Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy

Posts tagged ‘middle east’

It was Kerma Not Nubia or Kush

Nabta Playa the common origin of Kemet and Kerma

Nabta Playa the common origin of Kemet and Kerma

The people between the First and Sixth Cataract of the Nile, first created the African Kerma Civilization (2500 BC-1500 BC) which evolved from the indigenous Pre-Kerma (c. 3500–2500 BC)
then came the Early Kerma (c. 2500–2050 BC) or C-Group Phase Ia–Ib; then
the Middle Kerma (c. 2050–1750 BC) or C-Group Phase Ib–IIa; then
the Classic Kerma (c. 1750–1580 BC) or C-Group Phase IIb–III; then
the Final Kerma (c. 1580–1500 BC) C-Group Phase IIb–III.

Kerma was disintegrated by the actions of refugee nomadic Arab Yemeni Israelite coming via Abyssinia since 1876 BC. While north Kemet (Aka Delta of Egypt) was invaded and colonized by Turkic Mongolian Hyksos (1630-1523 BC) who are the forefathers of Persians, Jews, Turks, Romans, yellow Indians, Gypsies, and Arabized Turkic rulers and wealthy in Arabia and Africa.

Kemet and Kerma were liberated from the Turkic Hyksos in the north of Kemet; and from the Arab Israelite in the south of Kerma by King Ahmose I (Eighteenth Dynasty XVIII 1549–1292), who is from a family of kings and queens of mixed Kemet-Kerma origin. Almost all the kings of Kemet and Kerma looked a like and were relatives of indigenous origin.

Kush was a sad degeneration of Kerma based on slavery and looting. Nubia is a very late final collapse of Kerma. There are nothing indigenous called Nubian or Kushite civilization, these were feeble cultures built on top of the ruins of Kerma.
Kemet was not White, and Kerma was not Black because these two modern racist terms were invented by Turkic Mongolian groups to claim false European origin and despise and reject African great heritages.

Kemet and Kerma were very closely related sister nations share a common distant origin of “Nabta Playa”. By the 6th millennium BC, evidences of prehistoric organized advanced communities exist and prove the common origin of Kerma and Kemet. Logically the Kerma nation became more tanned than their brothers in the north.

The features of original Arabs are not much different from those of Abyssinian and Kerma. Pale-skin Arabs are actually not Arabs at all, they are Arabized Turkic Mongolians falsely claiming to be Arabs.

King Ahmose I (Eighteenth Dynasty XVIII 1549–1292)

King Ahmose I (Eighteenth Dynasty XVIII 1549–1292)


The Hyksos Did Not Bring or Introduce Chariots to Egypt

Ancient Egyptians (Kemets) mastered mathematics as it was essential for their very advanced knowledge in building construction, astronomy, agriculture, administration, and technologies.

Ancient Egyptian mathematics  is the mathematics that was developed and used in Ancient Egypt c. 3000 to c. 300 BC, from the Old Kingdom of Egypt until roughly the beginning of Hellenistic Egypt. The ancient Egyptians utilized a numeral system for counting and solving written mathematical problems, often involving multiplication and fractions. Evidence for Egyptian mathematics is limited to a scarce amount of surviving sources written on papyri. From these texts it is known that ancient Egyptians understood concepts of geometry, such as determining the surface area and volume of three-dimensional shapes useful for architectural engineering, and algebra, such as the false position method and quadratic equations.

Evidence indicates that Egyptians made use of potter’s wheels in the manufacturing of pottery from as early as the 4th Dynasty (2600 BC). It is certain that Egyptians invented and used carts driven by ox and donkey. After the Egyptians were invaded by barbaric nomadic Hyksos riding horse-back, Egyptians invented light single-horse chariots and used them for war.

The Hyksos were Turkic Mongolians with their slaves and mercenaries from defeated nations (mainly Iranian Kurds as foot soldiers, mercenaries, and concubines). Only with the invention of the light chariot with spoked wheels did the horse take on military significance. And that is exactly what the Egyptians did and used to defeat the horse-riding Hyksos.

The claims of Alfred S. Bradfrod that the Hyksos introduced to Egyptians chariot are baseless. [Around 1700 BCE an outside nation, known as the Hyksos, invaded Egypt and slowly took control both militarily and politically. The Hyksos people introduced to Egyptians the horse, chariot and modern Bronze Age weapons.  The chariot developed around 2000 BCE, and the Indo-Iranians were the first to use a chariot similar to those of the Hyksos—“light, two wheeled and spoked.”]  With Arrow, Sword and Spear: A History of Warfare in the Ancient World (Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Publishers, 2001), page 13.

The Chariot:  A Weapon that Revolutionized Egyptian Warfare, by Richard Carney, says: [Around 1700 BCE an outside nation, known as the Hyksos, invaded Egypt and slowly took control both militarily and politically. The Hyksos people introduced to Egyptians the horse, chariot and modern Bronze Age weapons. ] While admitting that Egypt is one of the oldest civilizations in the world, it is illogical that scientists and historians could write that the Hyksos brought or introduced chariots to Egypt. (Read: The Chariot).

The main points here are: 1. The Hyksos didn’t introduce the chariot to Egypt; 2. Using chariot in war was invented by Egyptians; and 3. Peaceful usage of carts, coaches, and wagons were known much earlier both in Central Asia, China, India, Mesopotamia, Egypt, and elsewhere.

The History of Central Asia: The Age of the Steppe Warriors. (I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd, October 2012) a book by Christoph Baumer is helpful in relating different vehicles to different regions and usages.


Kurds and Turkic Mongolians and the Mitanni Kingdom 1500-1300 BC

Kurds and Turkic Mongolians and the Mitanni Kingdom 1500-1300 BC

Kurds and Turkic Mongolians and the Mitanni Kingdom 1500-1300 BC

The Mitanni kingdom was referred to as the Maryannu, Nahrin or Mitanni by the Egyptians, the Hurri by the Hittites, and the Hanigalbat by the Assyrians. The different names seem to have referred to the same kingdom and were used interchangeably, according to Michael C. Astour.

No native sources for the history of Mitanni have been found so far. Accounts are mainly based on Assyrian, Hittite, and Egyptian sources, as well as inscriptions from nearby places in Syria. Often it is not even possible to establish synchronicity between the rulers of different countries and cities, let alone give uncontested absolute dates. The definition and history of Mitanni is further beset by a lack of differentiation between linguistic, ethnic and political groups.

Mitanni originated not as a result of Aryan invasions, as some claim, but as a result of Turkic Mongolian invasion using Aryan slaves and collaborators. After the invasion of Aryans and the theft of their land in Iran, some of the Kurds resorted to the western mountains, but most of Kurds were subjugated and enslaved and were used as foot soldiers, workers, and concubines. The greatest genetic and feature improvements of Turkic Mongolians came as a result of their miscegenation and reproduction with the defeated and enslaved Iranian Kurds (Aryans).

In fact, Mitanni was created as a result of Turkic Mongolian attacks on Iran which took over the heritage and civilization of Iranians and Assyrians and attributed them to themselves. That period was of Turkic Mongolian intensive raids in the region, which resulted in the fall of the Hittite civilization, the late Bronze Age Collapse, and the emergence of groups of fugitives, refugees and mercenaries, called the Sea Peoples in 1177 BC. It coincided with the settlement and invasion by the Israelites, an Arab tribe that came from its homeland in Yemen in 1406 BC. In the course of their refuge in Abyssinia and destruction of the Kerma civilization in the Sudan, the Israelites cooperated with the Hyksos, who occupied north Kemet from 1630 until 1523 BC. King Ahmose I expelled both groups and pursued both the Hyksos in northern Kemet and the Israelites in the kingdom of Kerma in northern Sudan, on Kemet southern border.

It is certain that the Hyksos, who were Turkic Mongolians, after being expelled from Egypt in 1523 BC created the Mitanni, along with Kurds among them as slaves, workers and agents. The most important evidence that Mitanni was Turkic Mongolian mixed with defeated Iranian Kurds is the use of horses, which is their characteristic and favorite weapon of looting and invasion.

The Kurds were used as soldiers, slaves, breeding stock, and mercenaries by Turkic Mongolian raiders to destroy three civilizations.
1. Kemet (ancient Egypt) with the Hyksos in 1630 BC.
2. Assyria (ancient Iraq) with the Miattani in 1500 BC.
3. Hittite (ancient Anatolia) with the Kaska in 1200 BC.

The authentic Iranian Eucharist Zoroastrianism was stolen by Turkic Mongolians and their slaves from the Iranian Aryans and turned into Magus Paganism, not a religion but a political tool. Kurds original homeland is only Iran and they are Aryans; and the Kurds who claim that the lands of the Kurds are in Iraq, Syria and Turkey are certainly serving the Turkic Mongolian groups of Persians, Turks, and Jews; but not the Kurds. No Kurdish presence was found in Iraq, Syria, and Turkey before 1700 BC. In order to discover the relationship between the Kurds and the Turkic Mongolians and Mitanni, an article can be found from a site specialized in the history of Zoroastrianism. The article does not deduce the same as this article, but it provides indicators and facts that support what came here.

Why There Are Similarities between Yakut and Ashkenazim DNA?

Why There Are Similarities between Yakut and Ashkenazim DNA

Why There Are Similarities between Yakut and Ashkenazim DNA

The Ashkenazim are certainly of Turkic Mongolian origin, same as the Yakut, and both are horse-riding nomads. The raids of Turkic Mongolians using horses expanded their invasions to the west and south to Rome and India. Collectively, Ashkenazi are less genetically diverse than other Jewish ethnic divisions. The Khazar developed very late in 750 AD compared to Turkic Mongolian raids in 1800 BC.

It is unreasonable to claim that Jews are an ethnic group because Jewishness in fact is a political association that was initiated by Turkic Mongolian but very soon it became a very heterogeneous assembly due to Turkic Mongolian vast raids, excessive slavery of nations, and intensive miscegenation to breed and change their physical appearance to look like Caucasians and Europeans. Let us first give brief definition of the Yakut then show a genetic study on their origin.

Yakuts (Sakha: Саха, Sakha) are a Turkic people who mainly inhabit the Sakha Republic (Yakutia) in North East Asia. The Yakut language belongs to the Siberian branch of the Turkic languages. Yakuts mainly live in the Republic of Sakha in the Russian Federation, with some extending to the Amur, Magadan, Sakhalin regions, and the Taymyr and Evenk Autonomous Districts.

The Yakuts are divided into two basic groups based on geography and economics. Yakuts in the north are historically semi-nomadic hunters, fishermen, reindeer breeders, while southern Yakuts engage in animal husbandry focusing on horses and cattle. Yakuts – Wikipedia

Genetically the Yakuts are a hybrid population, but culturally they are Turkic. This is not a totally exceptional pattern. Ashkenazi Jews and many Latin Americans exhibit the same disjunction between genetic admixture, and relative dominance of particular cultural forms as opposed to synthesis. Part of the issue here is that biological and cultural evolution operate differently, with the latter being far more flexible and unconstrained by the inheritance modes imposed by DNA and sexual reproduction.

The Yakuts also may serve as an example of a particular mode of long distance gene flow which was possible only with the rise of horses. The origins of the Yakuts – Gene Expression

A Resource for Turkic and Jewish History in Russia and Ukraine called (, established on May 5, 1995 by Kevin Alan Brook, author of The Jews of Khazaria (1st edition, 1999; 2nd edition, 2006), is the leading Internet provider of information about the Khazar Kingdom.) posted the following article: Special Topic: East/Northeast Asian Admixture in Ashkenazic Jews saying:

Occasionally I get comments from Ashkenazic Jews from Eastern Europe that they or certain members of their families have a few physical characteristics typical of East Asian peoples belonging to the Mongoloid race, such as something Asiatic about their eyes, cheekbones, or hair thickness. There are also some photographs of Ashkenazim where such features are faintly evident, although European and Middle Eastern (West Asian and Southwest Asian) phenotypes prevail in most families.

It turns out there is a genetic basis for a small amount of East Asian and Northeast Asian (East Siberian) ancestry in Ashkenazim, just as there is in some neighbors of Ashkenazim such as non-Jewish Hungarians, Ukrainians, Romanians, and Russians, though the Mongoloid inputs into these populations didn’t always come from the same source populations. Let’s review the evidence we have so far: Here (Note:The genetic testing company 23andMe had updated their methodology or their reference samples and the formerly “Yakut” segments in Ashkenazim were usually reclassified as “Broadly East Asian”.)

Ashkenazim Origin

The history of Ashkenazim is shrouded in mystery. Many theories have arisen speculating on their emergence as a distinct community of Jews.

Here is another hypothesis that makes a lot of sense. It supposes that the origin of Ashkenazim is very much older than the emergence of Khazar Khaganate in c. 650–969 AD. The term Jews (originally Yehudim, Israeli pronunciation [jehuˈdim]) must had appeared only in 535 BC.

The Jews are not Israelite but all Jews originated from Turkic Mongolians, similar to Persians, Turks, Romans, “whitened” Europeans, and Caucasoid Indians. While the Israelite were originally Arab tribe from Yemen. Therefore, the Israelite were Semite; but the Jews are not Semite at all.

The invasions of Turkic Mongolians into the Pontiac-Caspian Steppe which resulted in the formation of Slavic groups in the region, and later all Turkic Khaganates including the Khazar, could had started around 1700 BC.

Abyssinian Hypothesis New Interpretation of Bible History

Abyssinian Hypothesis on Israelite, Hebrew, Jewish History – New Interpretation of Bible History

Judaism: The Greatest Lie Ever Sold

Most jews today (95%) readily admit that they are descendants of Turko-Finnish Mongoloid racial stock which had converted to Pharisaic Babylonian Talmudism (Judaism) around 740 A.D. Since that time, jewdom has continued to miscegenate with the Caucasian race so as to appear less different from the White race and thus further cloak their true identity.

And finally, by deluding the White race through the boundless deception of having them believe that jews are the ‘chosen people’ of the Christian bible, Judaism seems to be effortlessly moving closer and closer to fulfilling its ‘messianic’ goal of world domination by way of constantly getting us to buy the greatest lie ever sold.

via Judaism: The Greatest Lie Ever Sold

%d bloggers like this: