Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy

Posts tagged ‘middle east’

How Jews, Judaism, and Hebrew were invented?


The Semien Mountains of Gondar, Ethiopia, where Moses received the Torah

The Semien Mountains of Gondar, Ethiopia, where Moses received the Torah

Israelite Journeys

Israelite Journeys

My Punt Lands Hypothesis states that the Jews are not at all Israelite. Because the Jews are of Turkic Mongolian origin, just like: Hyksos, Mittani, Persians, Bedouin ʾAʿrāb, Sabaeans, Romans, Turks, Gypsies, Moors, Khazar, and others in Eastern Europe and the Eurasian Steppe.

While the Israelite were exclusively Ge’ez-speaking Africans from the Lands of Punt. The hypothesis also emphasizes that the stories of Creation, Deluge, Joseph, Exodus, Solomon, and all other biblical characters were in the Lands of Punt; and the Creation and Deluge were of local, and not global, nature. The Exodus of 1446 BC was within Punt by crossing a river only.

After receiving the Torah in Ge’ez on the Semien Mountains, Moses led the Israelite to their promised land in the Afar Triangle (the Danakil Depression) where they established Israel confederation then a united kingdom. While the original home of Abraham was near Harar city.

King Solomon ruled Israel and built Beit HaMikdash (The Temple) where he kept the Arc of the Covenant. Upon his death in 926 BC, the tribe of Judah started collusion with the Sabaeans in Yemen and Turkic Mongolians roaming in the Middle Assyrian Empire (1392-934 BC).

Due to Turkic Mongolian raids the whole of Eastern Mediterranean region suffered from the Late Bronze Age Collapse (roughly between the years of 1250-1000 BC). The period from 1200 BC to 900 BC was a dark age for the entire Near East, North Africa, Caucasus, Mediterranean and Balkan regions, with great upheavals and mass movements of people.

The Neo-Assyrian Empire (911 BC–609 BC) brought to its collapse by Turkic Mongolians allied with Judah tribe and Sabaeans. This led to the creation of Neo-Babylonian Empire (626 BC–539 BC) which ushered the rise of Judah tribe and the collapse of other tries of the Israelite.

Jews, Judaism, Hebrew language, and Rabbinic Hebrew Torah were invented during 580-530 BC by a collusion between Judah Israelite tribe and Turkic Mongolian colonizers of Neo-Babylonia and Turkic Mongolian Persians. The origin of Hebrew is Ge’ez mixed with Aramaic and Persian.

The Jews (Yehudi) are not Israelite or from anywhere in the region, they were Turkic Mongolians. The Turkic Mongolians origin is in Altai Mountains and northern Tarim Basin of Western Mongolia, Eastern Kazakhstan, and Northern Uyghur. The original Israel, Israelite, and the Law of Moses were African 100% and had nothing with Arabia or Jews or Asia.

The Persians and Neo-Babylonians were one branch of Turkic Mongolians who colonized Iran and Iraq. They imported the Israelite history and religion from the Land of Punt and cooked Judaism and invented the Jews and colonized Aramaic lands with their inventions. It is an ideology of political association for conquering nations and looting them with religious veils.

Jesus was of African Puntite origin and he was sent by the God of the Ge’ez Israelite to bring back the lost sheep of the House of Israel from colonized Aramaic lands. He was targeted and persecuted by Turkic Mongolian Persians, Jews, and Romans.

Nonsense dies naturally; that is why fake histories and religions are dying, and being replaced by sensible history and religion (without s).
Genuine Israel and Israelite versus Fake Israel and Israelite

Genuine Israel and Israelite versus Fake Israel and Israelite

The Punt Lands Hypothesis

The Punt Lands Hypothesis

Advertisements

What is the Ethnic Origin of Haile Selassie?


Haile Selassie

Haile Selassie

The facial features and biography of Haile Selassie, or “Tafari Makonnen Woldemikael”, raise many suspicions. They might indicate there is some non-African origin in his blood.

Could it be his hooked strange nose and big ears of Asiatic invaders?

Elyas Mulu Kiros wrote on Jul 05, 2012, on Pambazuka

[Who was Emperor Haile Selassie’s mother?

Politics, ethnicity and religion have always been interwoven in Ethiopia, which is why Haile Selassie never wanted to reveal the full identity of his mother.

“Who was Emperor Haile Selassie’s mother?” is the title of this Amharic article. This is a controversial topic that many Ethiopians feel uncomfortable to talk about due to its political heaviness. The article discusses how the emperor and writers of his biography never revealed his mother’s full name or her photograph in public during or after his reign, deliberately due to the sensitivity of the issue.

Why was it sensitive and why was the mother’s identity hidden from the public unlike the emperor’s father? Simple answer: Because her religious and ethnic identities would have been obstacles to Haile Selassie’s ascent to power. In addition, the emperor’s mother had no royal lineage, but his father Ras Makonnen was a general and governor himself whose parents, though they had mixed heritage, were descended from nobility, which helped the emperor claim the throne.

According to the article: 1) The emperor’s mother had a mixed ethnic background, just like many Ethiopians; she was half-Gurague and half-Wara Iluu; thus, far from the then dominant ethnic group, or ruling class, the Amhara. 2) Her father was a Muslim. Orthodox Christianity was the de-facto official religion at the time.

Think of President Barack (Hussein) Obama for a second and how the US media and the Republicans play with his middle name and mixed background, especially when he visits conservative states. That was, perhaps, the kind of scrutiny that the Emperor wanted to avoid when he guarded his mother’s identity.

The emperor’s mother was called Yeshimebet Ali Gamcho. Yeshimebet is a Christian/Amharic name; Ali is Muslim; and Gamcho is ethnic/non-Amharic.

Why is it relevant to talk about this topic today? In order to fully understand the ongoing political quagmire in Ethiopia and to devise some kind of meaningful solution, one must put the present in a historical context, as Professor Markakis recently argued in an interview. One can use the past like a mirror to reflect the present on it so one can see a clearer future.……………..]

Mäkonnen Wäldä-Mika'él Woldemelekot the alledge father of Haile Selassie

Mäkonnen Wäldä-Mika’él Woldemelekot the alledge father of Haile Selassie

Haile Selassie’s royal line (through his father’s mother) originated from the Amhara people, He was born on 23 July 1892, in the village of Ejersa Goro, in the Harar province of Ethiopia. His mother was Woizero (“Lady”) Yeshimebet Ali Abba Jifar, daughter of the renowned Oromo ruler of Wollo province Dejazmach Ali Abba Jifar. His maternal grandmother was of Gurage heritage. Tafari’s father was Ras Makonnen Woldemikael Gudessa, the governor of Harar.

Yeshimebet Ali, daughter of Woizero (later Immabet-Hoy) Wolete Giyorgis and Dejazmatch Ali Abba Jiffar, who was a Muslim chief of the Warra Illu clan of the Wollo Oromo tribe, and a former trader from Gondar. Was she a legitimate child? Yeshimebet Ali Abba Jiffar had eight miscarriages before giving birth to Haile Selassie. This is weird and the child doesn’t look like his official father (Mäkonnen Wäldä-Mika’él Woldemelekot).

Asiatic features of Haile Selassie also looks like that of Al Saud and the Emiratis. Look at his “father’s” nose, ears, and eyebrows. This is a controversial topic that many Ethiopians feel uncomfortable to talk about due to its political heaviness. The article discusses how the emperor and writers of his biography never revealed his mother’s full name or her photograph in public during or after his reign, deliberately due to the sensitivity of the issue.

The Israelites are from around Harar; but Haile Selassie could be of Turkic Mongolian father which is Jewish and not Israelite.

An Ethiopian commented saying: [Yes indeed somebody told me that his Pakistani dad mate with his Ethiopian mother .his Pakistani dad was in Ethiopia for some reason to do something and this brings me to have suspicious that he had some Turkic Mongolian race through his Pakistani father. If you look his non biological father on picture there is no way he looks like him.

The Pakistani man of Selassi biological father used to go secretly and mate with Selassi’s mother weyezero (native honored name given to married woman) Yeshmebet. This happens when Ras Mekonenen goes for mission outside of the city of Harar in Ethiopia].

This could lead to a very serious conclusion that is the Turkic Mongolian Jews destroyed and stole once again the history and the identity of Israelites. This time with just one woman and her illegitimate child.

The real Exodus of 1446 BC was within Punt only and it was not from Punt to Yemen. It was from Gondar to Simien Mountains where Moses received the Ten Commandments and the Torah. They crossed a wide wild river only, but not a sea.

The broken tablets must had been moved in the Arc of Covenant to a desert new home of Israelite, which could be in the Afar Triangle or Rift Valley. A simplified geologic map of the Afar Depression. Here there must be a lot of gold from which King Solomon got his wealth.

simplified geologic map of the Afar Depression

simplified geologic map of the Afar Depression

Haile Selassie’s mother full name is Yeshimebet Ali Abba Jifar. Embarrassing or ethnic/non-Amharic name was not the reason at all to hide her biography. Most probably Yeshimebet Ali had had shameful past and that is why he tried to conceal her history.

Many indications show that Haile Selassie was a criminal, a traitor, a fake figure, illegitimate child and power grabber.

Not only the origin and motives of Haile Selassie, or “Tafari Makonnen Woldemikael” were dubious but also his accession to power and the deaths/killings of the conservative Empress Zewditu and her husband Gugsa Welle.

He was implanted by Jews and he served them, because his real father was not Ethiopian, but a Turkic Mongolian. He killed, starved, stole, oppressed, corrupted, divided, and impoverished Ethiopia and Ethiopians.

Discovering Real Friends and Real Enemies


The Most Important Groups Created by Turkic Mongolians

The Most Important Groups Created by Turkic Mongolians

Important Update Notice on 24 July 2018: I have updated my Abyssinian Hypothesis  after discovering the that single-hump camel (The dromedary) was unknown in Arabia, Aram, Assyria, and Kemet before 950 BC, while in abundance in the land of Punt.

This led to make the following major changes:
1- The proposed origin of Israelite from being Arabic-speaking Arab Yemenis to Ge’ez-speaking African Puntite;
2- Rename the Abyssinian Hypothesis to the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis;
3- The Turkic Mongolian colonizers and rulers of Neo-Babylonia invited elders from the House of Israel to Babylonia in around 580 BC in what is called the Babylonian Exile to help the create Judaism and colonize Aramaic land in 530 BC;
4- The Hebrew Language and the Hebrew Israelite are products of admixture between Ge’ez Israelite, Turkic Mongolian Persians, and colonized Aramaic. They existed only after 530 C; and
5- The Lost Sheep of the House of Israel are those Israelite who  left the land of Punt and decided to collaborate with Turkic Mongolians to invent Judaism and colonize Aramaic lands; and turned into Hebrew Israelite.

Therefore, the Israelite Exodus of 1446 BC was only within Punt, from one region to another. The Jews are not Israelite at all; and the name Judah was just used deceptively to relate the Jews to the Israelite. The Israelite were scattered all over the world and they no longer exist as a nation or a tribe.

For more details on the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis read the following three articles:
1- How Persians Cooked a Cult and Called it Judaism Part 1
2- The Turkic Mongolian-African Israelite Joint-ventures
3- Jesus Pointing to “The Lost Sheep of the house of Israel” and “the Gentiles”
[End of notice]

Discovering Real Friends and Real Enemies

The crises of tyranny and bad governance and the lack of political participation and restriction of fundamental freedoms in the countries of the region and in neighboring countries, including Sudan, Eritrea, Somalia, Djibouti, Yemen and the Gulf States is primarily due to the old and long legacy of looting and exploitation by Turkic Mongolians (and not only the Turks and the Mongols), and these ropes are still wrapped around the necks and the conscience and in economy, politics and society.

Therefore, the emancipation from this legacy and the resolution of the resulting crises must only be based on understanding the real causes and the real history and then forming an international and regional movement to withdraw the foreign backing that assists these regimes against their people; and to provide sustainable support and partnership with popular movements and political organizations to liberate their countries from the Turkic Mongolians who control them.

Appealing for support from similar corrupt governments and embassies, most of them in fact partners in this devastating legacy will not benefit; and will certainly harm genuine opposition groups and peoples.

Perhaps the current governments in Ethiopia, Egypt and southern Africa are the most capable and most qualified to move outside the influence of Turkic Mongolian groups, including the Turks, Romans, Persians, fake Europeans and their collaborators.

اكتشاف الاصدقاء و الاعداء الحقيقيين

ازمات الاستبداد في الحكم و انعدام المشاركة السياسية و تقييد الحريات الاساسية في دول المنطقة و الجوار و منهم السودان و اريتريا و الصومال و جيبوتي و اليمن و دول الخليج ترجع في المقام الاول لارث قديم و طويل من النهب و السبي قام به الترك منغول (و ليس فقط الاتراك و المغول) و لازالت حبائله ملتفة حول الاعناق و الوجدان و في الاقتصاد و السياسة و المجتمع.

لذا فان الانعتاق من هذا الارث و حل الازمات الناتجة عنه لا تقوم الا بفهم الاسباب و التاريخ الحقيقي و من ثم تشكيل حركة اقليمية  دولية لسحب الدعم الاجنبي الذي يسند تلك الانظمة المتأمرة ضد شعوبها و لتوفير مساندة مستدامة و شراكة مع الحركات الشعبية و التنظيمات السياسية للتحرر من اذناب الترك منغول المتسلطين عليهم.

اما استجداء انظمة و سفارات اغلبهم شركاء في هذا الارث المخرب فلن يفيد بل و سيضر المعارضين و الشعوب. ربما الحكومات الحالية في اثيوبيا و مصر و الجنوب الافريقي هم الاقدر و الاكثر تأهيلا للتحرك خارج اطار نفوذ مجموعات الترك منغول و منهم الاتراك و الرومان و الفرس و الاوروبيين المزوريين و عملائهم.

The Significance of the Presidential Seal of Turkey


The Significance of the Presidential Seal of Turkey

The Significance of the Presidential Seal of Turkey

The Presidential Seal of Turkey points to only small part of the truth about the real history Turkic Mongolian groups.

Because if they tell the whole story it would tantamount to a declaration of war against all nations of the world.

Read the writings of Turanists, the Turkic Mongolian extremists, including the Jews, and what they say about the history of the ancient Turkic Mongolians since before the building the Great Wall of China
Instead of repeating the outdated and wrong concepts that have been engraved in history and in mind for thousands of years, researching, thinking, and discovery must be done, not to deny the truthful facts that are presented to the world honestly and effortlessly.
Many Turkic Mongolian groups stretched from East in India and Iran to West in Rome and the Americas

Wake up peoples of the world! Your slumber does not hurt you separately, but hurts the entire world.

Presidential Seal of Turkey

Erdoğan and Abbas with actors representing the 16 Great Turkic Empires (2015)

Erdoğan and Abbas with actors representing the 16 Great Turkic Empires (2015)

It was Kerma Not Nubia or Kush


Nabta Playa the common origin of Kemet and Kerma

Nabta Playa the common origin of Kemet and Kerma

The people between the First and Sixth Cataract of the Nile, first created the African Kerma Civilization (2500 BC-1500 BC) which evolved from the indigenous Pre-Kerma (c. 3500–2500 BC)
then came the Early Kerma (c. 2500–2050 BC) or C-Group Phase Ia–Ib; then
the Middle Kerma (c. 2050–1750 BC) or C-Group Phase Ib–IIa; then
the Classic Kerma (c. 1750–1580 BC) or C-Group Phase IIb–III; then
the Final Kerma (c. 1580–1500 BC) C-Group Phase IIb–III.

Kerma was disintegrated by the actions of refugee nomadic Arab Yemeni Israelite coming via Abyssinia since 1876 BC. While north Kemet (Aka Delta of Egypt) was invaded and colonized by Turkic Mongolian Hyksos (1630-1523 BC) who are the forefathers of Persians, Jews, Turks, Romans, yellow Indians, Gypsies, and Arabized Turkic rulers and wealthy in Arabia and Africa.

Kemet and Kerma were liberated from the Turkic Hyksos in the north of Kemet; and from the Arab Israelite in the south of Kerma by King Ahmose I (Eighteenth Dynasty XVIII 1549–1292), who is from a family of kings and queens of mixed Kemet-Kerma origin. Almost all the kings of Kemet and Kerma looked a like and were relatives of indigenous origin.

Kush was a sad degeneration of Kerma based on slavery and looting. Nubia is a very late final collapse of Kerma. There are nothing indigenous called Nubian or Kushite civilization, these were feeble cultures built on top of the ruins of Kerma.
Kemet was not White, and Kerma was not Black because these two modern racist terms were invented by Turkic Mongolian groups to claim false European origin and despise and reject African great heritages.

Kemet and Kerma were very closely related sister nations share a common distant origin of “Nabta Playa”. By the 6th millennium BC, evidences of prehistoric organized advanced communities exist and prove the common origin of Kerma and Kemet. Logically the Kerma nation became more tanned than their brothers in the north.

The features of original Arabs are not much different from those of Abyssinian and Kerma. Pale-skin Arabs are actually not Arabs at all, they are Arabized Turkic Mongolians falsely claiming to be Arabs.

King Ahmose I (Eighteenth Dynasty XVIII 1549–1292)

King Ahmose I (Eighteenth Dynasty XVIII 1549–1292)

The Hyksos Did Not Bring or Introduce Chariots to Egypt


Important Update Notice on 24 July 2018: I have updated my Abyssinian Hypothesis  after discovering the that single-hump camel (The dromedary) was unknown in Arabia, Aram, Assyria, and Kemet before 950 BC, while in abundance in the land of Punt.

This led to make the following major changes:
1- The proposed origin of Israelite from being Arabic-speaking Arab Yemenis to Ge’ez-speaking African Puntite;
2- Rename the Abyssinian Hypothesis to the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis;
3- The Turkic Mongolian colonizers and rulers of Neo-Babylonia invited elders from the House of Israel to Babylonia in around 580 BC in what is called the Babylonian Exile to help the create Judaism and colonize Aramaic land in 530 BC;
4- The Hebrew Language and the Hebrew Israelite are products of admixture between Ge’ez Israelite, Turkic Mongolian Persians, and colonized Aramaic. They existed only after 530 C; and
5- The Lost Sheep of the House of Israel are those Israelite who  left the land of Punt and decided to collaborate with Turkic Mongolians to invent Judaism and colonize Aramaic lands; and turned into Hebrew Israelite.

Therefore, the Israelite Exodus of 1446 BC was only within Punt, from one region to another. The Jews are not Israelite at all; and the name Judah was just used deceptively to relate the Jews to the Israelite. The Israelite were scattered all over the world and they no longer exist as a nation or a tribe.

For more details on the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis read the following three articles:
1- How Persians Cooked a Cult and Called it Judaism Part 1
2- The Turkic Mongolian-African Israelite Joint-ventures
3- Jesus Pointing to “The Lost Sheep of the house of Israel” and “the Gentiles”
[End of notice]

Ancient Egyptians (Kemets) mastered mathematics as it was essential for their very advanced knowledge in building construction, astronomy, agriculture, administration, and technologies.

Ancient Egyptian mathematics  is the mathematics that was developed and used in Ancient Egypt c. 3000 to c. 300 BC, from the Old Kingdom of Egypt until roughly the beginning of Hellenistic Egypt. The ancient Egyptians utilized a numeral system for counting and solving written mathematical problems, often involving multiplication and fractions. Evidence for Egyptian mathematics is limited to a scarce amount of surviving sources written on papyri. From these texts it is known that ancient Egyptians understood concepts of geometry, such as determining the surface area and volume of three-dimensional shapes useful for architectural engineering, and algebra, such as the false position method and quadratic equations.

Evidence indicates that Egyptians made use of potter’s wheels in the manufacturing of pottery from as early as the 4th Dynasty (2600 BC). It is certain that Egyptians invented and used carts driven by ox and donkey. After the Egyptians were invaded by barbaric nomadic Hyksos riding horse-back, Egyptians invented light single-horse chariots and used them for war.

The Hyksos were Turkic Mongolians with their slaves and mercenaries from defeated nations (mainly Iranian Kurds as foot soldiers, mercenaries, and concubines). Only with the invention of the light chariot with spoked wheels did the horse take on military significance. And that is exactly what the Egyptians did and used to defeat the horse-riding Hyksos.

The claims of Alfred S. Bradfrod that the Hyksos introduced to Egyptians chariot are baseless. [Around 1700 BCE an outside nation, known as the Hyksos, invaded Egypt and slowly took control both militarily and politically. The Hyksos people introduced to Egyptians the horse, chariot and modern Bronze Age weapons.  The chariot developed around 2000 BCE, and the Indo-Iranians were the first to use a chariot similar to those of the Hyksos—“light, two wheeled and spoked.”]  With Arrow, Sword and Spear: A History of Warfare in the Ancient World (Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Publishers, 2001), page 13.

The Chariot:  A Weapon that Revolutionized Egyptian Warfare, by Richard Carney, says: [Around 1700 BCE an outside nation, known as the Hyksos, invaded Egypt and slowly took control both militarily and politically. The Hyksos people introduced to Egyptians the horse, chariot and modern Bronze Age weapons. ] While admitting that Egypt is one of the oldest civilizations in the world, it is illogical that scientists and historians could write that the Hyksos brought or introduced chariots to Egypt. (Read: The Chariot).

The main points here are: 1. The Hyksos didn’t introduce the chariot to Egypt; 2. Using chariot in war was invented by Egyptians; and 3. Peaceful usage of carts, coaches, and wagons were known much earlier both in Central Asia, China, India, Mesopotamia, Egypt, and elsewhere.

The History of Central Asia: The Age of the Steppe Warriors. (I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd, October 2012) a book by Christoph Baumer is helpful in relating different vehicles to different regions and usages.

 

Kurds and Turkic Mongolians and the Mitanni Kingdom 1500-1300 BC


Kurds and Turkic Mongolians and the Mitanni Kingdom 1500-1300 BC

Kurds and Turkic Mongolians and the Mitanni Kingdom 1500-1300 BC

Important Update Notice on 24 July 2018: I have updated my Abyssinian Hypothesis  after discovering the that single-hump camel (The dromedary) was unknown in Arabia, Aram, Assyria, and Kemet before 950 BC, while in abundance in the land of Punt.

This led to make the following major changes:
1- The proposed origin of Israelite from being Arabic-speaking Arab Yemenis to Ge’ez-speaking African Puntite;
2- Rename the Abyssinian Hypothesis to the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis;
3- The Turkic Mongolian colonizers and rulers of Neo-Babylonia invited elders from the House of Israel to Babylonia in around 580 BC in what is called the Babylonian Exile to help the create Judaism and colonize Aramaic land in 530 BC;
4- The Hebrew Language and the Hebrew Israelite are products of admixture between Ge’ez Israelite, Turkic Mongolian Persians, and colonized Aramaic. They existed only after 530 C; and
5- The Lost Sheep of the House of Israel are those Israelite who  left the land of Punt and decided to collaborate with Turkic Mongolians to invent Judaism and colonize Aramaic lands; and turned into Hebrew Israelite.

Therefore, the Israelite Exodus of 1446 BC was only within Punt, from one region to another. The Jews are not Israelite at all; and the name Judah was just used deceptively to relate the Jews to the Israelite. The Israelite were scattered all over the world and they no longer exist as a nation or a tribe.

For more details on the Ge’ez Puntite Hypothesis read the following three articles:
1- How Persians Cooked a Cult and Called it Judaism Part 1
2- The Turkic Mongolian-African Israelite Joint-ventures
3- Jesus Pointing to “The Lost Sheep of the house of Israel” and “the Gentiles”
[End of notice]

The Mitanni kingdom was referred to as the Maryannu, Nahrin or Mitanni by the Egyptians, the Hurri by the Hittites, and the Hanigalbat by the Assyrians. The different names seem to have referred to the same kingdom and were used interchangeably, according to Michael C. Astour.

No native sources for the history of Mitanni have been found so far. Accounts are mainly based on Assyrian, Hittite, and Egyptian sources, as well as inscriptions from nearby places in Syria. Often it is not even possible to establish synchronicity between the rulers of different countries and cities, let alone give uncontested absolute dates. The definition and history of Mitanni is further beset by a lack of differentiation between linguistic, ethnic and political groups.

Mitanni originated not as a result of Aryan invasions, as some claim, but as a result of Turkic Mongolian invasion using Aryan slaves and collaborators. After the invasion of Aryans and the theft of their land in Iran, some of the Kurds resorted to the western mountains, but most of Kurds were subjugated and enslaved and were used as foot soldiers, workers, and concubines. The greatest genetic and feature improvements of Turkic Mongolians came as a result of their miscegenation and reproduction with the defeated and enslaved Iranian Kurds (Aryans).

In fact, Mitanni was created as a result of Turkic Mongolian attacks on Iran which took over the heritage and civilization of Iranians and Assyrians and attributed them to themselves. That period was of Turkic Mongolian intensive raids in the region, which resulted in the fall of the Hittite civilization, the late Bronze Age Collapse, and the emergence of groups of fugitives, refugees and mercenaries, called the Sea Peoples in 1177 BC. It coincided with the settlement and invasion by the Israelites, an Arab tribe that came from its homeland in Yemen in 1406 BC. In the course of their refuge in Abyssinia and destruction of the Kerma civilization in the Sudan, the Israelites cooperated with the Hyksos, who occupied north Kemet from 1630 until 1523 BC. King Ahmose I expelled both groups and pursued both the Hyksos in northern Kemet and the Israelites in the kingdom of Kerma in northern Sudan, on Kemet southern border.

It is certain that the Hyksos, who were Turkic Mongolians, after being expelled from Egypt in 1523 BC created the Mitanni, along with Kurds among them as slaves, workers and agents. The most important evidence that Mitanni was Turkic Mongolian mixed with defeated Iranian Kurds is the use of horses, which is their characteristic and favorite weapon of looting and invasion.

The Kurds were used as soldiers, slaves, breeding stock, and mercenaries by Turkic Mongolian raiders to destroy three civilizations.
1. Kemet (ancient Egypt) with the Hyksos in 1630 BC.
2. Assyria (ancient Iraq) with the Miattani in 1500 BC.
3. Hittite (ancient Anatolia) with the Kaska in 1200 BC.

The authentic Iranian Eucharist Zoroastrianism was stolen by Turkic Mongolians and their slaves from the Iranian Aryans and turned into Magus Paganism, not a religion but a political tool. Kurds original homeland is only Iran and they are Aryans; and the Kurds who claim that the lands of the Kurds are in Iraq, Syria and Turkey are certainly serving the Turkic Mongolian groups of Persians, Turks, and Jews; but not the Kurds. No Kurdish presence was found in Iraq, Syria, and Turkey before 1700 BC. In order to discover the relationship between the Kurds and the Turkic Mongolians and Mitanni, an article can be found from a site specialized in the history of Zoroastrianism. The article does not deduce the same as this article, but it provides indicators and facts that support what came here.

%d bloggers like this: