothesis had been updated after I discovered new strong evidences, including the camel presence which was limited to the Horn of Africa.

Now, the hypothesis is called Punt Lands Hypothesis and it states that the Israelites were from Punt Lands, and not Arabs; and the Exodus was local across a river.

Jews are descendants of Turkic Mongolian Hyksos in Babylon in 580 BC and were invented in Babylon.

First Jews were Amorites bandits led by horse-riding expelled Hyksos and Kassites who used few Ethiopian Judahites to invent Jews, Judaism, Hebrew language and the Tanakh to replace the Ge’ez Torah of Mosses, and establish fake Israel and fake Jerusalem in western Amorites land.

Kush on the Nile River bears the same name of the Kassites ,Kaššu, Kassi, Kasi or Kashic who appeared in 1531 until 1155 BC in Babylon.

The light-complexion people of Arabia, the Levant, Egypt, and North and East Africa who claim to be Arabs are actually descendants of the Amorites with the Turkic Mongolian Hyksos bandits.

The light-complexion “Arabs” are the Bedouins who colonized the tanned-complexion original Arabs in the Western and Southern coasts of Arabia, who are much closer in everything to the peoples of the Horn of Africa and Kmt.

The diagram shows how Hyksos and Amorites created Kush to invade Kmt by Bedouins and Fulani (who are slaves taken from west, central and east Africa).

Just compare these two maps to discover how much deception survived 2600 years.
My Punt-Lands Hypothesis of the interpretation of the Mosaic Torah and the history of the Children of Israel

Compare Punt-Lands Hypothesis with what the academic, religious and media institutions offer. They mention the history of the Hyksos, of whom the Jews appeared after 950 years, and affixed it to the Children of Israel who had nothing to do with the Jews. And the world believed this naive lie for 2,600 years.

The True Relationship between Kmt and Assyria in 670 BC


Necho I ruled (672 – 664 BC). He was the King of Lower Kmt from his capital in the ancient city of Sais. He was the first documented king in the Twenty-Sixth Dynasty.

Necho I was an ally of the Neo Assyrian Empire (911 BC–609 BC) in its struggle against the remnants of the Hyksos, including the ancestors of the Jews and the Kushites. The Assyrian king, Esarhaddon, began commanding an army to protect Necho, but died before his arrival.

He was succeeded by his son Ashurbanipal (668 – 627 BC), the grandson of Sennacherib. Ashurbanipal sent an army against the Kushites in 667 BC and remained in his capital at Nineveh and defeated Taharqa king of the 25th family near Memphis, who fled south. Ashurbanipal supported King Nacho with Assyrian soldiers to protect the lower Kmt from the Kushites

After the death of the Kushite Taharqa in 664 BC and his defeat, his successor, Tantmani, invaded the lower Kmt again with a large army. In Memphis he defeated the Kemites and killed King Necho in battle and Psamtik I took refuge in Assyria.

Ashurbanipal sent another army south of Greek soldiers and again succeeded in defeating the Kushites north of Memphis. Tantmani fled to Kush and did not threaten Kmt again. Psamtik I and the Assyrians shattered the remnants of the Kushites severely. The Assyrians were given gifts from war spoils taken from Kushites

The Assyrian Kmtian cooperation continued and after Psamtik I liberated Kmt he maintained friendly relations with the Assyrians. After the liberation of Thebes permanently from the Kushites, Kmt was united once under a king of Sau / Sais.

Psamtik I son of Necho ruled from 664 to 610 BC, the son of Sais and the pride of Lower Kmt.
Jewish sources claim that he was against the Assyrians while the fact is that the Assyrians were his allies and helped him to establish close ties with the Greeks to counter the danger of the Kushites from the south and encouraged many Greeks to settle in Kmt and established settlements for them and encouraged them to join the quantum army.

Trade between Egypt and Greece was also active at that time, and Sais was an important trade center punched with Greece and the Mediterranean countries. So the role of the Greeks at that time was that of a friend

Most probably, the Psamtik I statue which was discovered in 2017 totally fragmented and buried was brought from Sais to be destroyed in Matariya, near Heliopolis, by Persians and Jews who are Hyksos descendants to erase his great history and achievements against the remnants of Hyksos and their offshoots.

The Great Role of Abyssinia in Liberating the Region


The great Role of Abyssinia in Liberating the Region

The great Role of Abyssinia in Liberating the Region

Important Update Notice on 24 July 2018: I have updated my Abyssinian Hypothesis  after discovering the that single-hump camel (The dromedary) was unknown in Arabia, Aram, Assyria, and Kemet before 950 BC, while in abundance in the land of Punt.

This led to make the following major changes:
1- The proposed origin of Israelite from being Arabic-speaking Arab Yemenis to Ge’ez-speaking African Puntite;
2- Rename the Abyssinian Hypothesis to the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis;
3- The Turkic Mongolian colonizers and rulers of Neo-Babylonia invited elders from the House of Israel to Babylonia in around 580 BC in what is called the Babylonian Exile to help the create Judaism and colonize Aramaic land in 530 BC;
4- The Hebrew Language and the Hebrew Israelite are products of admixture between Ge’ez Israelite, Turkic Mongolian Persians, and colonized Aramaic. They existed only after 530 C; and
5- The Lost Sheep of the House of Israel are those Israelite who  left the land of Punt and decided to collaborate with Turkic Mongolians to invent Judaism and colonize Aramaic lands; and turned into Hebrew Israelite.

Therefore, the Israelite Exodus of 1446 BC was only within Punt, from one region to another. The Jews are not Israelite at all; and the name Judah was just used deceptively to relate the Jews to the Israelite. The Israelite were scattered all over the world and they no longer exist as a nation or a tribe.

For more details on the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis read the following three articles:
1- How Persians Cooked a Cult and Called it Judaism Part 1
2- The Turkic Mongolian-African Israelite Joint-ventures
3- Jesus Pointing to “The Lost Sheep of the house of Israel” and “the Gentiles”
[End of notice]

The Abyssinians (Habesha), the descendants of Punt, put an end to the Turkic Mongolian colony of D’mt (c. 980 BC–c. 400 BC) and liberated their lands in 400 BC.

Then also stopped the Turkic Mongolian colony of Kush in 350 AD and saved the people of present day Sudan.

The Abyssinian struggles against foreign colonization in the region ended with the overthrow of the murderous kingdom of Ḥimyar (110 BC–525 AD) in 525 AD, the heir to the Sabaean Kingdom (between 1200 and 800 BC to 275 AD) which was a Turkic Mongolian pretender of biblical Sheba.

It is truly regrettable and damaging to find unjustified aggrandizement for the kingdom of Kush, which is meant to obliterate the original history and civilization in Sudan that is the civilization of Kerma, which built the first foundation and lasted for more than 2,000 years.

This is seen in false allegations of mentioning Kush in sites dates back to Kemt’s Middle Kingdom era, but that is impossible to be because Kush (c 785 BC–c AD 350) was not yet made at that time.

The honorable and great roles played by Abyssinia in maintaining peace, justice, and prosperity in the region are indeed great examples of humility and fairness. Thanks Habesha!

[Note: The Turkic Mongolian groups who devastated all the Middle East, India, Europe, and Africa are originally from Western Mongolia, East Kazakhstan Region and the Uyghurs of Xinjiang in China. They are of Mongolian and Turkic speaking groups from the Altaic Family. They are the creators of Persians, Jews, Turks, Romans, yellow Indians, Gypsies, Bedouins, and Arabized Turkic rulers and wealthy in Arabia and Africa]

How did the Civilizations of Punt and Kerma Fall?


How did the Civilizations of Punt and Karma Fall

How did the Civilizations of Punt and Karma Fall

Important Update Notice on 24 July 2018: I have updated my Abyssinian Hypothesis  after discovering the that single-hump camel (The dromedary) was unknown in Arabia, Aram, Assyria, and Kemet before 950 BC, while in abundance in the land of Punt.

This led to make the following major changes:
1- The proposed origin of Israelite from being Arabic-speaking Arab Yemenis to Ge’ez-speaking African Puntite;
2- Rename the Abyssinian Hypothesis to the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis;
3- The Turkic Mongolian colonizers and rulers of Neo-Babylonia invited elders from the House of Israel to Babylonia in around 580 BC in what is called the Babylonian Exile to help the create Judaism and colonize Aramaic land in 530 BC;
4- The Hebrew Language and the Hebrew Israelite are products of admixture between Ge’ez Israelite, Turkic Mongolian Persians, and colonized Aramaic. They existed only after 530 C; and
5- The Lost Sheep of the House of Israel are those Israelite who  left the land of Punt and decided to collaborate with Turkic Mongolians to invent Judaism and colonize Aramaic lands; and turned into Hebrew Israelite.

Therefore, the Israelite Exodus of 1446 BC was only within Punt, from one region to another. The Jews are not Israelite at all; and the name Judah was just used deceptively to relate the Jews to the Israelite. The Israelite were scattered all over the world and they no longer exist as a nation or a tribe.

For more details on the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis read the following three articles:
1- How Persians Cooked a Cult and Called it Judaism Part 1
2- The Turkic Mongolian-African Israelite Joint-ventures
3- Jesus Pointing to “The Lost Sheep of the house of Israel” and “the Gentiles”
[End of notice]

The people between the First and Sixth Cataract of the Nile, first created the African Kerma Civilization (2500 BC-1500 BC) which evolved from the indigenous Pre-Kerma (c. 3500–2500 BC)
then came the Early Kerma (c. 2500–2050 BC) or C-Group Phase Ia–Ib;
then the Middle Kerma (c. 2050–1750 BC) or C-Group Phase Ib–IIa;
then the Classic Kerma (c. 1750–1580 BC) or C-Group Phase IIb–III;
then the Final Kerma (c. 1580–1500 BC) C-Group Phase IIb–III.

Kerma was disintegrated by Arab Israelite from Yemen came as nomadic refugees via Punt since 1876 BC. While north Kemet (Aka Delta of Egypt) was invaded and colonized by Turkic Mongolian Hyksos (1630-1523 BC) who are the forefathers of Persians, Jews, Turks, Romans, yellow Indians, Gypsies, Bedouins, and Arabized Turkic rulers and wealthy in Arabia and Africa

The Israelites who were Yemenite Arabs took refuge in Punt in 1876 BC. The people and rulers of Punt received them well for 430 years. During their refuge, many of those Israelites moved further into Kerma (ancient Nubia) and neighboring countries. Soon after their arrival the nomadic Israelites started looting, damaging, and enslaving the peoples of Punt, Kerma, and their neighbors, including the Beja people.

But the rulers of Kerma and Punt in cooperation and support from the kings of Kamet (It was not yet called Egypt) started to protect themselves. King Ahmose I who ruled from 1549 BC until 1524 BC till King Thutmose III who ruled from 1479 BC until 1425 BC began liberating north Kemt from the Turkic Mongolian Hyksos in 1523 BC and chased them till the borders with Assyria. Then Kemt went further and assisted Kerma and Punt to kick out the Israelites and expelled them from their lands and push them back to Yemen by force in 1446 BC.

Unfortunately, the eastern coast of Punt, particularly the land of the Beja, fell again under raids since 1200 BC but this time from Turkic Mongolians coming from the Arabian Peninsula after they devastated it. Around 1000 BC the Turkic Mongolian raiders established themselves in Southern Arabia and created in 800 BC the Sabaean chieftaincy pretending to be Sheba of Punt.

In the eastern coast of Punt they created a Turkic Mongolian colony calling it D’mt (c. 980 BC–c. 400 BC). The Sabaeans and D’mt worked together and in c 785 BC a third kingdom was created in what used to be Kerma. The new sister kingdom was called Kush. With these three kingdoms Turkic Mongolian devastation, looting and slavery continued in Arabia, Punt, and Karma.

This resulted in the final fall of civilizations of Punt and Karma. Kush indeed was degeneration and vulgarization of the Kerma civilization that was one of the greatest and oldest African and human achievements. The fall of the Beja to Turkic Mongolians had grave repercussions led to the loss of independence, freedom, and development in Punt and Kerma.

The Turkic Mongolian groups who devastated all the Middle East, India, Europe, and Africa are originally from Western Mongolia, East Kazakhstan Region and the Uyghurs of Xinjiang in China. They are of Mongolian and Turkic speaking groups from the Altaic Family.

The Most Important Groups Created by Turkic Mongolians

The Most Important Groups Created by Turkic Mongolians

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: