Protect Democracy & Expose Western Liberal Democracy

Archive for July, 2020

Amhara Links to Turkic Akkadians and Early Jews


Haile Selassie

Haile SelassieThe common saying that Ethiopia was never colonized is a fallacy because the Amhara elites were actually of foreign partial descent and total colonial interests. The colonization which turned Tigray in Gondar into Amhara was covert sneaking banditry control. Amhara elites since 1270 AD got power and wealth by serving slavery raids of the earliest Turkic Akkadian Jewish settlers.

Turkic Akkadians invented the early Jews out of the Hebrews in Babylon in 580 BC to threaten and attack the region and replace the Israelites. The Amhara elites aided early Jews to replace the genuine faith of Moses and Jesus and the history of the whole region with their Jewish versions.

The only true faithful monarchy of Ethiopia was Axum Empire (c. 100 –940 AD) and was annihilated in 940 AD by bandits led by a pagan warlord woman worked for the Turkic Akkadian Jews to destroy the genuine heritage of Moses and Jesus in Tigray. She was called Queen Yodit (Judith) or “Gudit”.

From Yodit bandits came the Zagwe dynasty (c. 940-1137/1270). It was replaced by two separate regimes. Amorite Bedouin collaborators created a regime on the Red Sea coast (today Eritrea) called Medri Bahri (c.1137–1879). And then Turkic Akkadian Jewish collaborators founded the Solomonic dynasty in the Amhara region. The actual last ruler of Solomonic and other Amharic regimes was Tafari Makonnen (Haile Selassie). They were in fact crypto Jews and not Israelites or Jesus faithfuls.

The Solomonic dynasty (1270-1604/1975), also known as the House of Solomon, claim lineal descent from the biblical King Solomon and the Queen of Sheba. This claim is false, and the Amhara elite although were originally Tigray close to Israelites assisting the Jews against Tigray people.

All the Solomonic and other rulers in Amhara were feudal masters who served and intermarried with Akkadians. While their eastern counterparts in Medri Bahri were weaker and poorer Bedouin Amorites. Amhara fell under Akkadian influence and mixed elite who served Turkic Akkadian Jewish slavery and interests. While Eritreans were under Bedouin Arabized Amorites who also enslaved.

The Amharic language originated as result of a pidginization process with a local substratum and Akkadian superstratum to enable communication between people who spoke mainly Tigray with a number of different local languages. This pidginization of the new language had enabled Akkadian invaders and their soldiers to create communication means independent of the Church, which used the Ge’ez language. The Amharic language served as the working language of feudal Ethiopia.

The Amhara people are totally different from Amhara elite. The Amhara people are only Tigray who used a new mixed language called Amharic. This language was imposed by the foreigners and their collaborators and it was from Akkadian and mixed with other languages to serve war and slavery.

Genetics is an acrobatic methods claim to be scientific but it is not at all. The people of Tigray proper, and also the devastated Tigray in Amhara and Eritrea, are close to Israelites; but the Amharic and Eritrean elites are closer to Akkadians and Amorites which make them Turkic Jewish and Amorite Bedouins; but not Puntite African Israelites and Puntite ancient genuine Arabs.

Ethiopia was colonized by few Turkic Akkadians who were within the elites and collaborators. The elites were not recognized as foreigners but in fact they are foreigners. And this is tacit colonization and unrecognizable for the naïve and unaware.

The Devastation of Habesha and Punt Peoples


Region 1 is the home of Tigray who were devastated by Bedouin Amorites (bandits from the deserts of west Asia (Jordan, central Arabia, Syria, Iraq)) and turned Tigrinya, Tigre and others.

Region 3 is the home of Tigray who were devastated by Turkic Mongolian (bandits from East Asia) slavery and feudal masters and turned Amhara.

Region 2 (Tigray proper) is the home of Tigray who are still holding their history, freedom and faith.

Tigray are close to Israelites while Tigrinya are close to Jews. Judaism is not the message of Moses at all. It is a political association that is why Isaias Afwerki the despot of Eritrea hate Tigray and collaborate with the Jewish Israel.

The similarities between Amharic and Akkadian are not accidental. They prove that the first slave masters and feudal lords were Turkic Mongolians who dominated power and wealth and turned the original Tigray of that region into Amhara. See this study: The Origin of Amharic

Many linguistic studies indicate that the origin of Amharic language has Akkadian influences. These support my hypothesis that the Akkadians created the Amharic elite out of Tigray; while the Amorites created the Tigrinya elites out of Tigray. See this Study: The Influence of Cushitic on the Semitic Languages of Ethiopia a Problem of Substratum

Only the peoples of Punt Lands, and this includes the ancient dark-skin ancient Arabs, are the descendants of Adam. Bedouins who are pale yellowish Amorites are not Arabs and not Adam’s descendants. Therefore, the descendants of Adam and Noah are only the peoples of Punt Lands.

Buur Heybe (“the mountain of the clay sand”) is a small village in the southern Bay province of Somalia. It is the largest of several granitic inselbergs in the region’s Doi belt.

The Gogollis Qabe or Gogoshiis Qabe (“the furnished place”), a local rock shelter, is the seat of the first professional excavation in the country. In 1935, Grazioni found a Middle and Later Stone Age archaeological sequence here. The ancient implements belonged to the Somaliland Stillbay culture typified by points and scrapers produced through flat percussion flaking. J.D. Clark a decade later excavated a nearby site, the Gury Waabay (“the poisonous house”), located around half a kilometer to the north. In the 1980s, Brandt also excavated the granitic inselberg, uncovering a top level Holocene layer. Fourteen burials were found therein, which constitute the earliest chronometrically dated burials from the Horn of Africa and contain the earliest definitive grave artefacts in the wider region. A lower layer was likewise associated with the Stone Age Eibian (Doian) industry. Another local rock shelter is referred to as Abka Eeden I Oboy Haawo (“Adam and Eve’s court”). In addition, several rock formations in the area feature cave art.

Buur Heybe historically served as a key religious and political hub. According to oral tradition in the Doi (“red soil”) belt, several dynasties were based in the town. The Eyle aver that the area was at various times invaded and occupied by a succession of early Cushitic settlers, the Jidle, Maadanle and Ajuran, whom they each managed to defeat. A number of ancient burial sites dated from this pre-Islamic period sit atop the mountain’s peak, and are a center of annual pilgrimage (siyaro). A trench near the holy places is said to serve as a passage toward heaven (siraad), and as such is off-limits to individuals possessing a nefarious past. These burial sites on the mountain’s summit were later made into Muslim holy sites in the ensuing Islamic period, including the Owol Qaasing (derived from the Arabic “Abdul Qaasim”, one of the names of Prophet Muhammad) and Sheikh Abdulqadir al-Jilaani (named for the founder of the Qadiriyya order).

Buur Heybe is today primarily inhabited by the Eyle, a sub-clan of the Rahanwayne of agro-pastoralists, potters and part-time hunters. Their ethnonym translates as the “hunters with dogs”. The Eyle are believed to be remnants of the aboriginal San hunter-gatherers who inhabited southern Somalia prior to the arrival from the north of Afro-Asiatic populations of the Cushitic branch. Buur Heybe is consequently also known as Buur Eyle (“Eyle mountain”), in recognition of the first inhabitants in the surrounding villages of Howaal Dheri, Berdaale and Muuney.

The Story of the Jews and Others by Tarig Anter


The Story of the Jews and Others by Tarig Anter

It is quite clear for me that the Jews were re-branding for the Hebrews. And the Hebrews were the expelled wandering Hyksos out of Kmt. The Hyksos originally were the Akkadians with the Amorites.

The Akkadians who invaded and colonized Subar and Sumer (upper and lower Mesopotamia) in 2334 BC were horse-riding Turkic Mongolian bandits with Hurrian foot slaves and mercenaries from south Caucasus.

The Bedouins and the Yemeni Mukrabs (warlords) were also Akkadians with the Amorites; but they did not join the Hyksos. Thus, the Bedouins are, in fact, only poor and backward form of the Jews. They became so miserable because they did not participate in the conquest and occupation of Kmt (ancient Egypt); from which the Hyksos (Akkadians with the Amorites) learned and acquired skills, warship, and wealth. Therefore, the Bedouins in the Arabian Peninsula, the Gulf, the Levant, Iraq, Jordan and Egypt are really an extension of the Jews; and in the past century they got oil money.

I believe that Adam, Enoch, Abraham, Jacob (Israel) and the Israelites were originally from around Ogaden Region. Joseph was sold and took high position in Harar. And the rest of the Israelites moved to the Ethiopian Plateau. Moses was born and raised around Lake Tana (not today’s Egypt).

After killing an Ethiopian, Moses took refuge, married and had two sons in the land of Beja (East Sudan). Later, He went back to Lake Tana to lead the Israelite and save them. They went to Simien Mountains after their Exodus, which was across a seasonal river (not the Red Sea). Moses received the Ten Commandments and the Book of Moses in 1446 BC. He was directed to take the Israelites to their new homeland in the Afar Triangle. They took time and went there after the death of Moses.

After 400 years David then Solomon ruled the Kingdom of Israel with ‘Temple” (Beit ha-Mikdash) in the Afar Triangle. That was in 1000 BC. The Queen of Shebe, Makeda, of Tigray visited Solomon and bore his child. Then went back to Tigray. At that time there were a slavery colony called D’mt to the east of Tigray made by bandits from Amorites and Akkadians who invaded and colonized Arabs.

Parallel and before this time there were serious events in Sumer started in 2400 BC. Turkic Horse-riding bandits with Hurrian slaves from south Caucasus invaded Subar and Sumer (upper and lower Mesopotamia). They defeated and colonized the Sumerians; and the bandits were called Akkadians.

In 2154 BC, the Akkadians were defeated and expelled and went west to the deserts of the nomadic Amorites. They made a coalition, and about 1670 BC they invaded Kmt (ancient Egypt, which was forced to bear the name Ekpt and Mizr in 334 BC). In 1523 BC King Ahmose I of Kmt defeated and expelled the coalition which was called Hyksos (Heka Khasut, meaning rulers of foreign nomads); the rulers were the horse-riding Akkadians and the nomads were the Amorites.

Most of the Hyksos (Akkadians + Amorites) fled east to the deserts of Amorites in Levant and Arabia. The wandering expelled Hyksos were called Aperu. Haperu, turned Hebrew. The Hebrews were amalgamation of nomadic bandits same as Bedouins, from Turkic East Asiatic + Amorite West Asiatic. They were pale yellowish people, not brownish as the African Israelites from Punt Lands.

So, Hebrews are not Israelites at all. And until 580 BC there were no Jews. There were only the Israelite Judah tribe in Punt Lands, who are unrelated to Hebrews, and much older and different from the yellowish Jews who were invented by the Babylon Akkadians from the Hebrews. Therefore, the Jews are in fact only re-packaging of the Hebrews; and the Hebrews are re-packaging of the Hyksos (Turkic Akkadians + Bedouin Amorites). And Bedouins are similar to Hebrews not Arabs.

Ancient Arabs are much like and related to the peoples of Punt Lands (the Horn of Africa, some called Ethiopians). The only home of ancient Arabs is the western and southern coasts of the Peninsula. Today’s Arabs are yellowish Hebrews and kin to Jews, and they are not the ancient Arabs.

Adam, Noah, Abraham, Enoch and all the characters and stories of the real Book of Moses are Ethiopians; and not as the Tanakh and Old Testament are saying. Abraham used camels since 1900 BC and all Iraq, Egypt and today’s state of Israel knew camels 1000 year after Abraham. This Hebrew Bible was written by Ezra in Babylon 850 years after Moses.

The Akkadians invited few rebels from the Judah tribe through their D’mt colony to assist them to invent the Hebrew Bible, and re-branded a group of Hebrews turning them to Jews, and turned the teaching of Moses given by God to the Israelite into a copy used by the Hebrew to create Judaism.

The collaborating few Judahites were the lost sheep of the House of Israel that Jesus came to deliver and save them, and take them back to the real Israel and Jerusalem in Afar. The Akkadians and Amorites wanted to create a colony next to Egypt and disturb that region with man-made religious and historic pretexts. And they did that with the help of few collaborators from Judahite Israelites. Jews and Hebrews are not Israelite at all. The Jews (Amorites plus Turkic Akkadians) rejected Jesus.

During their colonization, the Hyksos invasions (Turkic Akkadians + the Amorites) passed Kmt and reached the Berber of North Africa, and together they invaded and enslaved West Africans since 1600 BC. This created slave groups used by the Hebrews (Akkadians + Amorites) with the Berber.

So, the 1600 AD slavery of African Americans is related to the 1500 BC Hebrews slavery, but they are not Israelite at all. The true Israelite are not Hebrew, because Israelites are brown Ethiopians while the Hebrew are yellow Hyksos (Akkadians + Amorites). African Americans are black West Africans.

Kush was another colony of the Hyksos similar to D’mt. But Kush was made using West African slave soldiers. The Hyksos (Akkadians + Amorites) together with Berber from North Africa invaded allover West Africa and made Fulani slavery camps and used them to invade and loot Kerma on the Nile 6 Cataracts from 1500 BC. After 430 years of protection down the 4th Cataract from Kmt, the bandits toppled Kerma in 1000 BC, and in 785 BC were grouped under one warlord; and declared Kush.

Soon after the 24 Dynasty liberated Kmt from the 23 and 22 Libyan Hyksos and Amorite Bedouin Dynasties, Kush rushed to invade Kmt and give support to the defeated Hyksos in West Asia against the attempt of Assyrians to stop them. The Assyrians were protecting the region from the Hebrews.

After defeating and expelling the 25 Dynasty, the combined forces of Kmt and Assyria were defeated by the Hebrews in Carchemish in 605 BC. Until that time there were no Jews, Judaism, and Israel or Judah Kingdoms in West Asia east of Kmt. Only 25 years later in Babylon all these were invented.

Other than Akkadians, Turkic Mongolian horse-riding invading bandits created groups including: the Persians; the Romans; the Huns; the Slavs; the Bulgars; the Roma; the Fulani; the Pashtuns and much later the Khazars. These groups are who colonized the Americas.

Kushite Queen Tabiry of the 25 Dynasty Links to Hyksos


Tabiry was the daughter of King Alara of Kush from his wife Kasaqa; and was the wife of her brother King Piye. She held some interesting titles: Her majesty Main/first King’s Wife, (hmt niswt ‘at tpit n hm.f) and “The Great One of the Foreign Country” (ta-aat-khesut), and khesut could mean nomads, similar to that in Hyksos.

She also held the more standard titles of King’s Wife (hmt niswt), King’s Daughter (s3t niswt), and King’s Sister (snt niswt).

Tabiry was buried in a pyramid at El-Kurru (K.53). A carved granite funerary stela found in her tomb mentions she is the daughter of Alara of Kush and the wife of Piye. The stela is now in Khartoum.

The stela gives Tabiry further titles. Reisner had translated one of her titles as ‘the great chieftainess of the Temehu’ (southern Libyans), and concluded that the royal house of Kush was somehow related to the Libyans. Other scientists had since shown that her title might be read as “Great One (or ‘Chieftainess’) of the Desert-dwellers”, showing her title connects her to the Kushites and not to Libyans.

الملكة الكوشية تابيري تربط الأسرة 25 إلى الهكسوس

كانت تابيري ابنة ملك كوش الارا من زوجته كاساقا وكانت زوجة شقيقها الملك بيي/بعنخي. وحملت بعض الألقاب المثيرة للاهتمام منهم: صاحبة الجلالة الرئيسية / زوجة الملك الأولى وزعيمة بلاد البدو (ta-aat-khesut) وكلمة خسوت مماثلة لتلك في كلمة هكسوس

كما أنها حملت ألقاب أخري تقليدية مثل زوجة الملك (hmt niswt) وابنة الملك  (s3t niswt)وأخت الملك(snt niswt).

دفنت تابيري في هرم في الكرو رقم (K 53). ولها لوحة جنائزية منحوتة من الجرانيت وجدت في قبرها تذكر أنها ابنة ملك كوش الارا وزوجة الملك بعنخي وموجودة الآن في الخرطوم.

تذكر اللوحة أن تابيري لها المزيد من الألقاب. وقام العالم الامريكي رايزنر بترجمة أحد ألقابها على أنها “زعيم القبيلة العظيم لتيمحو” (جنوب الليبيين) وأعتبر ريزنر أن ذلك دليل يؤكد أن الاسرة الحاكمة في كوش كانت مرتبطة بطريقة ما بالليبيين. وقد ذكر علماء آخرون منذ ذلك الحين أن الترجمة قد تقرأ على أنها عظيمة أو زعيمة القبائل الصحراوية مما يدل على أن لقب تابيري ربما يربطها بالكوشيين وليس الليبيين.

The Relationship of Fulani to Hyksos and Romani Gypsies


The Fulani language is called Fulfulde, and a linguist said it was closer to the Roma language. He linked the Fulani to the Hyksos. He said exactly what I say; the appearance of Fulani is linked to the expulsion of the Hyksos from Kmt.

This also confirms that Kush are Hyksos and their slaves from West Africa and they were the Fulani. It also explains the reasons for the mystery of the origin of the Meroitic language.

Maurice Delafosse (20 December 1870 – 13 November 1926) was a French ethnographer and who worked in the field of the languages of Africa. He said: I think I may say that of all African, Asiatic, Oceanian, and European tongues which I have compared with the language of the Fulani, the language of the gypsies is that which appears to me possess the greatest point of resemblance.

JOURNAL ARTICLE: The Fulani – A Nomadic Tribe in Northern Nigeria; Mustafa B. Ibrahim; African Affairs; Vol. 65, No. 259 (Apr., 1966), pp. 170-176. Published by: Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal African Society

Also mentioned in: A Tropical Dependency: An Outline of the Ancient History of the Western Sudan with an Account of the Modern Settlement of Northern Nigeria; Authors: Flora Louisa Shaw, Lady Flora Louise Shaw Lugard; Publisher: James Nisbet, 1905; Original from: Harvard University; Digitized: 11 Dec 2007; Length: 508 pages.

Contents: INTRODUCTORY 1; CONQUEST OF North Africa AND SPAIN BY 24; ARAB Civilization IN SPAIN 31; THE EMPIRE OF The Two SHORES 50; AFRICAN RULE IN SPAIN 58; DECLINE OF MOHAMMEDAN POWER IN SPAIN 67; SPANISH ARABS IN AFRICA 73; NEGROLAND AND THE WESTERN ARABS 83; THE LATER ASKIAS 211; THE PHARAOHS IN HAUSSALAND 227; THE DOMINATION OF KANO 245; BORNU 268; THE MOORISH CONQUEST 296; THE SOUDAN UNDER THE MOORS 306; EUROPE IN WEST AFRICA 322; THE EUROPEAN SLAVE TRADE 333; BERBER AND BLACK 99; MORABITE CONQUEST OF THE SOUDAN 107; GHANA AND TIMBUCTOO 113; IBN BATUTA IN MELLE 129; ADMINISTRATION OF THE MELLESTINE 142; MEETING OF EASTERN AND WESTERN INFLUENCE UPON 153; RISE OF THE SONGHAY EMPIRE 163; Askia MOHAMMED ABOU BEKR 181; SONGHAY UNDER ASKIA THE GREAT 190; SONGHAY UNDER ASKIA THE GREAT continued 199; ENGLAND AND FRANCE ON THE LOWER NIGER 348; ORIGIN OF THE FULANI 373; RISE OF THE FULANI IN THE SOUDAN 381; SULTAN BELLO 390; CONQUEST OF SOKOTO AND KANO 438; British Policy IN NORTHERN NIGERIA 449; ECONOMIC RESOURCES OF NORTHERN NIGERIA 485; THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRADE 491; INDEX 501

علاقة الفولاني بالهكسوس والغجر

لغة الفولاني اسمها فلفولدي وقال فيها خبير لغات انها اقرب للغة الغجر. ويربط بين الفولاني والهكسوس يقول بالظبط كما اقول بان ظهور الفولاني مرتبط بطرد الهكسوس

وهذا يؤكد أيضا أن الكوشيين هم عبارة عن هكسوس ورقيق لهم من غرب أفريقيا وهم الفولاني. ويفسر كذلك أسباب غموض أصل اللغة المروية

موريس ديلافوس (20 ديسمبر 1870 – 13 نوفمبر 1926) عالمًا عرقيات فرنسي وعمل في مجال لغات إفريقيا

Jewish Ambitions for an Entity from the Nile to the Euphrates Stares


If this interpretation of history is true, it would indicate a catastrophic outcome.

Since the Jews were transformed from the Hebrews; and the Hebrews were the expelled Hyksos. And the Hyksos originally were the Akkadians with the Amorites.

And, since the Bedouins and the Yemeni Mukrabs were also Akkadians with the Amorites; but they did not join the Hyksos.

Thus, the Bedouins are, in fact, only poor and backward Jews. They became so because they did not participate in the conquest and occupation of Kmt (ancient Egypt); from which the Hyksos (Akkadians with the Amorites) learned and acquired skills, warship, and wealth.

Therefore, the Bedouins in the north and south of the Arabian Peninsula, the Gulf, the Levant, Iraq, Jordan and Egypt are really an extension of a backward, ignorant and impoverished type of Jews; even if only in the past century they have got money.

With this interpretation, we will find that the Jews’ ambitions for an entity from the Nile to the Euphrates have already become within their grasp; and an existing fact that people do not realize.

This requires very urgent action to contain the Bedouins; who are Amorites with the Akkadians. The Akkadians are Turkic Mongolians from East Asia who occupied Subar and Sumer (Mesopotamia).

%d bloggers like this: