Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy

Posts tagged ‘Syria’

Turko-Persian NOT Indo-Iranian Kurdistan Project


It is very important to notice the outstanding similarities between Kurds, Turks, Romani (Gypsies), Romans, earliest Jews, Caucasoid Indians, wealthy in Arabia, and Persians.

Their strong connections explain a lot, including the Turkic Mongolian origin of the Hyksos and their use of Kurds as foot soldiers, mercenaries and slaves.

Kurdistan is a Turkic Mongolian project to use the Kurds, who are originally Iranian, to expand in Iraq, Syria, and Anatolia. This way the Kurds shall lose their legitimate right of their original homeland which is Iran.

Thus lands and regions to be taken from Iraq, Syria, and Anatolia shall be annexed to be given to those Kurds who are Turkic Mongolian collaborators; while Turkic Mongolian Persians remain holding Iran.

It is quite striking that the Kurds are not much interested in establishing a Kurdish self-ruled territory in Iran, while the Kurds are very active and forceful in establishing Kurdish territories in Iraq, Syria, and Anatolia.

Mitanni (1500-1300 BC) originated not as a result of Aryan invasions, as some claim, but as a result of Turkic Mongolian invasion using Aryan slaves and collaborators. After the invasion of Aryans and the theft of their land in Iran, some of the Kurds resorted to the western mountains, but most of Kurds were subjugated and enslaved and were used as foot soldiers, workers, and concubines. The greatest genetic and feature improvements of Turkic Mongolians came as a result of their miscegenation and reproduction with the defeated and enslaved Iranian Kurds (Aryans).

Kurds and Turkic Mongolians and the Mitanni Kingdom 1500-1300 BC

Kurds and Turkic Mongolians and the Mitanni Kingdom 1500-1300 BC

Advertisements

Kurds and Turkic Mongolians and the Mitanni Kingdom 1500-1300 BC


Kurds and Turkic Mongolians and the Mitanni Kingdom 1500-1300 BC

Kurds and Turkic Mongolians and the Mitanni Kingdom 1500-1300 BC

The Mitanni kingdom was referred to as the Maryannu, Nahrin or Mitanni by the Egyptians, the Hurri by the Hittites, and the Hanigalbat by the Assyrians. The different names seem to have referred to the same kingdom and were used interchangeably, according to Michael C. Astour.

No native sources for the history of Mitanni have been found so far. Accounts are mainly based on Assyrian, Hittite, and Egyptian sources, as well as inscriptions from nearby places in Syria. Often it is not even possible to establish synchronicity between the rulers of different countries and cities, let alone give uncontested absolute dates. The definition and history of Mitanni is further beset by a lack of differentiation between linguistic, ethnic and political groups.

Mitanni originated not as a result of Aryan invasions, as some claim, but as a result of Turkic Mongolian invasion using Aryan slaves and collaborators. After the invasion of Aryans and the theft of their land in Iran, some of the Kurds resorted to the western mountains, but most of Kurds were subjugated and enslaved and were used as foot soldiers, workers, and concubines. The greatest genetic and feature improvements of Turkic Mongolians came as a result of their miscegenation and reproduction with the defeated and enslaved Iranian Kurds (Aryans).

In fact, Mitanni was created as a result of Turkic Mongolian attacks on Iran which took over the heritage and civilization of Iranians and Assyrians and attributed them to themselves. That period was of Turkic Mongolian intensive raids in the region, which resulted in the fall of the Hittite civilization, the late Bronze Age Collapse, and the emergence of groups of fugitives, refugees and mercenaries, called the Sea Peoples in 1177 BC. It coincided with the settlement and invasion by the Israelites, an Arab tribe that came from its homeland in Yemen in 1406 BC. In the course of their refuge in Abyssinia and destruction of the Kerma civilization in the Sudan, the Israelites cooperated with the Hyksos, who occupied north Kemet from 1630 until 1523 BC. King Ahmose I expelled both groups and pursued both the Hyksos in northern Kemet and the Israelites in the kingdom of Kerma in northern Sudan, on Kemet southern border.

It is certain that the Hyksos, who were Turkic Mongolians, after being expelled from Egypt in 1523 BC created the Mitanni, along with Kurds among them as slaves, workers and agents. The most important evidence that Mitanni was Turkic Mongolian mixed with defeated Iranian Kurds is the use of horses, which is their characteristic and favorite weapon of looting and invasion.

The Kurds were used as soldiers, slaves, breeding stock, and mercenaries by Turkic Mongolian raiders to destroy three civilizations.
1. Kemet (ancient Egypt) with the Hyksos in 1630 BC.
2. Assyria (ancient Iraq) with the Miattani in 1500 BC.
3. Hittite (ancient Anatolia) with the Kaska in 1200 BC.

The authentic Iranian Eucharist Zoroastrianism was stolen by Turkic Mongolians and their slaves from the Iranian Aryans and turned into Magus Paganism, not a religion but a political tool. Kurds original homeland is only Iran and they are Aryans; and the Kurds who claim that the lands of the Kurds are in Iraq, Syria and Turkey are certainly serving the Turkic Mongolian groups of Persians, Turks, and Jews; but not the Kurds. No Kurdish presence was found in Iraq, Syria, and Turkey before 1700 BC. In order to discover the relationship between the Kurds and the Turkic Mongolians and Mitanni, an article can be found from a site specialized in the history of Zoroastrianism. The article does not deduce the same as this article, but it provides indicators and facts that support what came here.

Perhaps the Palestinians are not One Nation but Two Nations


Perhaps Palestinians are not One Nation but they are two Nations - Jebusites & Philistia

It is noticeable that geography, politics and culture divide the Palestinians into two distinct, separate and even contradictory and conflicting parts between the West Bank (the Jordan River) and the population of the Gaza Strip. Are these divisions the result of historical and racial differences? To answer this question it is necessary to note the following:
The Jews are a group of Turkic Mongolians who were sent by the colonists to Persia and Babylonia (and they also left Mongols) to displace the Hebrew Israelite of Israel and replace them in Canaan. This has been confirmed by the Samaritans and the Beta Israel Ethiopians, as well as by the loss of the tribes of Israel and other profound ethnic, cultural, religious and political transformations that followed the Babylonian return in 530 BC.

Turkic Mongolians, the origin of Jews, had existed in the region since 1800 BC with various names such as Chasu YHWH and Hyksos. Their raids and destruction caused the collapse of the Bronze Age in 1177 BC for the majority of Mediterranean civilizations and countries. It is a pivotal era documented in archeology and history books. This massive collapse resulted in a large number of large migrations and the emergence of so-called “sea peoples” fugitives and mercenaries. At the time, the Hebrew Israelites were occupying and were present in Canaan and were still allied with the Turkic Mongolians before the collapse of this alliance in 626 BC.

The first waves of Palestinians came with the collapse of the Bronze Age and the fall of the Hittite Empire and civilization in and around Anatolia. The second wave of settlements were to the Philistia region and it was organized by the Turkic Mongolians after they called themselves Jews. This was in 530 BC with the expulsion and dispersal of the Israelites from Canaan. They brought in new immigrant labor and slaves to be added to the first wave of of the sea peoples and they settled the second group in the region of Philistia; and both settlers became known as Palestinians in Western Bank and also in of Philistia despite their differences.

It is clear that the history of settler groups that were later known to the Palestinians occurred on two stages. The first stage is the migrations of the so-called “peoples of the sea”. It is noteworthy that the Jebusites are a group of settlers concentrated in the eastern region of River Jordan and they differed from the Canaanites despite attempts to include them as Canaanites, but they are closer to the Hittites (the peoples of ancient Anatolia). Many scholars consider the origin of the Jebusites is the Hittite. This is confirmed by the gods they worshiped before they converted to Christianity. As well as the similarity between them and Armenians.

The second phase was different Mediterranean groups to replace the expelled and displaced Canaanite and Hebrew. This second group was settled in what is now the Gaza Strip. “Philistia” was first mentioned in the works of the Greek historian Herodotus in the fifth century BC. With the emergence of Christianity the inhabitants of the West Bank, adopted the new religion that emerged in the lands they became advocates and defenders of Christianity in the face of Jews. While the inhabitants of the Gaza Strip remained in their old beliefs until the Islamic conquest came and embraced Islam as a means of coexistence and protection.

How to Understand the Middle East Conflicts in 5 Minutes


Canaan not Israel nor Palestine

Canaan not Israel nor Palestine

Ancient Iran was a civilized, peaceful and sophisticated Aryan country that was infiltrated and then occupied by Turkic hordes who then founded the Achaemenids, the first barbaric savage Persian state.

And then they replaced a few hundred captives from the Hebrew house of David who were brought to Babylon by several hundred thousands of Turkic settlers and invented the Jews and Judaism in Canaan in 530 BC

This was followed by the control of the Turkic Jews over the Hebrew Israelites who had invaded and occupied Canaan in 1400 BC.

The Turkic Jews evacuated the Canaanites and replaced them with groups of foreigners and slaves brought from the Mediterranean Sea and this formed the Palestinian population.

The forgotten conflict is in fact between the Canaanites, the owners of the homeland and the occupiers from three different sides. The internal conflict between the occupiers has three sides:

  1. The Hebrew Israelite are Semitic Arabs (Israelis of Yemeni origin)
  2. The Turkic Mongolian Jews (made by Turkic Persians) and
  3. The Philistines who were brought by the Jews from the island of Crete and other Mediterranean countries

It is strange that Palestinians claim to be Arabs because the only Arabs in occupied Canaan are the Hebrew Israelite (Israelis of Yemeni origin).

The disputed territories, called “Palestine” or “Israel”, are Canaanite Aramaic, Phoenician, Syriac and part of the Fertile Crescent, and it was never Arabic or Turkic.

Canaan will remain Canaan despite time, power and falsification of history

Let us begin by looking at the hypotheses presented in a calm, objective and scientific manner. Let us look at the linguistic, archaeological and cultural heritage of the disputed area, which is Aramaic by all standards and related to the history and civilizations of the region and is a civilization steeped in history.

Consider for example the Egyptian, Sumerian and Assyrian civilizations and look for any evidence of a Palestinian presence before 530 BC.

In simple words, the Jewish-Palestinian conflict is a corrupt struggle between three occupiers using forged religions originated from the same source; while the legitimate land owners are completely and globally ignored.

Who are the Israelite, Hebrew, Jews, and Palestinians

Who are the Israelite, Hebrew, Jews, and Palestinians

The Jewish-Palestinian Conflict is a Corrupt Struggle between Occupiers


Canaan not Israel nor Palestine

Canaan not Israel nor Palestine

Ancient Iran was a civilized, peaceful and sophisticated Aryan country that was infiltrated and then occupied by Turkic hordes who then founded the Achaemenids, the first barbaric savage Persian state.

And then they replaced a few hundred captives from the Hebrew house of David who were brought to Babylon by several hundred thousands of Turkic settlers and invented the Jews and Judaism in Canaan in 530 BC

This was followed by the control of the Turkic Jews over the Hebrew Israelites who had invaded and occupied Canaan in 1400 BC.

The Turkic Jews evacuated the Canaanites and replaced them with groups of foreigners and slaves brought from the Mediterranean Sea and this formed the Palestinian population.

The forgotten conflict is in fact between the Canaanites, the owners of the homeland and the occupiers from three different sides. The internal conflict between the occupiers has three sides:

1. The Hebrew Israelite are Semitic Arabs (Israelis of Yemeni origin)

2. The Turkic Mongolian Jews (made by Turkic Persians) and

3. The Philistines who were brought by the Jews from the island of Crete and other Mediterranean countries

It is strange that Palestinians claim to be Arabs because the only Arabs in occupied Canaan are the Hebrew Israelite (Israelis of Yemeni origin).

The disputed territories, called “Palestine” or “Israel”, are Canaanite Aramaic, Phoenician, Syriac and part of the Fertile Crescent, and it was never Arabic or Turkic.

Canaan will remain Canaan despite time, power and falsification of history

Let us begin by looking at the hypotheses presented in a calm, objective and scientific manner. Let us look at the linguistic, archaeological and cultural heritage of the disputed area, which is Aramaic by all standards and related to the history and civilizations of the region and is a civilization steeped in history.

Consider for example the Egyptian, Sumerian and Assyrian civilizations and look for any evidence of a Palestinian presence before 530 BC.

In simple words, the Jewish-Palestinian conflict is a corrupt struggle between three occupiers using forged religions originated from the same source; while the legitimate land owners are completely and globally ignored.

Who are the Israelite, Hebrew, Jews, and Palestinians

Who are the Israelite, Hebrew, Jews, and Palestinians

Money Businesses from Babylonia to Court Jews to the Rothschilds


the tradition amongst Babylonian Jews of wearing turbans started in distant antiquity and continued uninterrupted until the early, or mid-20th century

the tradition amongst Babylonian Jews of wearing turbans started in distant antiquity and continued uninterrupted until the early, or mid-20th century

There is no evidence that money businesses played any role in the pre-Exilic era in old Israel. According to the ethos of the original Israelite society, then founded on a pronounced agrarian structure, lending was part of the assistance a man owed to his neighbor or brother in need (cf. Deut. 23:21).

But during the Babylonian era Jews were prepared to take over the Israelite and had greater opportunities to come into contact with experienced Turkic Persian lending practices and to participate in credit operations. After the Exile, money businesses became common in the new Jewish land.

Meanwhile, the most important Jewish community of Babylonia , were given an impulse toward a new way of life by the longstanding traditions of a capitalist type of economy existing around them. In Babylonia, Jews engaged in financial transactions: some were farmers of taxes and customs, and the wealthiest of them were landowners. However, Talmudic references show that the standards of an agrarian economy were still dominant and therefore gamblers and usurers were not thought trustworthy witnesses. (more…)

The Turkic Origin of Jews Made in Babylonian Iraq in 530 BC


Map of the Babylonian Captivity

Map of the Babylonian Captivity

The Turkic origins of the first Jews and Babylonian Talmudic Judaism

In 627 BC, the Assyrian Empire came under series of raids from brutal unknown nomadic groups. The development of the events are not known with certainty. The raids intensified upon the death of Ashurbanipal, king of Assyria in 626 BC.

It became apparent that hordes of Turkic Persians raiders with slaves from Scythia, Cimmerian, and Media crossed the borders of the Assyrian Empire, destroying Ashkelon and raiding as far as Egypt. They took over the city of Babylon from the Assyrians and made it their center, then Calah (Nimrud) was burned, but the strong walls of Nineveh protected the remnants of the Assyrian army that had taken refuge there.

In 612 BC the Assyrian capital Nineveh was raided by the Turkified Medes, Scythians, Babylonians and other bandits. As a protection, the Assyrians moved their capital to Harran. When Harran was captured by the same raiding Turkic groups in 609 BC, the Assyrian capital was once again moved, this time to Carchemish, on the Euphrates River, in north western Assyria in what is today north Syria, near Turkey.

In 609 BC Pharaoh Necho II  of Egypt decided to came to assist the Assyrian king Ashur-uballit II. He led the Egyptian army and marched to fight against the raiders. The Egyptian army of Pharaoh Necho II was delayed by a fight against the forces of King Josiah of Judah. Josiah was killed, and his army was defeated in the Battle of Megiddo (609 BC). (more…)

%d bloggers like this: